Free Trial

Aurora Mobile (JG) Competitors

Aurora Mobile logo
$5.12 +0.01 (+0.20%)
As of 11:34 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

JG vs. DOMO, SANG, TEAD, BNAI, and HCAT

Should you buy Aurora Mobile stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Aurora Mobile with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Aurora Mobile include Domo (DOMO), Sangoma Technologies (SANG), Teads (TEAD), Brand Engagement Network (BNAI), and Health Catalyst (HCAT). These companies are all part of the "computer software" industry.

How does Aurora Mobile compare to Domo?

Domo (NASDAQ:DOMO) and Aurora Mobile (NASDAQ:JG) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Domo and Domo both had 7 articles in the media. Aurora Mobile's average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Domo's score of -0.06 indicating that Aurora Mobile is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Domo
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Aurora Mobile
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Aurora Mobile has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Domo. Domo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aurora Mobile, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Domo$318.86M0.45-$59.34M-$1.45N/A
Aurora Mobile$53.60M0.57$60K$0.1242.67

Aurora Mobile has a net margin of 1.06% compared to Domo's net margin of -18.61%. Aurora Mobile's return on equity of 4.08% beat Domo's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Domo-18.61% N/A -27.88%
Aurora Mobile 1.06%4.08%1.02%

Domo currently has a consensus price target of $6.42, indicating a potential upside of 100.21%. Given Domo's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Domo is more favorable than Aurora Mobile.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Domo
3 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Aurora Mobile
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Domo has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aurora Mobile has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

76.6% of Domo shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.5% of Aurora Mobile shares are held by institutional investors. 13.3% of Domo shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 31.2% of Aurora Mobile shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Aurora Mobile beats Domo on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aurora Mobile compare to Sangoma Technologies?

Sangoma Technologies (NASDAQ:SANG) and Aurora Mobile (NASDAQ:JG) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

Sangoma Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $4.00, indicating a potential upside of 12.04%. Given Sangoma Technologies' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Sangoma Technologies is more favorable than Aurora Mobile.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sangoma Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Aurora Mobile
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Sangoma Technologies has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aurora Mobile has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Aurora Mobile has a net margin of 1.06% compared to Sangoma Technologies' net margin of -3.04%. Aurora Mobile's return on equity of 4.08% beat Sangoma Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sangoma Technologies-3.04% -2.26% -1.71%
Aurora Mobile 1.06%4.08%1.02%

39.7% of Sangoma Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.5% of Aurora Mobile shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.2% of Aurora Mobile shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Aurora Mobile had 5 more articles in the media than Sangoma Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Aurora Mobile and 2 mentions for Sangoma Technologies. Sangoma Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Aurora Mobile's score of 0.17 indicating that Sangoma Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sangoma Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Aurora Mobile
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Aurora Mobile has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sangoma Technologies. Sangoma Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aurora Mobile, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sangoma Technologies$236.69M0.50-$5.01M-$0.19N/A
Aurora Mobile$53.60M0.57$60K$0.1242.67

Summary

Aurora Mobile beats Sangoma Technologies on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aurora Mobile compare to Teads?

Teads (NASDAQ:TEAD) and Aurora Mobile (NASDAQ:JG) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Teads has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aurora Mobile has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Teads currently has a consensus price target of $3.27, suggesting a potential upside of 148.42%. Given Teads' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Teads is more favorable than Aurora Mobile.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Teads
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Aurora Mobile
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Aurora Mobile has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Teads. Teads is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aurora Mobile, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Teads$1.30B0.10-$517.07M-$5.24N/A
Aurora Mobile$53.60M0.57$60K$0.1242.67

60.4% of Teads shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.5% of Aurora Mobile shares are held by institutional investors. 12.0% of Teads shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 31.2% of Aurora Mobile shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Aurora Mobile had 2 more articles in the media than Teads. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Aurora Mobile and 5 mentions for Teads. Teads' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Aurora Mobile's score of 0.17 indicating that Teads is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Teads
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Aurora Mobile
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Aurora Mobile has a net margin of 1.06% compared to Teads' net margin of -39.14%. Aurora Mobile's return on equity of 4.08% beat Teads' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Teads-39.14% -17.58% -3.50%
Aurora Mobile 1.06%4.08%1.02%

Summary

Aurora Mobile beats Teads on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aurora Mobile compare to Brand Engagement Network?

Brand Engagement Network (NASDAQ:BNAI) and Aurora Mobile (NASDAQ:JG) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brand Engagement Network
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Aurora Mobile
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

15.8% of Brand Engagement Network shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.5% of Aurora Mobile shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.6% of Brand Engagement Network shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.2% of Aurora Mobile shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Brand Engagement Network has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aurora Mobile has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Aurora Mobile has higher revenue and earnings than Brand Engagement Network. Brand Engagement Network is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aurora Mobile, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brand Engagement Network$280K407.90-$8.62M-$1.81N/A
Aurora Mobile$53.60M0.57$60K$0.1242.67

In the previous week, Aurora Mobile had 3 more articles in the media than Brand Engagement Network. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Aurora Mobile and 4 mentions for Brand Engagement Network. Brand Engagement Network's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Aurora Mobile's score of 0.17 indicating that Brand Engagement Network is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brand Engagement Network
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Aurora Mobile
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Aurora Mobile has a net margin of 1.06% compared to Brand Engagement Network's net margin of -2,189.33%. Aurora Mobile's return on equity of 4.08% beat Brand Engagement Network's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brand Engagement Network-2,189.33% -235.73% -72.24%
Aurora Mobile 1.06%4.08%1.02%

Summary

Aurora Mobile beats Brand Engagement Network on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aurora Mobile compare to Health Catalyst?

Health Catalyst (NASDAQ:HCAT) and Aurora Mobile (NASDAQ:JG) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Health Catalyst has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aurora Mobile has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Aurora Mobile has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Health Catalyst. Health Catalyst is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aurora Mobile, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Health Catalyst$311.14M0.43-$177.97M-$3.72N/A
Aurora Mobile$53.60M0.57$60K$0.1242.67

In the previous week, Aurora Mobile had 4 more articles in the media than Health Catalyst. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Aurora Mobile and 3 mentions for Health Catalyst. Health Catalyst's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Aurora Mobile's score of 0.17 indicating that Health Catalyst is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Health Catalyst
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Aurora Mobile
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Aurora Mobile has a net margin of 1.06% compared to Health Catalyst's net margin of -87.69%. Aurora Mobile's return on equity of 4.08% beat Health Catalyst's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Health Catalyst-87.69% -3.52% -1.77%
Aurora Mobile 1.06%4.08%1.02%

85.0% of Health Catalyst shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.5% of Aurora Mobile shares are held by institutional investors. 19.4% of Health Catalyst shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.2% of Aurora Mobile shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Health Catalyst currently has a consensus target price of $2.77, suggesting a potential upside of 52.77%. Given Health Catalyst's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Health Catalyst is more favorable than Aurora Mobile.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Health Catalyst
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.23
Aurora Mobile
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Aurora Mobile beats Health Catalyst on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Aurora Mobile News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for JG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding JG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

JG vs. The Competition

MetricAurora MobileINTERNET SOFTWARE IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$30.72M$16.86B$39.80B$12.32B
Dividend YieldN/A3.05%3.16%5.66%
P/E Ratio42.6762.0181.3824.65
Price / Sales0.5740.61634.17171.03
Price / Cash38.4170.8049.0237.92
Price / Book2.166.329.946.84
Net Income$60K$384.51M$1.07B$337.45M
7 Day Performance-6.88%0.22%1.31%2.48%
1 Month Performance-18.41%3.34%7.06%4.36%
1 Year Performance-51.21%-3.55%163.02%32.45%

Aurora Mobile Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
JG
Aurora Mobile
1.3107 of 5 stars
$5.12
+0.2%
N/A-51.3%$30.72M$53.60M42.67590
DOMO
Domo
2.964 of 5 stars
$3.02
-8.2%
$6.42
+112.5%
-76.8%$136.35M$318.86MN/A920
SANG
Sangoma Technologies
2.1766 of 5 stars
$3.75
+8.4%
$4.00
+6.7%
-37.8%$124.80M$236.69MN/A730
TEAD
Teads
2.5328 of 5 stars
$1.24
+5.1%
$3.27
+163.4%
-47.2%$120.27M$1.30BN/A1,700
BNAI
Brand Engagement Network
0.3678 of 5 stars
$20.27
+5.7%
N/A+466.8%$118.78M$280KN/A26

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:JG) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners