Go Pro

VP (VP) Competitors

VP logo
GBX 461 -9.00 (-1.91%)
As of 09/11/2026

VP vs. FERG, NTG, ASY, GMS, and AA4

Should you buy VP stock or one of its competitors? VP's main competitors and comparable companies include Ferguson (FERG), Northgate (NTG), Andrews Sykes Group (ASY), Gulf Marine Services (GMS), and Amedeo Air Four Plus (AA4). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "trading companies & distributors" industry.

How does VP compare to Ferguson?

Ferguson (LON:FERG) and VP (LON:VP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Ferguson has a beta of 1.118, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, VP has a beta of 0.347, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, VP had 16 more articles in the media than Ferguson. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for VP and 6 mentions for Ferguson. Ferguson's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat VP's score of -0.20 indicating that Ferguson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ferguson
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
VP
1 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

64.7% of Ferguson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.5% of VP shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ferguson shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 57.5% of VP shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ferguson pays an annual dividend of GBX 337.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 144.2%. VP pays an annual dividend of GBX 39 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.5%. Ferguson pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. VP pays out -286.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

VP has a consensus price target of GBX 686.67, suggesting a potential upside of 48.95%. Given VP's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe VP is more favorable than Ferguson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ferguson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
VP
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Ferguson has a net margin of 6.55% compared to VP's net margin of -1.52%. Ferguson's return on equity of 35.11% beat VP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ferguson6.55% 35.11% 10.15%
VP -1.52%-3.89%9.45%

Ferguson has higher revenue and earnings than VP. VP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferguson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferguson£31.32B0.01£2.10B£1.02 thousand0.23
VP£368.77M0.49-£5.38M-£13.63N/A

Summary

Ferguson beats VP on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does VP compare to Northgate?

Northgate (LON:NTG) and VP (LON:VP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, VP had 22 more articles in the media than Northgate. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for VP and 0 mentions for Northgate. Northgate's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat VP's score of -0.20 indicating that Northgate is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Northgate Neutral
VP Neutral

VP has a consensus target price of GBX 686.67, suggesting a potential upside of 48.95%. Given VP's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe VP is more favorable than Northgate.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Northgate
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
VP
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Northgate pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.18 per share. VP pays an annual dividend of GBX 39 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.5%. Northgate pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. VP pays out -286.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. VP is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

31.5% of VP shares are held by institutional investors. 57.5% of VP shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Northgate has higher revenue and earnings than VP. VP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Northgate, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Northgate£729.28M0.00N/A£35.50N/A
VP£368.77M0.49-£5.38M-£13.63N/A

Northgate has a net margin of 0.00% compared to VP's net margin of -1.52%. Northgate's return on equity of 0.00% beat VP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NorthgateN/A N/A N/A
VP -1.52%-3.89%9.45%

Summary

VP beats Northgate on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does VP compare to Andrews Sykes Group?

Andrews Sykes Group (LON:ASY) and VP (LON:VP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and profitability.

Andrews Sykes Group has a net margin of 23.64% compared to VP's net margin of -1.52%. Andrews Sykes Group's return on equity of 35.67% beat VP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Andrews Sykes Group23.64% 35.67% 16.52%
VP -1.52%-3.89%9.45%

Andrews Sykes Group has a beta of 0.283, meaning that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, VP has a beta of 0.347, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, VP had 22 more articles in the media than Andrews Sykes Group. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for VP and 0 mentions for Andrews Sykes Group. Andrews Sykes Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat VP's score of -0.20 indicating that Andrews Sykes Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Andrews Sykes Group Neutral
VP Neutral

Andrews Sykes Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than VP. VP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Andrews Sykes Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Andrews Sykes Group£76.50M2.95£17.31M£43.2012.50
VP£368.77M0.49-£5.38M-£13.63N/A

0.1% of Andrews Sykes Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.5% of VP shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of Andrews Sykes Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 57.5% of VP shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

VP has a consensus price target of GBX 686.67, indicating a potential upside of 48.95%. Given VP's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe VP is more favorable than Andrews Sykes Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Andrews Sykes Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
VP
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Andrews Sykes Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 25.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. VP pays an annual dividend of GBX 39 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.5%. Andrews Sykes Group pays out 60.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. VP pays out -286.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. VP is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

VP beats Andrews Sykes Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does VP compare to Gulf Marine Services?

VP (LON:VP) and Gulf Marine Services (LON:GMS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

VP currently has a consensus target price of GBX 686.67, indicating a potential upside of 48.95%. Given VP's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe VP is more favorable than Gulf Marine Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
VP
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gulf Marine Services
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Gulf Marine Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than VP. VP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulf Marine Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
VP£368.77M0.49-£5.38M-£13.63N/A
Gulf Marine Services£180.54M1.16£48.19M£1.6411.04

Gulf Marine Services has a net margin of 0.31% compared to VP's net margin of -1.52%. Gulf Marine Services' return on equity of 0.14% beat VP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
VP-1.52% -3.89% 9.45%
Gulf Marine Services 0.31%0.14%5.32%

VP has a beta of 0.347, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gulf Marine Services has a beta of 0.646, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

31.5% of VP shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of Gulf Marine Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 57.5% of VP shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Gulf Marine Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, VP had 20 more articles in the media than Gulf Marine Services. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for VP and 2 mentions for Gulf Marine Services. VP's average media sentiment score of -0.20 beat Gulf Marine Services' score of -0.53 indicating that VP is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
VP
1 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Gulf Marine Services
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Summary

VP beats Gulf Marine Services on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does VP compare to Amedeo Air Four Plus?

VP (LON:VP) and Amedeo Air Four Plus (LON:AA4) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

VP currently has a consensus price target of GBX 686.67, indicating a potential upside of 48.95%. Given VP's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe VP is more favorable than Amedeo Air Four Plus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
VP
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Amedeo Air Four Plus
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, VP had 22 more articles in the media than Amedeo Air Four Plus. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for VP and 0 mentions for Amedeo Air Four Plus. Amedeo Air Four Plus' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat VP's score of -0.20 indicating that Amedeo Air Four Plus is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
VP Neutral
Amedeo Air Four Plus Neutral

31.5% of VP shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.0% of Amedeo Air Four Plus shares are owned by institutional investors. 57.5% of VP shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Amedeo Air Four Plus shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

VP has a beta of 0.347, indicating that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amedeo Air Four Plus has a beta of 0.42011246, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Amedeo Air Four Plus has lower revenue, but higher earnings than VP. VP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amedeo Air Four Plus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
VP£368.77M0.49-£5.38M-£13.63N/A
Amedeo Air Four Plus£143.46M1.31£25.96M£8.218.82

Amedeo Air Four Plus has a net margin of 12.69% compared to VP's net margin of -1.52%. Amedeo Air Four Plus' return on equity of 8.21% beat VP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
VP-1.52% -3.89% 9.45%
Amedeo Air Four Plus 12.69%8.21%N/A

VP pays an annual dividend of GBX 39 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.5%. Amedeo Air Four Plus pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.0%. VP pays out -286.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Amedeo Air Four Plus pays out 97.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

VP and Amedeo Air Four Plus tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get VP News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for VP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding VP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

VP vs. The Competition

MetricVPTrading Companies & Distributors IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£181.92M£9.30B£10.20B£2.87B
Dividend Yield6.84%3.51%97.17%6.23%
P/E Ratio-33.8227.1625.74366.83
Price / Sales0.4922.56433.0083,599.70
Price / Cash30.2547.3123.7127.89
Price / Book1.173.724.846.33
Net Income-£5.38M£372.29M£612.68M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-3.15%-1.31%-1.56%-0.69%
1 Month Performance-0.65%-5.02%-3.85%0.18%
1 Year Performance-21.86%4.74%6.34%20.03%

VP Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
VP
VP
1.9492 of 5 stars
GBX 461
-1.9%
GBX 686.67
+49.0%
-21.7%£181.92M£368.77MN/A2,753
FERG
Ferguson
N/AGBX 234.33
flat
N/A-98.6%£454.46M£31.32B0.2336,000
NTG
Northgate
N/AN/AN/AN/A£333.08M£729.28M7.043,000
ASY
Andrews Sykes Group
N/AGBX 570
-0.9%
N/A+0.5%£238.60M£76.50M13.19500
GMS
Gulf Marine Services
N/AGBX 18.20
flat
N/A+9.2%£209.69M£188.12M11.105,480

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:VP) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners