Go Pro

Supreme (SUP) Competitors

Supreme logo
GBX 150 -2.00 (-1.32%)
As of 12:23 PM Eastern

SUP vs. XPP, LUCE, TFW, DIA, and AFC

Should you buy Supreme stock or one of its competitors? Supreme's main competitors and comparable companies include XP Power (XPP), Luceco (LUCE), FW Thorpe (TFW), Dialight (DIA), and AFC Energy (AFC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electrical equipment" industry.

How does Supreme compare to XP Power?

Supreme (LON:SUP) and XP Power (LON:XPP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

XP Power has a consensus target price of GBX 1,859.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1.11%. Given XP Power's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe XP Power is more favorable than Supreme.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Supreme
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
XP Power
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Supreme had 37 more articles in the media than XP Power. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Supreme and 1 mentions for XP Power. Supreme's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat XP Power's score of 0.00 indicating that Supreme is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Supreme
20 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
9 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
XP Power
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

9.6% of Supreme shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.0% of XP Power shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.8% of Supreme shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of XP Power shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Supreme has a beta of 1.014, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, XP Power has a beta of 1.802, meaning that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

Supreme has a net margin of 6.68% compared to XP Power's net margin of -3.72%. Supreme's return on equity of 21.11% beat XP Power's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Supreme6.68% 21.11% 20.33%
XP Power -3.72%-4.89%2.24%

Supreme has higher revenue and earnings than XP Power. XP Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Supreme, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Supreme£270.21M0.65£22.28M£15.0010.00
XP Power£228.30M2.26-£15.01M-£42.00N/A

Summary

Supreme beats XP Power on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Supreme compare to Luceco?

Supreme (LON:SUP) and Luceco (LON:LUCE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and dividends.

9.6% of Supreme shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.8% of Luceco shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.8% of Supreme shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.6% of Luceco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Supreme has a beta of 1.014, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Luceco has a beta of 1.379, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Supreme has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Luceco. Supreme is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luceco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Supreme£270.21M0.65£22.28M£15.0010.00
Luceco£271.40M1.24£19.13M£13.4017.01

Supreme pays an annual dividend of GBX 5 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Luceco pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Supreme pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Luceco pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Supreme is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Luceco has a consensus target price of GBX 295, indicating a potential upside of 29.39%. Given Luceco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Luceco is more favorable than Supreme.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Supreme
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Luceco
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Luceco has a net margin of 7.48% compared to Supreme's net margin of 6.68%. Supreme's return on equity of 21.11% beat Luceco's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Supreme6.68% 21.11% 20.33%
Luceco 7.48%20.71%8.58%

In the previous week, Supreme had 37 more articles in the media than Luceco. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Supreme and 1 mentions for Luceco. Supreme's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Luceco's score of 0.37 indicating that Supreme is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Supreme
20 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
9 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Luceco
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Supreme and Luceco tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Supreme compare to FW Thorpe?

Supreme (LON:SUP) and FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

FW Thorpe has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Supreme. Supreme is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Supreme£270.21M0.65£22.28M£15.0010.00
FW Thorpe£173.20M1.66£24.42M£21.9011.69

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to Supreme's net margin of 6.68%. Supreme's return on equity of 21.11% beat FW Thorpe's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Supreme6.68% 21.11% 20.33%
FW Thorpe 14.73%13.58%8.02%

Supreme pays an annual dividend of GBX 5 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. FW Thorpe pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Supreme pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. FW Thorpe pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Supreme had 38 more articles in the media than FW Thorpe. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Supreme and 0 mentions for FW Thorpe. Supreme's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat FW Thorpe's score of 0.00 indicating that Supreme is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Supreme Positive
FW Thorpe Neutral

Supreme has a beta of 1.014, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.433, suggesting that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

9.6% of Supreme shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.2% of FW Thorpe shares are held by institutional investors. 54.8% of Supreme shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 55.5% of FW Thorpe shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Supreme beats FW Thorpe on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Supreme compare to Dialight?

Dialight (LON:DIA) and Supreme (LON:SUP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Supreme has higher revenue and earnings than Dialight. Supreme is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dialight, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dialight£166.90M1.31-£23.05M£1.00546.00
Supreme£270.21M0.65£22.28M£15.0010.00

35.9% of Dialight shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.6% of Supreme shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Dialight shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.8% of Supreme shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dialight has a beta of 0.641, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Supreme has a beta of 1.014, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Supreme has a net margin of 6.68% compared to Dialight's net margin of -9.03%. Supreme's return on equity of 21.11% beat Dialight's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dialight-9.03% -33.79% 0.05%
Supreme 6.68%21.11%20.33%

In the previous week, Supreme had 38 more articles in the media than Dialight. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Supreme and 0 mentions for Dialight. Supreme's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Dialight's score of 0.00 indicating that Supreme is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Dialight Neutral
Supreme Positive

Summary

Supreme beats Dialight on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Supreme compare to AFC Energy?

Supreme (LON:SUP) and AFC Energy (LON:AFC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

Supreme has a beta of 1.014, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AFC Energy has a beta of 2.372, suggesting that its share price is 137% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Supreme
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
AFC Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Supreme has a net margin of 6.68% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -4,949.58%. Supreme's return on equity of 21.11% beat AFC Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Supreme6.68% 21.11% 20.33%
AFC Energy -4,949.58%-52.55%-35.77%

9.6% of Supreme shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of AFC Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 54.8% of Supreme shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of AFC Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Supreme had 38 more articles in the media than AFC Energy. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Supreme and 0 mentions for AFC Energy. Supreme's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat AFC Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Supreme is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Supreme Positive
AFC Energy Neutral

Supreme has higher revenue and earnings than AFC Energy. AFC Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Supreme, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Supreme£270.21M0.65£22.28M£15.0010.00
AFC Energy£125K1,338.34-£22.39M-£2.41N/A

Summary

Supreme beats AFC Energy on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Supreme News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SUP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SUP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SUP vs. The Competition

MetricSupremeElectrical Equipment IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£175.98M£11.50B£10.93B£2.88B
Dividend Yield3.55%2.31%97.21%6.10%
P/E Ratio10.0046.5227.85368.46
Price / Sales0.651,691.29347.9183,426.45
Price / Cash22.1231.3024.9227.89
Price / Book3.036.024.997.08
Net Income£22.28M£140.51M£610.09M£5.89B
7 Day Performance5.63%1.68%1.01%0.54%
1 Month Performance10.33%2.28%3.82%3.02%
1 Year Performance-19.35%23.64%14.57%64.50%

Supreme Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SUP
Supreme
N/AGBX 150
-1.3%
N/A-18.3%£175.98M£270.21M10.007,800
XPP
XP Power
0.9237 of 5 stars
GBX 1,734
-1.6%
GBX 1,859.50
+7.2%
+89.1%£486.08M£228.30MN/A2,435
LUCE
Luceco
4.6122 of 5 stars
GBX 236.26
-1.6%
GBX 295
+24.9%
+87.9%£347.75M£271.40M17.631,504
TFW
FW Thorpe
N/AGBX 264
+2.3%
N/A-14.8%£295.84M£173.20M12.05900
DIA
Dialight
N/AGBX 520
flat
N/A+179.6%£207.88M£166.90M520.001,358

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SUP) was last updated on 8/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners