VEL vs. SBSI, CFX, OFG, FCAP, OBT, PFC, TRIN, SOS, HARL, and ING
Should you be buying Velocity Composites stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Velocity Composites include Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (SBSI), Colefax Group (CFX), Octopus Future Generations VCT (OFG), Cavendish Financial (FCAP), Obtala (OBT), Petrofac (PFC), Trinity Exploration & Production (TRIN), Sosandar (SOS), Harland & Wolff Group (HARL), and Ingenta (ING). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.
Velocity Composites vs. Its Competitors
Velocity Composites (LON:VEL) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, community ranking, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 46.81% compared to Velocity Composites' net margin of -11.83%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 1.21% beat Velocity Composites' return on equity.
Velocity Composites currently has a consensus target price of GBX 60, suggesting a potential upside of 85.47%. Given Velocity Composites' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Velocity Composites is more favorable than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust.
Velocity Composites has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, Velocity Composites' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust'saverage media sentiment score.
Velocity Composites received 92 more outperform votes than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust when rated by MarketBeat users.
40.9% of Velocity Composites shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.1% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.1% of Velocity Composites shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Velocity Composites. Velocity Composites is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Summary
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats Velocity Composites on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Velocity Composites News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for VEL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Velocity Composites Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:VEL) was last updated on 6/13/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff