Go Pro

Oxford Technology VCT 2 (OXH) Competitors

GBX 8.50 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 09/16/2026

OXH vs. PU12, CYS, WINV, MILA, and TV2H

Should you buy Oxford Technology VCT 2 stock or one of its competitors? Oxford Technology VCT 2's main competitors and comparable companies include Puma VCT 12 (PU12), Chrysalis VCT (CYS), Worsley Investors (WINV), Mila Resources (MILA), and Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs (TV2H). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Oxford Technology VCT 2 compare to Puma VCT 12?

Puma VCT 12 (LON:PU12) and Oxford Technology VCT 2 (LON:OXH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has a net margin of 223.79% compared to Puma VCT 12's net margin of 0.00%. Oxford Technology VCT 2's return on equity of 14.00% beat Puma VCT 12's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Puma VCT 12N/A N/A N/A
Oxford Technology VCT 2 223.79%14.00%-13.12%

In the previous week, Puma VCT 12's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Oxford Technology VCT 2'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Puma VCT 12 Neutral
Oxford Technology VCT 2 Neutral

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Puma VCT 12. Puma VCT 12 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Technology VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Puma VCT 12£5.99M0.00N/A£0.17N/A
Oxford Technology VCT 2£859K2.76£55.58M£2.403.54

Summary

Puma VCT 12 and Oxford Technology VCT 2 tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Oxford Technology VCT 2 compare to Chrysalis VCT?

Oxford Technology VCT 2 (LON:OXH) and Chrysalis VCT (LON:CYS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has a net margin of 223.79% compared to Chrysalis VCT's net margin of 0.00%. Oxford Technology VCT 2's return on equity of 14.00% beat Chrysalis VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oxford Technology VCT 2223.79% 14.00% -13.12%
Chrysalis VCT N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Oxford Technology VCT 2's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chrysalis VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Oxford Technology VCT 2 Neutral
Chrysalis VCT Neutral

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis VCT. Chrysalis VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Technology VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Technology VCT 2£859K2.76£55.58M£2.403.54
Chrysalis VCT£789K0.00N/A£0.50N/A

Summary

Oxford Technology VCT 2 beats Chrysalis VCT on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Oxford Technology VCT 2 compare to Worsley Investors?

Oxford Technology VCT 2 (LON:OXH) and Worsley Investors (LON:WINV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Oxford Technology VCT 2's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Worsley Investors'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Oxford Technology VCT 2 Neutral
Worsley Investors Neutral

20.4% of Worsley Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Oxford Technology VCT 2 shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 33.5% of Worsley Investors shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Worsley Investors. Worsley Investors is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Technology VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Technology VCT 2£859K2.76£55.58M£2.403.54
Worsley Investors£4.65M1.99£36.92K£12.262.23

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has a beta of 0.0029213922, suggesting that its stock price is 100% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Worsley Investors has a beta of 0.115, suggesting that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has a net margin of 223.79% compared to Worsley Investors' net margin of 205.38%. Worsley Investors' return on equity of 19.23% beat Oxford Technology VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oxford Technology VCT 2223.79% 14.00% -13.12%
Worsley Investors 205.38%19.23%0.43%

Summary

Worsley Investors beats Oxford Technology VCT 2 on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Oxford Technology VCT 2 compare to Mila Resources?

Mila Resources (LON:MILA) and Oxford Technology VCT 2 (LON:OXH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Mila Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Oxford Technology VCT 2'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mila Resources Neutral
Oxford Technology VCT 2 Neutral

2.5% of Mila Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 14.0% of Mila Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Oxford Technology VCT 2 shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has higher revenue and earnings than Mila Resources. Mila Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Technology VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mila ResourcesN/AN/A-£364.80K-£0.12N/A
Oxford Technology VCT 2£859K2.76£55.58M£2.403.54

Mila Resources has a beta of 0.302, indicating that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oxford Technology VCT 2 has a beta of 0.0029213922, indicating that its share price is 100% less volatile than the broader market.

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has a net margin of 223.79% compared to Mila Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Oxford Technology VCT 2's return on equity of 14.00% beat Mila Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mila ResourcesN/A -9.96% -5.89%
Oxford Technology VCT 2 223.79%14.00%-13.12%

Summary

Oxford Technology VCT 2 beats Mila Resources on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Oxford Technology VCT 2 compare to Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs?

Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs (LON:TV2H) and Oxford Technology VCT 2 (LON:OXH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has higher revenue and earnings than Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs. Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Technology VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare ShsN/AN/AN/A-£0.02N/A
Oxford Technology VCT 2£859K2.76£55.58M£2.403.54

In the previous week, Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Oxford Technology VCT 2'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs Neutral
Oxford Technology VCT 2 Neutral

Oxford Technology VCT 2 has a net margin of 223.79% compared to Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs' net margin of 0.00%. Oxford Technology VCT 2's return on equity of 14.00% beat Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare ShsN/A N/A N/A
Oxford Technology VCT 2 223.79%14.00%-13.12%

Summary

Oxford Technology VCT 2 beats Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Oxford Technology VCT 2 News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OXH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OXH vs. The Competition

MetricOxford Technology VCT 2Capital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.37M£5.32B£13.74B£2.87B
Dividend Yield0.75%7.51%5.94%6.26%
P/E Ratio3.5429.9525.27366.64
Price / Sales2.761,230.13509.5490,001.44
Price / Cash24.0947.7139.4027.89
Price / Book0.323.512.726.34
Net Income£55.58M£417.39M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.68%-0.78%0.14%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-1.57%-0.21%0.11%
1 Year PerformanceN/A3.84%7.70%19.40%

Oxford Technology VCT 2 Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OXH
Oxford Technology VCT 2
N/AGBX 8.50
flat
N/AN/A£2.37M£859K3.54N/A
PU12
Puma VCT 12
N/AN/AN/AN/A£9.25M£5.99M141.18N/A
CYS
Chrysalis VCT
N/AN/AN/AN/A£9.25M£789K65.0017
WINV
Worsley Investors
N/AGBX 27.40
-2.8%
N/A-5.5%£9.25M£4.65M2.232
MILA
Mila Resources
N/AGBX 1.20
-4.0%
N/A+65.3%£8.94MN/AN/A4

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:OXH) was last updated on 9/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners