Do analysts rate CWR or TFW?

Ceres Power currently has a consensus price target of GBX 950, indicating a potential upside of 57.15%. Given Ceres Power's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Ceres Power is more favorable than FW Thorpe. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ceres Power 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 FW Thorpe 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CWR or TFW?

FW Thorpe has higher revenue and earnings than Ceres Power. Ceres Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ceres Power £32.64M 36.26 -£40.57M -£24.52 N/A FW Thorpe £173.20M 1.70 £24.42M £21.90 11.96

Is CWR or TFW more profitable?

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to Ceres Power's net margin of -145.65%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat Ceres Power's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ceres Power -145.65% -39.26% -12.83% FW Thorpe 14.73% 13.58% 8.02%

Do analysts prefer VLX or TFW?

Volex presently has a consensus price target of GBX 472.50, indicating a potential downside of 19.37%. Given Volex's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Volex is more favorable than FW Thorpe. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Volex 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 FW Thorpe 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher valuation & earnings, VLX or TFW?

Volex has higher revenue and earnings than FW Thorpe. FW Thorpe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Volex £1.15B 0.93 £54.37M £30.40 19.28 FW Thorpe £173.20M 1.70 £24.42M £21.90 11.96

Is VLX or TFW more profitable?

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to Volex's net margin of 4.96%. Volex's return on equity of 14.90% beat FW Thorpe's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Volex 4.96% 14.90% 6.30% FW Thorpe 14.73% 13.58% 8.02%

Does the media favor VLX or TFW?

In the previous week, Volex and Volex both had 1 articles in the media. FW Thorpe's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Volex's score of 0.65 indicating that FW Thorpe is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Volex 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive FW Thorpe 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend TFW or XPP?

XP Power has a consensus target price of GBX 1,769.33, suggesting a potential downside of 7.56%. Given XP Power's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe XP Power is more favorable than FW Thorpe. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FW Thorpe 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 XP Power 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, TFW or XPP?

FW Thorpe has higher earnings, but lower revenue than XP Power. XP Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FW Thorpe £173.20M 1.70 £24.42M £21.90 11.96 XP Power £230.10M 2.33 -£15.01M -£42.00 N/A

Is TFW or XPP more profitable?

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to XP Power's net margin of -4.95%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat XP Power's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FW Thorpe 14.73% 13.58% 8.02% XP Power -4.95% -6.50% 2.24%

Does the media refer more to TFW or XPP?

In the previous week, FW Thorpe and FW Thorpe both had 1 articles in the media. FW Thorpe's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat XP Power's score of 0.00 indicating that FW Thorpe is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FW Thorpe 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive XP Power 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate LUCE or TFW?

Luceco presently has a consensus price target of GBX 260, indicating a potential downside of 0.77%. Given Luceco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Luceco is more favorable than FW Thorpe. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Luceco 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 FW Thorpe 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, LUCE or TFW?

FW Thorpe has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Luceco. FW Thorpe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luceco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Luceco £271.40M 1.42 £19.13M £13.40 19.55 FW Thorpe £173.20M 1.70 £24.42M £21.90 11.96

Is LUCE or TFW more profitable?

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to Luceco's net margin of 7.48%. Luceco's return on equity of 20.71% beat FW Thorpe's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Luceco 7.48% 20.71% 8.58% FW Thorpe 14.73% 13.58% 8.02%

Does the media favor LUCE or TFW?

In the previous week, Luceco had 3 more articles in the media than FW Thorpe. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Luceco and 1 mentions for FW Thorpe. FW Thorpe's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Luceco's score of 0.76 indicating that FW Thorpe is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Luceco 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive FW Thorpe 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer TFW or AFC?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FW Thorpe 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 AFC Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has better valuation and earnings, TFW or AFC?

FW Thorpe has higher revenue and earnings than AFC Energy. AFC Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FW Thorpe £173.20M 1.70 £24.42M £21.90 11.96 AFC Energy £125K 1,338.34 -£22.39M -£2.41 N/A

Is TFW or AFC more profitable?

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -4,949.58%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat AFC Energy's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FW Thorpe 14.73% 13.58% 8.02% AFC Energy -4,949.58% -52.55% -35.77%

FW Thorpe (TFW) Competitors

GBX 262 +7.00 (+2.75%)

As of 11:53 AM Eastern

Compare

TFW vs. CWR, VLX, XPP, LUCE, and AFC

Should you buy FW Thorpe stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares FW Thorpe with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with FW Thorpe include Ceres Power (CWR), Volex (VLX), XP Power (XPP), Luceco (LUCE), and AFC Energy (AFC). These companies are all part of the "electrical equipment & parts" industry.

How does FW Thorpe compare to Ceres Power?

Ceres Power (LON:CWR) and FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and risk.

FW Thorpe has higher revenue and earnings than Ceres Power. Ceres Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ceres Power	£32.64M	36.26	-£40.57M	-£24.52	N/A
FW Thorpe	£173.20M	1.70	£24.42M	£21.90	11.96

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to Ceres Power's net margin of -145.65%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat Ceres Power's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ceres Power	-145.65%	-39.26%	-12.83%
FW Thorpe	14.73%	13.58%	8.02%

Ceres Power has a beta of 3.2377484, meaning that its stock price is 224% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.433, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FW Thorpe had 1 more articles in the media than Ceres Power. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for FW Thorpe and 0 mentions for Ceres Power. FW Thorpe's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Ceres Power's score of 0.00 indicating that FW Thorpe is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ceres Power	Neutral
FW Thorpe	Positive

Ceres Power currently has a consensus price target of GBX 950, indicating a potential upside of 57.15%. Given Ceres Power's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Ceres Power is more favorable than FW Thorpe.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ceres Power	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
FW Thorpe	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

28.2% of Ceres Power shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.7% of FW Thorpe shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.9% of Ceres Power shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 55.4% of FW Thorpe shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

FW Thorpe beats Ceres Power on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FW Thorpe compare to Volex?

Volex (LON:VLX) and FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Volex has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.433, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Volex has higher revenue and earnings than FW Thorpe. FW Thorpe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Volex	£1.15B	0.93	£54.37M	£30.40	19.28
FW Thorpe	£173.20M	1.70	£24.42M	£21.90	11.96

19.3% of Volex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.7% of FW Thorpe shares are held by institutional investors. 35.1% of Volex shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 55.4% of FW Thorpe shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volex presently has a consensus price target of GBX 472.50, indicating a potential downside of 19.37%. Given Volex's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Volex is more favorable than FW Thorpe.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Volex	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
FW Thorpe	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Volex pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.89 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. FW Thorpe pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Volex pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. FW Thorpe pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to Volex's net margin of 4.96%. Volex's return on equity of 14.90% beat FW Thorpe's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Volex	4.96%	14.90%	6.30%
FW Thorpe	14.73%	13.58%	8.02%

In the previous week, Volex and Volex both had 1 articles in the media. FW Thorpe's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Volex's score of 0.65 indicating that FW Thorpe is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Volex	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
FW Thorpe	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Volex beats FW Thorpe on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FW Thorpe compare to XP Power?

FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) and XP Power (LON:XPP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

XP Power has a consensus target price of GBX 1,769.33, suggesting a potential downside of 7.56%. Given XP Power's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe XP Power is more favorable than FW Thorpe.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FW Thorpe	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
XP Power	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

FW Thorpe has higher earnings, but lower revenue than XP Power. XP Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FW Thorpe	£173.20M	1.70	£24.42M	£21.90	11.96
XP Power	£230.10M	2.33	-£15.01M	-£42.00	N/A

In the previous week, FW Thorpe and FW Thorpe both had 1 articles in the media. FW Thorpe's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat XP Power's score of 0.00 indicating that FW Thorpe is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FW Thorpe	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
XP Power	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to XP Power's net margin of -4.95%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat XP Power's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FW Thorpe	14.73%	13.58%	8.02%
XP Power	-4.95%	-6.50%	2.24%

FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.433, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, XP Power has a beta of 1.805, meaning that its stock price is 81% more volatile than the broader market.

3.7% of FW Thorpe shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.7% of XP Power shares are held by institutional investors. 55.4% of FW Thorpe shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of XP Power shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

FW Thorpe beats XP Power on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FW Thorpe compare to Luceco?

Luceco (LON:LUCE) and FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Luceco has a beta of 1.345, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.433, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

FW Thorpe has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Luceco. FW Thorpe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luceco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Luceco	£271.40M	1.42	£19.13M	£13.40	19.55
FW Thorpe	£173.20M	1.70	£24.42M	£21.90	11.96

Luceco pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. FW Thorpe pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Luceco pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. FW Thorpe pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. FW Thorpe is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

17.2% of Luceco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.7% of FW Thorpe shares are held by institutional investors. 23.6% of Luceco shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 55.4% of FW Thorpe shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Luceco had 3 more articles in the media than FW Thorpe. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Luceco and 1 mentions for FW Thorpe. FW Thorpe's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Luceco's score of 0.76 indicating that FW Thorpe is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Luceco	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
FW Thorpe	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to Luceco's net margin of 7.48%. Luceco's return on equity of 20.71% beat FW Thorpe's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Luceco	7.48%	20.71%	8.58%
FW Thorpe	14.73%	13.58%	8.02%

Luceco presently has a consensus price target of GBX 260, indicating a potential downside of 0.77%. Given Luceco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Luceco is more favorable than FW Thorpe.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Luceco	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
FW Thorpe	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Luceco beats FW Thorpe on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FW Thorpe compare to AFC Energy?

FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) and AFC Energy (LON:AFC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

3.7% of FW Thorpe shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of AFC Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 55.4% of FW Thorpe shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of AFC Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, FW Thorpe had 1 more articles in the media than AFC Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for FW Thorpe and 0 mentions for AFC Energy. AFC Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat FW Thorpe's score of 1.11 indicating that AFC Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FW Thorpe	Positive
AFC Energy	Positive

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FW Thorpe	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
AFC Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -4,949.58%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat AFC Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FW Thorpe	14.73%	13.58%	8.02%
AFC Energy	-4,949.58%	-52.55%	-35.77%

FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.433, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AFC Energy has a beta of 2.372, suggesting that its share price is 137% more volatile than the broader market.

FW Thorpe has higher revenue and earnings than AFC Energy. AFC Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FW Thorpe	£173.20M	1.70	£24.42M	£21.90	11.96
AFC Energy	£125K	1,338.34	-£22.39M	-£2.41	N/A

Summary

FW Thorpe beats AFC Energy on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FW Thorpe News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TFW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TFW vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FW Thorpe	Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£294.06M	£9.09B	£9.74B	£2.78B
Dividend Yield	2.81%	3.49%	3.55%	6.16%
P/E Ratio	11.96	65.52	25.73	365.72
Price / Sales	1.70	55,543.36	4,867.97	86,253.69
Price / Cash	11.45	12.60	27.93	27.85
Price / Book	1.74	4.87	4.61	7.92
Net Income	£24.42M	-£40.66M	£793.53M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	4.80%	0.65%	-0.07%	-0.87%
1 Month Performance	-1.13%	-2.86%	0.18%	-0.76%
1 Year Performance	-16.03%	75.10%	25.08%	70.67%

FW Thorpe Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TFW FW Thorpe	N/A	GBX 262 +2.7%	N/A	-15.0%	£294.06M	£173.20M	11.96	900	News Coverage Positive News Gap Up
CWR Ceres Power	1.9717 of 5 stars	GBX 591 +6.0%	GBX 950 +60.7%	+743.0%	£1.09B	£32.64M	N/A	591	Gap Up
VLX Volex	1.4752 of 5 stars	GBX 597 +3.5%	GBX 472.50 -20.9%	+94.5%	£1.06B	£1.15B	19.64	12,000
XPP XP Power	1.2166 of 5 stars	GBX 1,926.88 +1.6%	GBX 1,769.33 -8.2%	+113.2%	£531.49M	£230.10M	N/A	2,435	News Coverage Gap Down
LUCE Luceco	3.4797 of 5 stars	GBX 288.02 +0.7%	GBX 240 -16.7%	+78.9%	£420.96M	£271.40M	21.49	1,504	High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TFW) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FW Thorpe (TFW) Competitors

TFW vs. CWR, VLX, XPP, LUCE, and AFC

How does FW Thorpe compare to Ceres Power?

Summary

How does FW Thorpe compare to Volex?

Summary

How does FW Thorpe compare to XP Power?

Summary

How does FW Thorpe compare to Luceco?

Summary

How does FW Thorpe compare to AFC Energy?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TFW vs. The Competition

FW Thorpe Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

FW Thorpe (TFW) Competitors

TFW vs. CWR, VLX, XPP, LUCE, and AFC

How does FW Thorpe compare to Ceres Power?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CWR or TFW?

Is CWR or TFW more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, CWR or TFW?

Does the media refer more to CWR or TFW?

Do analysts rate CWR or TFW?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CWR or TFW?

Summary

How does FW Thorpe compare to Volex?

Which has more volatility & risk, VLX or TFW?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, VLX or TFW?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in VLX or TFW?

Do analysts prefer VLX or TFW?

Is VLX or TFW a better dividend stock?

Is VLX or TFW more profitable?

Does the media favor VLX or TFW?

Summary

How does FW Thorpe compare to XP Power?

Do analysts recommend TFW or XPP?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, TFW or XPP?

Does the media refer more to TFW or XPP?

Is TFW or XPP more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, TFW or XPP?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of TFW or XPP?

Summary

How does FW Thorpe compare to Luceco?

Which has more risk & volatility, LUCE or TFW?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, LUCE or TFW?

Is LUCE or TFW a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in LUCE or TFW?

Does the media favor LUCE or TFW?

Is LUCE or TFW more profitable?

Do analysts rate LUCE or TFW?

Summary

How does FW Thorpe compare to AFC Energy?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of TFW or AFC?

Does the media favor TFW or AFC?

Do analysts prefer TFW or AFC?

Is TFW or AFC more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, TFW or AFC?

Which has better valuation and earnings, TFW or AFC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TFW vs. The Competition

FW Thorpe Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools