Free Trial

Liquidia (LQDA) Competitors

Liquidia logo
$53.13 +10.83 (+25.60%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$50.93 -2.20 (-4.14%)
As of 05:04 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

LQDA vs. SNN, PEN, SOLV, GKOS, and BLCO

Should you be buying Liquidia stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Liquidia include Smith & Nephew SNATS (SNN), Penumbra (PEN), Solventum (SOLV), Glaukos (GKOS), and Bausch + Lomb (BLCO). These companies are all part of the "medical equipment" industry.

How does Liquidia compare to Smith & Nephew SNATS?

Liquidia (NASDAQ:LQDA) and Smith & Nephew SNATS (NYSE:SNN) are both medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Liquidia currently has a consensus price target of $46.22, suggesting a potential downside of 12.92%. Smith & Nephew SNATS has a consensus price target of $30.93, suggesting a potential upside of 6.22%. Given Smith & Nephew SNATS's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Smith & Nephew SNATS is more favorable than Liquidia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Liquidia
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
Smith & Nephew SNATS
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

64.5% of Liquidia shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.6% of Smith & Nephew SNATS shares are held by institutional investors. 25.6% of Liquidia shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Smith & Nephew SNATS shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Liquidia had 15 more articles in the media than Smith & Nephew SNATS. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Liquidia and 7 mentions for Smith & Nephew SNATS. Smith & Nephew SNATS's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Liquidia's score of 0.24 indicating that Smith & Nephew SNATS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Liquidia
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Smith & Nephew SNATS
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Smith & Nephew SNATS has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidia.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Liquidia$158.32M29.80-$68.92M-$0.83N/A
Smith & Nephew SNATS$6.16B2.02$625MN/AN/A

Liquidia has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Smith & Nephew SNATS has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Smith & Nephew SNATS has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Liquidia's net margin of -43.53%. Smith & Nephew SNATS's return on equity of 0.00% beat Liquidia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Liquidia-43.53% -209.33% -25.32%
Smith & Nephew SNATS N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Smith & Nephew SNATS beats Liquidia on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidia compare to Penumbra?

Liquidia (NASDAQ:LQDA) and Penumbra (NYSE:PEN) are both medical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Penumbra has a net margin of 11.76% compared to Liquidia's net margin of -43.53%. Penumbra's return on equity of 10.87% beat Liquidia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Liquidia-43.53% -209.33% -25.32%
Penumbra 11.76%10.87%8.45%

Liquidia currently has a consensus price target of $46.22, suggesting a potential downside of 12.92%. Penumbra has a consensus price target of $361.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.34%. Given Penumbra's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Penumbra is more favorable than Liquidia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Liquidia
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
Penumbra
0 Sell rating(s)
14 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.18

In the previous week, Liquidia had 11 more articles in the media than Penumbra. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Liquidia and 11 mentions for Penumbra. Penumbra's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat Liquidia's score of 0.24 indicating that Penumbra is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Liquidia
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Penumbra
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Penumbra has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidia. Liquidia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Penumbra, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Liquidia$158.32M29.80-$68.92M-$0.83N/A
Penumbra$1.40B9.01$177.69M$4.3474.11

64.5% of Liquidia shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.9% of Penumbra shares are held by institutional investors. 25.6% of Liquidia shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Penumbra shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Liquidia has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Penumbra has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Penumbra beats Liquidia on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidia compare to Solventum?

Liquidia (NASDAQ:LQDA) and Solventum (NYSE:SOLV) are both medical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Solventum has a net margin of 17.33% compared to Liquidia's net margin of -43.53%. Solventum's return on equity of 23.51% beat Liquidia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Liquidia-43.53% -209.33% -25.32%
Solventum 17.33%23.51%7.63%

Liquidia currently has a consensus price target of $46.22, suggesting a potential downside of 12.92%. Solventum has a consensus price target of $85.91, suggesting a potential upside of 15.91%. Given Solventum's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Solventum is more favorable than Liquidia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Liquidia
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
Solventum
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.46

In the previous week, Liquidia had 1 more articles in the media than Solventum. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Liquidia and 21 mentions for Solventum. Solventum's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Liquidia's score of 0.24 indicating that Solventum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Liquidia
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Solventum
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
12 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Solventum has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidia. Liquidia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Solventum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Liquidia$158.32M29.80-$68.92M-$0.83N/A
Solventum$8.26B1.55$1.56B$8.169.08

64.5% of Liquidia shares are held by institutional investors. 25.6% of Liquidia shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Solventum shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Liquidia has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Solventum has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Solventum beats Liquidia on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidia compare to Glaukos?

Liquidia (NASDAQ:LQDA) and Glaukos (NYSE:GKOS) are both mid-cap medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

64.5% of Liquidia shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.0% of Glaukos shares are held by institutional investors. 25.6% of Liquidia shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.4% of Glaukos shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Glaukos has a net margin of -34.34% compared to Liquidia's net margin of -43.53%. Glaukos' return on equity of -6.92% beat Liquidia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Liquidia-43.53% -209.33% -25.32%
Glaukos -34.34%-6.92%-5.25%

Liquidia presently has a consensus price target of $46.22, suggesting a potential downside of 12.92%. Glaukos has a consensus price target of $144.42, suggesting a potential upside of 6.84%. Given Glaukos' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Glaukos is more favorable than Liquidia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Liquidia
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
Glaukos
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

In the previous week, Liquidia had 9 more articles in the media than Glaukos. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Liquidia and 13 mentions for Glaukos. Glaukos' average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Liquidia's score of 0.24 indicating that Glaukos is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Liquidia
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Glaukos
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Liquidia has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its share price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Glaukos has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Liquidia has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Glaukos. Liquidia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glaukos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Liquidia$158.32M29.80-$68.92M-$0.83N/A
Glaukos$507.44M15.64-$187.69M-$3.28N/A

Summary

Glaukos beats Liquidia on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidia compare to Bausch + Lomb?

Liquidia (NASDAQ:LQDA) and Bausch + Lomb (NYSE:BLCO) are both mid-cap medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

64.5% of Liquidia shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.1% of Bausch + Lomb shares are held by institutional investors. 25.6% of Liquidia shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Bausch + Lomb shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Bausch + Lomb has a net margin of -4.21% compared to Liquidia's net margin of -43.53%. Bausch + Lomb's return on equity of 3.60% beat Liquidia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Liquidia-43.53% -209.33% -25.32%
Bausch + Lomb -4.21%3.60%1.69%

Liquidia presently has a consensus price target of $46.22, suggesting a potential downside of 12.92%. Bausch + Lomb has a consensus price target of $18.08, suggesting a potential upside of 12.32%. Given Bausch + Lomb's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Bausch + Lomb is more favorable than Liquidia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Liquidia
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
Bausch + Lomb
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.21

In the previous week, Liquidia had 10 more articles in the media than Bausch + Lomb. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Liquidia and 12 mentions for Bausch + Lomb. Bausch + Lomb's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Liquidia's score of 0.24 indicating that Bausch + Lomb is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Liquidia
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Bausch + Lomb
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Liquidia has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its share price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bausch + Lomb has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Liquidia has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bausch + Lomb. Liquidia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bausch + Lomb, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Liquidia$158.32M29.80-$68.92M-$0.83N/A
Bausch + Lomb$5.10B1.13-$360M-$0.62N/A

Summary

Bausch + Lomb beats Liquidia on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Liquidia News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LQDA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LQDA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LQDA vs. The Competition

MetricLiquidiaMED IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$4.72B$3.37B$6.18B$12.27B
Dividend YieldN/A2.24%2.78%5.22%
P/E Ratio-63.9515.1920.6625.69
Price / Sales29.80194.05527.0364.81
Price / CashN/A56.9327.8136.27
Price / Book104.076.949.776.74
Net Income-$68.92M$24.11M$3.54B$333.09M
7 Day PerformanceN/AN/AN/A0.52%
1 Month Performance37.69%4.75%6.33%9.09%
1 Year Performance246.46%78.29%41.88%42.54%

Liquidia Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LQDA
Liquidia
2.0036 of 5 stars
$53.13
+25.6%
$46.22
-13.0%
+176.7%$4.72B$158.32MN/A50
SNN
Smith & Nephew SNATS
3.0197 of 5 stars
$30.92
-0.8%
$34.75
+12.4%
+5.6%$13.30B$6.16BN/A16,988
PEN
Penumbra
2.7759 of 5 stars
$324.77
-0.2%
$364.60
+12.3%
+8.4%$12.80B$1.40B71.854,700
SOLV
Solventum
3.4771 of 5 stars
$67.52
+1.3%
$89.45
+32.5%
+4.4%$11.55B$8.33B7.6120,000
GKOS
Glaukos
2.0211 of 5 stars
$135.98
-3.0%
$138.85
+2.1%
+48.1%$8.24B$507.44MN/A1,094

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:LQDA) was last updated on 5/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners