Speedy Hire (SDY) Competitors

Speedy Hire pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.2%. Andrews Sykes Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 25.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Speedy Hire pays out -36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Andrews Sykes Group pays out 60.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Speedy Hire is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Andrews Sykes Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Speedy Hire. Speedy Hire is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Andrews Sykes Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Speedy Hire has a beta of 0.709, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Andrews Sykes Group has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Andrews Sykes Group has a net margin of 23.64% compared to Speedy Hire's net margin of -6.39%. Andrews Sykes Group's return on equity of 35.67% beat Speedy Hire's return on equity.

In the previous week, Speedy Hire's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Andrews Sykes Group'saverage media sentiment score.

51.6% of Speedy Hire shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Andrews Sykes Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Speedy Hire shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.0% of Andrews Sykes Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Speedy Hire currently has a consensus target price of GBX 63, suggesting a potential upside of 235.11%. Given Speedy Hire's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Speedy Hire is more favorable than Andrews Sykes Group.

VP has a net margin of -1.52% compared to Speedy Hire's net margin of -6.39%. VP's return on equity of -3.89% beat Speedy Hire's return on equity.

Speedy Hire currently has a consensus price target of GBX 63, suggesting a potential upside of 235.11%. VP has a consensus price target of GBX 686.67, suggesting a potential upside of 41.58%. Given Speedy Hire's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Speedy Hire is more favorable than VP.

Speedy Hire has a beta of 0.709, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, VP has a beta of 0.347, indicating that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, VP had 9 more articles in the media than Speedy Hire. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for VP and 0 mentions for Speedy Hire. Speedy Hire's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat VP's score of -0.05 indicating that Speedy Hire is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Speedy Hire pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.2%. VP pays an annual dividend of GBX 39 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Speedy Hire pays out -36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. VP pays out -286.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

51.6% of Speedy Hire shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.5% of VP shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Speedy Hire shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 57.5% of VP shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Speedy Hire has higher revenue and earnings than VP. VP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Speedy Hire, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

19.0% of Amedeo Air Four Plus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.6% of Speedy Hire shares are held by institutional investors. 8.2% of Amedeo Air Four Plus shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Speedy Hire shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Amedeo Air Four Plus has a net margin of 12.69% compared to Speedy Hire's net margin of -6.39%. Amedeo Air Four Plus' return on equity of 8.21% beat Speedy Hire's return on equity.

Amedeo Air Four Plus has a beta of 0.42011246, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Speedy Hire has a beta of 0.709, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Amedeo Air Four Plus' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Speedy Hire'saverage media sentiment score.

Amedeo Air Four Plus pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.0%. Speedy Hire pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.2%. Amedeo Air Four Plus pays out 97.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Speedy Hire pays out -36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Speedy Hire is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Speedy Hire has a consensus target price of GBX 63, suggesting a potential upside of 235.11%. Given Speedy Hire's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Speedy Hire is more favorable than Amedeo Air Four Plus.

Amedeo Air Four Plus has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Speedy Hire. Speedy Hire is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amedeo Air Four Plus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Avation's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Speedy Hire'saverage media sentiment score.

Avation has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Speedy Hire. Avation is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Speedy Hire, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Avation has a beta of 0.118, suggesting that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Speedy Hire has a beta of 0.709, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

12.5% of Avation shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.6% of Speedy Hire shares are held by institutional investors. 24.1% of Avation shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Speedy Hire shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Speedy Hire has a net margin of -6.39% compared to Avation's net margin of -11.96%. Avation's return on equity of -5.70% beat Speedy Hire's return on equity.

Avation currently has a consensus price target of GBX 270, suggesting a potential upside of 93.55%. Speedy Hire has a consensus price target of GBX 63, suggesting a potential upside of 235.11%. Given Speedy Hire's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Speedy Hire is more favorable than Avation.

Avation pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.99 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Speedy Hire pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.2%. Avation pays out -4.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Speedy Hire pays out -36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Speedy Hire is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.