Do analysts prefer TFW or XPP?

XP Power has a consensus price target of GBX 1,769.33, indicating a potential downside of 5.38%. Given XP Power's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe XP Power is more favorable than FW Thorpe. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FW Thorpe 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 XP Power 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Which has higher earnings and valuation, TFW or XPP?

FW Thorpe has higher earnings, but lower revenue than XP Power. XP Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FW Thorpe £173.20M 1.75 £24.42M £21.90 12.28 XP Power £230.10M 2.28 -£15.01M -£42.00 N/A

Is TFW or XPP more profitable?

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to XP Power's net margin of -4.95%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat XP Power's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FW Thorpe 14.73% 13.58% 8.02% XP Power -4.95% -6.50% 2.24%

Do analysts recommend LUCE or TFW?

Luceco currently has a consensus price target of GBX 240, suggesting a potential downside of 11.44%. Given Luceco's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Luceco is more favorable than FW Thorpe. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Luceco 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 FW Thorpe 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, LUCE or TFW?

FW Thorpe has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Luceco. FW Thorpe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luceco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Luceco £271.40M 1.47 £19.13M £13.40 20.22 FW Thorpe £173.20M 1.75 £24.42M £21.90 12.28

Is LUCE or TFW more profitable?

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to Luceco's net margin of 7.48%. Luceco's return on equity of 20.71% beat FW Thorpe's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Luceco 7.48% 20.71% 8.58% FW Thorpe 14.73% 13.58% 8.02%

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, TFW or SUP?

FW Thorpe has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Supreme. Supreme is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FW Thorpe £173.20M 1.75 £24.42M £21.90 12.28 Supreme £250.65M 0.69 £22.28M £18.10 8.18

Is TFW or SUP more profitable?

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to Supreme's net margin of 8.71%. Supreme's return on equity of 27.64% beat FW Thorpe's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FW Thorpe 14.73% 13.58% 8.02% Supreme 8.71% 27.64% 20.33%

Do analysts recommend AFC or TFW?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score AFC Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 FW Thorpe 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, AFC or TFW?

FW Thorpe has higher revenue and earnings than AFC Energy. AFC Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio AFC Energy £125K 1,338.34 -£22.39M -£2.41 N/A FW Thorpe £173.20M 1.75 £24.42M £21.90 12.28

Is AFC or TFW more profitable?

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -17,756.00%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat AFC Energy's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets AFC Energy -17,756.00% -76.88% -35.77% FW Thorpe 14.73% 13.58% 8.02%

Which has better earnings and valuation, DIA or TFW?

FW Thorpe has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Dialight. FW Thorpe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dialight, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Dialight £179.60M 0.82 -£23.05M £18.40 20.11 FW Thorpe £173.20M 1.75 £24.42M £21.90 12.28

Is DIA or TFW more profitable?

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to Dialight's net margin of -8.94%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat Dialight's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Dialight -8.94% -33.79% 0.05% FW Thorpe 14.73% 13.58% 8.02%

FW Thorpe (TFW) Competitors

GBX 269 +14.00 (+5.49%)

As of 12:46 PM Eastern

Compare

TFW vs. XPP, LUCE, SUP, AFC, and DIA

Should you buy FW Thorpe stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares FW Thorpe with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with FW Thorpe include XP Power (XPP), Luceco (LUCE), Supreme (SUP), AFC Energy (AFC), and Dialight (DIA). These companies are all part of the "electrical equipment & parts" industry.

How does FW Thorpe compare to XP Power?

FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) and XP Power (LON:XPP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.432, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, XP Power has a beta of 1.784, suggesting that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, XP Power had 1 more articles in the media than FW Thorpe. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for XP Power and 0 mentions for FW Thorpe. XP Power's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat FW Thorpe's score of 0.00 indicating that XP Power is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FW Thorpe	Neutral
XP Power	Positive

XP Power has a consensus price target of GBX 1,769.33, indicating a potential downside of 5.38%. Given XP Power's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe XP Power is more favorable than FW Thorpe.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FW Thorpe	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
XP Power	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to XP Power's net margin of -4.95%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat XP Power's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FW Thorpe	14.73%	13.58%	8.02%
XP Power	-4.95%	-6.50%	2.24%

3.7% of FW Thorpe shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.6% of XP Power shares are held by institutional investors. 54.9% of FW Thorpe shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of XP Power shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FW Thorpe has higher earnings, but lower revenue than XP Power. XP Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FW Thorpe	£173.20M	1.75	£24.42M	£21.90	12.28
XP Power	£230.10M	2.28	-£15.01M	-£42.00	N/A

Summary

XP Power beats FW Thorpe on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FW Thorpe compare to Luceco?

Luceco (LON:LUCE) and FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Luceco had 1 more articles in the media than FW Thorpe. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Luceco and 0 mentions for FW Thorpe. FW Thorpe's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Luceco's score of -1.00 indicating that FW Thorpe is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Luceco	Negative
FW Thorpe	Neutral

Luceco currently has a consensus price target of GBX 240, suggesting a potential downside of 11.44%. Given Luceco's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Luceco is more favorable than FW Thorpe.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Luceco	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
FW Thorpe	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Luceco pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. FW Thorpe pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Luceco pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. FW Thorpe pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. FW Thorpe is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

17.7% of Luceco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.7% of FW Thorpe shares are held by institutional investors. 24.1% of Luceco shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.9% of FW Thorpe shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

FW Thorpe has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Luceco. FW Thorpe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luceco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Luceco	£271.40M	1.47	£19.13M	£13.40	20.22
FW Thorpe	£173.20M	1.75	£24.42M	£21.90	12.28

Luceco has a beta of 1.319, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.432, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to Luceco's net margin of 7.48%. Luceco's return on equity of 20.71% beat FW Thorpe's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Luceco	7.48%	20.71%	8.58%
FW Thorpe	14.73%	13.58%	8.02%

Summary

Luceco beats FW Thorpe on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FW Thorpe compare to Supreme?

FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) and Supreme (LON:SUP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, Supreme had 24 more articles in the media than FW Thorpe. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Supreme and 0 mentions for FW Thorpe. Supreme's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat FW Thorpe's score of 0.00 indicating that Supreme is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FW Thorpe	Neutral
Supreme	Neutral

3.7% of FW Thorpe shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.7% of Supreme shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.9% of FW Thorpe shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.4% of Supreme shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.432, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Supreme has a beta of 1.062, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to Supreme's net margin of 8.71%. Supreme's return on equity of 27.64% beat FW Thorpe's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FW Thorpe	14.73%	13.58%	8.02%
Supreme	8.71%	27.64%	20.33%

FW Thorpe has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Supreme. Supreme is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FW Thorpe	£173.20M	1.75	£24.42M	£21.90	12.28
Supreme	£250.65M	0.69	£22.28M	£18.10	8.18

FW Thorpe pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Supreme pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. FW Thorpe pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Supreme pays out 28.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Supreme is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Supreme beats FW Thorpe on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FW Thorpe compare to AFC Energy?

AFC Energy (LON:AFC) and FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -17,756.00%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat AFC Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
AFC Energy	-17,756.00%	-76.88%	-35.77%
FW Thorpe	14.73%	13.58%	8.02%

In the previous week, AFC Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled FW Thorpe'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
AFC Energy	Neutral
FW Thorpe	Neutral

15.6% of AFC Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.7% of FW Thorpe shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of AFC Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.9% of FW Thorpe shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
AFC Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
FW Thorpe	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

AFC Energy has a beta of 2.372, suggesting that its stock price is 137% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.432, suggesting that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

FW Thorpe has higher revenue and earnings than AFC Energy. AFC Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
AFC Energy	£125K	1,338.34	-£22.39M	-£2.41	N/A
FW Thorpe	£173.20M	1.75	£24.42M	£21.90	12.28

Summary

FW Thorpe beats AFC Energy on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FW Thorpe compare to Dialight?

Dialight (LON:DIA) and FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

36.0% of Dialight shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.7% of FW Thorpe shares are held by institutional investors. 5.2% of Dialight shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 54.9% of FW Thorpe shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to Dialight's net margin of -8.94%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat Dialight's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dialight	-8.94%	-33.79%	0.05%
FW Thorpe	14.73%	13.58%	8.02%

Dialight has a beta of 0.633, indicating that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.432, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Dialight's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled FW Thorpe'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Dialight	Neutral
FW Thorpe	Neutral

FW Thorpe has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Dialight. FW Thorpe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dialight, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dialight	£179.60M	0.82	-£23.05M	£18.40	20.11
FW Thorpe	£173.20M	1.75	£24.42M	£21.90	12.28

Summary

FW Thorpe beats Dialight on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FW Thorpe News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TFW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TFW vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FW Thorpe	Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£302.32M	£9.17B	£9.57B	£2.78B
Dividend Yield	2.61%	3.46%	3.54%	6.13%
P/E Ratio	12.28	64.72	25.08	364.74
Price / Sales	1.75	64,549.49	5,129.22	87,565.33
Price / Cash	11.45	12.58	28.20	27.85
Price / Book	1.79	5.07	5.08	7.71
Net Income	£24.42M	-£40.66M	£794.09M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.75%	0.09%	0.45%	0.07%
1 Month Performance	7.60%	6.96%	2.30%	3.26%
1 Year Performance	-11.51%	105.62%	30.49%	75.52%

FW Thorpe Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TFW FW Thorpe	N/A	GBX 269 +5.5%	N/A	-17.7%	£302.32M	£173.20M	12.28	900	Gap Down
XPP XP Power	2.6458 of 5 stars	GBX 1,900.15 +0.0%	GBX 1,769.33 -6.9%	+146.0%	£532.61M	£230.10M	N/A	2,435	News Coverage
LUCE Luceco	2.4777 of 5 stars	GBX 269 +0.7%	GBX 240 -10.8%	+88.3%	£393.00M	£271.40M	20.07	1,504	High Trading Volume
SUP Supreme	N/A	GBX 158 flat	N/A	-17.2%	£185.36M	£250.65M	8.73	7,800
AFC AFC Energy	0.2386 of 5 stars	GBX 14.72 flat	N/A	+71.2%	£167.29M	£125K	N/A	120	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TFW) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FW Thorpe (TFW) Competitors