Go Pro
→ Your book attached (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free STS Stock Alerts

STS Global Income & Growth Trust (STS) Competitors

STS Global Income & Growth Trust logo
GBX 224.80 +0.80 (+0.36%)
As of 06:20 AM Eastern
Compare

STS vs. SOI, EDIN, GROW, JPE, and EWI

Should you buy STS Global Income & Growth Trust stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares STS Global Income & Growth Trust with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with STS Global Income & Growth Trust include Schroder Oriental Income (SOI), Edinburgh Investment (EDIN), Molten Ventures (GROW), JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth (JPE), and Edinburgh Worldwide (EWI). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does STS Global Income & Growth Trust compare to Schroder Oriental Income?

Schroder Oriental Income (LON:SOI) and STS Global Income & Growth Trust (LON:STS) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Schroder Oriental Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. STS Global Income & Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.91 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Schroder Oriental Income pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. STS Global Income & Growth Trust pays out -98.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. STS Global Income & Growth Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

9.7% of Schroder Oriental Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Schroder Oriental Income shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

STS Global Income & Growth Trust has a net margin of 142.51% compared to Schroder Oriental Income's net margin of 94.62%. Schroder Oriental Income's return on equity of 39.20% beat STS Global Income & Growth Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Oriental Income94.62% 39.20% -2.12%
STS Global Income & Growth Trust 142.51%-4.38%2.28%

In the previous week, STS Global Income & Growth Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Schroder Oriental Income. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for STS Global Income & Growth Trust and 0 mentions for Schroder Oriental Income. STS Global Income & Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat Schroder Oriental Income's score of 0.00 indicating that STS Global Income & Growth Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder Oriental Income Neutral
STS Global Income & Growth Trust Very Positive

Schroder Oriental Income has higher revenue and earnings than STS Global Income & Growth Trust. STS Global Income & Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder Oriental Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Oriental Income£334.18M2.92£106.18M£144.693.02
STS Global Income & Growth Trust-£10.37M-24.14£18.28M-£10.03N/A

Schroder Oriental Income has a beta of 0.669, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, STS Global Income & Growth Trust has a beta of 0.544717, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Schroder Oriental Income beats STS Global Income & Growth Trust on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does STS Global Income & Growth Trust compare to Edinburgh Investment?

Edinburgh Investment (LON:EDIN) and STS Global Income & Growth Trust (LON:STS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

9.7% of Edinburgh Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Edinburgh Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Edinburgh Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 30.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. STS Global Income & Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.91 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Edinburgh Investment pays out 54.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. STS Global Income & Growth Trust pays out -98.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. STS Global Income & Growth Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Edinburgh Investment has a beta of 0.96137434, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, STS Global Income & Growth Trust has a beta of 0.544717, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

STS Global Income & Growth Trust has a net margin of 142.51% compared to Edinburgh Investment's net margin of 89.72%. Edinburgh Investment's return on equity of 7.03% beat STS Global Income & Growth Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Edinburgh Investment89.72% 7.03% 6.69%
STS Global Income & Growth Trust 142.51%-4.38%2.28%

In the previous week, Edinburgh Investment had 5 more articles in the media than STS Global Income & Growth Trust. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Edinburgh Investment and 2 mentions for STS Global Income & Growth Trust. STS Global Income & Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat Edinburgh Investment's score of 1.29 indicating that STS Global Income & Growth Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Edinburgh Investment
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
STS Global Income & Growth Trust
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Edinburgh Investment has higher revenue and earnings than STS Global Income & Growth Trust. STS Global Income & Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Edinburgh Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Edinburgh Investment£79.43M12.83£180.50M£55.9114.22
STS Global Income & Growth Trust-£10.37M-24.14£18.28M-£10.03N/A

Summary

Edinburgh Investment beats STS Global Income & Growth Trust on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does STS Global Income & Growth Trust compare to Molten Ventures?

Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) and STS Global Income & Growth Trust (LON:STS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

STS Global Income & Growth Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Molten Ventures. STS Global Income & Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Molten Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Molten Ventures£125.60M7.89-£33.58M£61.609.35
STS Global Income & Growth Trust-£10.37M-24.14£18.28M-£10.03N/A

Molten Ventures presently has a consensus target price of GBX 638.67, indicating a potential upside of 10.93%. Given Molten Ventures' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Molten Ventures is more favorable than STS Global Income & Growth Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
STS Global Income & Growth Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 193.06% compared to STS Global Income & Growth Trust's net margin of 142.51%. Molten Ventures' return on equity of 8.51% beat STS Global Income & Growth Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Molten Ventures193.06% 8.51% -3.46%
STS Global Income & Growth Trust 142.51%-4.38%2.28%

41.3% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, STS Global Income & Growth Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Molten Ventures. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for STS Global Income & Growth Trust and 1 mentions for Molten Ventures. STS Global Income & Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat Molten Ventures' score of 1.49 indicating that STS Global Income & Growth Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Molten Ventures
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
STS Global Income & Growth Trust
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.9414055, suggesting that its share price is 94% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, STS Global Income & Growth Trust has a beta of 0.544717, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Molten Ventures beats STS Global Income & Growth Trust on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does STS Global Income & Growth Trust compare to JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth?

JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth (LON:JPE) and STS Global Income & Growth Trust (LON:STS) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, STS Global Income & Growth Trust had 2 more articles in the media than JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for STS Global Income & Growth Trust and 0 mentions for JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth. STS Global Income & Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth's score of 0.00 indicating that STS Global Income & Growth Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth Neutral
STS Global Income & Growth Trust Very Positive

JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.17 per share. STS Global Income & Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.91 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth pays out 22.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. STS Global Income & Growth Trust pays out -98.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. STS Global Income & Growth Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

7.4% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

STS Global Income & Growth Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth. STS Global Income & Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth£104.78M0.00N/A£0.75N/A
STS Global Income & Growth Trust-£10.37M-24.14£18.28M-£10.03N/A

STS Global Income & Growth Trust has a net margin of 142.51% compared to JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth's net margin of 0.00%. JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth's return on equity of 0.00% beat STS Global Income & Growth Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed GrowthN/A N/A N/A
STS Global Income & Growth Trust 142.51%-4.38%2.28%

Summary

STS Global Income & Growth Trust beats JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does STS Global Income & Growth Trust compare to Edinburgh Worldwide?

Edinburgh Worldwide (LON:EWI) and STS Global Income & Growth Trust (LON:STS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Edinburgh Worldwide has a beta of 0.756, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, STS Global Income & Growth Trust has a beta of 0.544717, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Edinburgh Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than STS Global Income & Growth Trust. STS Global Income & Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Edinburgh Worldwide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Edinburgh Worldwide£180.36M5.35£70.29M£48.855.71
STS Global Income & Growth Trust-£10.37M-24.14£18.28M-£10.03N/A

In the previous week, STS Global Income & Growth Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Edinburgh Worldwide. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for STS Global Income & Growth Trust and 1 mentions for Edinburgh Worldwide. STS Global Income & Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat Edinburgh Worldwide's score of 1.08 indicating that STS Global Income & Growth Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Edinburgh Worldwide Positive
STS Global Income & Growth Trust Very Positive

STS Global Income & Growth Trust has a net margin of 142.51% compared to Edinburgh Worldwide's net margin of 94.47%. Edinburgh Worldwide's return on equity of 25.75% beat STS Global Income & Growth Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Edinburgh Worldwide94.47% 25.75% -6.45%
STS Global Income & Growth Trust 142.51%-4.38%2.28%

4.9% of Edinburgh Worldwide shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Edinburgh Worldwide shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Edinburgh Worldwide beats STS Global Income & Growth Trust on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get STS Global Income & Growth Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for STS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

STS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSTS Global Income & Growth TrustAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£250.42M£2.37B£5.99B£2.78B
Dividend Yield3.77%6.01%5.25%6.15%
P/E Ratio-22.4160.2729.23366.62
Price / Sales-24.142,043.611,116.0785,967.93
Price / Cash52.1160.3348.6027.87
Price / Book1.011.386.687.82
Net Income£18.28M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.40%-0.29%-0.27%-0.61%
1 Month Performance-2.68%-0.80%0.05%-1.36%
1 Year Performance-5.55%8.58%18.17%65.98%

STS Global Income & Growth Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
STS
STS Global Income & Growth Trust
N/AGBX 224.80
+0.4%		N/A-5.0%£250.42M-£10.37MN/A6
SOI
Schroder Oriental Income
N/AGBX 453
-1.3%		N/A+52.5%£1.01B£334.18M3.13180
EDIN
Edinburgh Investment
N/AGBX 788.05
-1.0%		N/A-0.4%£1.01B£79.43M14.09N/A
GROW
Molten Ventures
3.0458 of 5 stars		GBX 582.50
-1.9%		GBX 638.67
+9.6%		+71.7%£1.00B£125.60M9.4620
JPE
JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.00B£104.78M1,250.00N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:STS) was last updated on 6/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Do NOT Buy SpaceX – Do This Instead
SpaceX just went public - and Whitney Tilson, Harvard MBA and 30-year Wall Street veteran, says buying in coul...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX is offering you shares. Don't take them.
SpaceX is reserving 30% of its IPO shares for retail investors through Robinhood, Fidelity, and Schwab. At a $...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump just signed it
A recent policy development is drawing attention from income-focused investors. According to one analyst, c...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Better than SpaceX? Grab this ticker instead.
Larry Benedict generated $274 million for his clients by finding the trades most investors missed. Now he says...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Porter flew 3,300 miles to investigate this system
Porter Stansberry flew the Porter and Co. team 3,300 miles to Dublin to investigate a 17-year investing experi...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel