FW Thorpe (TFW) Competitors

FW Thorpe logo
GBX 262 +7.00 (+2.75%)
As of 06/23/2026 11:53 AM Eastern

TFW vs. CWR, VLX, XPP, LUCE, and AFC

Should you buy FW Thorpe stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares FW Thorpe with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with FW Thorpe include Ceres Power (CWR), Volex (VLX), XP Power (XPP), Luceco (LUCE), and AFC Energy (AFC). These companies are all part of the "electrical equipment & parts" industry.

How does FW Thorpe compare to Ceres Power?

FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) and Ceres Power (LON:CWR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.433, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ceres Power has a beta of 3.2377484, meaning that its share price is 224% more volatile than the broader market.

Ceres Power has a consensus price target of GBX 950, suggesting a potential upside of 57.15%. Given Ceres Power's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ceres Power is more favorable than FW Thorpe.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FW Thorpe
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ceres Power
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to Ceres Power's net margin of -145.65%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat Ceres Power's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FW Thorpe14.73% 13.58% 8.02%
Ceres Power -145.65%-39.26%-12.83%

In the previous week, FW Thorpe had 1 more articles in the media than Ceres Power. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for FW Thorpe and 0 mentions for Ceres Power. FW Thorpe's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Ceres Power's score of 0.00 indicating that FW Thorpe is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FW Thorpe Positive
Ceres Power Neutral

3.7% of FW Thorpe shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.2% of Ceres Power shares are held by institutional investors. 55.4% of FW Thorpe shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.9% of Ceres Power shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

FW Thorpe has higher revenue and earnings than Ceres Power. Ceres Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FW Thorpe£173.20M1.70£24.42M£21.9011.96
Ceres Power£32.64M36.26-£40.57M-£24.52N/A

Summary

FW Thorpe beats Ceres Power on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FW Thorpe compare to Volex?

FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) and Volex (LON:VLX) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

FW Thorpe pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Volex pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.89 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. FW Thorpe pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Volex pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Volex has a consensus target price of GBX 472.50, suggesting a potential downside of 19.37%. Given Volex's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Volex is more favorable than FW Thorpe.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FW Thorpe
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Volex
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

3.7% of FW Thorpe shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.3% of Volex shares are owned by institutional investors. 55.4% of FW Thorpe shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 35.1% of Volex shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.433, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Volex has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FW Thorpe and FW Thorpe both had 1 articles in the media. FW Thorpe's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Volex's score of 0.65 indicating that FW Thorpe is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FW Thorpe
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Volex
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to Volex's net margin of 4.96%. Volex's return on equity of 14.90% beat FW Thorpe's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FW Thorpe14.73% 13.58% 8.02%
Volex 4.96%14.90%6.30%

Volex has higher revenue and earnings than FW Thorpe. FW Thorpe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FW Thorpe£173.20M1.70£24.42M£21.9011.96
Volex£1.15B0.93£54.37M£30.4019.28

Summary

Volex beats FW Thorpe on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FW Thorpe compare to XP Power?

FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) and XP Power (LON:XPP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

XP Power has a consensus price target of GBX 1,769.33, suggesting a potential downside of 7.56%. Given XP Power's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe XP Power is more favorable than FW Thorpe.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FW Thorpe
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
XP Power
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, FW Thorpe and FW Thorpe both had 1 articles in the media. FW Thorpe's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat XP Power's score of 0.00 indicating that FW Thorpe is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FW Thorpe
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
XP Power
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to XP Power's net margin of -4.95%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat XP Power's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FW Thorpe14.73% 13.58% 8.02%
XP Power -4.95%-6.50%2.24%

FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.433, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, XP Power has a beta of 1.805, meaning that its stock price is 81% more volatile than the broader market.

FW Thorpe has higher earnings, but lower revenue than XP Power. XP Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FW Thorpe£173.20M1.70£24.42M£21.9011.96
XP Power£230.10M2.33-£15.01M-£42.00N/A

3.7% of FW Thorpe shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.7% of XP Power shares are held by institutional investors. 55.4% of FW Thorpe shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of XP Power shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

FW Thorpe beats XP Power on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FW Thorpe compare to Luceco?

FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) and Luceco (LON:LUCE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

3.7% of FW Thorpe shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of Luceco shares are owned by institutional investors. 55.4% of FW Thorpe shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.6% of Luceco shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Luceco has a consensus price target of GBX 260, indicating a potential downside of 0.77%. Given Luceco's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Luceco is more favorable than FW Thorpe.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FW Thorpe
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Luceco
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

FW Thorpe pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Luceco pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. FW Thorpe pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Luceco pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. FW Thorpe is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

FW Thorpe has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Luceco. FW Thorpe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luceco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FW Thorpe£173.20M1.70£24.42M£21.9011.96
Luceco£271.40M1.42£19.13M£13.4019.55

In the previous week, Luceco had 3 more articles in the media than FW Thorpe. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Luceco and 1 mentions for FW Thorpe. Luceco's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat FW Thorpe's score of 1.11 indicating that Luceco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FW Thorpe
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Luceco
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to Luceco's net margin of 7.48%. Luceco's return on equity of 20.71% beat FW Thorpe's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FW Thorpe14.73% 13.58% 8.02%
Luceco 7.48%20.71%8.58%

FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.433, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Luceco has a beta of 1.345, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Luceco beats FW Thorpe on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FW Thorpe compare to AFC Energy?

FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) and AFC Energy (LON:AFC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and dividends.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FW Thorpe
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
AFC Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.433, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AFC Energy has a beta of 2.372, meaning that its share price is 137% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FW Thorpe had 1 more articles in the media than AFC Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for FW Thorpe and 0 mentions for AFC Energy. AFC Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat FW Thorpe's score of 1.11 indicating that AFC Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FW Thorpe Positive
AFC Energy Positive

FW Thorpe has higher revenue and earnings than AFC Energy. AFC Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FW Thorpe£173.20M1.70£24.42M£21.9011.96
AFC Energy£125K1,338.34-£22.39M-£2.41N/A

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -4,949.58%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat AFC Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FW Thorpe14.73% 13.58% 8.02%
AFC Energy -4,949.58%-52.55%-35.77%

3.7% of FW Thorpe shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of AFC Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 55.4% of FW Thorpe shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of AFC Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

FW Thorpe beats AFC Energy on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FW Thorpe News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TFW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TFW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TFW vs. The Competition

MetricFW ThorpeElectrical Equipment & Parts IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£294.06M£9.09B£9.74B£2.78B
Dividend Yield2.81%3.49%3.55%6.16%
P/E Ratio11.9665.5225.73365.72
Price / Sales1.7055,543.364,867.9786,253.69
Price / Cash11.4512.6027.9327.85
Price / Book1.744.874.617.92
Net Income£24.42M-£40.66M£793.53M£5.89B
7 Day Performance4.38%-1.07%-0.22%-0.93%
1 Month Performance-1.13%-2.96%0.17%-0.76%
1 Year Performance-15.48%68.12%24.21%69.29%

FW Thorpe Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TFW
FW Thorpe
N/AGBX 262
+2.7%
N/A-16.0%£294.06M£173.20M11.96900
CWR
Ceres Power
1.9717 of 5 stars
GBX 591
+6.0%
GBX 950
+60.7%
+682.0%£1.09B£32.64MN/A591
VLX
Volex
1.4752 of 5 stars
GBX 597
+3.5%
GBX 472.50
-20.9%
+90.3%£1.06B£1.15B19.6412,000
XPP
XP Power
1.2166 of 5 stars
GBX 1,926.88
+1.6%
GBX 1,769.33
-8.2%
+108.0%£531.49M£230.10MN/A2,435
LUCE
Luceco
3.4797 of 5 stars
GBX 288.02
+0.7%
GBX 240
-16.7%
+79.0%£420.96M£271.40M21.491,504

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TFW) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners