Free Trial

Princess Private Equity (PEY) Competitors

Princess Private Equity logo
GBX 8.14 -0.22 (-2.62%)
As of 10:26 AM Eastern

PEY vs. PBLT, PU11, JPB, LFI, and AEET

Should you buy Princess Private Equity stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Princess Private Equity with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Princess Private Equity include TOC Property Backed Lending Trust (PBLT), Puma VCT 11 (PU11), JPMorgan Brazil Investment Trust (JPB), London Finance & Investment Group (LFI), and Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust (AEET). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Princess Private Equity compare to TOC Property Backed Lending Trust?

Princess Private Equity (LON:PEY) and TOC Property Backed Lending Trust (LON:PBLT) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

19.5% of Princess Private Equity shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Princess Private Equity shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

TOC Property Backed Lending Trust has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Princess Private Equity's net margin of -53.48%. TOC Property Backed Lending Trust's return on equity of 0.00% beat Princess Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Princess Private Equity-53.48% -2.55% 1.72%
TOC Property Backed Lending Trust N/A N/A N/A

Princess Private Equity has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TOC Property Backed Lending Trust. Princess Private Equity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TOC Property Backed Lending Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Princess Private Equity-£84.10M-0.07£2.29B-£130.00N/A
TOC Property Backed Lending Trust£1.49M0.00N/A£3.50N/A

Princess Private Equity pays an annual dividend of GBX 75 per share and has a dividend yield of 921.3%. TOC Property Backed Lending Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.05 per share. Princess Private Equity pays out -57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TOC Property Backed Lending Trust pays out 1.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Princess Private Equity is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Princess Private Equity had 1 more articles in the media than TOC Property Backed Lending Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Princess Private Equity and 0 mentions for TOC Property Backed Lending Trust. Princess Private Equity's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled TOC Property Backed Lending Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Princess Private Equity Neutral
TOC Property Backed Lending Trust Neutral

Summary

Princess Private Equity beats TOC Property Backed Lending Trust on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Princess Private Equity compare to Puma VCT 11?

Princess Private Equity (LON:PEY) and Puma VCT 11 (LON:PU11) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Princess Private Equity has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Puma VCT 11. Princess Private Equity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Puma VCT 11, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Princess Private Equity-£84.10M-0.07£2.29B-£130.00N/A
Puma VCT 11£763K0.00N/A£0.20N/A

Puma VCT 11 has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Princess Private Equity's net margin of -53.48%. Puma VCT 11's return on equity of 0.00% beat Princess Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Princess Private Equity-53.48% -2.55% 1.72%
Puma VCT 11 N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Princess Private Equity had 1 more articles in the media than Puma VCT 11. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Princess Private Equity and 0 mentions for Puma VCT 11. Princess Private Equity's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Puma VCT 11'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Princess Private Equity Neutral
Puma VCT 11 Neutral

19.5% of Princess Private Equity shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Princess Private Equity shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Princess Private Equity pays an annual dividend of GBX 75 per share and has a dividend yield of 921.3%. Puma VCT 11 pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.05 per share. Princess Private Equity pays out -57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Puma VCT 11 pays out 25.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Princess Private Equity is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Princess Private Equity beats Puma VCT 11 on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Princess Private Equity compare to JPMorgan Brazil Investment Trust?

Princess Private Equity (LON:PEY) and JPMorgan Brazil Investment Trust (LON:JPB) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Princess Private Equity has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JPMorgan Brazil Investment Trust.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Princess Private Equity-£84.10M-0.07£2.29B-£130.00N/A
JPMorgan Brazil Investment TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

JPMorgan Brazil Investment Trust has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Princess Private Equity's net margin of -53.48%. JPMorgan Brazil Investment Trust's return on equity of 0.00% beat Princess Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Princess Private Equity-53.48% -2.55% 1.72%
JPMorgan Brazil Investment Trust N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Princess Private Equity had 1 more articles in the media than JPMorgan Brazil Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Princess Private Equity and 0 mentions for JPMorgan Brazil Investment Trust. Princess Private Equity's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Brazil Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Princess Private Equity Neutral
JPMorgan Brazil Investment Trust Neutral

Princess Private Equity pays an annual dividend of GBX 75 per share and has a dividend yield of 921.3%. JPMorgan Brazil Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.01 per share. Princess Private Equity pays out -57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

19.5% of Princess Private Equity shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Princess Private Equity shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Princess Private Equity beats JPMorgan Brazil Investment Trust on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Princess Private Equity compare to London Finance & Investment Group?

Princess Private Equity (LON:PEY) and London Finance & Investment Group (LON:LFI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Princess Private Equity has a beta of 0.19295007, indicating that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, London Finance & Investment Group has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

19.5% of Princess Private Equity shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of London Finance & Investment Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Princess Private Equity shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 65.3% of London Finance & Investment Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Princess Private Equity pays an annual dividend of GBX 75 per share and has a dividend yield of 921.3%. London Finance & Investment Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share. Princess Private Equity pays out -57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. London Finance & Investment Group pays out 714.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Princess Private Equity is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Princess Private Equity has higher earnings, but lower revenue than London Finance & Investment Group. Princess Private Equity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than London Finance & Investment Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Princess Private Equity-£84.10M-0.07£2.29B-£130.00N/A
London Finance & Investment Group£1.69M0.00£1.38M£0.14N/A

London Finance & Investment Group has a net margin of 90.10% compared to Princess Private Equity's net margin of -53.48%. London Finance & Investment Group's return on equity of 20.74% beat Princess Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Princess Private Equity-53.48% -2.55% 1.72%
London Finance & Investment Group 90.10%20.74%2.39%

In the previous week, Princess Private Equity had 1 more articles in the media than London Finance & Investment Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Princess Private Equity and 0 mentions for London Finance & Investment Group. Princess Private Equity's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled London Finance & Investment Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Princess Private Equity Neutral
London Finance & Investment Group Neutral

Summary

London Finance & Investment Group beats Princess Private Equity on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Princess Private Equity compare to Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust?

Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust (LON:AEET) and Princess Private Equity (LON:PEY) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.4%. Princess Private Equity pays an annual dividend of GBX 75 per share and has a dividend yield of 921.3%. Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust pays out -606.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Princess Private Equity pays out -57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust has a beta of -0.19, indicating that its stock price is 119% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Princess Private Equity has a beta of 0.19295007, indicating that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Princess Private Equity has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust. Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Princess Private Equity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust£1.42M14.89£1.22M-£0.66N/A
Princess Private Equity-£84.10M-0.07£2.29B-£130.00N/A

19.9% of Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.5% of Princess Private Equity shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Princess Private Equity shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Princess Private Equity had 1 more articles in the media than Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Princess Private Equity and 0 mentions for Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust. Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Princess Private Equity'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust Neutral
Princess Private Equity Neutral

Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust has a net margin of -35.22% compared to Princess Private Equity's net margin of -53.48%. Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust's return on equity of -1.40% beat Princess Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust-35.22% -1.40% 2.90%
Princess Private Equity -53.48%-2.55%1.72%

Summary

Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust beats Princess Private Equity on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Princess Private Equity News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PEY and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PEY vs. The Competition

MetricPrincess Private EquityAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£5.51M£2.36B£5.64B£2.79B
Dividend Yield7.68%5.99%5.27%6.09%
P/E Ratio-0.0625.2315.77366.07
Price / Sales-0.071,956.92926.6288,440.80
Price / Cash0.1560.1790.3227.89
Price / Book0.011.354.397.73
Net Income£2.29B£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.55%-0.25%0.04%0.58%
1 Month Performance-10.73%2.27%1.86%2.57%
1 Year Performance-12.08%13.33%21.45%87.36%

Princess Private Equity Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PEY
Princess Private Equity
N/AGBX 8.14
-2.6%
N/A-9.9%£5.51M-£84.10MN/AN/A
PBLT
TOC Property Backed Lending Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£23.16M£1.49M24.57314
PU11
Puma VCT 11
N/AN/AN/AN/A£22.88M£763K300.00N/A
JPB
JPMorgan Brazil Investment Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£22.29MN/AN/AN/A
LFI
London Finance & Investment Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£21.85M£1.69M500.004

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PEY) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners