Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) Competitors

1.0% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.3% of Broadwind Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Broadwind Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Broadwind Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Broadwind Energy has a net margin of 3.30% compared to Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's net margin of 1.27%. Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's return on equity of 2.18% beat Broadwind Energy's return on equity.

Broadwind Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Asia Pacific Wire & Cable. Asia Pacific Wire & Cable is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadwind Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Broadwind Energy has a beta of 1.74, meaning that its share price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

Broadwind Energy has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 31.00%. Given Broadwind Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Broadwind Energy is more favorable than Asia Pacific Wire & Cable.

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Inno has a beta of -24.62, meaning that its stock price is 2,562% less volatile than the broader market.

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has higher revenue and earnings than Inno. Inno is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Asia Pacific Wire & Cable, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Inno'saverage media sentiment score.

1.0% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Inno shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Inno shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has a net margin of 1.27% compared to Inno's net margin of -86.76%. Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's return on equity of 2.18% beat Inno's return on equity.

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aqua Metals has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has higher revenue and earnings than Aqua Metals. Aqua Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Asia Pacific Wire & Cable, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Aqua Metals had 4 more articles in the media than Asia Pacific Wire & Cable. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Aqua Metals and 0 mentions for Asia Pacific Wire & Cable. Aqua Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's score of 0.00 indicating that Aqua Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has a net margin of 1.27% compared to Aqua Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's return on equity of 2.18% beat Aqua Metals' return on equity.

1.0% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of Aqua Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Aqua Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Howmet Aerospace has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Howmet Aerospace has a net margin of 20.23% compared to Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's net margin of 1.27%. Howmet Aerospace's return on equity of 29.27% beat Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's return on equity.

90.5% of Howmet Aerospace shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.0% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Howmet Aerospace shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Howmet Aerospace pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Asia Pacific Wire & Cable pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Howmet Aerospace pays out 11.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Asia Pacific Wire & Cable pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Howmet Aerospace has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Howmet Aerospace has higher revenue and earnings than Asia Pacific Wire & Cable. Asia Pacific Wire & Cable is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Howmet Aerospace, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Howmet Aerospace had 21 more articles in the media than Asia Pacific Wire & Cable. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Howmet Aerospace and 0 mentions for Asia Pacific Wire & Cable. Howmet Aerospace's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's score of 0.00 indicating that Howmet Aerospace is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Howmet Aerospace presently has a consensus target price of $287.95, indicating a potential upside of 6.42%. Given Howmet Aerospace's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Howmet Aerospace is more favorable than Asia Pacific Wire & Cable.