Huron Consulting Group Competitors

Huron Consulting Group (NASDAQ:HURN) and Equifax (NYSE:EFX) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

90.3% of Huron Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Equifax shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Huron Consulting Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Equifax shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Equifax has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Huron Consulting Group and Equifax's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Equifax has higher revenue and earnings than Huron Consulting Group. Huron Consulting Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equifax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Huron Consulting Group and Equifax's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Huron Consulting Group and Equifax, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Huron Consulting Group presently has a consensus price target of $64.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 30.79%. Equifax has a consensus price target of $199.3182, suggesting a potential downside of 14.38%. Given Huron Consulting Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Huron Consulting Group is more favorable than Equifax.

Summary

Equifax beats Huron Consulting Group on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Huron Consulting Group (NASDAQ:HURN) and Verisk Analytics (NASDAQ:VRSK) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

90.3% of Huron Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Verisk Analytics shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Huron Consulting Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Verisk Analytics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Huron Consulting Group and Verisk Analytics' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Verisk Analytics has higher revenue and earnings than Huron Consulting Group. Huron Consulting Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Verisk Analytics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Huron Consulting Group and Verisk Analytics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Huron Consulting Group and Verisk Analytics, as reported by MarketBeat.

Huron Consulting Group presently has a consensus target price of $64.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 30.79%. Verisk Analytics has a consensus target price of $203.25, suggesting a potential upside of 18.80%. Given Huron Consulting Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Huron Consulting Group is more favorable than Verisk Analytics.

Summary

Verisk Analytics beats Huron Consulting Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Huron Consulting Group (NASDAQ:HURN) and Dun & Bradstreet (NYSE:DNB) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

90.3% of Huron Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.2% of Dun & Bradstreet shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Huron Consulting Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.3% of Dun & Bradstreet shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Huron Consulting Group and Dun & Bradstreet's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Huron Consulting Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Dun & Bradstreet. Dun & Bradstreet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Huron Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Huron Consulting Group and Dun & Bradstreet's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Huron Consulting Group and Dun & Bradstreet, as reported by MarketBeat.

Huron Consulting Group presently has a consensus target price of $64.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 30.79%. Dun & Bradstreet has a consensus target price of $29.1250, suggesting a potential upside of 38.69%. Given Dun & Bradstreet's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dun & Bradstreet is more favorable than Huron Consulting Group.

Summary

Dun & Bradstreet beats Huron Consulting Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Huron Consulting Group (NASDAQ:HURN) and Nielsen (NYSE:NLSN) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

90.3% of Huron Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Huron Consulting Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Nielsen shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nielsen has a beta of 1.46, meaning that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Huron Consulting Group and Nielsen's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Nielsen has higher revenue and earnings than Huron Consulting Group. Nielsen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Huron Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Huron Consulting Group and Nielsen's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Huron Consulting Group and Nielsen, as reported by MarketBeat.

Huron Consulting Group presently has a consensus target price of $64.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 30.79%. Nielsen has a consensus target price of $25.80, suggesting a potential upside of 5.52%. Given Huron Consulting Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Huron Consulting Group is more favorable than Nielsen.

Summary

Nielsen beats Huron Consulting Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Huron Consulting Group (NASDAQ:HURN) and FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Huron Consulting Group and FTI Consulting, as reported by MarketBeat.

Huron Consulting Group presently has a consensus target price of $64.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 30.79%. FTI Consulting has a consensus target price of $170.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.20%. Given Huron Consulting Group's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Huron Consulting Group is more favorable than FTI Consulting.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Huron Consulting Group and FTI Consulting's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

FTI Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than Huron Consulting Group. FTI Consulting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Huron Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

90.3% of Huron Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Huron Consulting Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Huron Consulting Group and FTI Consulting's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

FTI Consulting beats Huron Consulting Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Exponent (NASDAQ:EXPO) and Huron Consulting Group (NASDAQ:HURN) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

Exponent has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Exponent and Huron Consulting Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Huron Consulting Group has a consensus target price of $64.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 30.79%. Given Huron Consulting Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Huron Consulting Group is more favorable than Exponent.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Exponent and Huron Consulting Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Exponent has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Huron Consulting Group. Huron Consulting Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Exponent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

89.5% of Exponent shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.3% of Huron Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Exponent shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Huron Consulting Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Exponent and Huron Consulting Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Huron Consulting Group beats Exponent on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.