Free Trial
Your Portfolio Deserves Better! MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Upgrade Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Charles River Associates (CRAI) Competitors

Charles River Associates logo
$148.23 +0.84 (+0.57%)
Closing price 05/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$148.34 +0.11 (+0.07%)
As of 05/22/2026 05:36 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CRAI vs. CAR, CCRN, BAH, EFX, and FCN

Should you buy Charles River Associates stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Charles River Associates with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Charles River Associates include Avis Budget Group (CAR), Cross Country Healthcare (CCRN), Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH), Equifax (EFX), and FTI Consulting (FCN).

How does Charles River Associates compare to Avis Budget Group?

Avis Budget Group (NASDAQ:CAR) and Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) are related companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, Avis Budget Group had 13 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Avis Budget Group and 2 mentions for Charles River Associates. Avis Budget Group's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Charles River Associates' score of -0.10 indicating that Avis Budget Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Avis Budget Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Charles River Associates
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

96.3% of Avis Budget Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are held by institutional investors. 50.5% of Avis Budget Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Charles River Associates has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Avis Budget Group. Avis Budget Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Avis Budget Group$11.86B0.50-$889M-$19.05N/A
Charles River Associates$751.58M1.27$54.78M$7.2020.59

Charles River Associates has a net margin of 6.22% compared to Avis Budget Group's net margin of -5.68%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 26.02% beat Avis Budget Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Avis Budget Group-5.68% N/A -0.47%
Charles River Associates 6.22%26.02%8.35%

Avis Budget Group has a beta of 1.91, indicating that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Avis Budget Group currently has a consensus target price of $125.25, indicating a potential downside of 25.02%. Charles River Associates has a consensus target price of $245.00, indicating a potential upside of 65.28%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Avis Budget Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Avis Budget Group
5 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Charles River Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Charles River Associates beats Avis Budget Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Charles River Associates compare to Cross Country Healthcare?

Cross Country Healthcare (NASDAQ:CCRN) and Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Charles River Associates had 1 more articles in the media than Cross Country Healthcare. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Charles River Associates and 1 mentions for Cross Country Healthcare. Cross Country Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Charles River Associates' score of -0.10 indicating that Cross Country Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cross Country Healthcare
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Charles River Associates
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Charles River Associates has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cross Country Healthcare. Cross Country Healthcare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cross Country Healthcare$1.05B0.40-$94.85M-$3.05N/A
Charles River Associates$751.58M1.27$54.78M$7.2020.59

Cross Country Healthcare has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Charles River Associates has a net margin of 6.22% compared to Cross Country Healthcare's net margin of -9.84%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 26.02% beat Cross Country Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cross Country Healthcare-9.84% -0.74% -0.54%
Charles River Associates 6.22%26.02%8.35%

Cross Country Healthcare currently has a consensus price target of $12.72, suggesting a potential downside of 2.53%. Charles River Associates has a consensus price target of $245.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.28%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Cross Country Healthcare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cross Country Healthcare
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.90
Charles River Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

96.0% of Cross Country Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of Cross Country Healthcare shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Charles River Associates beats Cross Country Healthcare on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Charles River Associates compare to Booz Allen Hamilton?

Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) and Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE:BAH) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Booz Allen Hamilton has a net margin of 7.35% compared to Charles River Associates' net margin of 6.22%. Booz Allen Hamilton's return on equity of 76.79% beat Charles River Associates' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Charles River Associates6.22% 26.02% 8.35%
Booz Allen Hamilton 7.35%76.79%10.95%

Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.8% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Booz Allen Hamilton had 20 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Booz Allen Hamilton and 2 mentions for Charles River Associates. Booz Allen Hamilton's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Charles River Associates' score of -0.10 indicating that Booz Allen Hamilton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Charles River Associates
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Booz Allen Hamilton
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
12 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Booz Allen Hamilton has higher revenue and earnings than Charles River Associates. Booz Allen Hamilton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charles River Associates$751.58M1.27$54.78M$7.2020.59
Booz Allen Hamilton$11.98B0.79$935M$6.7311.69

Charles River Associates currently has a consensus target price of $245.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.28%. Booz Allen Hamilton has a consensus target price of $93.33, suggesting a potential upside of 18.59%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Booz Allen Hamilton.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Charles River Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Booz Allen Hamilton
4 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.79

Charles River Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Booz Allen Hamilton pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Charles River Associates pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton pays out 35.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Charles River Associates has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Booz Allen Hamilton has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Booz Allen Hamilton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Booz Allen Hamilton beats Charles River Associates on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Charles River Associates compare to Equifax?

Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) and Equifax (NYSE:EFX) are both business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Equifax has higher revenue and earnings than Charles River Associates. Charles River Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equifax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charles River Associates$751.58M1.27$54.78M$7.2020.59
Equifax$6.28B3.11$660.30M$5.6828.91

Equifax has a net margin of 11.12% compared to Charles River Associates' net margin of 6.22%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 26.02% beat Equifax's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Charles River Associates6.22% 26.02% 8.35%
Equifax 11.12%20.41%8.27%

Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Equifax has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of Equifax shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Equifax shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Charles River Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Equifax pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Charles River Associates pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Equifax pays out 39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Charles River Associates has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Equifax has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Charles River Associates is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Charles River Associates presently has a consensus price target of $245.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.28%. Equifax has a consensus price target of $226.67, suggesting a potential upside of 38.01%. Given Charles River Associates' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Equifax.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Charles River Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Equifax
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.68

In the previous week, Equifax had 7 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Equifax and 2 mentions for Charles River Associates. Equifax's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Charles River Associates' score of -0.10 indicating that Equifax is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Charles River Associates
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Equifax
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Equifax beats Charles River Associates on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Charles River Associates compare to FTI Consulting?

FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) and Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) are both business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

FTI Consulting presently has a consensus target price of $174.50, suggesting a potential upside of 12.97%. Charles River Associates has a consensus target price of $245.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.28%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than FTI Consulting.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FTI Consulting
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Charles River Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

FTI Consulting has a net margin of 6.88% compared to Charles River Associates' net margin of 6.22%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 26.02% beat FTI Consulting's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FTI Consulting6.88% 15.14% 7.63%
Charles River Associates 6.22%26.02%8.35%

99.4% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

FTI Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than Charles River Associates. FTI Consulting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTI Consulting$3.79B1.23$270.87M$8.4118.37
Charles River Associates$751.58M1.27$54.78M$7.2020.59

In the previous week, FTI Consulting had 5 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for FTI Consulting and 2 mentions for Charles River Associates. FTI Consulting's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Charles River Associates' score of -0.10 indicating that FTI Consulting is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FTI Consulting
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Charles River Associates
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Charles River Associates beats FTI Consulting on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Charles River Associates News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRAI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRAI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRAI vs. The Competition

MetricCharles River AssociatesConsulting IndustryBusiness SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$952.59M$4.16B$6.64B$12.31B
Dividend Yield1.55%2.56%3.02%5.31%
P/E Ratio20.5914.7330.4225.66
Price / Sales1.272.01422.8183.69
Price / Cash11.4017.7124.1356.72
Price / Book4.8314.356.787.14
Net Income$54.78M$251.10M$204.61M$335.72M
7 Day Performance7.61%5.43%1.37%3.03%
1 Month Performance-1.24%-4.23%-1.79%2.88%
1 Year Performance-20.07%-24.96%33.27%35.20%

Charles River Associates Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRAI
Charles River Associates
4.5424 of 5 stars
$148.23
+0.6%
$245.00
+65.3%
-21.3%$952.59M$751.58M20.59940
CAR
Avis Budget Group
2.3609 of 5 stars
$148.44
+1.5%
$125.00
-15.8%
+41.9%$5.24B$11.65BN/A25,000
CCRN
Cross Country Healthcare
1.9648 of 5 stars
$13.12
+0.1%
$12.72
-3.0%
-3.5%$424.05M$1.00BN/A6,784
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton
4.0614 of 5 stars
$77.54
+3.5%
$93.33
+20.4%
-39.0%$9.42B$11.98B11.6035,800
EFX
Equifax
4.8422 of 5 stars
$163.80
-0.3%
$228.06
+39.2%
-37.6%$19.52B$6.07B28.8615,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CRAI) was last updated on 5/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners