Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Competitors

CECO Environmental (NASDAQ:CECE) and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (NASDAQ:APWC) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares CECO Environmental and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

CECO Environmental has higher revenue and earnings than Asia Pacific Wire & Cable.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for CECO Environmental and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable, as provided by MarketBeat.

CECO Environmental currently has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.76%. Given CECO Environmental's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe CECO Environmental is more favorable than Asia Pacific Wire & Cable.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

69.9% of CECO Environmental shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are held by institutional investors. 13.3% of CECO Environmental shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its share price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares CECO Environmental and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

CECO Environmental beats Asia Pacific Wire & Cable on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

NN (NASDAQ:NNBR) and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (NASDAQ:APWC) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares NN and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NN.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for NN and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable, as provided by MarketBeat.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

79.3% of NN shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are held by institutional investors. 3.5% of NN shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

NN has a beta of 3.35, meaning that its share price is 235% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its share price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares NN and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

NN beats Asia Pacific Wire & Cable on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lakeland Industries (NASDAQ:LAKE) and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (NASDAQ:APWC) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Lakeland Industries and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

70.8% of Lakeland Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of Lakeland Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Lakeland Industries and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Lakeland Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Asia Pacific Wire & Cable.

Risk and Volatility

Lakeland Industries has a beta of 0.03, meaning that its share price is 97% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its share price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Lakeland Industries and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable, as provided by MarketBeat.

Lakeland Industries currently has a consensus target price of $31.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 0.18%. Given Lakeland Industries' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Lakeland Industries is more favorable than Asia Pacific Wire & Cable.

Summary

Lakeland Industries beats Asia Pacific Wire & Cable on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

LiqTech International (NASDAQ:LIQT) and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (NASDAQ:APWC) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares LiqTech International and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

57.5% of LiqTech International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of LiqTech International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares LiqTech International and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

LiqTech International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Asia Pacific Wire & Cable.

Risk and Volatility

LiqTech International has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for LiqTech International and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

LiqTech International currently has a consensus price target of $8.50, suggesting a potential downside of 23.22%. Given LiqTech International's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe LiqTech International is more favorable than Asia Pacific Wire & Cable.

Summary

LiqTech International beats Asia Pacific Wire & Cable on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Quad/Graphics (NYSE:QUAD) and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (NASDAQ:APWC) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Quad/Graphics and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Quad/Graphics.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

39.9% of Quad/Graphics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are held by institutional investors. 8.5% of Quad/Graphics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Quad/Graphics and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Risk and Volatility

Quad/Graphics has a beta of 2.07, meaning that its stock price is 107% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Quad/Graphics and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Quad/Graphics beats Asia Pacific Wire & Cable on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (NASDAQ:APWC) and Intellicheck (NASDAQ:IDN) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Asia Pacific Wire & Cable and Intellicheck's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has higher revenue and earnings than Intellicheck.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

1.1% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.5% of Intellicheck shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.8% of Intellicheck shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Asia Pacific Wire & Cable and Intellicheck, as reported by MarketBeat.

Intellicheck has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential upside of 35.58%. Given Intellicheck's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Intellicheck is more favorable than Asia Pacific Wire & Cable.

Volatility & Risk

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intellicheck has a beta of 2.23, indicating that its share price is 123% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Asia Pacific Wire & Cable and Intellicheck's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Intellicheck beats Asia Pacific Wire & Cable on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.