Go Pro

Beneficient (BENF) Competitors

Beneficient logo
$1.46 +0.01 (+0.69%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.46 +0.01 (+0.34%)
As of 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BENF vs. LCCC, NOEM, TGE, GROW, and MLCI

Should you buy Beneficient stock or one of its competitors? Beneficient's main competitors and comparable companies include Lakeshore Acquisition III (LCCC), CO2 Energy Transition (NOEM), The Generation Essentials Group (TGE), U.S. Global Investors (GROW), and Mount Logan Capital (MLCI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Beneficient compare to Lakeshore Acquisition III?

Lakeshore Acquisition III (NASDAQ:LCCC) and Beneficient (NASDAQ:BENF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

90.6% of Beneficient shares are held by institutional investors. 22.5% of Lakeshore Acquisition III shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.1% of Beneficient shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Beneficient had 55 more articles in the media than Lakeshore Acquisition III. MarketBeat recorded 56 mentions for Beneficient and 1 mentions for Lakeshore Acquisition III. Lakeshore Acquisition III's average media sentiment score of 1.82 beat Beneficient's score of 0.02 indicating that Lakeshore Acquisition III is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lakeshore Acquisition III Very Positive
Beneficient Neutral

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lakeshore Acquisition IIIN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
BeneficientN/AN/AN/A-$7.11N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lakeshore Acquisition III
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Beneficient
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lakeshore Acquisition IIIN/A N/A N/A
Beneficient N/A N/A N/A

Lakeshore Acquisition III has a beta of 0.01, meaning that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Beneficient has a beta of -0.04, meaning that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lakeshore Acquisition III beats Beneficient on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beneficient compare to CO2 Energy Transition?

Beneficient (NASDAQ:BENF) and CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

Beneficient has a beta of -0.04, suggesting that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CO2 Energy Transition has a beta of -0.11, suggesting that its stock price is 111% less volatile than the broader market.

Beneficient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CO2 Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BeneficientN/AN/AN/A-$7.11N/A
CO2 Energy TransitionN/AN/A$1.65M$0.1570.73

In the previous week, Beneficient had 54 more articles in the media than CO2 Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 56 mentions for Beneficient and 2 mentions for CO2 Energy Transition. CO2 Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Beneficient's score of 0.02 indicating that CO2 Energy Transition is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Beneficient Neutral
CO2 Energy Transition Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Beneficient
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
CO2 Energy Transition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Beneficient's return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BeneficientN/A N/A N/A
CO2 Energy Transition N/A -75.59%2.02%

90.6% of Beneficient shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.1% of Beneficient shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Beneficient beats CO2 Energy Transition on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beneficient compare to The Generation Essentials Group?

Beneficient (NASDAQ:BENF) and The Generation Essentials Group (NYSE:TGE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Beneficient
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
The Generation Essentials Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Beneficient has a beta of -0.04, meaning that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Generation Essentials Group has a beta of -1.27, meaning that its share price is 227% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Beneficient had 56 more articles in the media than The Generation Essentials Group. MarketBeat recorded 56 mentions for Beneficient and 0 mentions for The Generation Essentials Group. Beneficient's average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat The Generation Essentials Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Beneficient is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Beneficient Neutral
The Generation Essentials Group Neutral

90.6% of Beneficient shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.1% of Beneficient shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.6% of The Generation Essentials Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BeneficientN/A N/A N/A
The Generation Essentials Group N/A N/A N/A

Beneficient has higher earnings, but lower revenue than The Generation Essentials Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BeneficientN/AN/AN/A-$7.11N/A
The Generation Essentials Group$98.32M0.37-$7.75MN/AN/A

Summary

Beneficient beats The Generation Essentials Group on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beneficient compare to U.S. Global Investors?

Beneficient (NASDAQ:BENF) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Beneficient had 54 more articles in the media than U.S. Global Investors. MarketBeat recorded 56 mentions for Beneficient and 2 mentions for U.S. Global Investors. U.S. Global Investors' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Beneficient's score of 0.02 indicating that U.S. Global Investors is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Beneficient
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
44 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
U.S. Global Investors
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Beneficient
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 29.81% compared to Beneficient's net margin of 0.00%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.70% beat Beneficient's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BeneficientN/A N/A N/A
U.S. Global Investors 29.81%6.70%6.30%

90.6% of Beneficient shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.1% of Beneficient shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Beneficient has a beta of -0.04, suggesting that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

U.S. Global Investors has higher revenue and earnings than Beneficient. Beneficient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than U.S. Global Investors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BeneficientN/AN/AN/A-$7.11N/A
U.S. Global Investors$10.25M3.58$3.06M$0.2511.92

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Beneficient on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beneficient compare to Mount Logan Capital?

Beneficient (NASDAQ:BENF) and Mount Logan Capital (NASDAQ:MLCI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

90.6% of Beneficient shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.1% of Beneficient shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Mount Logan Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Beneficient had 55 more articles in the media than Mount Logan Capital. MarketBeat recorded 56 mentions for Beneficient and 1 mentions for Mount Logan Capital. Mount Logan Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Beneficient's score of 0.02 indicating that Mount Logan Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Beneficient Neutral
Mount Logan Capital Very Positive

Mount Logan Capital has a consensus price target of $8.00, suggesting a potential upside of 129.23%. Given Mount Logan Capital's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Mount Logan Capital is more favorable than Beneficient.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Beneficient
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Mount Logan Capital
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Beneficient has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mount Logan Capital. Mount Logan Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beneficient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BeneficientN/AN/AN/A-$7.11N/A
Mount Logan Capital$53.57M0.73-$60.85M-$6.67N/A

Beneficient has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Mount Logan Capital's net margin of -155.36%. Beneficient's return on equity of 0.00% beat Mount Logan Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BeneficientN/A N/A N/A
Mount Logan Capital -155.36%-72.32%-3.99%

Summary

Beneficient beats Mount Logan Capital on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Beneficient News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BENF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BENF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BENF vs. The Competition

MetricBeneficientCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$21.05M$5.25B$13.62B$13.10B
Dividend YieldN/A7.52%6.00%13.51%
P/E Ratio-0.2129.3324.9525.75
Price / SalesN/A1,253.23511.4586.14
Price / CashN/A47.8150.3252.93
Price / BookN/A3.502.716.30
Net IncomeN/A$417.39M$1.32B$359.77M
7 Day Performance159.88%-0.11%-0.50%-0.17%
1 Month Performance-36.52%-2.32%-1.90%-4.06%
1 Year Performance-47.21%5.05%9.34%6.09%

Beneficient Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BENF
Beneficient
1.5757 of 5 stars
$1.46
+0.7%
N/A-48.6%$21.05MN/AN/A50
LCCC
Lakeshore Acquisition III
1.6108 of 5 stars
$10.59
+0.6%
N/AN/A$40.47MN/AN/A1
NOEM
CO2 Energy Transition
1.0582 of 5 stars
$10.57
-1.1%
N/A+4.0%$39.30MN/A70.44N/A
TGE
The Generation Essentials Group
0.4431 of 5 stars
$0.86
-2.7%
N/A-68.8%$37.94M$98.32MN/A750
GROW
U.S. Global Investors
2.0108 of 5 stars
$2.97
-0.3%
N/A+8.5%$36.53M$10.25M11.8820

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BENF) was last updated on 9/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners