Amesite (AMST) Competitors

Where Food Comes From (NASDAQ:WFCF) and Amesite (NASDAQ:AMST) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk and community ranking.

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, WFCF or AMST?

Where Food Comes From has higher revenue and earnings than Amesite. Amesite is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Where Food Comes From, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Where Food Comes From	$25.44M	2.10	$2.15M	$0.37	27.65
Amesite	$82.54K	160.66	-$4.40M	-$1.36	-2.13

Which has more risk and volatility, WFCF or AMST?

Where Food Comes From has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Amesite has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Does the media refer more to WFCF or AMST?

In the previous week, Where Food Comes From and Where Food Comes From both had 2 articles in the media. Where Food Comes From's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Amesite's score of 0.62 indicating that Where Food Comes From is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Where Food Comes From	Positive
Amesite	Positive

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of WFCF or AMST?

18.8% of Where Food Comes From shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.6% of Amesite shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.3% of Where Food Comes From shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.0% of Amesite shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Does the MarketBeat Community favor WFCF or AMST?

Where Food Comes From received 106 more outperform votes than Amesite when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 64.63% of users gave Where Food Comes From an outperform vote while only 0.00% of users gave Amesite an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Where Food Comes From	Outperform Votes 106 64.63%	Underperform Votes 58 35.37%
Amesite	Outperform Votes No Votes	Underperform Votes 1 100.00%

Is WFCF or AMST more profitable?

Where Food Comes From has a net margin of 8.23% compared to Amesite's net margin of -5,391.86%. Where Food Comes From's return on equity of 19.31% beat Amesite's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Where Food Comes From	8.23%	19.31%	11.29%
Amesite	-5,391.86%	-189.67%	-148.13%

Summary

Where Food Comes From beats Amesite on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.