Go Pro

Beneficient (BENF) Competitors

Beneficient logo
$2.40 -0.07 (-2.83%)
Closing price 08/14/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.46 +0.06 (+2.29%)
As of 08/14/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BENF vs. MPV, DHF, SITC, TAVI, and EARN

Should you buy Beneficient stock or one of its competitors? Beneficient's main competitors and comparable companies include Barings Participation Investors (MPV), BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund (DHF), Site Centers (SITC), Tavia Acquisition (TAVI), and Ellington Credit (EARN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Beneficient compare to Barings Participation Investors?

Beneficient (NASDAQ:BENF) and Barings Participation Investors (NYSE:MPV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Beneficient
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Barings Participation Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BeneficientN/AN/AN/A-$7.11N/A
Barings Participation Investors$14.64M11.99N/AN/AN/A

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BeneficientN/A N/A N/A
Barings Participation Investors N/A N/A N/A

90.6% of Beneficient shares are held by institutional investors. 10.1% of Beneficient shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Barings Participation Investors shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Beneficient and Beneficient both had 5 articles in the media. Beneficient's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Barings Participation Investors' score of 0.50 indicating that Beneficient is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Beneficient
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Barings Participation Investors
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Beneficient beats Barings Participation Investors on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beneficient compare to BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund?

BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund (NYSE:DHF) and Beneficient (NASDAQ:BENF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

36.2% of BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.6% of Beneficient shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.6% of BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.1% of Beneficient shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies FundN/A N/A N/A
Beneficient N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Beneficient had 4 more articles in the media than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Beneficient and 1 mentions for BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund. Beneficient's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's score of 1.00 indicating that Beneficient is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund Positive
Beneficient Very Positive

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund$12.84M13.57N/AN/AN/A
BeneficientN/AN/AN/A-$7.11N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Beneficient
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Beneficient beats BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beneficient compare to Site Centers?

Site Centers (NYSE:SITC) and Beneficient (NASDAQ:BENF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Beneficient had 5 more articles in the media than Site Centers. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Beneficient and 0 mentions for Site Centers. Beneficient's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Site Centers' score of 0.00 indicating that Beneficient is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Site Centers Neutral
Beneficient Very Positive

Site Centers has a net margin of 219.18% compared to Beneficient's net margin of 0.00%. Site Centers' return on equity of 40.56% beat Beneficient's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Site Centers219.18% 40.56% 27.81%
Beneficient N/A N/A N/A

88.7% of Site Centers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.6% of Beneficient shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Site Centers shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.1% of Beneficient shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Site Centers currently has a consensus price target of $6.75, indicating a potential upside of 127.66%. Given Site Centers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Site Centers is more favorable than Beneficient.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Site Centers
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Beneficient
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Site Centers has higher revenue and earnings than Beneficient. Beneficient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Site Centers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Site Centers$113.49M1.37$177.86M$2.411.23
BeneficientN/AN/AN/A-$7.11N/A

Summary

Site Centers beats Beneficient on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beneficient compare to Tavia Acquisition?

Beneficient (NASDAQ:BENF) and Tavia Acquisition (NASDAQ:TAVI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, dividends and valuation.

90.6% of Beneficient shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.1% of Beneficient shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.6% of Tavia Acquisition shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Beneficient had 2 more articles in the media than Tavia Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Beneficient and 3 mentions for Tavia Acquisition. Beneficient's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Tavia Acquisition's score of 1.42 indicating that Beneficient is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Beneficient Very Positive
Tavia Acquisition Positive

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BeneficientN/A N/A N/A
Tavia Acquisition N/A N/A N/A

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BeneficientN/AN/AN/A-$7.11N/A
Tavia AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Beneficient
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Tavia Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Beneficient beats Tavia Acquisition on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beneficient compare to Ellington Credit?

Ellington Credit (NYSE:EARN) and Beneficient (NASDAQ:BENF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

20.4% of Ellington Credit shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.6% of Beneficient shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Ellington Credit shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.1% of Beneficient shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ellington Credit currently has a consensus target price of $5.50, indicating a potential upside of 25.43%. Given Ellington Credit's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Ellington Credit is more favorable than Beneficient.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ellington Credit
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Beneficient
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Ellington Credit had 3 more articles in the media than Beneficient. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Ellington Credit and 5 mentions for Beneficient. Beneficient's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Ellington Credit's score of 0.77 indicating that Beneficient is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ellington Credit
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Beneficient
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Beneficient has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ellington Credit. Ellington Credit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beneficient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ellington Credit$15.88M10.38-$38.85M-$0.98N/A
BeneficientN/AN/AN/A-$7.11N/A

Beneficient has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ellington Credit's net margin of -70.52%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ellington Credit-70.52% N/A N/A
Beneficient N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Ellington Credit beats Beneficient on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Beneficient News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BENF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BENF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BENF vs. The Competition

MetricBeneficientCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$34.84M$5.73B$13.87B$13.07B
Dividend YieldN/A7.38%5.87%10.64%
P/E Ratio-0.3438.2529.4025.40
Price / SalesN/A1,208.86507.22125.76
Price / CashN/A48.2837.2653.27
Price / BookN/A3.692.816.21
Net IncomeN/A$417.15M$1.31B$347.71M
7 Day Performance-20.00%0.60%0.77%1.08%
1 Month Performance-28.57%1.18%1.43%1.87%
1 Year Performance-3.85%6.64%12.06%20.79%

Beneficient Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BENF
Beneficient
0.6126 of 5 stars
$2.40
-2.8%
N/A-3.8%$34.84MN/AN/A80
MPV
Barings Participation Investors
N/A$16.42
+1.8%
N/A-13.9%$176.63MN/AN/A900
DHF
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
N/A$2.40
+0.2%
N/A-7.2%$174.21M$12.84MN/AN/A
SITC
Site Centers
2.1096 of 5 stars
$3.26
+2.7%
$6.75
+107.4%
-74.6%$170.79M$113.49M0.98270
TAVI
Tavia Acquisition
1.5447 of 5 stars
$10.68
-0.2%
N/A+4.1%$170.04MN/AN/A2

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BENF) was last updated on 8/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners