S&P 500   3,841.47 (-0.30%)
DOW   30,996.98 (-0.57%)
QQQ   325.42 (-0.29%)
AAPL   139.07 (+1.61%)
MSFT   225.95 (+0.44%)
FB   274.50 (+0.60%)
GOOGL   1,892.56 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,292.23 (-0.45%)
TSLA   846.64 (+0.20%)
NVDA   548.50 (-1.12%)
BABA   258.62 (-0.53%)
CGC   33.80 (+0.72%)
GE   11.11 (+0.36%)
MU   82.28 (-3.21%)
AMD   92.79 (+1.38%)
NIO   61.95 (+6.19%)
T   28.93 (+0.35%)
F   11.52 (-0.09%)
ACB   10.65 (-4.66%)
BA   205.84 (-0.76%)
DIS   172.78 (+0.88%)
NFLX   565.17 (-2.53%)
GILD   66.94 (-0.06%)
S&P 500   3,841.47 (-0.30%)
DOW   30,996.98 (-0.57%)
QQQ   325.42 (-0.29%)
AAPL   139.07 (+1.61%)
MSFT   225.95 (+0.44%)
FB   274.50 (+0.60%)
GOOGL   1,892.56 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,292.23 (-0.45%)
TSLA   846.64 (+0.20%)
NVDA   548.50 (-1.12%)
BABA   258.62 (-0.53%)
CGC   33.80 (+0.72%)
GE   11.11 (+0.36%)
MU   82.28 (-3.21%)
AMD   92.79 (+1.38%)
NIO   61.95 (+6.19%)
T   28.93 (+0.35%)
F   11.52 (-0.09%)
ACB   10.65 (-4.66%)
BA   205.84 (-0.76%)
DIS   172.78 (+0.88%)
NFLX   565.17 (-2.53%)
GILD   66.94 (-0.06%)
S&P 500   3,841.47 (-0.30%)
DOW   30,996.98 (-0.57%)
QQQ   325.42 (-0.29%)
AAPL   139.07 (+1.61%)
MSFT   225.95 (+0.44%)
FB   274.50 (+0.60%)
GOOGL   1,892.56 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,292.23 (-0.45%)
TSLA   846.64 (+0.20%)
NVDA   548.50 (-1.12%)
BABA   258.62 (-0.53%)
CGC   33.80 (+0.72%)
GE   11.11 (+0.36%)
MU   82.28 (-3.21%)
AMD   92.79 (+1.38%)
NIO   61.95 (+6.19%)
T   28.93 (+0.35%)
F   11.52 (-0.09%)
ACB   10.65 (-4.66%)
BA   205.84 (-0.76%)
DIS   172.78 (+0.88%)
NFLX   565.17 (-2.53%)
GILD   66.94 (-0.06%)
S&P 500   3,841.47 (-0.30%)
DOW   30,996.98 (-0.57%)
QQQ   325.42 (-0.29%)
AAPL   139.07 (+1.61%)
MSFT   225.95 (+0.44%)
FB   274.50 (+0.60%)
GOOGL   1,892.56 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,292.23 (-0.45%)
TSLA   846.64 (+0.20%)
NVDA   548.50 (-1.12%)
BABA   258.62 (-0.53%)
CGC   33.80 (+0.72%)
GE   11.11 (+0.36%)
MU   82.28 (-3.21%)
AMD   92.79 (+1.38%)
NIO   61.95 (+6.19%)
T   28.93 (+0.35%)
F   11.52 (-0.09%)
ACB   10.65 (-4.66%)
BA   205.84 (-0.76%)
DIS   172.78 (+0.88%)
NFLX   565.17 (-2.53%)
GILD   66.94 (-0.06%)
Log in
NYSE:FCN

FTI Consulting Competitors

$116.42
+0.68 (+0.59 %)
(As of 01/22/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$115.57
Now: $116.42
$116.85
50-Day Range
$106.96
MA: $111.53
$116.69
52-Week Range
$94.87
Now: $116.42
$144.10
Volume304,087 shs
Average Volume310,564 shs
Market Capitalization$4.15 billion
P/E Ratio23.91
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.41

Competitors

FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) Vs. VRSK, EFX, NLSN, EXPO, ICFI, and CBZ

Should you be buying FCN stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "research & consulting services" are considered alternatives and competitors to FTI Consulting, including Verisk Analytics (VRSK), Equifax (EFX), Nielsen (NLSN), Exponent (EXPO), ICF International (ICFI), and CBIZ (CBZ).

FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) and Verisk Analytics (NASDAQ:VRSK) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for FTI Consulting and Verisk Analytics, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FTI Consulting00203.00
Verisk Analytics15702.46

FTI Consulting currently has a consensus price target of $171.00, indicating a potential upside of 46.88%. Verisk Analytics has a consensus price target of $191.25, indicating a potential downside of 0.78%. Given FTI Consulting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe FTI Consulting is more favorable than Verisk Analytics.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.3% of FTI Consulting shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.2% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of FTI Consulting shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares FTI Consulting and Verisk Analytics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FTI Consulting7.56%13.27%7.18%
Verisk Analytics19.12%36.42%11.46%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FTI Consulting and Verisk Analytics' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTI Consulting$2.35 billion1.76$216.73 million$5.8020.07
Verisk Analytics$2.61 billion12.02$449.90 million$4.3844.01

Verisk Analytics has higher revenue and earnings than FTI Consulting. FTI Consulting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Verisk Analytics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Verisk Analytics beats FTI Consulting on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) and Equifax (NYSE:EFX) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for FTI Consulting and Equifax, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FTI Consulting00203.00
Equifax08802.50

FTI Consulting currently has a consensus price target of $171.00, indicating a potential upside of 46.88%. Equifax has a consensus price target of $178.3667, indicating a potential downside of 0.21%. Given FTI Consulting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe FTI Consulting is more favorable than Equifax.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.3% of FTI Consulting shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of Equifax shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of FTI Consulting shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Equifax shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares FTI Consulting and Equifax's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FTI Consulting7.56%13.27%7.18%
Equifax11.29%29.20%9.34%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FTI Consulting and Equifax's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTI Consulting$2.35 billion1.76$216.73 million$5.8020.07
Equifax$3.51 billion6.20$-398,800,000.00$5.6231.80

FTI Consulting has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Equifax. FTI Consulting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equifax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Equifax has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Equifax beats FTI Consulting on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) and Nielsen (NYSE:NLSN) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for FTI Consulting and Nielsen, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FTI Consulting00203.00
Nielsen03602.67

FTI Consulting currently has a consensus price target of $171.00, indicating a potential upside of 46.88%. Nielsen has a consensus price target of $20.7273, indicating a potential downside of 4.61%. Given FTI Consulting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe FTI Consulting is more favorable than Nielsen.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.3% of FTI Consulting shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of FTI Consulting shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Nielsen shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares FTI Consulting and Nielsen's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FTI Consulting7.56%13.27%7.18%
Nielsen-2.38%22.28%3.45%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FTI Consulting and Nielsen's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTI Consulting$2.35 billion1.76$216.73 million$5.8020.07
Nielsen$6.50 billion1.19$-415,000,000.00$1.6912.86

FTI Consulting has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nielsen. Nielsen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTI Consulting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nielsen has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

FTI Consulting beats Nielsen on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) and Exponent (NASDAQ:EXPO) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for FTI Consulting and Exponent, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FTI Consulting00203.00
Exponent01202.67

FTI Consulting currently has a consensus price target of $171.00, indicating a potential upside of 46.88%. Exponent has a consensus price target of $89.00, indicating a potential downside of 4.55%. Given FTI Consulting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe FTI Consulting is more favorable than Exponent.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.3% of FTI Consulting shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.3% of Exponent shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of FTI Consulting shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Exponent shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares FTI Consulting and Exponent's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FTI Consulting7.56%13.27%7.18%
Exponent19.63%23.66%15.24%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FTI Consulting and Exponent's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTI Consulting$2.35 billion1.76$216.73 million$5.8020.07
Exponent$417.20 million11.54$82.46 million$1.5360.94

FTI Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than Exponent. FTI Consulting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Exponent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Exponent has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

FTI Consulting beats Exponent on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) and ICF International (NASDAQ:ICFI) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FTI Consulting and ICF International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTI Consulting$2.35 billion1.76$216.73 million$5.8020.07
ICF International$1.48 billion1.04$68.94 million$4.1519.65

FTI Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than ICF International. ICF International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTI Consulting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares FTI Consulting and ICF International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FTI Consulting7.56%13.27%7.18%
ICF International4.19%10.77%4.85%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.3% of FTI Consulting shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of ICF International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of FTI Consulting shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of ICF International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ICF International has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for FTI Consulting and ICF International, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FTI Consulting00203.00
ICF International00403.00

FTI Consulting currently has a consensus price target of $171.00, indicating a potential upside of 46.88%. ICF International has a consensus price target of $91.40, indicating a potential upside of 12.09%. Given FTI Consulting's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe FTI Consulting is more favorable than ICF International.

Summary

FTI Consulting beats ICF International on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) and CBIZ (NYSE:CBZ) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares FTI Consulting and CBIZ's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTI Consulting$2.35 billion1.76$216.73 million$5.8020.07
CBIZ$948.42 million1.56$70.71 million$1.2721.42

FTI Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than CBIZ. FTI Consulting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CBIZ, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares FTI Consulting and CBIZ's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FTI Consulting7.56%13.27%7.18%
CBIZ8.08%11.27%5.27%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.3% of FTI Consulting shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.4% of CBIZ shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of FTI Consulting shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of CBIZ shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CBIZ has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for FTI Consulting and CBIZ, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FTI Consulting00203.00
CBIZ00103.00

FTI Consulting currently has a consensus target price of $171.00, indicating a potential upside of 46.88%. Given FTI Consulting's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FTI Consulting is more favorable than CBIZ.

Summary

FTI Consulting beats CBIZ on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


FTI Consulting Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Verisk Analytics logo
VRSK
Verisk Analytics
1.9$192.76+1.1%$31.34 billion$2.61 billion61.78
Equifax logo
EFX
Equifax
1.6$178.74+0.1%$21.74 billion$3.51 billion49.79Analyst Report
Nielsen logo
NLSN
Nielsen
1.1$21.73+0.2%$7.76 billion$6.50 billion-51.74News Coverage
Exponent logo
EXPO
Exponent
1.7$93.24+1.1%$4.81 billion$417.20 million62.16Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
ICF International logo
ICFI
ICF International
2.1$81.54+0.8%$1.54 billion$1.48 billion25.32
CBIZ logo
CBZ
CBIZ
1.4$27.20+0.0%$1.48 billion$948.42 million19.57
Huron Consulting Group logo
HURN
Huron Consulting Group
1.5$58.30+3.6%$1.33 billion$965.47 million-291.49Analyst Report
News Coverage
CRA International logo
CRAI
CRA International
1.9$59.75+3.0%$464.62 million$451.37 million21.19
VSE logo
VSEC
VSE
1.7$41.39+3.0%$457.40 million$752.63 million413.94News Coverage
Franklin Covey logo
FC
Franklin Covey
1.5$24.96+1.9%$350.34 million$198.46 million-35.66
Acacia Research logo
ACTG
Acacia Research
0.9$5.74+6.4%$282.86 million$11.25 million47.83News Coverage
Mistras Group logo
MG
Mistras Group
1.7$8.49+3.2%$247.85 million$748.59 million-2.49
Odyssey Marine Exploration logo
OMEX
Odyssey Marine Exploration
0.5$7.01+1.6%$85.58 million$3.10 million-4.74High Trading Volume
News Coverage
This page was last updated on 1/22/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.