Free Trial

Princess Private Equity (PEY) Competitors

Princess Private Equity logo
GBX 7 +0.06 (+0.86%)
As of 08:29 AM Eastern

PEY vs. TPVE, KZG, YOLO, FFWD, and MAFL

Should you buy Princess Private Equity stock or one of its competitors? Princess Private Equity's main competitors and comparable companies include Triple Point Income VCT Plc E (TPVE), Kazera Global (KZG), Yolo Leisure and Technology (YOLO), Fastforward Innovations (FFWD), and Mineral & Financial Investments (MAFL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Princess Private Equity compare to Triple Point Income VCT Plc E?

Princess Private Equity (LON:PEY) and Triple Point Income VCT Plc E (LON:TPVE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Princess Private Equity has a net margin of 140.83% compared to Triple Point Income VCT Plc E's net margin of 32.42%. Triple Point Income VCT Plc E's return on equity of 3.97% beat Princess Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Princess Private Equity140.83% -13.23% 1.72%
Triple Point Income VCT Plc E 32.42%3.97%2.47%

Princess Private Equity has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Triple Point Income VCT Plc E. Princess Private Equity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triple Point Income VCT Plc E, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Princess Private Equity-£84.10M-0.06£2.29B-£130.00N/A
Triple Point Income VCT Plc E£4.35M0.00£1.41M£0.08N/A

18.7% of Princess Private Equity shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Princess Private Equity shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 54.3% of Triple Point Income VCT Plc E shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Given Triple Point Income VCT Plc E's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Triple Point Income VCT Plc E is more favorable than Princess Private Equity.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Princess Private Equity
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Triple Point Income VCT Plc E
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Princess Private Equity pays an annual dividend of GBX 75 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,080.7%. Triple Point Income VCT Plc E pays an annual dividend of GBX 12 per share. Princess Private Equity pays out -57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Triple Point Income VCT Plc E pays out 15,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Princess Private Equity is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Princess Private Equity has a beta of 0.128, indicating that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Triple Point Income VCT Plc E has a beta of 0.14, indicating that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Princess Private Equity had 3 more articles in the media than Triple Point Income VCT Plc E. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Princess Private Equity and 0 mentions for Triple Point Income VCT Plc E. Princess Private Equity's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Triple Point Income VCT Plc E's score of 0.00 indicating that Princess Private Equity is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Princess Private Equity Positive
Triple Point Income VCT Plc E Neutral

Summary

Princess Private Equity and Triple Point Income VCT Plc E tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Princess Private Equity compare to Kazera Global?

Kazera Global (LON:KZG) and Princess Private Equity (LON:PEY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kazera Global
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Princess Private Equity
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Princess Private Equity had 3 more articles in the media than Kazera Global. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Princess Private Equity and 0 mentions for Kazera Global. Princess Private Equity's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Kazera Global's score of 0.00 indicating that Princess Private Equity is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kazera Global Neutral
Princess Private Equity Positive

Princess Private Equity has a net margin of 140.83% compared to Kazera Global's net margin of -15,996.15%. Princess Private Equity's return on equity of -13.23% beat Kazera Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kazera Global-15,996.15% -89.18% -11.84%
Princess Private Equity 140.83%-13.23%1.72%

Princess Private Equity has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kazera Global. Kazera Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Princess Private Equity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kazera Global£26K615.17-£2.74M-£0.43N/A
Princess Private Equity-£84.10M-0.06£2.29B-£130.00N/A

Kazera Global has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Princess Private Equity has a beta of 0.128, meaning that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

2.1% of Kazera Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.7% of Princess Private Equity shares are held by institutional investors. 41.4% of Kazera Global shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Princess Private Equity shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Princess Private Equity beats Kazera Global on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Princess Private Equity compare to Yolo Leisure and Technology?

Yolo Leisure and Technology (LON:YOLO) and Princess Private Equity (LON:PEY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

In the previous week, Princess Private Equity had 3 more articles in the media than Yolo Leisure and Technology. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Princess Private Equity and 0 mentions for Yolo Leisure and Technology. Princess Private Equity's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Yolo Leisure and Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Princess Private Equity is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Yolo Leisure and Technology Neutral
Princess Private Equity Positive

18.7% of Princess Private Equity shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Princess Private Equity shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Princess Private Equity has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Yolo Leisure and Technology. Princess Private Equity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yolo Leisure and Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yolo Leisure and Technology£14K0.00N/A-£1.50N/A
Princess Private Equity-£84.10M-0.06£2.29B-£130.00N/A

Princess Private Equity has a net margin of 140.83% compared to Yolo Leisure and Technology's net margin of 0.00%. Yolo Leisure and Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Princess Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Yolo Leisure and TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
Princess Private Equity 140.83%-13.23%1.72%

Given Yolo Leisure and Technology's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Yolo Leisure and Technology is more favorable than Princess Private Equity.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Yolo Leisure and Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Princess Private Equity
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Princess Private Equity beats Yolo Leisure and Technology on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Princess Private Equity compare to Fastforward Innovations?

Fastforward Innovations (LON:FFWD) and Princess Private Equity (LON:PEY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Princess Private Equity has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fastforward Innovations. Princess Private Equity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fastforward Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fastforward Innovations-£4.19M0.00N/A-£3.30N/A
Princess Private Equity-£84.10M-0.06£2.29B-£130.00N/A

18.7% of Princess Private Equity shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Princess Private Equity shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Princess Private Equity has a net margin of 140.83% compared to Fastforward Innovations' net margin of 0.00%. Fastforward Innovations' return on equity of 0.00% beat Princess Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fastforward InnovationsN/A N/A N/A
Princess Private Equity 140.83%-13.23%1.72%

Given Fastforward Innovations' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Fastforward Innovations is more favorable than Princess Private Equity.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fastforward Innovations
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Princess Private Equity
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Princess Private Equity had 3 more articles in the media than Fastforward Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Princess Private Equity and 0 mentions for Fastforward Innovations. Princess Private Equity's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Fastforward Innovations' score of 0.00 indicating that Princess Private Equity is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fastforward Innovations Neutral
Princess Private Equity Positive

Summary

Princess Private Equity beats Fastforward Innovations on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Princess Private Equity compare to Mineral & Financial Investments?

Princess Private Equity (LON:PEY) and Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Princess Private Equity has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mineral & Financial Investments. Princess Private Equity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mineral & Financial Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Princess Private Equity-£84.10M-0.06£2.29B-£130.00N/A
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M11.22£2.04M£8.405.08

Princess Private Equity has a beta of 0.128, suggesting that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.681, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

18.7% of Princess Private Equity shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Princess Private Equity shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Princess Private Equity had 3 more articles in the media than Mineral & Financial Investments. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Princess Private Equity and 0 mentions for Mineral & Financial Investments. Princess Private Equity's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Mineral & Financial Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Princess Private Equity is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Princess Private Equity Positive
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral

Princess Private Equity has a net margin of 140.83% compared to Mineral & Financial Investments' net margin of 125.37%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 23.41% beat Princess Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Princess Private Equity140.83% -13.23% 1.72%
Mineral & Financial Investments 125.37%23.41%11.52%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Princess Private Equity
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Mineral & Financial Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats Princess Private Equity on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Princess Private Equity News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PEY and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PEY vs. The Competition

MetricPrincess Private EquityCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£4.70M£5.13B£13.31B£2.82B
Dividend Yield9.23%7.57%6.04%6.26%
P/E Ratio-0.0529.4224.39366.26
Price / Sales-0.061,259.19508.6789,110.96
Price / Cash0.1547.6729.4627.89
Price / Book0.003.482.706.93
Net Income£2.29B£415.67M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.55%-0.11%-0.46%-0.72%
1 Month Performance-3.05%-2.72%-3.22%-1.09%
1 Year Performance-33.76%9.03%10.49%22.87%

Princess Private Equity Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PEY
Princess Private Equity
0.5087 of 5 stars
GBX 7
+0.9%
N/A-34.3%£4.70M-£84.10MN/A2,000
TPVE
Triple Point Income VCT Plc E
N/AN/AN/AN/A£18.09M£4.35M781.25N/A
KZG
Kazera Global
N/AGBX 1.60
flat
N/A+5.4%£17.65M£26KN/A29
YOLO
Yolo Leisure and Technology
N/AN/AN/AN/A£17.57M£14KN/A2
FFWD
Fastforward Innovations
N/AN/AN/AN/A£17.55M-£4.19MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PEY) was last updated on 10/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners