Does the media prefer CAR or CRAI?

In the previous week, Avis Budget Group had 1 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Avis Budget Group and 16 mentions for Charles River Associates. Charles River Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Avis Budget Group's score of 0.26 indicating that Charles River Associates is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Avis Budget Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Charles River Associates 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor BAH or CRAI?

In the previous week, Charles River Associates had 7 more articles in the media than Booz Allen Hamilton. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Charles River Associates and 9 mentions for Booz Allen Hamilton. Booz Allen Hamilton's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Charles River Associates' score of 0.71 indicating that Booz Allen Hamilton is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Booz Allen Hamilton 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Charles River Associates 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to EFX or CRAI?

In the previous week, Charles River Associates had 3 more articles in the media than Equifax. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Charles River Associates and 13 mentions for Equifax. Charles River Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Equifax's score of 0.40 indicating that Charles River Associates is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Equifax 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Charles River Associates 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CRAI or FCN?

In the previous week, Charles River Associates had 11 more articles in the media than FTI Consulting. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Charles River Associates and 5 mentions for FTI Consulting. FTI Consulting's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Charles River Associates' score of 0.71 indicating that FTI Consulting is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Charles River Associates 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive FTI Consulting 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer G or CRAI?

In the previous week, Genpact had 8 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Genpact and 16 mentions for Charles River Associates. Charles River Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Genpact's score of 0.41 indicating that Charles River Associates is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Genpact 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 5 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Charles River Associates 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Charles River Associates (CRAI) Competitors

$168.50 -0.23 (-0.14%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

CRAI vs. CAR, BAH, EFX, FCN, and G

Should you buy Charles River Associates stock or one of its competitors? Charles River Associates's main competitors and comparable companies include Avis Budget Group (CAR), Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH), Equifax (EFX), FTI Consulting (FCN), and Genpact (G). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Charles River Associates compare to Avis Budget Group?

Avis Budget Group (NASDAQ:CAR) and Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Charles River Associates has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Avis Budget Group. Avis Budget Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Avis Budget Group	$11.65B	0.42	-$889M	-$18.17	N/A
Charles River Associates	$794.64M	1.33	$54.78M	$7.51	22.44

Avis Budget Group has a beta of 1.92, suggesting that its share price is 92% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

96.4% of Avis Budget Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are held by institutional investors. 50.5% of Avis Budget Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Avis Budget Group presently has a consensus target price of $132.75, indicating a potential downside of 4.89%. Charles River Associates has a consensus target price of $245.00, indicating a potential upside of 45.40%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Avis Budget Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Avis Budget Group	5 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Charles River Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Avis Budget Group had 1 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Avis Budget Group and 16 mentions for Charles River Associates. Charles River Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Avis Budget Group's score of 0.26 indicating that Charles River Associates is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Avis Budget Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Charles River Associates	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Charles River Associates has a net margin of 6.20% compared to Avis Budget Group's net margin of -5.43%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 27.31% beat Avis Budget Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Avis Budget Group	-5.43%	N/A	-0.37%
Charles River Associates	6.20%	27.31%	8.36%

Summary

Charles River Associates beats Avis Budget Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Charles River Associates compare to Booz Allen Hamilton?

Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE:BAH) and Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

91.8% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Charles River Associates had 7 more articles in the media than Booz Allen Hamilton. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Charles River Associates and 9 mentions for Booz Allen Hamilton. Booz Allen Hamilton's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Charles River Associates' score of 0.71 indicating that Booz Allen Hamilton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Booz Allen Hamilton	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Charles River Associates	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Booz Allen Hamilton pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Charles River Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Booz Allen Hamilton pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Charles River Associates pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Booz Allen Hamilton has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years and Charles River Associates has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Booz Allen Hamilton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Booz Allen Hamilton has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Charles River Associates' net margin of 6.20%. Booz Allen Hamilton's return on equity of 76.71% beat Charles River Associates' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Booz Allen Hamilton	7.01%	76.71%	11.48%
Charles River Associates	6.20%	27.31%	8.36%

Booz Allen Hamilton presently has a consensus target price of $84.08, indicating a potential upside of 7.31%. Charles River Associates has a consensus target price of $245.00, indicating a potential upside of 45.40%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Booz Allen Hamilton.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Booz Allen Hamilton	4 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.93
Charles River Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Booz Allen Hamilton has higher revenue and earnings than Charles River Associates. Booz Allen Hamilton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Booz Allen Hamilton	$11.09B	0.85	$851M	$6.36	12.32
Charles River Associates	$794.64M	1.33	$54.78M	$7.51	22.44

Summary

Booz Allen Hamilton beats Charles River Associates on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Charles River Associates compare to Equifax?

Equifax (NYSE:EFX) and Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Charles River Associates had 3 more articles in the media than Equifax. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Charles River Associates and 13 mentions for Equifax. Charles River Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Equifax's score of 0.40 indicating that Charles River Associates is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Equifax	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Charles River Associates	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Equifax pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Charles River Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Equifax pays out 39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Charles River Associates pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Equifax has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Charles River Associates has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Charles River Associates is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Equifax has a net margin of 10.73% compared to Charles River Associates' net margin of 6.20%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 27.31% beat Equifax's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Equifax	10.73%	21.61%	8.41%
Charles River Associates	6.20%	27.31%	8.36%

Equifax currently has a consensus price target of $215.79, suggesting a potential upside of 19.46%. Charles River Associates has a consensus price target of $245.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.40%. Given Charles River Associates' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Equifax.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Equifax	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Charles River Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Equifax has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

96.2% of Equifax shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Equifax shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Equifax has higher revenue and earnings than Charles River Associates. Charles River Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equifax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Equifax	$6.07B	3.49	$660.30M	$5.69	31.75
Charles River Associates	$794.64M	1.33	$54.78M	$7.51	22.44

Summary

Equifax beats Charles River Associates on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Charles River Associates compare to FTI Consulting?

Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) and FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

FTI Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than Charles River Associates. FTI Consulting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Charles River Associates	$794.64M	1.33	$54.78M	$7.51	22.44
FTI Consulting	$3.79B	1.11	$270.87M	$8.27	18.43

Charles River Associates presently has a consensus price target of $245.00, indicating a potential upside of 45.40%. FTI Consulting has a consensus price target of $174.50, indicating a potential upside of 14.49%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than FTI Consulting.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Charles River Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
FTI Consulting	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Charles River Associates had 11 more articles in the media than FTI Consulting. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Charles River Associates and 5 mentions for FTI Consulting. FTI Consulting's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Charles River Associates' score of 0.71 indicating that FTI Consulting is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Charles River Associates	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
FTI Consulting	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTI Consulting has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its share price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

FTI Consulting has a net margin of 6.44% compared to Charles River Associates' net margin of 6.20%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 27.31% beat FTI Consulting's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Charles River Associates	6.20%	27.31%	8.36%
FTI Consulting	6.44%	15.91%	7.35%

84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of FTI Consulting shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of FTI Consulting shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Charles River Associates beats FTI Consulting on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Charles River Associates compare to Genpact?

Genpact (NYSE:G) and Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and earnings.

96.0% of Genpact shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Genpact shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Genpact pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Charles River Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Genpact pays out 22.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Charles River Associates pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Genpact has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Charles River Associates has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Genpact is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Genpact presently has a consensus target price of $39.33, indicating a potential upside of 15.86%. Charles River Associates has a consensus target price of $245.00, indicating a potential upside of 45.40%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Genpact.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Genpact	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.22
Charles River Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Genpact has higher revenue and earnings than Charles River Associates. Genpact is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Genpact	$5.08B	1.12	$552.49M	$3.37	10.07
Charles River Associates	$794.64M	1.33	$54.78M	$7.51	22.44

In the previous week, Genpact had 8 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Genpact and 16 mentions for Charles River Associates. Charles River Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Genpact's score of 0.41 indicating that Charles River Associates is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Genpact	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	5 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Charles River Associates	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Genpact has a net margin of 11.04% compared to Charles River Associates' net margin of 6.20%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 27.31% beat Genpact's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Genpact	11.04%	23.34%	10.68%
Charles River Associates	6.20%	27.31%	8.36%

Genpact has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Charles River Associates beats Genpact on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Charles River Associates News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRAI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CRAI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Charles River Associates	Professional Services Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$1.06B	$7.78B	$10.92B	$12.94B
Dividend Yield	1.35%	3.77%	97.10%	10.33%
P/E Ratio	22.44	38.24	28.24	25.29
Price / Sales	1.33	24.77	450.43	79.66
Price / Cash	13.03	22.73	24.70	50.42
Price / Book	5.82	5.79	4.55	6.23
Net Income	$54.78M	$238.96M	$608.54M	$347.40M
7 Day Performance	-4.59%	0.99%	1.08%	1.46%
1 Month Performance	4.89%	10.25%	2.36%	-0.49%
1 Year Performance	-11.48%	-4.46%	13.84%	20.91%

Charles River Associates Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CRAI Charles River Associates	4.4427 of 5 stars	$168.50 -0.1%	$245.00 +45.4%	-9.0%	$1.06B	$794.64M	22.44	940	Earnings Report Dividend Announcement Analyst Revision
CAR Avis Budget Group	1.6886 of 5 stars	$140.16 +0.9%	$132.75 -5.3%	-8.1%	$4.95B	$11.65B	N/A	25,000	Trending News
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton	4.3768 of 5 stars	$72.23 +1.5%	$84.08 +16.4%	-27.9%	$8.68B	$11.22B	11.34	31,500	Positive News Gap Down
EFX Equifax	4.567 of 5 stars	$176.03 +1.1%	$215.79 +22.6%	-24.0%	$20.66B	$6.07B	30.91	15,000
FCN FTI Consulting	3.7245 of 5 stars	$157.66 -0.5%	$174.50 +10.7%	-8.7%	$4.75B	$3.92B	19.04	8,118	Positive News Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CRAI) was last updated on 8/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Charles River Associates (CRAI) Competitors

CRAI vs. CAR, BAH, EFX, FCN, and G

How does Charles River Associates compare to Avis Budget Group?

Summary

How does Charles River Associates compare to Booz Allen Hamilton?

Summary

How does Charles River Associates compare to Equifax?

Summary

How does Charles River Associates compare to FTI Consulting?

Summary

How does Charles River Associates compare to Genpact?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRAI vs. The Competition

Charles River Associates Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Charles River Associates (CRAI) Competitors

CRAI vs. CAR, BAH, EFX, FCN, and G

How does Charles River Associates compare to Avis Budget Group?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CAR or CRAI?

Which has more volatility and risk, CAR or CRAI?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CAR or CRAI?

Do analysts rate CAR or CRAI?

Does the media prefer CAR or CRAI?

Is CAR or CRAI more profitable?

Summary

How does Charles River Associates compare to Booz Allen Hamilton?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in BAH or CRAI?

Which has more risk & volatility, BAH or CRAI?

Does the media favor BAH or CRAI?

Is BAH or CRAI a better dividend stock?

Is BAH or CRAI more profitable?

Do analysts prefer BAH or CRAI?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, BAH or CRAI?

Summary

How does Charles River Associates compare to Equifax?

Does the media refer more to EFX or CRAI?

Is EFX or CRAI a better dividend stock?

Is EFX or CRAI more profitable?

Do analysts prefer EFX or CRAI?

Which has more volatility and risk, EFX or CRAI?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in EFX or CRAI?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, EFX or CRAI?

Summary

How does Charles River Associates compare to FTI Consulting?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CRAI or FCN?

Do analysts prefer CRAI or FCN?

Does the media refer more to CRAI or FCN?

Which has more volatility and risk, CRAI or FCN?

Is CRAI or FCN more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CRAI or FCN?

Summary

How does Charles River Associates compare to Genpact?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of G or CRAI?

Is G or CRAI a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer G or CRAI?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, G or CRAI?

Does the media prefer G or CRAI?

Is G or CRAI more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, G or CRAI?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRAI vs. The Competition

Charles River Associates Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools