Go Pro
→ The cat is out the bag (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free PCIP Stock Alerts

PCI-PAL (PCIP) Competitors

PCI-PAL logo
GBX 62.90 +1.40 (+2.28%)
As of 11:32 AM Eastern
Compare

PCIP vs. BLTG, FNX, DOTD, AOM, and BKS

Should you buy PCI-PAL stock or one of its competitors? PCI-PAL's main competitors and comparable companies include Blancco Technology Group (BLTG), Fonix Mobile (FNX), dotdigital Group (DOTD), ActiveOps (AOM), and Beeks Financial Cloud Group (BKS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "software" industry.

How does PCI-PAL compare to Blancco Technology Group?

Blancco Technology Group (LON:BLTG) and PCI-PAL (LON:PCIP) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Blancco Technology Group has a net margin of 6.22% compared to PCI-PAL's net margin of -2.12%. PCI-PAL's return on equity of 31.19% beat Blancco Technology Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blancco Technology Group6.22% 3.52% 2.17%
PCI-PAL -2.12%31.19%-10.01%

PCI-PAL has a consensus price target of GBX 115, suggesting a potential upside of 82.83%. Given PCI-PAL's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PCI-PAL is more favorable than Blancco Technology Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Blancco Technology Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
PCI-PAL
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

84.0% of Blancco Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PCI-PAL shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Blancco Technology Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.4% of PCI-PAL shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Blancco Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than PCI-PAL. PCI-PAL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blancco Technology Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blancco Technology Group£44.15M0.00£2.75M£0.04N/A
PCI-PAL£23.21M1.96-£1.18M-£0.68N/A

In the previous week, PCI-PAL's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Blancco Technology Group's score of 0.00 indicating that PCI-PAL is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blancco Technology Group Neutral
PCI-PAL Neutral

Blancco Technology Group has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PCI-PAL has a beta of 0.626, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Blancco Technology Group and PCI-PAL tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PCI-PAL compare to Fonix Mobile?

Fonix Mobile (LON:FNX) and PCI-PAL (LON:PCIP) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Fonix Mobile has higher revenue and earnings than PCI-PAL. PCI-PAL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fonix Mobile, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fonix Mobile£76.36M2.21£10.67M£11.2015.40
PCI-PAL£23.21M1.96-£1.18M-£0.68N/A

12.9% of Fonix Mobile shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PCI-PAL shares are held by institutional investors. 27.1% of Fonix Mobile shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.4% of PCI-PAL shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, PCI-PAL's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Fonix Mobile's score of 0.00 indicating that PCI-PAL is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fonix Mobile Neutral
PCI-PAL Neutral

Fonix Mobile has a net margin of 14.66% compared to PCI-PAL's net margin of -2.12%. Fonix Mobile's return on equity of 104.64% beat PCI-PAL's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fonix Mobile14.66% 104.64% 13.10%
PCI-PAL -2.12%31.19%-10.01%

Fonix Mobile currently has a consensus target price of GBX 293, suggesting a potential upside of 69.86%. PCI-PAL has a consensus target price of GBX 115, suggesting a potential upside of 82.83%. Given PCI-PAL's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe PCI-PAL is more favorable than Fonix Mobile.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fonix Mobile
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
PCI-PAL
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Fonix Mobile has a beta of 0.582, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PCI-PAL has a beta of 0.626, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fonix Mobile beats PCI-PAL on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PCI-PAL compare to dotdigital Group?

PCI-PAL (LON:PCIP) and dotdigital Group (LON:DOTD) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

PCI-PAL has a beta of 0.626, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, dotdigital Group has a beta of 1.459, meaning that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

dotdigital Group has higher revenue and earnings than PCI-PAL. PCI-PAL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than dotdigital Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PCI-PAL£23.21M1.96-£1.18M-£0.68N/A
dotdigital Group£85.75M1.82£11.03M£2.9417.55

dotdigital Group has a net margin of 10.76% compared to PCI-PAL's net margin of -2.12%. PCI-PAL's return on equity of 31.19% beat dotdigital Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PCI-PAL-2.12% 31.19% -10.01%
dotdigital Group 10.76%8.80%8.64%

19.8% of PCI-PAL shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.7% of dotdigital Group shares are held by institutional investors. 9.4% of PCI-PAL shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of dotdigital Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PCI-PAL presently has a consensus price target of GBX 115, indicating a potential upside of 82.83%. dotdigital Group has a consensus price target of GBX 122.50, indicating a potential upside of 137.40%. Given dotdigital Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe dotdigital Group is more favorable than PCI-PAL.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PCI-PAL
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
dotdigital Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, dotdigital Group had 2 more articles in the media than PCI-PAL. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for dotdigital Group and 0 mentions for PCI-PAL. dotdigital Group's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat PCI-PAL's score of 0.34 indicating that dotdigital Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PCI-PAL Neutral
dotdigital Group Neutral

Summary

dotdigital Group beats PCI-PAL on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PCI-PAL compare to ActiveOps?

PCI-PAL (LON:PCIP) and ActiveOps (LON:AOM) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

PCI-PAL has a beta of 0.626, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ActiveOps has a beta of 0.827, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

19.8% of PCI-PAL shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.4% of ActiveOps shares are held by institutional investors. 9.4% of PCI-PAL shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.0% of ActiveOps shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ActiveOps had 1 more articles in the media than PCI-PAL. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ActiveOps and 0 mentions for PCI-PAL. ActiveOps' average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat PCI-PAL's score of 0.34 indicating that ActiveOps is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PCI-PAL Neutral
ActiveOps Neutral

ActiveOps has higher revenue and earnings than PCI-PAL. PCI-PAL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ActiveOps, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PCI-PAL£23.21M1.96-£1.18M-£0.68N/A
ActiveOps£45.00M3.26£820.59K-£3.23N/A

PCI-PAL currently has a consensus target price of GBX 115, indicating a potential upside of 82.83%. ActiveOps has a consensus target price of GBX 355, indicating a potential upside of 72.71%. Given PCI-PAL's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe PCI-PAL is more favorable than ActiveOps.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PCI-PAL
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
ActiveOps
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

PCI-PAL has a net margin of -2.12% compared to ActiveOps' net margin of -4.02%. PCI-PAL's return on equity of 31.19% beat ActiveOps' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PCI-PAL-2.12% 31.19% -10.01%
ActiveOps -4.02%-29.18%2.27%

Summary

ActiveOps beats PCI-PAL on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PCI-PAL compare to Beeks Financial Cloud Group?

PCI-PAL (LON:PCIP) and Beeks Financial Cloud Group (LON:BKS) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

PCI-PAL currently has a consensus price target of GBX 115, indicating a potential upside of 82.83%. Beeks Financial Cloud Group has a consensus price target of GBX 335, indicating a potential upside of 52.27%. Given PCI-PAL's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe PCI-PAL is more favorable than Beeks Financial Cloud Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PCI-PAL
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Beeks Financial Cloud Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Beeks Financial Cloud Group has higher revenue and earnings than PCI-PAL. PCI-PAL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beeks Financial Cloud Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PCI-PAL£23.21M1.96-£1.18M-£0.68N/A
Beeks Financial Cloud Group£35.46M4.24£2.15M£1.14192.98

Beeks Financial Cloud Group has a net margin of 2.68% compared to PCI-PAL's net margin of -2.12%. PCI-PAL's return on equity of 31.19% beat Beeks Financial Cloud Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PCI-PAL-2.12% 31.19% -10.01%
Beeks Financial Cloud Group 2.68%2.17%0.44%

PCI-PAL has a beta of 0.626, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Beeks Financial Cloud Group has a beta of 0.35, indicating that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

19.8% of PCI-PAL shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.2% of Beeks Financial Cloud Group shares are held by institutional investors. 9.4% of PCI-PAL shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 32.7% of Beeks Financial Cloud Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, PCI-PAL's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Beeks Financial Cloud Group's score of 0.00 indicating that PCI-PAL is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PCI-PAL Neutral
Beeks Financial Cloud Group Neutral

Summary

Beeks Financial Cloud Group beats PCI-PAL on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PCI-PAL News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PCIP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PCIP vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPCI-PALSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£45.57M£15.80B£30.42B£2.88B
Dividend Yield0.44%3.43%2.72%6.11%
P/E Ratio-92.50127.6275.48368.70
Price / Sales1.961,308.63600.1983,338.10
Price / Cash6.9047.1652.3327.89
Price / Book-23.157.169.537.18
Net Income-£1.18M£436.26M£681.19M£5.89B
7 Day Performance6.41%0.21%1.44%0.87%
1 Month Performance43.28%2.49%2.33%2.81%
1 Year Performance33.26%7.63%199.49%69.35%

PCI-PAL Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PCIP
PCI-PAL
2.7443 of 5 stars		GBX 62.90
+2.3%		GBX 115
+82.8%		+31.3%£45.57M£23.21MN/A121
BLTG
Blancco Technology Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£174.53M£44.15M5,625.00300
FNX
Fonix Mobile
N/AGBX 170
-1.7%		GBX 293
+72.4%		-21.2%£165.96M£76.36M15.1845
DOTD
dotdigital Group
3.3085 of 5 stars		GBX 50.60
+1.7%		GBX 122.50
+142.1%		-26.3%£153.44M£85.75M17.21400
AOM
ActiveOps
2.3396 of 5 stars		GBX 210
+2.4%		GBX 355
+69.0%		+25.6%£150.06M£45.00MN/A180

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PCIP) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Buy These Stocks Before August 31st
Keith Kaplan has invested $17 million into his own AI research platform, now used by 180,000 investors worldwi...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
How a rare metal shortage sent gains up 2512 percent
In 2010, a rare earth metal called dysprosium surged 2,512 percent in two and a half years after China cut exp...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Wall Street is staring at the wrong AI trade
Anthropic just signed a 9.1 billion dollar, 20 year data center agreement covering 191 megawatts of capacity, ...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s New Currency Reset
Trump is launching a new $250 bill - but that may be a distraction. Behind the scenes, Executive Order 14241 i...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel