Free Trial

Acacia Research (ACTG) Competitors

Acacia Research logo
$4.72 -0.01 (-0.11%)
As of 03:34 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ACTG vs. CBZ, ICFI, CRAI, MG, and FC

Should you buy Acacia Research stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Acacia Research with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Acacia Research include CBIZ (CBZ), ICF International (ICFI), Charles River Associates (CRAI), Mistras Group (MG), and Franklin Covey (FC). These companies are all part of the "research & consulting services" industry.

How does Acacia Research compare to CBIZ?

Acacia Research (NASDAQ:ACTG) and CBIZ (NYSE:CBZ) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Acacia Research presently has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.25%. CBIZ has a consensus price target of $37.33, indicating a potential upside of 30.38%. Given CBIZ's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CBIZ is more favorable than Acacia Research.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Acacia Research
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
CBIZ
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

CBIZ has a net margin of 5.57% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -8.53%. CBIZ's return on equity of 12.62% beat Acacia Research's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Acacia Research-8.53% -2.81% -2.11%
CBIZ 5.57%12.62%5.17%

CBIZ has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Research. Acacia Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CBIZ, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acacia Research$285.23M1.60$21.68M-$0.18N/A
CBIZ$2.76B0.56$115.44M$2.4911.50

Acacia Research has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CBIZ has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Acacia Research had 2 more articles in the media than CBIZ. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Acacia Research and 3 mentions for CBIZ. Acacia Research's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat CBIZ's score of 1.03 indicating that Acacia Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Acacia Research
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CBIZ
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

86.7% of Acacia Research shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of CBIZ shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Acacia Research shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of CBIZ shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CBIZ beats Acacia Research on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acacia Research compare to ICF International?

Acacia Research (NASDAQ:ACTG) and ICF International (NASDAQ:ICFI) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and profitability.

ICF International has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Research. Acacia Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ICF International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acacia Research$285.23M1.60$21.68M-$0.18N/A
ICF International$1.87B0.59$91.59M$4.6213.22

Acacia Research has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ICF International has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

86.7% of Acacia Research shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of ICF International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Acacia Research shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of ICF International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

ICF International has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -8.53%. ICF International's return on equity of 11.38% beat Acacia Research's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Acacia Research-8.53% -2.81% -2.11%
ICF International 4.68%11.38%5.61%

Acacia Research presently has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.25%. ICF International has a consensus price target of $102.33, indicating a potential upside of 67.57%. Given ICF International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ICF International is more favorable than Acacia Research.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Acacia Research
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
ICF International
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

In the previous week, ICF International had 12 more articles in the media than Acacia Research. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for ICF International and 5 mentions for Acacia Research. Acacia Research's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat ICF International's score of 0.04 indicating that Acacia Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Acacia Research
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ICF International
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

ICF International beats Acacia Research on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acacia Research compare to Charles River Associates?

Acacia Research (NASDAQ:ACTG) and Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Charles River Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Research. Acacia Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acacia Research$285.23M1.60$21.68M-$0.18N/A
Charles River Associates$751.58M1.20$54.78M$7.2019.36

Acacia Research has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

86.7% of Acacia Research shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Acacia Research shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Charles River Associates has a net margin of 6.22% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -8.53%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 26.02% beat Acacia Research's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Acacia Research-8.53% -2.81% -2.11%
Charles River Associates 6.22%26.02%8.35%

Acacia Research presently has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.25%. Charles River Associates has a consensus price target of $245.00, indicating a potential upside of 75.72%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Acacia Research.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Acacia Research
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Charles River Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Charles River Associates had 7 more articles in the media than Acacia Research. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Charles River Associates and 5 mentions for Acacia Research. Acacia Research's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Charles River Associates' score of 0.08 indicating that Acacia Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Acacia Research
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Charles River Associates
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Charles River Associates beats Acacia Research on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acacia Research compare to Mistras Group?

Acacia Research (NASDAQ:ACTG) and Mistras Group (NYSE:MG) are both small-cap research & consulting services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Mistras Group has a net margin of 3.06% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -8.53%. Mistras Group's return on equity of 13.60% beat Acacia Research's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Acacia Research-8.53% -2.81% -2.11%
Mistras Group 3.06%13.60%5.35%

Acacia Research presently has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.25%. Mistras Group has a consensus price target of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.86%. Given Acacia Research's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Acacia Research is more favorable than Mistras Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Acacia Research
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Mistras Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, Mistras Group had 11 more articles in the media than Acacia Research. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Mistras Group and 5 mentions for Acacia Research. Acacia Research's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Mistras Group's score of 0.62 indicating that Acacia Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Acacia Research
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Mistras Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Acacia Research has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mistras Group has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

86.7% of Acacia Research shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.9% of Mistras Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Acacia Research shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Mistras Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Acacia Research has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mistras Group. Acacia Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mistras Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acacia Research$285.23M1.60$21.68M-$0.18N/A
Mistras Group$724.02M0.75$16.84M$0.7024.26

Summary

Mistras Group beats Acacia Research on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acacia Research compare to Franklin Covey?

Franklin Covey (NYSE:FC) and Acacia Research (NASDAQ:ACTG) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and valuation.

Franklin Covey has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -8.53%. Franklin Covey's return on equity of 12.79% beat Acacia Research's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Franklin Covey-0.88% 12.79% 3.23%
Acacia Research -8.53%-2.81%-2.11%

Franklin Covey currently has a consensus price target of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.52%. Acacia Research has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.25%. Given Acacia Research's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Acacia Research is more favorable than Franklin Covey.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Franklin Covey
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Acacia Research
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Acacia Research had 4 more articles in the media than Franklin Covey. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Acacia Research and 1 mentions for Franklin Covey. Acacia Research's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Franklin Covey's score of 0.00 indicating that Acacia Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Franklin Covey
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Acacia Research
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acacia Research has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

69.9% of Franklin Covey shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Franklin Covey shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Acacia Research shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Acacia Research has higher revenue and earnings than Franklin Covey. Franklin Covey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acacia Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Franklin Covey$267.07M0.88$3.07M-$0.21N/A
Acacia Research$285.23M1.60$21.68M-$0.18N/A

Summary

Acacia Research beats Franklin Covey on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Acacia Research News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ACTG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ACTG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ACTG vs. The Competition

MetricAcacia ResearchBUSINESS SVCS IndustryBusiness SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$455.42M$5.27B$6.31B$12.46B
Dividend YieldN/A3.12%3.12%5.30%
P/E Ratio-26.1912.1031.4925.56
Price / Sales1.601.41432.5072.25
Price / Cash6.5311.6323.4455.34
Price / Book0.804.826.746.72
Net Income$21.68M$155.84M$199.93M$333.62M
7 Day Performance0.32%3.61%0.01%0.35%
1 Month Performance-4.75%0.85%1.88%4.00%
1 Year Performance26.41%-3.47%36.46%36.32%

Acacia Research Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ACTG
Acacia Research
2.4108 of 5 stars
$4.72
-0.1%
$6.00
+27.3%
+21.6%$455.42M$285.23MN/A1,036
CBZ
CBIZ
4.9529 of 5 stars
$31.08
-1.9%
$37.33
+20.1%
-61.2%$1.66B$2.76B12.469,500
ICFI
ICF International
4.8229 of 5 stars
$69.00
-7.4%
$102.33
+48.3%
-30.4%$1.24B$1.87B13.878,400
CRAI
Charles River Associates
4.6961 of 5 stars
$140.11
+0.7%
$245.00
+74.9%
-26.8%$908.90M$751.58M17.31940
MG
Mistras Group
4.2354 of 5 stars
$18.04
-3.7%
$19.00
+5.3%
+115.8%$574.51M$724.02M25.794,800

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:ACTG) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners