Free Trial

Acacia Research (ACTG) Competitors

Acacia Research logo
$4.64 -0.10 (-2.01%)
Closing price 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$4.64 +0.00 (+0.11%)
As of 05:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ACTG vs. CBZ, HURN, ICFI, CRAI, and MG

Should you buy Acacia Research stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Acacia Research with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Acacia Research include CBIZ (CBZ), Huron Consulting Group (HURN), ICF International (ICFI), Charles River Associates (CRAI), and Mistras Group (MG). These companies are all part of the "research & consulting services" industry.

How does Acacia Research compare to CBIZ?

CBIZ (NYSE:CBZ) and Acacia Research (NASDAQ:ACTG) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

CBIZ has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acacia Research has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

CBIZ has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Research. Acacia Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CBIZ, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CBIZ$2.77B0.62$115.44M$2.4912.95
Acacia Research$215.05M2.08$21.68M-$0.18N/A

In the previous week, CBIZ had 3 more articles in the media than Acacia Research. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for CBIZ and 2 mentions for Acacia Research. Acacia Research's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat CBIZ's score of -0.06 indicating that Acacia Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CBIZ
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Acacia Research
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CBIZ presently has a consensus target price of $37.33, indicating a potential upside of 15.82%. Acacia Research has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.45%. Given Acacia Research's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Acacia Research is more favorable than CBIZ.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CBIZ
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Acacia Research
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

CBIZ has a net margin of 5.57% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -8.53%. CBIZ's return on equity of 12.62% beat Acacia Research's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CBIZ5.57% 12.62% 5.17%
Acacia Research -8.53%-2.81%-2.11%

87.4% of CBIZ shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.1% of CBIZ shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CBIZ beats Acacia Research on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acacia Research compare to Huron Consulting Group?

Huron Consulting Group (NASDAQ:HURN) and Acacia Research (NASDAQ:ACTG) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Huron Consulting Group has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Research. Acacia Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Huron Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huron Consulting Group$1.75B0.97$105.04M$5.8617.89
Acacia Research$215.05M2.08$21.68M-$0.18N/A

Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.09, meaning that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acacia Research has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

93.9% of Huron Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Huron Consulting Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Huron Consulting Group presently has a consensus target price of $205.50, indicating a potential upside of 96.07%. Acacia Research has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.45%. Given Huron Consulting Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Huron Consulting Group is more favorable than Acacia Research.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Huron Consulting Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Acacia Research
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Huron Consulting Group had 2 more articles in the media than Acacia Research. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Huron Consulting Group and 2 mentions for Acacia Research. Acacia Research's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Huron Consulting Group's score of 0.35 indicating that Acacia Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Huron Consulting Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Acacia Research
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Huron Consulting Group has a net margin of 5.94% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -8.53%. Huron Consulting Group's return on equity of 29.41% beat Acacia Research's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huron Consulting Group5.94% 29.41% 9.10%
Acacia Research -8.53%-2.81%-2.11%

Summary

Huron Consulting Group beats Acacia Research on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acacia Research compare to ICF International?

ICF International (NASDAQ:ICFI) and Acacia Research (NASDAQ:ACTG) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

ICF International has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acacia Research has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

ICF International has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -8.53%. ICF International's return on equity of 11.38% beat Acacia Research's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ICF International4.68% 11.38% 5.61%
Acacia Research -8.53%-2.81%-2.11%

ICF International has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Research. Acacia Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ICF International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ICF International$1.87B0.66$91.59M$4.6214.79
Acacia Research$215.05M2.08$21.68M-$0.18N/A

In the previous week, ICF International had 13 more articles in the media than Acacia Research. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for ICF International and 2 mentions for Acacia Research. Acacia Research's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat ICF International's score of 0.54 indicating that Acacia Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ICF International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Acacia Research
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

94.1% of ICF International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of ICF International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

ICF International pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Acacia Research pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.8%. ICF International pays out 12.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Acacia Research pays out -277.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Acacia Research is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

ICF International currently has a consensus price target of $102.33, suggesting a potential upside of 49.76%. Acacia Research has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 29.45%. Given ICF International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe ICF International is more favorable than Acacia Research.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ICF International
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Acacia Research
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

ICF International beats Acacia Research on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acacia Research compare to Charles River Associates?

Acacia Research (NASDAQ:ACTG) and Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Charles River Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Research. Acacia Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acacia Research$215.05M2.08$21.68M-$0.18N/A
Charles River Associates$751.58M1.22$54.78M$7.2019.73

Charles River Associates has a net margin of 6.22% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -8.53%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 26.02% beat Acacia Research's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Acacia Research-8.53% -2.81% -2.11%
Charles River Associates 6.22%26.02%8.35%

Acacia Research pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.8%. Charles River Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Acacia Research pays out -277.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Charles River Associates pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Charles River Associates has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Acacia Research is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

86.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Charles River Associates had 15 more articles in the media than Acacia Research. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Charles River Associates and 2 mentions for Acacia Research. Acacia Research's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Charles River Associates' score of 0.58 indicating that Acacia Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Acacia Research
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Charles River Associates
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Acacia Research has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Acacia Research presently has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.45%. Charles River Associates has a consensus price target of $245.00, indicating a potential upside of 72.48%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Acacia Research.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Acacia Research
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Charles River Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Charles River Associates beats Acacia Research on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acacia Research compare to Mistras Group?

Mistras Group (NYSE:MG) and Acacia Research (NASDAQ:ACTG) are both small-cap research & consulting services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

74.9% of Mistras Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.1% of Mistras Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mistras Group has a net margin of 3.06% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -8.53%. Mistras Group's return on equity of 13.60% beat Acacia Research's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mistras Group3.06% 13.60% 5.35%
Acacia Research -8.53%-2.81%-2.11%

Acacia Research has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mistras Group. Acacia Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mistras Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mistras Group$731.44M0.77$16.84M$0.7025.31
Acacia Research$215.05M2.08$21.68M-$0.18N/A

Mistras Group currently has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.22%. Acacia Research has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 29.45%. Given Acacia Research's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Acacia Research is more favorable than Mistras Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mistras Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Acacia Research
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Mistras Group has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acacia Research has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Acacia Research had 2 more articles in the media than Mistras Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Acacia Research and 0 mentions for Mistras Group. Mistras Group's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Acacia Research's score of 0.63 indicating that Mistras Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mistras Group Positive
Acacia Research Positive

Summary

Mistras Group beats Acacia Research on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Acacia Research News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ACTG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ACTG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ACTG vs. The Competition

MetricAcacia ResearchBUSINESS SVCS IndustryBusiness SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$447.69M$5.48B$6.57B$12.42B
Dividend YieldN/A2.28%2.96%5.29%
P/E Ratio-25.7512.1629.3924.19
Price / Sales2.081.40414.62138.36
Price / Cash6.4511.9024.6357.88
Price / Book0.774.875.906.72
Net Income$21.68M$154.98M$203.93M$337.19M
7 Day Performance-0.75%0.92%1.03%0.48%
1 Month Performance-9.65%22.52%1.38%5.07%
1 Year Performance22.94%-4.56%40.54%34.25%

Acacia Research Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ACTG
Acacia Research
2.1358 of 5 stars
$4.64
-2.0%
$6.00
+29.4%
+27.5%$456.87M$285.23MN/A1,036
CBZ
CBIZ
4.6924 of 5 stars
$33.61
+4.0%
$37.33
+11.1%
-52.8%$1.80B$2.76B13.479,500
HURN
Huron Consulting Group
4.5282 of 5 stars
$107.39
+0.4%
$205.50
+91.4%
-26.2%$1.74B$1.70B18.338,610
ICFI
ICF International
4.5721 of 5 stars
$69.09
-0.2%
$102.33
+48.1%
-15.1%$1.25B$1.87B14.998,400
CRAI
Charles River Associates
4.7402 of 5 stars
$141.77
-4.4%
$245.00
+72.8%
-24.5%$916.94M$751.58M19.71940

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:ACTG) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners