Go Pro

FTI Consulting (FCN) Competitors

FTI Consulting logo
$159.68 +0.30 (+0.19%)
Closing price 07/31/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$159.32 -0.35 (-0.22%)
As of 07/31/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FCN vs. IT, ROL, VSEC, EXPO, and IHS

Should you buy FTI Consulting stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares FTI Consulting with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with FTI Consulting include Gartner (IT), Rollins (ROL), VSE (VSEC), Exponent (EXPO), and IHS (IHS).

How does FTI Consulting compare to Gartner?

FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) and Gartner (NYSE:IT) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Gartner has higher revenue and earnings than FTI Consulting. Gartner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTI Consulting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTI Consulting$3.79B1.16$270.87M$8.2719.31
Gartner$6.50B1.56$729.23M$10.1214.95

FTI Consulting presently has a consensus price target of $174.50, suggesting a potential upside of 9.28%. Gartner has a consensus price target of $173.10, suggesting a potential upside of 14.38%. Given Gartner's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gartner is more favorable than FTI Consulting.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FTI Consulting
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Gartner
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

99.4% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of Gartner shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Gartner shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gartner has a net margin of 11.44% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of 6.44%. Gartner's return on equity of 161.39% beat FTI Consulting's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FTI Consulting6.44% 15.91% 7.35%
Gartner 11.44%161.39%12.74%

In the previous week, FTI Consulting had 4 more articles in the media than Gartner. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for FTI Consulting and 19 mentions for Gartner. Gartner's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat FTI Consulting's score of 0.45 indicating that Gartner is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FTI Consulting
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
13 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Gartner
8 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

FTI Consulting has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its share price is 105% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gartner has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Gartner beats FTI Consulting on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FTI Consulting compare to Rollins?

Rollins (NYSE:ROL) and FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

51.8% of Rollins shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.8% of Rollins shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Rollins had 9 more articles in the media than FTI Consulting. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Rollins and 23 mentions for FTI Consulting. Rollins' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat FTI Consulting's score of 0.45 indicating that Rollins is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Rollins
13 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FTI Consulting
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
13 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Rollins has a net margin of 13.55% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of 6.44%. Rollins' return on equity of 38.81% beat FTI Consulting's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rollins13.55% 38.81% 17.24%
FTI Consulting 6.44%15.91%7.35%

Rollins has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FTI Consulting. FTI Consulting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rollins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rollins$3.76B4.87$526.71M$1.1034.62
FTI Consulting$3.79B1.16$270.87M$8.2719.31

Rollins has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTI Consulting has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its stock price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

Rollins presently has a consensus target price of $48.71, suggesting a potential upside of 27.88%. FTI Consulting has a consensus target price of $174.50, suggesting a potential upside of 9.28%. Given Rollins' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Rollins is more favorable than FTI Consulting.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rollins
3 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
FTI Consulting
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Rollins beats FTI Consulting on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FTI Consulting compare to VSE?

VSE (NASDAQ:VSEC) and FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

FTI Consulting has a net margin of 6.44% compared to VSE's net margin of 4.95%. FTI Consulting's return on equity of 15.91% beat VSE's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
VSE4.95% 6.56% 4.68%
FTI Consulting 6.44%15.91%7.35%

VSE has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTI Consulting has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its stock price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

91.5% of VSE shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of FTI Consulting shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of VSE shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of FTI Consulting shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

VSE currently has a consensus price target of $239.78, indicating a potential upside of 23.35%. FTI Consulting has a consensus price target of $174.50, indicating a potential upside of 9.28%. Given VSE's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe VSE is more favorable than FTI Consulting.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
VSE
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
FTI Consulting
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

FTI Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than VSE. FTI Consulting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than VSE, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
VSE$1.11B4.90$11.70M$2.3782.02
FTI Consulting$3.79B1.16$270.87M$8.2719.31

In the previous week, FTI Consulting had 23 more articles in the media than VSE. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for FTI Consulting and 0 mentions for VSE. FTI Consulting's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat VSE's score of 0.00 indicating that FTI Consulting is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
VSE Neutral
FTI Consulting Neutral

Summary

FTI Consulting beats VSE on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FTI Consulting compare to Exponent?

Exponent (NASDAQ:EXPO) and FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

92.4% of Exponent shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Exponent shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FTI Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than Exponent. FTI Consulting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Exponent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Exponent$582.01M5.57$106.01M$2.2329.98
FTI Consulting$3.79B1.16$270.87M$8.2719.31

In the previous week, FTI Consulting had 8 more articles in the media than Exponent. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for FTI Consulting and 15 mentions for Exponent. Exponent's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat FTI Consulting's score of 0.45 indicating that Exponent is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Exponent
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FTI Consulting
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
13 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Exponent has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTI Consulting has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its stock price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

Exponent currently has a consensus price target of $81.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.17%. FTI Consulting has a consensus price target of $174.50, suggesting a potential upside of 9.28%. Given Exponent's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Exponent is more favorable than FTI Consulting.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Exponent
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
FTI Consulting
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Exponent has a net margin of 17.67% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of 6.44%. Exponent's return on equity of 31.48% beat FTI Consulting's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Exponent17.67% 31.48% 15.53%
FTI Consulting 6.44%15.91%7.35%

Summary

Exponent beats FTI Consulting on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FTI Consulting compare to IHS?

FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) and IHS (NYSE:IHS) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

IHS has a net margin of 10.74% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of 6.44%. FTI Consulting's return on equity of 15.91% beat IHS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FTI Consulting6.44% 15.91% 7.35%
IHS 10.74%-1,351.44%12.81%

99.4% of FTI Consulting shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.5% of IHS shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of FTI Consulting shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

FTI Consulting has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its share price is 105% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IHS has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

FTI Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than IHS. IHS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTI Consulting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTI Consulting$3.79B1.16$270.87M$8.2719.31
IHS$1.58B1.74$143.60M$0.5315.50

In the previous week, FTI Consulting had 16 more articles in the media than IHS. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for FTI Consulting and 7 mentions for IHS. IHS's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat FTI Consulting's score of 0.45 indicating that IHS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FTI Consulting
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
13 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
IHS
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

FTI Consulting presently has a consensus target price of $174.50, indicating a potential upside of 9.28%. IHS has a consensus target price of $8.38, indicating a potential upside of 1.95%. Given FTI Consulting's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe FTI Consulting is more favorable than IHS.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FTI Consulting
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
IHS
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

Summary

FTI Consulting beats IHS on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FTI Consulting News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FCN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FCN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FCN vs. The Competition

MetricFTI ConsultingProfessional Services IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$4.41B$7.20B$10.53B$23.66B
Dividend YieldN/A3.88%120.66%4.21%
P/E Ratio19.3137.5827.5731.00
Price / Sales1.1624.94306.6081.85
Price / Cash11.9122.5624.0718.73
Price / Book2.846.564.724.76
Net Income$270.87M$238.30M$610.65M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.26%0.26%-0.52%-0.34%
1 Month Performance4.10%4.23%-2.30%-0.53%
1 Year Performance-3.52%-7.91%12.56%19.19%

FTI Consulting Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FCN
FTI Consulting
3.0173 of 5 stars
$159.68
+0.2%
$174.50
+9.3%
-3.5%$4.41B$3.79B19.318,118
IT
Gartner
4.0384 of 5 stars
$147.71
+5.1%
$173.10
+17.2%
-53.9%$9.41B$6.50B14.6020,244
ROL
Rollins
4.7692 of 5 stars
$39.03
+1.2%
$48.71
+24.8%
-34.0%$18.55B$3.76B35.4821,946
VSEC
VSE
3.6381 of 5 stars
$200.93
+2.8%
$239.78
+19.3%
+32.9%$5.48B$1.11B84.781,600
EXPO
Exponent
4.2558 of 5 stars
$62.76
+2.1%
$77.50
+23.5%
-2.2%$2.98B$582.01M29.191,212

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FCN) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners