Go Pro
→ BlackRock is hoarding it. JPMorgan is hoarding it. Do you own it? (From Awesomely, LLC) (Ad)tc pixel Free OXH Stock Alerts

Oxford Technology VCT 2 (OXH) Competitors

GBX 8.50 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/14/2026
Compare

OXH vs. PU12, CYS, TV2H, TAN, and RTW

Should you buy Oxford Technology VCT 2 stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Oxford Technology VCT 2 with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Oxford Technology VCT 2 include Puma VCT 12 (PU12), Chrysalis VCT (CYS), Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs (TV2H), Tanfield Group (TAN), and RTW Biotech Opportunities (RTW). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Oxford Technology VCT 2 compare to Puma VCT 12?

Oxford Technology VCT 2 (LON:OXH) and Puma VCT 12 (LON:PU12) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Puma VCT 12. Puma VCT 12 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Technology VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Technology VCT 2£859K2.76£55.58M£2.403.54
Puma VCT 12£5.99M0.00N/A£0.17N/A

Puma VCT 12 has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Oxford Technology VCT 2's net margin of -106.54%. Puma VCT 12's return on equity of 0.00% beat Oxford Technology VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oxford Technology VCT 2-106.54% -7.77% -13.12%
Puma VCT 12 N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Oxford Technology VCT 2's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Puma VCT 12'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Oxford Technology VCT 2 Neutral
Puma VCT 12 Neutral

Summary

Puma VCT 12 beats Oxford Technology VCT 2 on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Oxford Technology VCT 2 compare to Chrysalis VCT?

Oxford Technology VCT 2 (LON:OXH) and Chrysalis VCT (LON:CYS) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Oxford Technology VCT 2's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chrysalis VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Oxford Technology VCT 2 Neutral
Chrysalis VCT Neutral

Chrysalis VCT has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Oxford Technology VCT 2's net margin of -106.54%. Chrysalis VCT's return on equity of 0.00% beat Oxford Technology VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oxford Technology VCT 2-106.54% -7.77% -13.12%
Chrysalis VCT N/A N/A N/A

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis VCT. Chrysalis VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Technology VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Technology VCT 2£859K2.76£55.58M£2.403.54
Chrysalis VCT£789K0.00N/A£0.50N/A

Summary

Chrysalis VCT beats Oxford Technology VCT 2 on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Oxford Technology VCT 2 compare to Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs?

Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs (LON:TV2H) and Oxford Technology VCT 2 (LON:OXH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Oxford Technology VCT 2's net margin of -106.54%. Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs' return on equity of 0.00% beat Oxford Technology VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare ShsN/A N/A N/A
Oxford Technology VCT 2 -106.54%-7.77%-13.12%

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has higher revenue and earnings than Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs. Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Technology VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare ShsN/AN/AN/A-£0.02N/A
Oxford Technology VCT 2£859K2.76£55.58M£2.403.54

In the previous week, Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Oxford Technology VCT 2'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs Neutral
Oxford Technology VCT 2 Neutral

Summary

Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs and Oxford Technology VCT 2 tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Oxford Technology VCT 2 compare to Tanfield Group?

Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) and Oxford Technology VCT 2 (LON:OXH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Tanfield Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Oxford Technology VCT 2'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tanfield Group Neutral
Oxford Technology VCT 2 Neutral

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has higher revenue and earnings than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Technology VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A
Oxford Technology VCT 2£859K2.76£55.58M£2.403.54

Tanfield Group has a beta of 0.248, indicating that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oxford Technology VCT 2 has a beta of 0.0029213922, indicating that its stock price is 100% less volatile than the broader market.

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has a net margin of -106.54% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. Oxford Technology VCT 2's return on equity of -7.77% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tanfield Group-23,900.00% -7.90% -1.19%
Oxford Technology VCT 2 -106.54%-7.77%-13.12%

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Oxford Technology VCT 2 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Oxford Technology VCT 2 beats Tanfield Group on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Oxford Technology VCT 2 compare to RTW Biotech Opportunities?

Oxford Technology VCT 2 (LON:OXH) and RTW Biotech Opportunities (LON:RTW) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

RTW Biotech Opportunities has a net margin of 158.61% compared to Oxford Technology VCT 2's net margin of -106.54%. RTW Biotech Opportunities' return on equity of 36.01% beat Oxford Technology VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oxford Technology VCT 2-106.54% -7.77% -13.12%
RTW Biotech Opportunities 158.61%36.01%-0.47%

RTW Biotech Opportunities has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Technology VCT 2. RTW Biotech Opportunities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Technology VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Technology VCT 2£859K2.76£55.58M£2.403.54
RTW Biotech Opportunities£250.89M0.03£14.09B£63.000.04

In the previous week, Oxford Technology VCT 2's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled RTW Biotech Opportunities'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Oxford Technology VCT 2 Neutral
RTW Biotech Opportunities Neutral

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has a beta of 0.0029213922, meaning that its share price is 100% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RTW Biotech Opportunities has a beta of 0.777, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

2.8% of RTW Biotech Opportunities shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Oxford Technology VCT 2 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of RTW Biotech Opportunities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

RTW Biotech Opportunities beats Oxford Technology VCT 2 on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Oxford Technology VCT 2 News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OXH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

OXH vs. The Competition

Export
MetricOxford Technology VCT 2Asset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.37M£2.50B£6.22B£2.85B
Dividend Yield0.75%6.00%5.24%6.12%
P/E Ratio3.5462.7729.67368.59
Price / Sales2.761,843.381,177.0784,769.40
Price / Cash24.0960.50117.4027.89
Price / Book0.321.326.537.56
Net Income£55.58M£265.96M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.01%0.04%0.46%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-0.08%0.05%-1.09%
1 Year PerformanceN/A7.68%15.52%62.59%

Oxford Technology VCT 2 Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OXH
Oxford Technology VCT 2
N/AGBX 8.50
flat		N/AN/A£2.37M£859K3.54N/A
PU12
Puma VCT 12
N/AN/AN/AN/A£9.25M£5.99M141.18N/A
CYS
Chrysalis VCT
N/AN/AN/AN/A£9.25M£789K65.0017
TV2H
Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs
N/AN/AN/AN/A£8.83MN/AN/AN/A
TAN
Tanfield Group
N/AGBX 5
+8.0%		N/A+0.3%£8.15MN/AN/A2

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:OXH) was last updated on 7/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The Lithium Gold Rush Minted A New $1B Unicorn
The Lithium Gold Rush Minted A New $1B Unicorn This lithium producer surpassed a $1B private valuation, joi...
EnergyX | Sponsoredtc pixel
What Saudi Arabia just did to the dollar changes everything
In June 2024, a 50-year arrangement tying Saudi oil to the U.S. dollar quietly expired. Garrett Goggin, CFA, C...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock is hoarding it. JPMorgan is hoarding it. Do you own it?
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
The only metrics you should watch as a day trader.
Day traders and swing traders don't need the same metrics - and using the wrong ones costs you edge. After 40 ...
The TradingPub | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s $250 Bill – See Immediately
Former Goldman Sachs VP Dr. David Eifrig is warning that July 28 could trigger the biggest wealth reset in mod...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
When I found Rolls-Royce under $2, most people thought I was crazy
In 2022, Karim Rahemtulla recommended Rolls-Royce when it traded under $2. The stock climbed more than 1,100% ...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel