Go Pro

ICF International (ICFI) Competitors

ICF International logo
$83.00 -0.68 (-0.81%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$82.55 -0.45 (-0.55%)
As of 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ICFI vs. ANDG, PL, SAIC, PSN, and AMTM

Should you buy ICF International stock or one of its competitors? ICF International's main competitors and comparable companies include Andersen Group (ANDG), Planet Labs PBC (PL), Science Applications International (SAIC), Parsons (PSN), and Amentum (AMTM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "research & consulting services" industry.

How does ICF International compare to Andersen Group?

Andersen Group (NYSE:ANDG) and ICF International (NASDAQ:ICFI) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

ICF International has a net margin of 4.86% compared to Andersen Group's net margin of 0.00%. ICF International's return on equity of 11.53% beat Andersen Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Andersen GroupN/A N/A N/A
ICF International 4.86%11.53%5.73%

Andersen Group presently has a consensus price target of $54.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.35%. ICF International has a consensus price target of $105.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.51%. Given ICF International's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ICF International is more favorable than Andersen Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Andersen Group
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
ICF International
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

94.1% of ICF International shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.0% of Andersen Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ICF International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

ICF International has higher revenue and earnings than Andersen Group. Andersen Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ICF International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Andersen Group$838.69M7.18-$2.32M-$0.53N/A
ICF International$1.87B0.79$91.59M$4.8317.18

In the previous week, ICF International had 3 more articles in the media than Andersen Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for ICF International and 2 mentions for Andersen Group. Andersen Group's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat ICF International's score of 0.07 indicating that Andersen Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Andersen Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ICF International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

ICF International beats Andersen Group on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ICF International compare to Planet Labs PBC?

Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) and ICF International (NASDAQ:ICFI) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

ICF International has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ICF International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Planet Labs PBC$307.73M20.84-$246.86M-$1.10N/A
ICF International$1.87B0.79$91.59M$4.8317.18

In the previous week, Planet Labs PBC had 19 more articles in the media than ICF International. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Planet Labs PBC and 5 mentions for ICF International. Planet Labs PBC's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat ICF International's score of 0.07 indicating that Planet Labs PBC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Planet Labs PBC
9 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
5 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ICF International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ICF International has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Planet Labs PBC currently has a consensus target price of $32.78, suggesting a potential upside of 85.96%. ICF International has a consensus target price of $105.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.51%. Given Planet Labs PBC's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Planet Labs PBC is more favorable than ICF International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Planet Labs PBC
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.46
ICF International
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of ICF International shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.4% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ICF International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ICF International has a net margin of 4.86% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -95.13%. ICF International's return on equity of 11.53% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Planet Labs PBC-95.13% -93.11% -29.17%
ICF International 4.86%11.53%5.73%

Summary

ICF International beats Planet Labs PBC on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ICF International compare to Science Applications International?

Science Applications International (NASDAQ:SAIC) and ICF International (NASDAQ:ICFI) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

Science Applications International has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ICF International has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Science Applications International has a net margin of 5.13% compared to ICF International's net margin of 4.86%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 34.68% beat ICF International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Science Applications International5.13% 34.68% 9.45%
ICF International 4.86%11.53%5.73%

Science Applications International currently has a consensus price target of $125.22, suggesting a potential downside of 5.44%. ICF International has a consensus price target of $105.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.51%. Given ICF International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ICF International is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Science Applications International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09
ICF International
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Science Applications International has higher revenue and earnings than ICF International. Science Applications International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ICF International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Science Applications International$7.26B0.76$358M$8.5515.49
ICF International$1.87B0.79$91.59M$4.8317.18

76.0% of Science Applications International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of ICF International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Science Applications International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ICF International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Science Applications International had 14 more articles in the media than ICF International. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Science Applications International and 5 mentions for ICF International. Science Applications International's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat ICF International's score of 0.07 indicating that Science Applications International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Science Applications International
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ICF International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. ICF International pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Science Applications International pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ICF International pays out 11.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Science Applications International beats ICF International on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ICF International compare to Parsons?

Parsons (NYSE:PSN) and ICF International (NASDAQ:ICFI) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

98.0% of Parsons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of ICF International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Parsons shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ICF International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ICF International had 4 more articles in the media than Parsons. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for ICF International and 1 mentions for Parsons. ICF International's average media sentiment score of 0.07 beat Parsons' score of 0.00 indicating that ICF International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Parsons
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ICF International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Parsons has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ICF International has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Parsons currently has a consensus price target of $64.08, indicating a potential upside of 50.97%. ICF International has a consensus price target of $105.00, indicating a potential upside of 26.51%. Given Parsons' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Parsons is more favorable than ICF International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Parsons
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
ICF International
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

ICF International has a net margin of 4.86% compared to Parsons' net margin of 2.50%. ICF International's return on equity of 11.53% beat Parsons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Parsons2.50% 8.10% 3.75%
ICF International 4.86%11.53%5.73%

Parsons has higher revenue and earnings than ICF International. ICF International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parsons, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Parsons$6.36B0.71$241.14M$1.4529.28
ICF International$1.87B0.79$91.59M$4.8317.18

Summary

Parsons and ICF International tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ICF International compare to Amentum?

Amentum (NYSE:AMTM) and ICF International (NASDAQ:ICFI) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

ICF International has a net margin of 4.86% compared to Amentum's net margin of 1.44%. Amentum's return on equity of 12.19% beat ICF International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Amentum1.44% 12.19% 5.08%
ICF International 4.86%11.53%5.73%

Amentum has a beta of 0.26, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ICF International has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

ICF International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Amentum. ICF International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amentum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Amentum$14.39B0.33$66M$0.8323.38
ICF International$1.87B0.79$91.59M$4.8317.18

In the previous week, Amentum and Amentum both had 5 articles in the media. Amentum's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat ICF International's score of 0.07 indicating that Amentum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Amentum
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ICF International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

39.9% of Amentum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of ICF International shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.4% of Amentum shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ICF International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Amentum currently has a consensus price target of $29.18, indicating a potential upside of 50.38%. ICF International has a consensus price target of $105.00, indicating a potential upside of 26.51%. Given Amentum's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Amentum is more favorable than ICF International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Amentum
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.31
ICF International
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

ICF International beats Amentum on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ICF International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ICFI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ICFI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ICFI vs. The Competition

MetricICF InternationalProfessional Services IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.50B$7.79B$10.33B$13.29B
Dividend Yield0.67%3.68%96.94%12.57%
P/E Ratio17.1833.4322.7721.27
Price / Sales0.7924.13288.6187.10
Price / Cash8.4021.8524.1052.76
Price / Book1.496.584.836.34
Net Income$91.59M$236.73M$613.71M$360.00M
7 Day Performance-4.25%-1.35%0.17%-0.11%
1 Month Performance-6.57%-5.40%-2.79%-3.42%
1 Year Performance-12.49%-11.79%3.77%5.46%

ICF International Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ICFI
ICF International
4.3077 of 5 stars
$83.00
-0.8%
$105.00
+26.5%
-11.1%$1.50B$1.87B17.188,400
ANDG
Andersen Group
2.4977 of 5 stars
$55.03
-2.4%
$54.00
-1.9%
N/A$6.22B$913.04MN/A2,300
PL
Planet Labs PBC
3.525 of 5 stars
$15.82
-2.3%
$32.78
+107.1%
+35.4%$5.78B$378.28MN/A945
SAIC
Science Applications International
3.896 of 5 stars
$130.92
-0.8%
$125.22
-4.4%
+34.9%$5.49B$7.26B15.3123,000
PSN
Parsons
4.24 of 5 stars
$46.60
-0.7%
$64.08
+37.5%
-45.3%$4.98B$6.36B32.1321,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:ICFI) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners