Go Pro

Acacia Research (ACTG) Competitors

Acacia Research logo
$4.41 -0.01 (-0.23%)
Closing price 07/13/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$4.42 +0.00 (+0.11%)
As of 07/13/2026 06:18 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ACTG vs. HURN, ICFI, CRAI, MG, and FC

Should you buy Acacia Research stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Acacia Research with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Acacia Research include Huron Consulting Group (HURN), ICF International (ICFI), Charles River Associates (CRAI), Mistras Group (MG), and Franklin Covey (FC). These companies are all part of the "research & consulting services" industry.

How does Acacia Research compare to Huron Consulting Group?

Acacia Research (NASDAQ:ACTG) and Huron Consulting Group (NASDAQ:HURN) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Acacia Research has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Huron Consulting Group had 6 more articles in the media than Acacia Research. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Huron Consulting Group and 2 mentions for Acacia Research. Acacia Research's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Huron Consulting Group's score of 0.91 indicating that Acacia Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Acacia Research
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Huron Consulting Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

86.7% of Acacia Research shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Huron Consulting Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Acacia Research shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Huron Consulting Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Acacia Research presently has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 36.05%. Huron Consulting Group has a consensus price target of $184.25, suggesting a potential upside of 65.65%. Given Huron Consulting Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Huron Consulting Group is more favorable than Acacia Research.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Acacia Research
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Huron Consulting Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Huron Consulting Group has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Research. Acacia Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Huron Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acacia Research$285.23M1.49$21.68M-$0.18N/A
Huron Consulting Group$1.70B1.06$105.04M$5.8618.98

Huron Consulting Group has a net margin of 5.94% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -8.53%. Huron Consulting Group's return on equity of 29.41% beat Acacia Research's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Acacia Research-8.53% -2.81% -2.11%
Huron Consulting Group 5.94%29.41%9.10%

Summary

Huron Consulting Group beats Acacia Research on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acacia Research compare to ICF International?

Acacia Research (NASDAQ:ACTG) and ICF International (NASDAQ:ICFI) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, ICF International had 1 more articles in the media than Acacia Research. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for ICF International and 2 mentions for Acacia Research. Acacia Research's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat ICF International's score of 0.46 indicating that Acacia Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Acacia Research
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ICF International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Acacia Research has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ICF International has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Acacia Research currently has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 36.05%. ICF International has a consensus price target of $102.33, suggesting a potential upside of 29.32%. Given Acacia Research's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Acacia Research is more favorable than ICF International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Acacia Research
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
ICF International
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

ICF International has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Research. Acacia Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ICF International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acacia Research$285.23M1.49$21.68M-$0.18N/A
ICF International$1.87B0.76$91.59M$4.6217.13

86.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of ICF International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ICF International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ICF International has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -8.53%. ICF International's return on equity of 11.38% beat Acacia Research's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Acacia Research-8.53% -2.81% -2.11%
ICF International 4.68%11.38%5.61%

Summary

ICF International beats Acacia Research on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acacia Research compare to Charles River Associates?

Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) and Acacia Research (NASDAQ:ACTG) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Acacia Research had 1 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Acacia Research and 1 mentions for Charles River Associates. Acacia Research's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Charles River Associates' score of 1.43 indicating that Acacia Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Charles River Associates Positive
Acacia Research Positive

84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Charles River Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Research. Acacia Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charles River Associates$751.58M1.45$54.78M$7.2023.47
Acacia Research$285.23M1.49$21.68M-$0.18N/A

Charles River Associates presently has a consensus target price of $245.00, indicating a potential upside of 44.96%. Acacia Research has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 36.05%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Acacia Research.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Charles River Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Acacia Research
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acacia Research has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Charles River Associates has a net margin of 6.22% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -8.53%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 26.02% beat Acacia Research's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Charles River Associates6.22% 26.02% 8.35%
Acacia Research -8.53%-2.81%-2.11%

Summary

Charles River Associates beats Acacia Research on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acacia Research compare to Mistras Group?

Acacia Research (NASDAQ:ACTG) and Mistras Group (NYSE:MG) are both small-cap research & consulting services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Acacia Research presently has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 36.05%. Mistras Group has a consensus price target of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.47%. Given Acacia Research's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Acacia Research is more favorable than Mistras Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Acacia Research
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Mistras Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

86.7% of Acacia Research shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.9% of Mistras Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Acacia Research shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Mistras Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mistras Group has a net margin of 3.06% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -8.53%. Mistras Group's return on equity of 13.60% beat Acacia Research's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Acacia Research-8.53% -2.81% -2.11%
Mistras Group 3.06%13.60%5.35%

In the previous week, Mistras Group had 1 more articles in the media than Acacia Research. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mistras Group and 2 mentions for Acacia Research. Acacia Research's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Mistras Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Acacia Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Acacia Research
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Mistras Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Acacia Research has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mistras Group. Acacia Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mistras Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acacia Research$285.23M1.49$21.68M-$0.18N/A
Mistras Group$724.02M0.71$16.84M$0.7023.11

Acacia Research has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mistras Group has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Mistras Group beats Acacia Research on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Acacia Research compare to Franklin Covey?

Franklin Covey (NYSE:FC) and Acacia Research (NASDAQ:ACTG) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

69.9% of Franklin Covey shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Franklin Covey shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acacia Research has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Franklin Covey had 5 more articles in the media than Acacia Research. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Franklin Covey and 2 mentions for Acacia Research. Acacia Research's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Franklin Covey's score of 0.51 indicating that Acacia Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Franklin Covey
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Acacia Research
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Franklin Covey has a net margin of 0.83% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -8.53%. Franklin Covey's return on equity of 17.37% beat Acacia Research's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Franklin Covey0.83% 17.37% 4.04%
Acacia Research -8.53%-2.81%-2.11%

Acacia Research has higher revenue and earnings than Franklin Covey. Acacia Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franklin Covey, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Franklin Covey$267.07M0.87$3.07M$0.17120.94
Acacia Research$285.23M1.49$21.68M-$0.18N/A

Franklin Covey currently has a consensus price target of $27.50, indicating a potential upside of 33.75%. Acacia Research has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 36.05%. Given Acacia Research's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Acacia Research is more favorable than Franklin Covey.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Franklin Covey
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Acacia Research
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Franklin Covey beats Acacia Research on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Acacia Research News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ACTG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ACTG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ACTG vs. The Competition

MetricAcacia ResearchBUSINESS SVCS IndustryBusiness SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$426.92M$5.54B$6.90B$12.61B
Dividend YieldN/A2.97%3.12%8.00%
P/E Ratio-24.5011.9328.6424.26
Price / Sales1.491.42344.87117.88
Price / Cash6.1611.4823.2149.36
Price / Book0.735.295.706.29
Net Income$21.68M$154.43M$203.89M$330.66M
7 Day Performance-0.90%-1.08%-1.60%-1.32%
1 Month Performance-5.77%-2.32%-2.23%-0.64%
1 Year Performance16.98%-6.43%13.25%19.08%

Acacia Research Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ACTG
Acacia Research
2.5819 of 5 stars
$4.41
-0.2%
$6.00
+36.1%
+11.1%$426.92M$285.23MN/A1,036
HURN
Huron Consulting Group
4.4312 of 5 stars
$97.16
flat
$184.25
+89.6%
-16.1%$1.58B$1.75B16.588,610
ICFI
ICF International
4.3577 of 5 stars
$74.99
flat
$102.33
+36.5%
-9.6%$1.36B$1.82B16.238,400
CRAI
Charles River Associates
4.6305 of 5 stars
$146.79
flat
$245.00
+66.9%
-14.2%$948.70M$770.71M20.39940
MG
Mistras Group
3.6889 of 5 stars
$16.69
+0.0%
$19.00
+13.8%
+99.0%$531.17M$724.02M23.854,800

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:ACTG) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners