Go Pro

Friedman Industries (FRD) Competitors

Friedman Industries logo
$43.91 +6.19 (+16.41%)
Closing price 08/7/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$43.64 -0.27 (-0.63%)
As of 08/7/2026 07:42 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FRD vs. SID, MTUS, SXC, METC, and ZEUS

Should you buy Friedman Industries stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Friedman Industries with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Friedman Industries include National Steel (SID), Metallus (MTUS), SunCoke Energy (SXC), Ramaco Resources (METC), and Olympic Steel (ZEUS). These companies are all part of the "steel" industry.

How does Friedman Industries compare to National Steel?

National Steel (NYSE:SID) and Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and valuation.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 3.63% compared to National Steel's net margin of -3.92%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 18.92% beat National Steel's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
National Steel-3.92% -10.69% -1.75%
Friedman Industries 3.63%18.92%8.53%

Friedman Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than National Steel. National Steel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Friedman Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
National Steel$8.02B0.15-$358.62M-$0.24N/A
Friedman Industries$646.91M0.49$19.53M$2.7615.91

National Steel has a beta of 1.57, meaning that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.57, meaning that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

National Steel currently has a consensus price target of $1.40, indicating a potential upside of 51.35%. Given National Steel's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe National Steel is more favorable than Friedman Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
National Steel
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33
Friedman Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of National Steel shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Friedman Industries had 1 more articles in the media than National Steel. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Friedman Industries and 1 mentions for National Steel. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat National Steel's score of -1.10 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
National Steel
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Friedman Industries
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Friedman Industries beats National Steel on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Friedman Industries compare to Metallus?

Metallus (NYSE:MTUS) and Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Metallus has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Metallus' net margin of 0.66%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 18.92% beat Metallus' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Metallus0.66% 3.35% 2.02%
Friedman Industries 3.63%18.92%8.53%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Metallus
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Friedman Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Friedman Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Metallus. Friedman Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metallus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Metallus$1.16B0.78-$1.20M$0.19114.31
Friedman Industries$646.91M0.49$19.53M$2.7615.91

77.6% of Metallus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Metallus shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Friedman Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Metallus had 19 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Metallus and 2 mentions for Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Metallus' score of 0.40 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Metallus
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Friedman Industries
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Friedman Industries beats Metallus on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Friedman Industries compare to SunCoke Energy?

Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) and SunCoke Energy (NYSE:SXC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Friedman Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SunCoke Energy. SunCoke Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Friedman Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Friedman Industries$646.91M0.49$19.53M$2.7615.91
SunCoke Energy$1.84B0.43-$44.20M-$0.64N/A

In the previous week, SunCoke Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for SunCoke Energy and 2 mentions for Friedman Industries. SunCoke Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Friedman Industries' score of 0.54 indicating that SunCoke Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Friedman Industries
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
SunCoke Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of SunCoke Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.6% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of SunCoke Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Friedman Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. SunCoke Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Friedman Industries pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SunCoke Energy pays out -75.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Friedman Industries has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and SunCoke Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. SunCoke Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SunCoke Energy has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

SunCoke Energy has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential downside of 4.01%. Given SunCoke Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SunCoke Energy is more favorable than Friedman Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Friedman Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
SunCoke Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 3.63% compared to SunCoke Energy's net margin of -2.88%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 18.92% beat SunCoke Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Friedman Industries3.63% 18.92% 8.53%
SunCoke Energy -2.88%6.37%2.28%

Summary

Friedman Industries beats SunCoke Energy on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Friedman Industries compare to Ramaco Resources?

Ramaco Resources (NASDAQ:METC) and Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Ramaco Resources had 22 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Ramaco Resources and 2 mentions for Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Ramaco Resources' score of -0.15 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ramaco Resources
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Friedman Industries
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Friedman Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Ramaco Resources. Ramaco Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Friedman Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ramaco Resources$536.62M1.24-$51.45M-$1.07N/A
Friedman Industries$646.91M0.49$19.53M$2.7615.91

Ramaco Resources has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.57, meaning that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

74.5% of Ramaco Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 46.1% of Ramaco Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Friedman Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Ramaco Resources' net margin of -11.98%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 18.92% beat Ramaco Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ramaco Resources-11.98% -13.54% -6.01%
Friedman Industries 3.63%18.92%8.53%

Ramaco Resources currently has a consensus price target of $22.71, indicating a potential upside of 121.82%. Given Ramaco Resources' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Ramaco Resources is more favorable than Friedman Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ramaco Resources
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Friedman Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Friedman Industries beats Ramaco Resources on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Friedman Industries compare to Olympic Steel?

Olympic Steel (NASDAQ:ZEUS) and Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Olympic Steel pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Friedman Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Olympic Steel pays out 54.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Olympic Steel has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Friedman Industries has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Olympic Steel is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Olympic Steel
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Friedman Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Olympic Steel has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.57, meaning that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Olympic Steel's net margin of 0.73%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 18.92% beat Olympic Steel's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Olympic Steel0.73% 2.11% 1.14%
Friedman Industries 3.63%18.92%8.53%

Olympic Steel has higher revenue and earnings than Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Olympic Steel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Olympic Steel$1.90B0.28$22.98M$1.1740.91
Friedman Industries$646.91M0.49$19.53M$2.7615.91

87.1% of Olympic Steel shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.8% of Olympic Steel shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Friedman Industries had 2 more articles in the media than Olympic Steel. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Friedman Industries and 0 mentions for Olympic Steel. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Olympic Steel's score of 0.00 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Olympic Steel Neutral
Friedman Industries Positive

Summary

Friedman Industries beats Olympic Steel on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Friedman Industries News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FRD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FRD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FRD vs. The Competition

MetricFriedman IndustriesMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$316.71M$3.84B$4.91B$13.02B
Dividend Yield0.36%5.24%4.71%10.20%
P/E Ratio11.4322.9121.1525.17
Price / Sales0.498,753.975,193.5888.07
Price / Cash13.3329.5927.0650.72
Price / Book2.0610.338.726.22
Net Income$19.53M$122.43M$154.73M$342.66M
7 Day Performance32.06%9.04%7.42%4.41%
1 Month Performance34.78%7.20%6.32%-0.28%
1 Year Performance173.75%54.48%43.53%22.60%

Friedman Industries Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FRD
Friedman Industries
1.728 of 5 stars
$43.91
+16.4%
N/A+184.6%$316.71M$646.91M11.43100
SID
National Steel
2.8739 of 5 stars
$0.90
-4.2%
$1.40
+54.9%
-32.2%$1.20B$8.02BN/A29,664
MTUS
Metallus
1.4591 of 5 stars
$21.85
+1.9%
N/A+44.5%$905.23M$1.16B114.951,865
SXC
SunCoke Energy
1.0266 of 5 stars
$9.40
-2.1%
$9.00
-4.2%
+25.9%$797.45M$1.84BN/A2,477
METC
Ramaco Resources
3.3742 of 5 stars
$10.23
+6.7%
$22.71
+122.0%
-52.7%$667.77M$536.62MN/A725

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FRD) was last updated on 8/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners