NNOX vs. LNZA, RDUS, VOCL, ECX, ICG, ACTG, CMPO, LQDT, ADSE, and FC
Should you be buying Nano-X Imaging stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Nano-X Imaging include LanzaTech Global (LNZA), Radius Recycling (RDUS), Creatd (VOCL), ECARX (ECX), Intchains Group (ICG), Acacia Research (ACTG), CompoSecure (CMPO), Liquidity Services (LQDT), ADS-TEC Energy (ADSE), and Franklin Covey (FC). These companies are all part of the "business services" sector.
Nano-X Imaging (NASDAQ:NNOX) and LanzaTech Global (NASDAQ:LNZA) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and community ranking.
21.5% of Nano-X Imaging shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.8% of LanzaTech Global shares are held by institutional investors. 7.7% of Nano-X Imaging shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Nano-X Imaging presently has a consensus price target of $16.25, indicating a potential upside of 81.97%. LanzaTech Global has a consensus price target of $8.00, indicating a potential upside of 277.36%. Given LanzaTech Global's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe LanzaTech Global is more favorable than Nano-X Imaging.
Nano-X Imaging received 18 more outperform votes than LanzaTech Global when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 100.00% of users gave LanzaTech Global an outperform vote while only 67.57% of users gave Nano-X Imaging an outperform vote.
LanzaTech Global has a net margin of -214.11% compared to Nano-X Imaging's net margin of -613.59%. Nano-X Imaging's return on equity of -30.27% beat LanzaTech Global's return on equity.
Nano-X Imaging has higher earnings, but lower revenue than LanzaTech Global. Nano-X Imaging is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LanzaTech Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Nano-X Imaging has a beta of 2.15, indicating that its share price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, LanzaTech Global has a beta of 1.46, indicating that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, LanzaTech Global had 1 more articles in the media than Nano-X Imaging. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for LanzaTech Global and 1 mentions for Nano-X Imaging. LanzaTech Global's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Nano-X Imaging's score of 0.00 indicating that LanzaTech Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Summary
LanzaTech Global beats Nano-X Imaging on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Nano-X Imaging News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NNOX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NNOX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Nano-X Imaging Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
