Do analysts recommend XPP or AFC?

XP Power currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,769.33, indicating a potential downside of 6.09%. Given XP Power's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe XP Power is more favorable than AFC Energy. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score XP Power 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 AFC Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has higher earnings and valuation, XPP or AFC?

XP Power has higher revenue and earnings than AFC Energy. XP Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AFC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio XP Power £230.10M 2.30 -£15.01M -£42.00 N/A AFC Energy £125K 1,338.34 -£22.39M -£2.41 N/A

Is XPP or AFC more profitable?

XP Power has a net margin of -4.95% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -17,756.00%. XP Power's return on equity of -6.50% beat AFC Energy's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets XP Power -4.95% -6.50% 2.24% AFC Energy -17,756.00% -76.88% -35.77%

Do analysts recommend LUCE or AFC?

Luceco currently has a consensus target price of GBX 240, indicating a potential downside of 9.09%. Given Luceco's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Luceco is more favorable than AFC Energy. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Luceco 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 AFC Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, LUCE or AFC?

Luceco has higher revenue and earnings than AFC Energy. AFC Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luceco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Luceco £271.40M 1.43 £19.13M £13.40 19.70 AFC Energy £125K 1,338.34 -£22.39M -£2.41 N/A

Is LUCE or AFC more profitable?

Luceco has a net margin of 7.48% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -17,756.00%. Luceco's return on equity of 20.71% beat AFC Energy's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Luceco 7.48% 20.71% 8.58% AFC Energy -17,756.00% -76.88% -35.77%

Do analysts rate AFC or TFW?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score AFC Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 FW Thorpe 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher valuation and earnings, AFC or TFW?

FW Thorpe has higher revenue and earnings than AFC Energy. AFC Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio AFC Energy £125K 1,338.34 -£22.39M -£2.41 N/A FW Thorpe £173.20M 1.69 £24.42M £21.90 11.87

Is AFC or TFW more profitable?

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -17,756.00%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat AFC Energy's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets AFC Energy -17,756.00% -76.88% -35.77% FW Thorpe 14.73% 13.58% 8.02%

Do analysts prefer SUP or AFC?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Supreme 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 AFC Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, SUP or AFC?

Supreme has higher revenue and earnings than AFC Energy. AFC Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Supreme, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Supreme £250.65M 0.68 £22.28M £18.10 8.01 AFC Energy £125K 1,338.34 -£22.39M -£2.41 N/A

Is SUP or AFC more profitable?

Supreme has a net margin of 8.71% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -17,756.00%. Supreme's return on equity of 27.64% beat AFC Energy's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Supreme 8.71% 27.64% 20.33% AFC Energy -17,756.00% -76.88% -35.77%

Do analysts rate DIA or AFC?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Dialight 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 AFC Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has higher valuation & earnings, DIA or AFC?

AFC Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Dialight. AFC Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dialight, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Dialight £179.60M 0.87 -£23.05M £18.40 21.20 AFC Energy £125K 1,338.34 -£22.39M -£2.41 N/A

Is DIA or AFC more profitable?

Dialight has a net margin of -7.52% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -17,756.00%. Dialight's return on equity of -31.80% beat AFC Energy's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Dialight -7.52% -31.80% 0.05% AFC Energy -17,756.00% -76.88% -35.77%

AFC Energy (AFC) Competitors

GBX 14.72 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 05/12/2026

Compare

AFC vs. XPP, LUCE, TFW, SUP, and DIA

Should you buy AFC Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares AFC Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with AFC Energy include XP Power (XPP), Luceco (LUCE), FW Thorpe (TFW), Supreme (SUP), and Dialight (DIA). These companies are all part of the "electrical equipment & parts" industry.

How does AFC Energy compare to XP Power?

XP Power (LON:XPP) and AFC Energy (LON:AFC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, XP Power had 1 more articles in the media than AFC Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for XP Power and 0 mentions for AFC Energy. XP Power's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled AFC Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
XP Power	Neutral
AFC Energy	Neutral

41.6% of XP Power shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of AFC Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of XP Power shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of AFC Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

XP Power has a net margin of -4.95% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -17,756.00%. XP Power's return on equity of -6.50% beat AFC Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
XP Power	-4.95%	-6.50%	2.24%
AFC Energy	-17,756.00%	-76.88%	-35.77%

XP Power currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,769.33, indicating a potential downside of 6.09%. Given XP Power's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe XP Power is more favorable than AFC Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
XP Power	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
AFC Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

XP Power has a beta of 1.784, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AFC Energy has a beta of 2.372, suggesting that its stock price is 137% more volatile than the broader market.

XP Power has higher revenue and earnings than AFC Energy. XP Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AFC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
XP Power	£230.10M	2.30	-£15.01M	-£42.00	N/A
AFC Energy	£125K	1,338.34	-£22.39M	-£2.41	N/A

Summary

XP Power beats AFC Energy on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does AFC Energy compare to Luceco?

Luceco (LON:LUCE) and AFC Energy (LON:AFC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

17.7% of Luceco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of AFC Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.1% of Luceco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of AFC Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Luceco currently has a consensus target price of GBX 240, indicating a potential downside of 9.09%. Given Luceco's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Luceco is more favorable than AFC Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Luceco	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
AFC Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Luceco has higher revenue and earnings than AFC Energy. AFC Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luceco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Luceco	£271.40M	1.43	£19.13M	£13.40	19.70
AFC Energy	£125K	1,338.34	-£22.39M	-£2.41	N/A

In the previous week, Luceco had 6 more articles in the media than AFC Energy. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Luceco and 0 mentions for AFC Energy. AFC Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Luceco's score of -1.00 indicating that AFC Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Luceco	Negative
AFC Energy	Neutral

Luceco has a net margin of 7.48% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -17,756.00%. Luceco's return on equity of 20.71% beat AFC Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Luceco	7.48%	20.71%	8.58%
AFC Energy	-17,756.00%	-76.88%	-35.77%

Luceco has a beta of 1.319, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AFC Energy has a beta of 2.372, suggesting that its share price is 137% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Luceco beats AFC Energy on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does AFC Energy compare to FW Thorpe?

AFC Energy (LON:AFC) and FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

AFC Energy has a beta of 2.372, suggesting that its share price is 137% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.432, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, AFC Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled FW Thorpe'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
AFC Energy	Neutral
FW Thorpe	Neutral

FW Thorpe has higher revenue and earnings than AFC Energy. AFC Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
AFC Energy	£125K	1,338.34	-£22.39M	-£2.41	N/A
FW Thorpe	£173.20M	1.69	£24.42M	£21.90	11.87

FW Thorpe has a net margin of 14.73% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -17,756.00%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 13.58% beat AFC Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
AFC Energy	-17,756.00%	-76.88%	-35.77%
FW Thorpe	14.73%	13.58%	8.02%

15.6% of AFC Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.7% of FW Thorpe shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of AFC Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.9% of FW Thorpe shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
AFC Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
FW Thorpe	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

FW Thorpe beats AFC Energy on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does AFC Energy compare to Supreme?

Supreme (LON:SUP) and AFC Energy (LON:AFC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Supreme had 33 more articles in the media than AFC Energy. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Supreme and 0 mentions for AFC Energy. Supreme's average media sentiment score of 0.07 beat AFC Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Supreme is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Supreme	Neutral
AFC Energy	Neutral

Supreme has a beta of 1.062, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AFC Energy has a beta of 2.372, indicating that its share price is 137% more volatile than the broader market.

Supreme has higher revenue and earnings than AFC Energy. AFC Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Supreme, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Supreme	£250.65M	0.68	£22.28M	£18.10	8.01
AFC Energy	£125K	1,338.34	-£22.39M	-£2.41	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Supreme	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
AFC Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Supreme has a net margin of 8.71% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -17,756.00%. Supreme's return on equity of 27.64% beat AFC Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Supreme	8.71%	27.64%	20.33%
AFC Energy	-17,756.00%	-76.88%	-35.77%

9.7% of Supreme shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of AFC Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 54.4% of Supreme shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of AFC Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Supreme beats AFC Energy on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does AFC Energy compare to Dialight?

Dialight (LON:DIA) and AFC Energy (LON:AFC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

Dialight has a net margin of -7.52% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -17,756.00%. Dialight's return on equity of -31.80% beat AFC Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dialight	-7.52%	-31.80%	0.05%
AFC Energy	-17,756.00%	-76.88%	-35.77%

36.0% of Dialight shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of AFC Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.2% of Dialight shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of AFC Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

AFC Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Dialight. AFC Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dialight, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dialight	£179.60M	0.87	-£23.05M	£18.40	21.20
AFC Energy	£125K	1,338.34	-£22.39M	-£2.41	N/A

In the previous week, Dialight's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled AFC Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Dialight	Neutral
AFC Energy	Neutral

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dialight	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
AFC Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Dialight has a beta of 0.633, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AFC Energy has a beta of 2.372, meaning that its stock price is 137% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Dialight beats AFC Energy on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get AFC Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AFC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AFC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	AFC Energy	Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£167.29M	£9.48B	£9.51B	£2.80B
Dividend Yield	4.13%	3.46%	3.52%	6.07%
P/E Ratio	-6.11	66.11	25.27	365.58
Price / Sales	1,338.34	67,234.45	5,231.74	88,235.94
Price / Cash	3.03	12.59	27.72	27.89
Price / Book	4.73	5.02	5.16	7.70
Net Income	-£22.39M	-£40.66M	£794.25M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	N/A	2.65%	1.68%	0.93%
1 Year Performance	76.29%	109.01%	32.30%	79.19%

AFC Energy Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AFC AFC Energy	0.2399 of 5 stars	GBX 14.72 flat	N/A	+76.3%	£167.29M	£125K	N/A	120	Gap Up
XPP XP Power	2.0091 of 5 stars	GBX 1,734.14 -2.7%	GBX 1,769.33 +2.0%	+149.3%	£499.53M	£230.10M	N/A	2,435
LUCE Luceco	2.5404 of 5 stars	GBX 240 +2.1%	GBX 228.33 -4.9%	+90.3%	£345.90M	£271.40M	17.91	1,504	Positive News Gap Up High Trading Volume
TFW FW Thorpe	N/A	GBX 258 -2.6%	N/A	-10.7%	£297.43M	£173.20M	11.78	900
SUP Supreme	N/A	GBX 161 -0.6%	N/A	-16.2%	£190.05M	£250.65M	8.90	7,800

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:AFC) was last updated on 6/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

AFC Energy (AFC) Competitors