Free Trial
Your Portfolio Deserves Better! MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Upgrade Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Friedman Industries (FRD) Competitors

Friedman Industries logo
$20.59 +0.16 (+0.78%)
As of 10:11 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FRD vs. ASTL, IIIN, HUHU, ACNT, and OCC

Should you buy Friedman Industries stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Friedman Industries with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Friedman Industries include Algoma Steel Group (ASTL), Insteel Industries (IIIN), HUHUTECH International Group (HUHU), Ascent Industries (ACNT), and Optical Cable (OCC). These companies are all part of the "steel works" industry.

How does Friedman Industries compare to Algoma Steel Group?

Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) and Algoma Steel Group (NASDAQ:ASTL) are both small-cap steel works companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 2.68% compared to Algoma Steel Group's net margin of -60.03%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 11.36% beat Algoma Steel Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Friedman Industries2.68% 11.36% 5.86%
Algoma Steel Group -60.03%-75.76%-23.96%

Friedman Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Algoma Steel Group. Algoma Steel Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Friedman Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Friedman Industries$444.60M0.33$6.09M$2.229.27
Algoma Steel Group$1.87B0.29-$704.89M-$7.45N/A

In the previous week, Algoma Steel Group had 13 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Algoma Steel Group and 0 mentions for Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Algoma Steel Group's score of -0.37 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Friedman Industries Very Positive
Algoma Steel Group Neutral

33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.0% of Algoma Steel Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.5% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.8% of Algoma Steel Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.59, indicating that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Algoma Steel Group has a beta of 1.55, indicating that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Friedman Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Algoma Steel Group
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.60

Friedman Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Algoma Steel Group pays an annual dividend of $0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Friedman Industries pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Algoma Steel Group pays out -0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Friedman Industries has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Algoma Steel Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Friedman Industries beats Algoma Steel Group on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Friedman Industries compare to Insteel Industries?

Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) and Insteel Industries (NYSE:IIIN) are both small-cap steel works companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.59, indicating that its share price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Insteel Industries has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.3% of Insteel Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Friedman Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Insteel Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Friedman Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Insteel Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Friedman Industries pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Insteel Industries pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Friedman Industries has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Friedman Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Insteel Industries has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Friedman Industries' net margin of 2.68%. Insteel Industries' return on equity of 11.72% beat Friedman Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Friedman Industries2.68% 11.36% 5.86%
Insteel Industries 6.16%11.72%9.19%

Insteel Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Insteel Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Friedman Industries$444.60M0.33$6.09M$2.229.27
Insteel Industries$689.91M0.70$41.02M$2.1811.48

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Friedman Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Insteel Industries
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

In the previous week, Insteel Industries had 1 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Insteel Industries and 0 mentions for Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Insteel Industries' score of 0.00 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Friedman Industries Very Positive
Insteel Industries Neutral

Summary

Insteel Industries beats Friedman Industries on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Friedman Industries compare to HUHUTECH International Group?

Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) and HUHUTECH International Group (NASDAQ:HUHU) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 2.68% compared to HUHUTECH International Group's net margin of 0.00%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 11.36% beat HUHUTECH International Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Friedman Industries2.68% 11.36% 5.86%
HUHUTECH International Group N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat HUHUTECH International Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Friedman Industries Very Positive
HUHUTECH International Group Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Friedman Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
HUHUTECH International Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.59, indicating that its share price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HUHUTECH International Group has a beta of -0.74, indicating that its share price is 174% less volatile than the broader market.

Friedman Industries has higher revenue and earnings than HUHUTECH International Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Friedman Industries$444.60M0.33$6.09M$2.229.27
HUHUTECH International Group$21.43M13.02-$17.34MN/AN/A

33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.5% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Friedman Industries beats HUHUTECH International Group on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Friedman Industries compare to Ascent Industries?

Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) and Ascent Industries (NASDAQ:ACNT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Friedman Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Ascent Industries
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.0% of Ascent Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Friedman Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.3% of Ascent Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ascent Industries had 1 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ascent Industries and 0 mentions for Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Ascent Industries' score of -0.20 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Friedman Industries Very Positive
Ascent Industries Neutral

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 2.68% compared to Ascent Industries' net margin of 1.54%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 11.36% beat Ascent Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Friedman Industries2.68% 11.36% 5.86%
Ascent Industries 1.54%-4.37%-3.31%

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.59, indicating that its share price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ascent Industries has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Friedman Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Ascent Industries. Friedman Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ascent Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Friedman Industries$444.60M0.33$6.09M$2.229.27
Ascent Industries$76.52M1.65$870K$0.13107.26

Summary

Friedman Industries beats Ascent Industries on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Friedman Industries compare to Optical Cable?

Optical Cable (NASDAQ:OCC) and Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) are both small-cap steel works companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Friedman Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Optical Cable. Optical Cable is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Friedman Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Optical Cable$73.04M1.23-$1.46M-$0.09N/A
Friedman Industries$444.60M0.33$6.09M$2.229.27

Optical Cable has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.59, meaning that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the broader market.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 2.68% compared to Optical Cable's net margin of -1.01%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 11.36% beat Optical Cable's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Optical Cable-1.01% -4.14% -1.89%
Friedman Industries 2.68%11.36%5.86%

13.6% of Optical Cable shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 22.4% of Optical Cable shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of Friedman Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Optical Cable had 2 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Optical Cable and 0 mentions for Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Optical Cable's score of 0.00 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Optical Cable Neutral
Friedman Industries Very Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Optical Cable
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Friedman Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Friedman Industries beats Optical Cable on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Friedman Industries News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FRD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FRD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FRD vs. The Competition

MetricFriedman IndustriesMETAL PROC&FABR IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$146.40M$2.85B$9.17B$12.12B
Dividend Yield0.78%2.35%3.58%5.32%
P/E Ratio9.2719.8125.0025.10
Price / Sales0.3311.154,439.2777.29
Price / Cash15.3130.8227.4037.30
Price / Book1.082.814.786.59
Net Income$6.09M$91.02M$794.33M$335.49M
7 Day Performance-4.28%-6.00%-1.23%-1.74%
1 Month Performance6.24%1.19%0.28%-1.72%
1 Year Performance23.81%53.41%33.15%27.17%

Friedman Industries Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FRD
Friedman Industries
2.0498 of 5 stars
$20.59
+0.8%
N/A+25.0%$146.40M$444.60M9.27100
ASTL
Algoma Steel Group
1.4581 of 5 stars
$5.07
+1.3%
N/A-9.2%$527.58M$1.49BN/A2,400
IIIN
Insteel Industries
2.178 of 5 stars
$26.77
+0.7%
N/AN/A$520.04M$647.71M12.281,007
HUHU
HUHUTECH International Group
0.878 of 5 stars
$9.62
-0.5%
N/A+106.7%$242.16M$21.43MN/AN/A
ACNT
Ascent Industries
0.6522 of 5 stars
$14.07
+1.0%
N/A+14.0%$126.61M$74.94M107.74710

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FRD) was last updated on 5/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners