Free Trial

TMT Investments (TMT) Competitors

TMT Investments logo
GBX 2.45 -0.10 (-3.88%)
As of 06/5/2026 10:54 AM Eastern

TMT vs. MNTC, HYG, CVCE, ALGW, and SURE

Should you buy TMT Investments stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares TMT Investments with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with TMT Investments include The Schiehallion Fund (MNTC), Seneca Growth Capital VCT (HYG), CVC Income & Growth (CVCE), Alpha Growth (ALGW), and Sure Ventures (SURE). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does TMT Investments compare to The Schiehallion Fund?

The Schiehallion Fund (LON:MNTC) and TMT Investments (LON:TMT) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

TMT Investments has a net margin of 1,402,069.33% compared to The Schiehallion Fund's net margin of 0.00%. TMT Investments' return on equity of 5.81% beat The Schiehallion Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Schiehallion FundN/A -19.31% -12.03%
TMT Investments 1,402,069.33%5.81%2.77%

TMT Investments has higher revenue and earnings than The Schiehallion Fund. The Schiehallion Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TMT Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Schiehallion Fund-£256.11M0.00-£267.21M£0.09N/A
TMT Investments£17.95M0.04£1.41B£52.860.05

24.2% of The Schiehallion Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.1% of TMT Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of The Schiehallion Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TMT Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

The Schiehallion Fund has a beta of 0.01, indicating that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TMT Investments has a beta of 0.937, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, The Schiehallion Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled TMT Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Schiehallion Fund Neutral
TMT Investments Neutral

Summary

TMT Investments beats The Schiehallion Fund on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TMT Investments compare to Seneca Growth Capital VCT?

Seneca Growth Capital VCT (LON:HYG) and TMT Investments (LON:TMT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

TMT Investments has a net margin of 1,402,069.33% compared to Seneca Growth Capital VCT's net margin of 0.00%. TMT Investments' return on equity of 5.81% beat Seneca Growth Capital VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seneca Growth Capital VCTN/A -15.25% -9.31%
TMT Investments 1,402,069.33%5.81%2.77%

TMT Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Seneca Growth Capital VCT. Seneca Growth Capital VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TMT Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seneca Growth Capital VCT-£1.80M-0.02-£2.67M-£0.08N/A
TMT Investments£17.95M0.04£1.41B£52.860.05

Seneca Growth Capital VCT has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TMT Investments has a beta of 0.937, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Seneca Growth Capital VCT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.1% of TMT Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Seneca Growth Capital VCT shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TMT Investments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Seneca Growth Capital VCT had 1 more articles in the media than TMT Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Seneca Growth Capital VCT and 0 mentions for TMT Investments. Seneca Growth Capital VCT's average media sentiment score of 1.84 beat TMT Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Seneca Growth Capital VCT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seneca Growth Capital VCT Very Positive
TMT Investments Neutral

Summary

TMT Investments beats Seneca Growth Capital VCT on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TMT Investments compare to CVC Income & Growth?

TMT Investments (LON:TMT) and CVC Income & Growth (LON:CVCE) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

TMT Investments has a beta of 0.937, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CVC Income & Growth has a beta of 0.18503673, indicating that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TMT Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CVC Income & Growth'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
TMT Investments Neutral
CVC Income & Growth Neutral

TMT Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CVC Income & Growth. CVC Income & Growth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TMT Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TMT Investments£17.95M0.04£1.41B£52.860.05
CVC Income & Growth£18.73M0.16N/A-£4.94N/A

TMT Investments has a net margin of 1,402,069.33% compared to CVC Income & Growth's net margin of -20.03%. TMT Investments' return on equity of 5.81% beat CVC Income & Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TMT Investments1,402,069.33% 5.81% 2.77%
CVC Income & Growth -20.03%-2.11%N/A

4.1% of TMT Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.9% of CVC Income & Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of TMT Investments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CVC Income & Growth shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

TMT Investments beats CVC Income & Growth on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TMT Investments compare to Alpha Growth?

TMT Investments (LON:TMT) and Alpha Growth (LON:ALGW) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

TMT Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Alpha Growth. Alpha Growth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TMT Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TMT Investments£17.95M0.04£1.41B£52.860.05
Alpha Growth£4.16M0.00-£1.60M-£0.32N/A

TMT Investments has a net margin of 1,402,069.33% compared to Alpha Growth's net margin of 17.42%. Alpha Growth's return on equity of 16.49% beat TMT Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TMT Investments1,402,069.33% 5.81% 2.77%
Alpha Growth 17.42%16.49%-0.18%

4.1% of TMT Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of Alpha Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of TMT Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.6% of Alpha Growth shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, TMT Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Alpha Growth'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
TMT Investments Neutral
Alpha Growth Neutral

TMT Investments has a beta of 0.937, meaning that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alpha Growth has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

TMT Investments beats Alpha Growth on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TMT Investments compare to Sure Ventures?

TMT Investments (LON:TMT) and Sure Ventures (LON:SURE) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

TMT Investments has a beta of 0.937, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sure Ventures has a beta of 0.08, suggesting that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

TMT Investments has a net margin of 1,402,069.33% compared to Sure Ventures' net margin of 63.19%. Sure Ventures' return on equity of 19.37% beat TMT Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TMT Investments1,402,069.33% 5.81% 2.77%
Sure Ventures 63.19%19.37%-20.52%

In the previous week, TMT Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sure Ventures'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
TMT Investments Neutral
Sure Ventures Neutral

TMT Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Sure Ventures. TMT Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sure Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TMT Investments£17.95M0.04£1.41B£52.860.05
Sure Ventures£3.06M0.91£5.09M£33.851.03

4.1% of TMT Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.2% of Sure Ventures shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of TMT Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.8% of Sure Ventures shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

TMT Investments beats Sure Ventures on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TMT Investments News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TMT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TMT vs. The Competition

MetricTMT InvestmentsAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£755K£2.51B£5.72B£2.79B
Dividend Yield4.49%6.02%5.28%6.12%
P/E Ratio0.0525.9416.39365.23
Price / Sales0.042,079.751,110.8287,121.98
Price / Cash0.0660.1590.1227.85
Price / Book0.001.376.507.68
Net Income£1.41B£264.62M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.49%-0.98%-0.87%-0.50%
1 Month Performance-1.96%-0.38%0.53%2.10%
1 Year Performance4.74%10.33%18.78%72.87%

TMT Investments Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TMT
TMT Investments
N/AGBX 2.45
-3.9%
N/A+4.7%£755K£17.95M0.057
MNTC
The Schiehallion Fund
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.08M-£256.11M4.89N/A
HYG
Seneca Growth Capital VCT
N/AGBX 9
flat
N/AN/A£2.98M-£1.33MN/AN/A
CVCE
CVC Income & Growth
N/AGBX 1.05
+0.8%
N/A-1.9%£2.91M£18.73MN/AN/A
ALGW
Alpha Growth
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.87M£4.16MN/A4

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TMT) was last updated on 6/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners