Free Trial

Franklin Covey (FC) Competitors

Franklin Covey logo
$20.88 -0.40 (-1.88%)
As of 03:30 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FC vs. CRAI, MG, ACTG, OMEX, and VRSK

Should you buy Franklin Covey stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Franklin Covey with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Franklin Covey include Charles River Associates (CRAI), Mistras Group (MG), Acacia Research (ACTG), Odyssey Marine Exploration (OMEX), and Verisk Analytics (VRSK). These companies are all part of the "research & consulting services" industry.

How does Franklin Covey compare to Charles River Associates?

Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) and Franklin Covey (NYSE:FC) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Charles River Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Franklin Covey. Franklin Covey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles River Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charles River Associates$751.58M1.19$54.78M$7.2019.28
Franklin Covey$267.07M0.88$3.07M-$0.21N/A

84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.9% of Franklin Covey shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Franklin Covey shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Charles River Associates has a net margin of 6.22% compared to Franklin Covey's net margin of -0.88%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 26.02% beat Franklin Covey's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Charles River Associates6.22% 26.02% 8.35%
Franklin Covey -0.88%12.79%3.23%

In the previous week, Charles River Associates had 11 more articles in the media than Franklin Covey. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Charles River Associates and 1 mentions for Franklin Covey. Charles River Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.08 beat Franklin Covey's score of 0.00 indicating that Charles River Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Charles River Associates
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Franklin Covey
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Charles River Associates presently has a consensus target price of $245.00, indicating a potential upside of 76.46%. Franklin Covey has a consensus target price of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.52%. Given Charles River Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Charles River Associates is more favorable than Franklin Covey.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Charles River Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Franklin Covey
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Charles River Associates has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Charles River Associates beats Franklin Covey on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Franklin Covey compare to Mistras Group?

Franklin Covey (NYSE:FC) and Mistras Group (NYSE:MG) are both small-cap research & consulting services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

69.9% of Franklin Covey shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.9% of Mistras Group shares are held by institutional investors. 15.2% of Franklin Covey shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Mistras Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Franklin Covey presently has a consensus target price of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.52%. Mistras Group has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.72%. Given Franklin Covey's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Franklin Covey is more favorable than Mistras Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Franklin Covey
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Mistras Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Mistras Group has higher revenue and earnings than Franklin Covey. Franklin Covey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mistras Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Franklin Covey$267.07M0.88$3.07M-$0.21N/A
Mistras Group$724.02M0.75$16.84M$0.7024.30

Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mistras Group has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mistras Group had 15 more articles in the media than Franklin Covey. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Mistras Group and 1 mentions for Franklin Covey. Mistras Group's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Franklin Covey's score of 0.00 indicating that Mistras Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Franklin Covey
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Mistras Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Mistras Group has a net margin of 3.06% compared to Franklin Covey's net margin of -0.88%. Mistras Group's return on equity of 13.60% beat Franklin Covey's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Franklin Covey-0.88% 12.79% 3.23%
Mistras Group 3.06%13.60%5.35%

Summary

Mistras Group beats Franklin Covey on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Franklin Covey compare to Acacia Research?

Franklin Covey (NYSE:FC) and Acacia Research (NASDAQ:ACTG) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

69.9% of Franklin Covey shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Acacia Research shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Franklin Covey shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Acacia Research shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Acacia Research had 4 more articles in the media than Franklin Covey. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Acacia Research and 1 mentions for Franklin Covey. Acacia Research's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Franklin Covey's score of 0.00 indicating that Acacia Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Franklin Covey
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Acacia Research
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Franklin Covey has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of -8.53%. Franklin Covey's return on equity of 12.79% beat Acacia Research's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Franklin Covey-0.88% 12.79% 3.23%
Acacia Research -8.53%-2.81%-2.11%

Acacia Research has higher revenue and earnings than Franklin Covey. Franklin Covey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acacia Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Franklin Covey$267.07M0.88$3.07M-$0.21N/A
Acacia Research$285.23M1.60$21.68M-$0.18N/A

Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acacia Research has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Franklin Covey currently has a consensus target price of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.52%. Acacia Research has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.25%. Given Acacia Research's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Acacia Research is more favorable than Franklin Covey.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Franklin Covey
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Acacia Research
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Acacia Research beats Franklin Covey on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Franklin Covey compare to Odyssey Marine Exploration?

Odyssey Marine Exploration (NASDAQ:OMEX) and Franklin Covey (NYSE:FC) are both small-cap research & consulting services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Odyssey Marine Exploration has a beta of -0.24, meaning that its share price is 124% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Franklin Covey has a consensus price target of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.52%. Given Franklin Covey's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Franklin Covey is more favorable than Odyssey Marine Exploration.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Odyssey Marine Exploration
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Franklin Covey
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Franklin Covey has higher revenue and earnings than Odyssey Marine Exploration. Franklin Covey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Odyssey Marine Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Odyssey Marine Exploration$350K188.10-$43.08M-$1.12N/A
Franklin Covey$267.07M0.88$3.07M-$0.21N/A

In the previous week, Odyssey Marine Exploration had 2 more articles in the media than Franklin Covey. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Odyssey Marine Exploration and 1 mentions for Franklin Covey. Odyssey Marine Exploration's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Franklin Covey's score of 0.00 indicating that Odyssey Marine Exploration is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Odyssey Marine Exploration
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Franklin Covey
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Franklin Covey has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Odyssey Marine Exploration's net margin of -18,586.78%. Franklin Covey's return on equity of 12.79% beat Odyssey Marine Exploration's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Odyssey Marine Exploration-18,586.78% N/A -269.07%
Franklin Covey -0.88%12.79%3.23%

50.0% of Odyssey Marine Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.9% of Franklin Covey shares are held by institutional investors. 8.0% of Odyssey Marine Exploration shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Franklin Covey shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Franklin Covey beats Odyssey Marine Exploration on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Franklin Covey compare to Verisk Analytics?

Franklin Covey (NYSE:FC) and Verisk Analytics (NASDAQ:VRSK) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Franklin Covey presently has a consensus price target of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.52%. Verisk Analytics has a consensus price target of $238.20, indicating a potential upside of 52.34%. Given Verisk Analytics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Verisk Analytics is more favorable than Franklin Covey.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Franklin Covey
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Verisk Analytics
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47

Verisk Analytics has higher revenue and earnings than Franklin Covey. Franklin Covey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Verisk Analytics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Franklin Covey$267.07M0.88$3.07M-$0.21N/A
Verisk Analytics$3.10B6.60$908.30M$6.5723.80

In the previous week, Verisk Analytics had 6 more articles in the media than Franklin Covey. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Verisk Analytics and 1 mentions for Franklin Covey. Verisk Analytics' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Franklin Covey's score of 0.00 indicating that Verisk Analytics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Franklin Covey
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Verisk Analytics
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Verisk Analytics has a net margin of 29.34% compared to Franklin Covey's net margin of -0.88%. Franklin Covey's return on equity of 12.79% beat Verisk Analytics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Franklin Covey-0.88% 12.79% 3.23%
Verisk Analytics 29.34%-2,405.75%18.40%

69.9% of Franklin Covey shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Verisk Analytics shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Franklin Covey shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Verisk Analytics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Verisk Analytics beats Franklin Covey on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Franklin Covey News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FC vs. The Competition

MetricFranklin CoveyConsulting IndustryBusiness SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$235.37M$4.04B$6.31B$23.00B
Dividend YieldN/A2.58%3.12%4.07%
P/E Ratio-99.4513.8531.4928.40
Price / Sales0.881.94432.5024.14
Price / Cash13.3417.7323.4425.11
Price / Book3.9513.556.744.76
Net Income$3.07M$251.10M$199.93M$1.06B
7 Day Performance-7.68%-6.20%0.01%-0.67%
1 Month Performance-9.06%-5.35%1.88%1.83%
1 Year Performance-10.39%-28.02%36.46%25.08%

Franklin Covey Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FC
Franklin Covey
2.1298 of 5 stars
$20.88
-1.9%
$26.00
+24.5%
-8.3%$235.37M$267.07MN/A1,120
CRAI
Charles River Associates
4.6961 of 5 stars
$146.89
+0.3%
$245.00
+66.8%
-26.8%$948.91M$751.58M20.40940
MG
Mistras Group
4.2354 of 5 stars
$17.22
-3.1%
$19.00
+10.3%
+115.8%$548.10M$724.02M24.614,800
ACTG
Acacia Research
2.4108 of 5 stars
$4.68
+0.8%
$6.00
+28.3%
+21.6%$451.56M$285.23MN/A1,036
OMEX
Odyssey Marine Exploration
0.7627 of 5 stars
$1.06
-7.5%
N/A+18.7%$61.74M$350KN/A10

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FC) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners