Go Pro

Charles River Associates (CRAI) Competitors

Charles River Associates logo
$146.79 +0.84 (+0.58%)
Closing price 07/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$146.52 -0.26 (-0.18%)
As of 07/2/2026 04:38 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CRAI vs. CAR, CCRN, BAH, EFX, and FCN

Should you buy Charles River Associates stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Charles River Associates with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Charles River Associates include Avis Budget Group (CAR), Cross Country Healthcare (CCRN), Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH), Equifax (EFX), and FTI Consulting (FCN).

How does Charles River Associates compare to Avis Budget Group?

Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) and Avis Budget Group (NASDAQ:CAR) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

Charles River Associates has a net margin of 6.22% compared to Avis Budget Group's net margin of -5.68%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 26.02% beat Avis Budget Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Charles River Associates6.22% 26.02% 8.35%
Avis Budget Group -5.68%N/A -0.47%

Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avis Budget Group has a beta of 1.91, indicating that its share price is 91% more volatile than the broader market.

Charles River Associates currently has a consensus price target of $245.00, indicating a potential upside of 66.91%. Avis Budget Group has a consensus price target of $131.50, indicating a potential downside of 19.54%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Avis Budget Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Charles River Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Avis Budget Group
4 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.60

In the previous week, Avis Budget Group had 3 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Avis Budget Group and 1 mentions for Charles River Associates. Avis Budget Group's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Charles River Associates' score of 1.15 indicating that Avis Budget Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Charles River Associates
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Avis Budget Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.4% of Avis Budget Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 50.5% of Avis Budget Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Charles River Associates has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Avis Budget Group. Avis Budget Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charles River Associates$770.71M1.23$54.78M$7.2020.39
Avis Budget Group$11.65B0.50-$889M-$19.05N/A

Summary

Charles River Associates beats Avis Budget Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Charles River Associates compare to Cross Country Healthcare?

Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) and Cross Country Healthcare (NASDAQ:CCRN) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cross Country Healthcare has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Charles River Associates has a net margin of 6.22% compared to Cross Country Healthcare's net margin of -9.84%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 26.02% beat Cross Country Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Charles River Associates6.22% 26.02% 8.35%
Cross Country Healthcare -9.84%-0.74%-0.54%

Charles River Associates has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cross Country Healthcare. Cross Country Healthcare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charles River Associates$770.71M1.23$54.78M$7.2020.39
Cross Country Healthcare$1.05B0.40-$94.85M-$3.05N/A

84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Cross Country Healthcare shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of Cross Country Healthcare shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Charles River Associates and Charles River Associates both had 1 articles in the media. Cross Country Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Charles River Associates' score of 1.15 indicating that Cross Country Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Charles River Associates
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cross Country Healthcare
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Charles River Associates presently has a consensus target price of $245.00, suggesting a potential upside of 66.91%. Cross Country Healthcare has a consensus target price of $12.05, suggesting a potential downside of 8.71%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Cross Country Healthcare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Charles River Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Cross Country Healthcare
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.90

Summary

Charles River Associates beats Cross Country Healthcare on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Charles River Associates compare to Booz Allen Hamilton?

Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE:BAH) and Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Booz Allen Hamilton has a net margin of 7.59% compared to Charles River Associates' net margin of 6.22%. Booz Allen Hamilton's return on equity of 76.07% beat Charles River Associates' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Booz Allen Hamilton7.59% 76.07% 11.19%
Charles River Associates 6.22%26.02%8.35%

Booz Allen Hamilton pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Charles River Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Booz Allen Hamilton pays out 34.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Charles River Associates pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Booz Allen Hamilton has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years and Charles River Associates has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Booz Allen Hamilton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.36, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

91.8% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Booz Allen Hamilton has higher revenue and earnings than Charles River Associates. Booz Allen Hamilton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Booz Allen Hamilton$11.22B0.67$851M$6.899.06
Charles River Associates$770.71M1.23$54.78M$7.2020.39

In the previous week, Booz Allen Hamilton had 6 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Booz Allen Hamilton and 1 mentions for Charles River Associates. Charles River Associates' average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Booz Allen Hamilton's score of 0.34 indicating that Charles River Associates is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Booz Allen Hamilton
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Charles River Associates
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Booz Allen Hamilton currently has a consensus price target of $86.50, suggesting a potential upside of 38.52%. Charles River Associates has a consensus price target of $245.00, suggesting a potential upside of 66.91%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Booz Allen Hamilton.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Booz Allen Hamilton
3 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.93
Charles River Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Booz Allen Hamilton beats Charles River Associates on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Charles River Associates compare to Equifax?

Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) and Equifax (NYSE:EFX) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Charles River Associates presently has a consensus target price of $245.00, suggesting a potential upside of 66.91%. Equifax has a consensus target price of $223.39, suggesting a potential upside of 29.98%. Given Charles River Associates' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Equifax.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Charles River Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Equifax
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.68

Equifax has a net margin of 11.12% compared to Charles River Associates' net margin of 6.22%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 26.02% beat Equifax's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Charles River Associates6.22% 26.02% 8.35%
Equifax 11.12%20.41%8.27%

Equifax has higher revenue and earnings than Charles River Associates. Charles River Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equifax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charles River Associates$770.71M1.23$54.78M$7.2020.39
Equifax$6.07B3.37$660.30M$5.6830.26

Charles River Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Equifax pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Charles River Associates pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Equifax pays out 39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Charles River Associates has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Equifax has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Charles River Associates is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Equifax has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Equifax had 10 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Equifax and 1 mentions for Charles River Associates. Equifax's average media sentiment score of 1.49 beat Charles River Associates' score of 1.15 indicating that Equifax is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Charles River Associates
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Equifax
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of Equifax shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Equifax shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Equifax beats Charles River Associates on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Charles River Associates compare to FTI Consulting?

Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) and FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) are both business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Charles River Associates presently has a consensus target price of $245.00, suggesting a potential upside of 66.91%. FTI Consulting has a consensus target price of $174.50, suggesting a potential upside of 13.76%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than FTI Consulting.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Charles River Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
FTI Consulting
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of FTI Consulting shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of FTI Consulting shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FTI Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than Charles River Associates. FTI Consulting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charles River Associates$770.71M1.23$54.78M$7.2020.39
FTI Consulting$3.79B1.22$270.87M$8.4118.24

FTI Consulting has a net margin of 6.88% compared to Charles River Associates' net margin of 6.22%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 26.02% beat FTI Consulting's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Charles River Associates6.22% 26.02% 8.35%
FTI Consulting 6.88%15.14%7.63%

In the previous week, FTI Consulting had 3 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for FTI Consulting and 1 mentions for Charles River Associates. Charles River Associates' average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat FTI Consulting's score of 0.69 indicating that Charles River Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Charles River Associates
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FTI Consulting
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTI Consulting has a beta of -0.04, indicating that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Charles River Associates beats FTI Consulting on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Charles River Associates News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRAI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRAI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRAI vs. The Competition

MetricCharles River AssociatesConsulting IndustryBusiness SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$943.27M$3.87B$6.97B$12.56B
Dividend Yield1.60%2.67%3.13%6.64%
P/E Ratio20.3920.0629.7624.55
Price / Sales1.231.64373.0097.27
Price / Cash11.2917.5024.3158.15
Price / Book4.515.335.906.45
Net Income$54.78M$245.85M$205.07M$336.71M
7 Day Performance0.44%1.33%1.82%1.37%
1 Month Performance3.34%-2.46%2.56%1.67%
1 Year Performance-25.25%-25.67%19.16%24.05%

Charles River Associates Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRAI
Charles River Associates
4.6714 of 5 stars
$146.79
+0.6%
$245.00
+66.9%
-24.9%$943.27M$770.71M20.39940
CAR
Avis Budget Group
1.8278 of 5 stars
$150.17
-3.2%
$131.50
-12.4%
-8.0%$5.31B$11.65BN/A25,000
CCRN
Cross Country Healthcare
2.6443 of 5 stars
$13.22
+0.0%
$12.05
-8.8%
+0.8%$426.98M$1.05BN/A6,784
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton
4.6556 of 5 stars
$60.04
-3.2%
$88.00
+46.6%
-42.3%$7.18B$11.22B8.7031,500
EFX
Equifax
4.9545 of 5 stars
$155.18
-2.1%
$223.78
+44.2%
-34.5%$18.46B$6.07B27.3015,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CRAI) was last updated on 7/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners