Go Pro

Friedman Industries (FRD) Competitors

Friedman Industries logo
$43.72 -1.12 (-2.50%)
As of 08/28/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

FRD vs. SXC, METC, MTUS, ZEUS, and METCB

Should you buy Friedman Industries stock or one of its competitors? Friedman Industries's main competitors and comparable companies include SunCoke Energy (SXC), Ramaco Resources (METC), Metallus (MTUS), Olympic Steel (ZEUS), and Ramaco Resources (METCB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "steel" industry.

How does Friedman Industries compare to SunCoke Energy?

Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) and SunCoke Energy (NYSE:SXC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and institutional ownership.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 3.63% compared to SunCoke Energy's net margin of -2.88%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 18.29% beat SunCoke Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Friedman Industries3.63% 18.29% 8.19%
SunCoke Energy -2.88%6.37%2.28%

SunCoke Energy has a consensus price target of $9.00, indicating a potential downside of 11.68%. Given SunCoke Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SunCoke Energy is more favorable than Friedman Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Friedman Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
SunCoke Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of SunCoke Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.6% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of SunCoke Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Friedman Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. SunCoke Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Friedman Industries pays out 4.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SunCoke Energy pays out -75.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Friedman Industries has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and SunCoke Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. SunCoke Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SunCoke Energy has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Friedman Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SunCoke Energy. SunCoke Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Friedman Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Friedman Industries$646.91M0.49$19.53M$3.8411.39
SunCoke Energy$1.84B0.47-$44.20M-$0.64N/A

In the previous week, SunCoke Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for SunCoke Energy and 2 mentions for Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat SunCoke Energy's score of 1.57 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Friedman Industries
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
SunCoke Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Friedman Industries beats SunCoke Energy on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Friedman Industries compare to Ramaco Resources?

Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) and Ramaco Resources (NASDAQ:METC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.5% of Ramaco Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.6% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 46.1% of Ramaco Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Friedman Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Ramaco Resources. Ramaco Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Friedman Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Friedman Industries$646.91M0.49$19.53M$3.8411.39
Ramaco Resources$536.62M1.57-$51.45M-$1.07N/A

Ramaco Resources has a consensus target price of $22.43, indicating a potential upside of 68.64%. Given Ramaco Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ramaco Resources is more favorable than Friedman Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Friedman Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ramaco Resources
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Ramaco Resources' net margin of -11.98%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 18.29% beat Ramaco Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Friedman Industries3.63% 18.29% 8.19%
Ramaco Resources -11.98%-13.54%-6.01%

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.57, meaning that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ramaco Resources has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ramaco Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Ramaco Resources and 2 mentions for Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Ramaco Resources' score of 0.90 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Friedman Industries
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Ramaco Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Friedman Industries beats Ramaco Resources on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Friedman Industries compare to Metallus?

Metallus (NYSE:MTUS) and Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

77.6% of Metallus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Metallus shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Metallus
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Friedman Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Metallus' net margin of 0.66%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 18.29% beat Metallus' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Metallus0.66% 3.35% 2.02%
Friedman Industries 3.63%18.29%8.19%

Friedman Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Metallus. Friedman Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metallus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Metallus$1.16B0.70-$1.20M$0.19102.84
Friedman Industries$646.91M0.49$19.53M$3.8411.39

In the previous week, Metallus and Metallus both had 2 articles in the media. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Metallus' score of 1.12 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Metallus
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Friedman Industries
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Metallus has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.57, meaning that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Friedman Industries beats Metallus on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Friedman Industries compare to Olympic Steel?

Olympic Steel (NASDAQ:ZEUS) and Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

87.1% of Olympic Steel shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.8% of Olympic Steel shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Olympic Steel has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Olympic Steel has higher revenue and earnings than Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Olympic Steel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Olympic Steel$1.90B0.28$22.98M$1.1740.91
Friedman Industries$646.91M0.49$19.53M$3.8411.39

Olympic Steel pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Friedman Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Olympic Steel pays out 54.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 4.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Olympic Steel has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Friedman Industries has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Olympic Steel is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Olympic Steel's net margin of 0.73%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 18.29% beat Olympic Steel's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Olympic Steel0.73% 2.11% 1.14%
Friedman Industries 3.63%18.29%8.19%

In the previous week, Friedman Industries had 2 more articles in the media than Olympic Steel. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Friedman Industries and 0 mentions for Olympic Steel. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Olympic Steel's score of 0.00 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Olympic Steel Neutral
Friedman Industries Very Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Olympic Steel
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Friedman Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Friedman Industries beats Olympic Steel on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Friedman Industries compare to Ramaco Resources?

Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) and Ramaco Resources (NASDAQ:METCB) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Friedman Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ramaco Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Ramaco Resources' net margin of -11.98%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 18.29% beat Ramaco Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Friedman Industries3.63% 18.29% 8.19%
Ramaco Resources -11.98%-13.54%-6.01%

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ramaco Resources has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Friedman Industries and Friedman Industries both had 2 articles in the media. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Ramaco Resources' score of 0.93 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Friedman Industries
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Ramaco Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.6% of Ramaco Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.6% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Friedman Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Ramaco Resources. Ramaco Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Friedman Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Friedman Industries$646.91M0.49$19.53M$3.8411.39
Ramaco Resources$536.62M0.87-$51.45M-$1.07N/A

Summary

Friedman Industries beats Ramaco Resources on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Friedman Industries News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FRD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FRD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FRD vs. The Competition

MetricFriedman IndustriesMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$323.42M$4.13B$5.13B$12.94B
Dividend Yield0.36%5.16%4.68%11.02%
P/E Ratio11.3925.5926.2625.45
Price / Sales0.497,459.444,437.1395.45
Price / Cash13.6130.0127.3454.21
Price / Book1.9210.659.016.14
Net Income$19.53M$123.10M$154.80M$348.86M
7 Day Performance4.82%8.69%6.42%-0.80%
1 Month Performance27.32%25.61%19.91%5.56%
1 Year Performance129.02%61.32%47.67%15.57%

Friedman Industries Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FRD
Friedman Industries
2.2086 of 5 stars
$43.72
-2.5%
N/A+129.7%$323.42M$646.91M11.39100
SXC
SunCoke Energy
1.5581 of 5 stars
$10.17
-1.1%
$9.00
-11.5%
+34.0%$863.23M$1.84BN/A2,477
METC
Ramaco Resources
3.0973 of 5 stars
$13.46
-3.2%
$22.43
+66.6%
-47.7%$853.23M$536.62MN/A725
MTUS
Metallus
1.6274 of 5 stars
$19.59
-1.6%
N/A+17.5%$812.01M$1.16B103.111,865
ZEUS
Olympic Steel
N/A$47.86
flat
N/AN/A$535.94M$1.90B40.912,163

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FRD) was last updated on 8/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners