Does the media prefer CRAI or CAR?

In the previous week, Avis Budget Group had 11 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Avis Budget Group and 8 mentions for Charles River Associates. Charles River Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Avis Budget Group's score of 0.18 indicating that Charles River Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Charles River Associates 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Avis Budget Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 16 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer CRAI or BAH?

In the previous week, Charles River Associates had 2 more articles in the media than Booz Allen Hamilton. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Charles River Associates and 6 mentions for Booz Allen Hamilton. Charles River Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Booz Allen Hamilton's score of 0.28 indicating that Charles River Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Charles River Associates 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Booz Allen Hamilton 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer EFX or CRAI?

In the previous week, Equifax had 1 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Equifax and 8 mentions for Charles River Associates. Equifax's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Charles River Associates' score of 0.52 indicating that Equifax is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Equifax 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Charles River Associates 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CRAI or FCN?

In the previous week, Charles River Associates and Charles River Associates both had 8 articles in the media. FTI Consulting's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Charles River Associates' score of 0.52 indicating that FTI Consulting is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Charles River Associates 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive FTI Consulting 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer CRAI or G?

In the previous week, Charles River Associates had 1 more articles in the media than Genpact. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Charles River Associates and 7 mentions for Genpact. Charles River Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Genpact's score of 0.32 indicating that Charles River Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Charles River Associates 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Genpact 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Charles River Associates (CRAI) Competitors

$162.02 +3.28 (+2.07%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$161.50 -0.52 (-0.32%)

As of 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

CRAI vs. CAR, BAH, EFX, FCN, and G

Should you buy Charles River Associates stock or one of its competitors? Charles River Associates's main competitors and comparable companies include Avis Budget Group (CAR), Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH), Equifax (EFX), FTI Consulting (FCN), and Genpact (G). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Charles River Associates compare to Avis Budget Group?

Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) and Avis Budget Group (NASDAQ:CAR) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Charles River Associates presently has a consensus price target of $245.00, indicating a potential upside of 51.22%. Avis Budget Group has a consensus price target of $135.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.76%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Avis Budget Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Charles River Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Avis Budget Group	3 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67

Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avis Budget Group has a beta of 1.91, indicating that its share price is 91% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Avis Budget Group had 11 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Avis Budget Group and 8 mentions for Charles River Associates. Charles River Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Avis Budget Group's score of 0.18 indicating that Charles River Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Charles River Associates	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Avis Budget Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	16 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Charles River Associates has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Avis Budget Group. Avis Budget Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Charles River Associates	$751.58M	1.35	$54.78M	$7.51	21.57
Avis Budget Group	$11.65B	0.32	-$889M	-$18.17	N/A

Charles River Associates has a net margin of 6.20% compared to Avis Budget Group's net margin of -5.43%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 27.31% beat Avis Budget Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Charles River Associates	6.20%	27.31%	8.36%
Avis Budget Group	-5.43%	N/A	-0.37%

84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.4% of Avis Budget Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 50.5% of Avis Budget Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Charles River Associates beats Avis Budget Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Charles River Associates compare to Booz Allen Hamilton?

Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) and Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE:BAH) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Charles River Associates had 2 more articles in the media than Booz Allen Hamilton. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Charles River Associates and 6 mentions for Booz Allen Hamilton. Charles River Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Booz Allen Hamilton's score of 0.28 indicating that Charles River Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Charles River Associates	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Booz Allen Hamilton	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.36, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Charles River Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Booz Allen Hamilton pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Charles River Associates pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Charles River Associates has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Booz Allen Hamilton has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Booz Allen Hamilton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Booz Allen Hamilton has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Charles River Associates' net margin of 6.20%. Booz Allen Hamilton's return on equity of 76.71% beat Charles River Associates' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Charles River Associates	6.20%	27.31%	8.36%
Booz Allen Hamilton	7.01%	76.71%	11.48%

84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.8% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Charles River Associates currently has a consensus target price of $245.00, indicating a potential upside of 51.22%. Booz Allen Hamilton has a consensus target price of $83.69, indicating a potential upside of 10.53%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Booz Allen Hamilton.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Charles River Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Booz Allen Hamilton	4 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.93

Booz Allen Hamilton has higher revenue and earnings than Charles River Associates. Booz Allen Hamilton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Charles River Associates	$751.58M	1.35	$54.78M	$7.51	21.57
Booz Allen Hamilton	$11.22B	0.81	$851M	$6.36	11.91

Summary

Charles River Associates beats Booz Allen Hamilton on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Charles River Associates compare to Equifax?

Equifax (NYSE:EFX) and Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

Equifax has a net margin of 10.73% compared to Charles River Associates' net margin of 6.20%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 27.31% beat Equifax's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Equifax	10.73%	21.61%	8.41%
Charles River Associates	6.20%	27.31%	8.36%

Equifax presently has a consensus target price of $214.53, indicating a potential upside of 38.35%. Charles River Associates has a consensus target price of $245.00, indicating a potential upside of 51.22%. Given Charles River Associates' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Equifax.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Equifax	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Charles River Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Equifax pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Charles River Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Equifax pays out 39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Charles River Associates pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Equifax has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Charles River Associates has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

96.2% of Equifax shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Equifax shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Equifax had 1 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Equifax and 8 mentions for Charles River Associates. Equifax's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Charles River Associates' score of 0.52 indicating that Equifax is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Equifax	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Charles River Associates	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Equifax has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Equifax has higher revenue and earnings than Charles River Associates. Charles River Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equifax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Equifax	$6.07B	3.00	$660.30M	$5.69	27.25
Charles River Associates	$751.58M	1.35	$54.78M	$7.51	21.57

Summary

Equifax beats Charles River Associates on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Charles River Associates compare to FTI Consulting?

Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) and FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Charles River Associates and Charles River Associates both had 8 articles in the media. FTI Consulting's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Charles River Associates' score of 0.52 indicating that FTI Consulting is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Charles River Associates	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
FTI Consulting	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTI Consulting has a beta of -0.05, meaning that its share price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

FTI Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than Charles River Associates. FTI Consulting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Charles River Associates	$751.58M	1.35	$54.78M	$7.51	21.57
FTI Consulting	$3.79B	0.97	$270.87M	$8.27	16.13

Charles River Associates currently has a consensus price target of $245.00, suggesting a potential upside of 51.22%. FTI Consulting has a consensus price target of $174.50, suggesting a potential upside of 30.83%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than FTI Consulting.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Charles River Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
FTI Consulting	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

FTI Consulting has a net margin of 6.44% compared to Charles River Associates' net margin of 6.20%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 27.31% beat FTI Consulting's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Charles River Associates	6.20%	27.31%	8.36%
FTI Consulting	6.44%	15.91%	7.35%

84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Charles River Associates beats FTI Consulting on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Charles River Associates compare to Genpact?

Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) and Genpact (NYSE:G) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Charles River Associates had 1 more articles in the media than Genpact. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Charles River Associates and 7 mentions for Genpact. Charles River Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Genpact's score of 0.32 indicating that Charles River Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Charles River Associates	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Genpact	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Genpact shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Genpact shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Charles River Associates presently has a consensus target price of $245.00, indicating a potential upside of 51.22%. Genpact has a consensus target price of $39.33, indicating a potential upside of 16.22%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Genpact.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Charles River Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Genpact	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.22

Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genpact has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Genpact has a net margin of 11.04% compared to Charles River Associates' net margin of 6.20%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 27.31% beat Genpact's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Charles River Associates	6.20%	27.31%	8.36%
Genpact	11.04%	23.34%	10.68%

Genpact has higher revenue and earnings than Charles River Associates. Genpact is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Charles River Associates	$751.58M	1.35	$54.78M	$7.51	21.57
Genpact	$5.08B	1.12	$552.49M	$3.37	10.04

Charles River Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Genpact pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Charles River Associates pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genpact pays out 22.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Charles River Associates has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Genpact has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Genpact is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Charles River Associates beats Genpact on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Charles River Associates News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRAI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CRAI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Charles River Associates	Professional Services Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$996.39M	$7.36B	$10.30B	$13.29B
Dividend Yield	1.44%	3.67%	96.94%	12.57%
P/E Ratio	21.57	33.44	22.94	20.92
Price / Sales	1.35	24.23	286.55	88.01
Price / Cash	12.28	21.85	24.10	52.76
Price / Book	4.98	6.58	4.89	6.32
Net Income	$54.78M	$236.73M	$614.63M	$359.73M
7 Day Performance	-1.43%	-0.38%	1.48%	1.35%
1 Month Performance	-8.41%	-5.21%	-2.84%	-3.68%
1 Year Performance	-22.05%	-12.22%	4.01%	5.56%

Charles River Associates Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CRAI Charles River Associates	4.6567 of 5 stars	$162.02 +2.1%	$245.00 +51.2%	-23.9%	$996.39M	$751.58M	21.57	959	News Coverage Positive News
CAR Avis Budget Group	3.3881 of 5 stars	$118.64 0.0%	$135.00 +13.8%	-31.7%	$4.20B	$11.65B	N/A	25,000	Trending News
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton	3.5118 of 5 stars	$80.49 +1.7%	$83.69 +4.0%	-23.6%	$9.67B	$11.22B	12.64	31,500
EFX Equifax	4.6831 of 5 stars	$169.83 -1.4%	$215.16 +26.7%	-37.7%	$19.98B	$6.07B	29.89	15,000	Positive News Analyst Forecast
FCN FTI Consulting	3.3065 of 5 stars	$149.78 -0.7%	$174.50 +16.5%	-15.6%	$4.14B	$3.92B	18.13	8,118	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CRAI) was last updated on 9/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Charles River Associates (CRAI) Competitors

CRAI vs. CAR, BAH, EFX, FCN, and G

How does Charles River Associates compare to Avis Budget Group?

Summary

How does Charles River Associates compare to Booz Allen Hamilton?

Summary

How does Charles River Associates compare to Equifax?

Summary

How does Charles River Associates compare to FTI Consulting?

Summary

How does Charles River Associates compare to Genpact?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRAI vs. The Competition

Charles River Associates Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Charles River Associates (CRAI) Competitors

CRAI vs. CAR, BAH, EFX, FCN, and G

How does Charles River Associates compare to Avis Budget Group?

Do analysts recommend CRAI or CAR?

Which has more risk and volatility, CRAI or CAR?

Does the media prefer CRAI or CAR?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CRAI or CAR?

Is CRAI or CAR more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CRAI or CAR?

Summary

How does Charles River Associates compare to Booz Allen Hamilton?

Does the media prefer CRAI or BAH?

Which has more risk & volatility, CRAI or BAH?

Is CRAI or BAH a better dividend stock?

Is CRAI or BAH more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CRAI or BAH?

Do analysts prefer CRAI or BAH?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CRAI or BAH?

Summary

How does Charles River Associates compare to Equifax?

Is EFX or CRAI more profitable?

Do analysts rate EFX or CRAI?

Is EFX or CRAI a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of EFX or CRAI?

Does the media prefer EFX or CRAI?

Which has more volatility & risk, EFX or CRAI?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, EFX or CRAI?

Summary

How does Charles River Associates compare to FTI Consulting?

Does the media refer more to CRAI or FCN?

Which has more risk and volatility, CRAI or FCN?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, CRAI or FCN?

Do analysts prefer CRAI or FCN?

Is CRAI or FCN more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CRAI or FCN?

Summary

How does Charles River Associates compare to Genpact?

Does the media prefer CRAI or G?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CRAI or G?

Do analysts rate CRAI or G?

Which has more risk & volatility, CRAI or G?

Is CRAI or G more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CRAI or G?

Is CRAI or G a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRAI vs. The Competition

Charles River Associates Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools