Do analysts prefer SXC or FRD?

SunCoke Energy presently has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential downside of 8.49%. Given SunCoke Energy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe SunCoke Energy is more favorable than Friedman Industries. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score SunCoke Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Friedman Industries 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media favor SXC or FRD?

In the previous week, SunCoke Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for SunCoke Energy and 1 mentions for Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat SunCoke Energy's score of 0.85 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SunCoke Energy 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Friedman Industries 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer FRD or MTUS?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Friedman Industries 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Metallus 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media prefer FRD or MTUS?

In the previous week, Metallus had 13 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Metallus and 1 mentions for Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Metallus' score of 0.80 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Friedman Industries 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Metallus 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate ZEUS or FRD?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Olympic Steel 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Friedman Industries 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media prefer ZEUS or FRD?

In the previous week, Olympic Steel and Olympic Steel both had 1 articles in the media. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Olympic Steel's score of -0.71 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Olympic Steel 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative Friedman Industries 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend METC or FRD?

Ramaco Resources presently has a consensus target price of $22.43, indicating a potential upside of 172.52%. Given Ramaco Resources' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ramaco Resources is more favorable than Friedman Industries. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ramaco Resources 2 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.22 Friedman Industries 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media prefer METC or FRD?

In the previous week, Ramaco Resources had 5 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Ramaco Resources and 1 mentions for Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Ramaco Resources' score of 0.57 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ramaco Resources 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Friedman Industries 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate FRD or ASTL?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Friedman Industries 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Algoma Steel Group 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.75

Does the media refer more to FRD or ASTL?

In the previous week, Algoma Steel Group had 4 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Algoma Steel Group and 1 mentions for Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Algoma Steel Group's score of 0.16 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Friedman Industries 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Algoma Steel Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Friedman Industries (FRD) Competitors

$41.85 -1.14 (-2.65%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$41.73 -0.12 (-0.29%)

As of 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

FRD vs. SXC, MTUS, ZEUS, METC, and ASTL

Should you buy Friedman Industries stock or one of its competitors? Friedman Industries's main competitors and comparable companies include SunCoke Energy (SXC), Metallus (MTUS), Olympic Steel (ZEUS), Ramaco Resources (METC), and Algoma Steel Group (ASTL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "steel" industry.

How does Friedman Industries compare to SunCoke Energy?

SunCoke Energy (NYSE:SXC) and Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

SunCoke Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. Friedman Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. SunCoke Energy pays out -75.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 4.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. SunCoke Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Friedman Industries has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. SunCoke Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 3.63% compared to SunCoke Energy's net margin of -2.88%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 18.29% beat SunCoke Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SunCoke Energy	-2.88%	6.37%	2.28%
Friedman Industries	3.63%	18.29%	8.19%

SunCoke Energy presently has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential downside of 8.49%. Given SunCoke Energy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe SunCoke Energy is more favorable than Friedman Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SunCoke Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Friedman Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, SunCoke Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for SunCoke Energy and 1 mentions for Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat SunCoke Energy's score of 0.85 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SunCoke Energy	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Friedman Industries	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

90.5% of SunCoke Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of SunCoke Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

SunCoke Energy has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

Friedman Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SunCoke Energy. SunCoke Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Friedman Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SunCoke Energy	$1.84B	0.45	-$44.20M	-$0.64	N/A
Friedman Industries	$646.91M	0.48	$19.53M	$3.84	11.20

Summary

Friedman Industries beats SunCoke Energy on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Friedman Industries compare to Metallus?

Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) and Metallus (NYSE:MTUS) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Metallus' net margin of 0.66%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 18.29% beat Metallus' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Friedman Industries	3.63%	18.29%	8.19%
Metallus	0.66%	3.35%	2.02%

In the previous week, Metallus had 13 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Metallus and 1 mentions for Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Metallus' score of 0.80 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Friedman Industries	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Metallus	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Friedman Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Metallus. Friedman Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metallus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Friedman Industries	$646.91M	0.48	$19.53M	$3.84	11.20
Metallus	$1.16B	0.71	-$1.20M	$0.19	104.87

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Friedman Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Metallus	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its share price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Metallus has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.6% of Metallus shares are held by institutional investors. 6.6% of Friedman Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Metallus shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Friedman Industries beats Metallus on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Friedman Industries compare to Olympic Steel?

Olympic Steel (NASDAQ:ZEUS) and Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Olympic Steel's net margin of 0.73%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 18.29% beat Olympic Steel's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Olympic Steel	0.73%	2.11%	1.14%
Friedman Industries	3.63%	18.29%	8.19%

In the previous week, Olympic Steel and Olympic Steel both had 1 articles in the media. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Olympic Steel's score of -0.71 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Olympic Steel	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
Friedman Industries	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Olympic Steel pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Friedman Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Olympic Steel pays out 54.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 4.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Olympic Steel has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Friedman Industries has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Olympic Steel is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Olympic Steel has higher revenue and earnings than Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Olympic Steel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Olympic Steel	$1.90B	0.28	$22.98M	$1.17	40.91
Friedman Industries	$646.91M	0.48	$19.53M	$3.84	11.20

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Olympic Steel	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Friedman Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Olympic Steel has a beta of 1.75, suggesting that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

87.1% of Olympic Steel shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 13.8% of Olympic Steel shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Friedman Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Friedman Industries beats Olympic Steel on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Friedman Industries compare to Ramaco Resources?

Ramaco Resources (NASDAQ:METC) and Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Ramaco Resources had 5 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Ramaco Resources and 1 mentions for Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Ramaco Resources' score of 0.57 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ramaco Resources	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Friedman Industries	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Ramaco Resources' net margin of -11.98%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 18.29% beat Ramaco Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ramaco Resources	-11.98%	-13.54%	-6.01%
Friedman Industries	3.63%	18.29%	8.19%

Friedman Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Ramaco Resources. Ramaco Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Friedman Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ramaco Resources	$536.62M	0.97	-$51.45M	-$1.07	N/A
Friedman Industries	$646.91M	0.48	$19.53M	$3.84	11.20

Ramaco Resources has a beta of 1.64, indicating that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its share price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

Ramaco Resources presently has a consensus target price of $22.43, indicating a potential upside of 172.52%. Given Ramaco Resources' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ramaco Resources is more favorable than Friedman Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ramaco Resources	2 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.22
Friedman Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

74.5% of Ramaco Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.1% of Ramaco Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Friedman Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Friedman Industries beats Ramaco Resources on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Friedman Industries compare to Algoma Steel Group?

Friedman Industries (NASDAQ:FRD) and Algoma Steel Group (NASDAQ:ASTL) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends and valuation.

Friedman Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Algoma Steel Group. Algoma Steel Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Friedman Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Friedman Industries	$646.91M	0.48	$19.53M	$3.84	11.20
Algoma Steel Group	$1.49B	0.30	-$704.89M	-$7.35	N/A

33.3% of Friedman Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.0% of Algoma Steel Group shares are held by institutional investors. 6.6% of Friedman Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.8% of Algoma Steel Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Algoma Steel Group had 4 more articles in the media than Friedman Industries. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Algoma Steel Group and 1 mentions for Friedman Industries. Friedman Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Algoma Steel Group's score of 0.16 indicating that Friedman Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Friedman Industries	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Algoma Steel Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Friedman Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Algoma Steel Group	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Algoma Steel Group has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Algoma Steel Group's net margin of -71.60%. Friedman Industries' return on equity of 18.29% beat Algoma Steel Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Friedman Industries	3.63%	18.29%	8.19%
Algoma Steel Group	-71.60%	-110.49%	-25.74%

Summary

Friedman Industries beats Algoma Steel Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Friedman Industries News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FRD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FRD vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Friedman Industries	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$310.08M	$3.72B	$4.67B	$13.40B
Dividend Yield	0.37%	5.25%	4.76%	16.37%
P/E Ratio	10.90	24.22	24.07	25.95
Price / Sales	0.47	26,402.99	15,725.48	86.00
Price / Cash	13.05	27.05	24.92	53.72
Price / Book	1.96	11.20	9.34	6.27
Net Income	$19.53M	$127.14M	$159.14M	$382.01M
7 Day Performance	5.60%	-0.89%	-0.79%	-1.35%
1 Month Performance	-7.41%	-6.33%	-5.88%	-5.60%
1 Year Performance	97.97%	15.32%	13.60%	-1.54%

Friedman Industries Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FRD Friedman Industries	1.8426 of 5 stars	$41.85 -2.7%	N/A	+111.9%	$310.08M	$646.91M	10.90	271	Positive News
SXC SunCoke Energy	1.2535 of 5 stars	$9.81 +0.7%	$9.00 -8.2%	+16.5%	$831.40M	$1.84B	N/A	2,477	Analyst Upgrade
MTUS Metallus	1.679 of 5 stars	$19.76 +1.7%	N/A	+19.9%	$818.43M	$1.16B	103.93	1,865	News Coverage Insider Trade Analyst Revision Gap Up
ZEUS Olympic Steel	0.5727 of 5 stars	$47.86 flat	N/A	N/A	$535.94M	$1.90B	40.91	2,163
METC Ramaco Resources	2.8882 of 5 stars	$8.20 -1.6%	$22.43 +173.7%	-79.8%	$519.48M	$536.62M	N/A	900

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FRD) was last updated on 10/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Friedman Industries (FRD) Competitors

FRD vs. SXC, MTUS, ZEUS, METC, and ASTL

How does Friedman Industries compare to SunCoke Energy?

Summary

How does Friedman Industries compare to Metallus?

Summary

How does Friedman Industries compare to Olympic Steel?

Summary

How does Friedman Industries compare to Ramaco Resources?

Summary

How does Friedman Industries compare to Algoma Steel Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FRD vs. The Competition

Friedman Industries Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Friedman Industries (FRD) Competitors

FRD vs. SXC, MTUS, ZEUS, METC, and ASTL

How does Friedman Industries compare to SunCoke Energy?

Is SXC or FRD a better dividend stock?

Is SXC or FRD more profitable?

Do analysts prefer SXC or FRD?

Does the media favor SXC or FRD?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in SXC or FRD?

Which has more volatility & risk, SXC or FRD?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, SXC or FRD?

Summary

How does Friedman Industries compare to Metallus?

Is FRD or MTUS more profitable?

Does the media prefer FRD or MTUS?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, FRD or MTUS?

Do analysts prefer FRD or MTUS?

Which has more volatility and risk, FRD or MTUS?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of FRD or MTUS?

Summary

How does Friedman Industries compare to Olympic Steel?

Is ZEUS or FRD more profitable?

Does the media prefer ZEUS or FRD?

Is ZEUS or FRD a better dividend stock?

Which has better valuation & earnings, ZEUS or FRD?

Do analysts rate ZEUS or FRD?

Which has more risk & volatility, ZEUS or FRD?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of ZEUS or FRD?

Summary

How does Friedman Industries compare to Ramaco Resources?

Does the media prefer METC or FRD?

Is METC or FRD more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, METC or FRD?

Which has more risk and volatility, METC or FRD?

Do analysts recommend METC or FRD?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in METC or FRD?

Summary

How does Friedman Industries compare to Algoma Steel Group?

Which has better earnings and valuation, FRD or ASTL?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in FRD or ASTL?

Does the media refer more to FRD or ASTL?

Do analysts rate FRD or ASTL?

Which has more risk & volatility, FRD or ASTL?

Is FRD or ASTL more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FRD vs. The Competition

Friedman Industries Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools