Free Trial

LM Funding America (LMFA) Competitors

LM Funding America logo
$0.22 +0.01 (+4.60%)
As of 10:58 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

LMFA vs. GLBZ, ANY, BTCT, CARV, and SNTG

Should you buy LM Funding America stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares LM Funding America with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with LM Funding America include Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ), Sphere 3D (ANY), BTC Digital (BTCT), Carver Bancorp (CARV), and Sentage (SNTG). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does LM Funding America compare to Glen Burnie Bancorp?

LM Funding America (NASDAQ:LMFA) and Glen Burnie Bancorp (NASDAQ:GLBZ) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

LM Funding America currently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 2,214.81%. Given LM Funding America's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe LM Funding America is more favorable than Glen Burnie Bancorp.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
LM Funding America
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Glen Burnie Bancorp
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Glen Burnie Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than LM Funding America. Glen Burnie Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LM Funding America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LM Funding America$8.85M0.42-$26.92M-$2.19N/A
Glen Burnie Bancorp$11.83M1.17-$110K-$0.03N/A

In the previous week, LM Funding America had 1 more articles in the media than Glen Burnie Bancorp. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for LM Funding America and 2 mentions for Glen Burnie Bancorp. LM Funding America's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Glen Burnie Bancorp's score of 0.00 indicating that LM Funding America is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
LM Funding America
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Glen Burnie Bancorp
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

22.7% of LM Funding America shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.8% of Glen Burnie Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of LM Funding America shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.6% of Glen Burnie Bancorp shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

LM Funding America has a beta of 2.34, meaning that its share price is 134% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Glen Burnie Bancorp has a beta of 0.16, meaning that its share price is 84% less volatile than the broader market.

Glen Burnie Bancorp has a net margin of 0.16% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of -368.68%. Glen Burnie Bancorp's return on equity of 0.14% beat LM Funding America's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LM Funding America-368.68% -102.63% -67.53%
Glen Burnie Bancorp 0.16%0.14%0.01%

Summary

LM Funding America and Glen Burnie Bancorp tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LM Funding America compare to Sphere 3D?

LM Funding America (NASDAQ:LMFA) and Sphere 3D (NASDAQ:ANY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

LM Funding America has a beta of 2.34, indicating that its stock price is 134% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sphere 3D has a beta of 3.63, indicating that its stock price is 263% more volatile than the broader market.

Sphere 3D has a net margin of -163.45% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of -368.68%. Sphere 3D's return on equity of -78.14% beat LM Funding America's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LM Funding America-368.68% -102.63% -67.53%
Sphere 3D -163.45%-78.14%-73.36%

Sphere 3D has higher revenue and earnings than LM Funding America. Sphere 3D is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LM Funding America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LM Funding America$8.85M0.42-$26.92M-$2.19N/A
Sphere 3D$11.18M1.17-$21.48M-$3.48N/A

22.7% of LM Funding America shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Sphere 3D shares are held by institutional investors. 15.0% of LM Funding America shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Sphere 3D shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, LM Funding America and LM Funding America both had 3 articles in the media. LM Funding America's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Sphere 3D's score of 0.41 indicating that LM Funding America is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
LM Funding America
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Sphere 3D
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

LM Funding America currently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2,214.81%. Given LM Funding America's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe LM Funding America is more favorable than Sphere 3D.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
LM Funding America
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Sphere 3D
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

LM Funding America beats Sphere 3D on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LM Funding America compare to BTC Digital?

LM Funding America (NASDAQ:LMFA) and BTC Digital (NASDAQ:BTCT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

LM Funding America has a beta of 2.34, suggesting that its stock price is 134% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BTC Digital has a beta of 5.36, suggesting that its stock price is 436% more volatile than the broader market.

22.7% of LM Funding America shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.3% of BTC Digital shares are held by institutional investors. 15.0% of LM Funding America shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of BTC Digital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

BTC Digital has higher revenue and earnings than LM Funding America. BTC Digital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LM Funding America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LM Funding America$8.85M0.42-$26.92M-$2.19N/A
BTC Digital$14.04M0.87-$9.06M-$1.20N/A

BTC Digital has a net margin of 0.00% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of -368.68%. BTC Digital's return on equity of 0.00% beat LM Funding America's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LM Funding America-368.68% -102.63% -67.53%
BTC Digital N/A N/A N/A

LM Funding America presently has a consensus target price of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2,214.81%. Given LM Funding America's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe LM Funding America is more favorable than BTC Digital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
LM Funding America
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
BTC Digital
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

In the previous week, LM Funding America and LM Funding America both had 3 articles in the media. LM Funding America's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat BTC Digital's score of 0.85 indicating that LM Funding America is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
LM Funding America
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BTC Digital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

BTC Digital beats LM Funding America on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LM Funding America compare to Carver Bancorp?

LM Funding America (NASDAQ:LMFA) and Carver Bancorp (NASDAQ:CARV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, LM Funding America had 3 more articles in the media than Carver Bancorp. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for LM Funding America and 0 mentions for Carver Bancorp. LM Funding America's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Carver Bancorp's score of 0.00 indicating that LM Funding America is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
LM Funding America Positive
Carver Bancorp Neutral

22.7% of LM Funding America shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.2% of Carver Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of LM Funding America shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Carver Bancorp shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

LM Funding America currently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 2,214.81%. Given LM Funding America's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe LM Funding America is more favorable than Carver Bancorp.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
LM Funding America
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Carver Bancorp
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

LM Funding America has a beta of 2.34, meaning that its share price is 134% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carver Bancorp has a beta of 1.53, meaning that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market.

Carver Bancorp has a net margin of -34.89% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of -368.68%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -102.63% beat Carver Bancorp's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LM Funding America-368.68% -102.63% -67.53%
Carver Bancorp -34.89%-171.55%-1.82%

Carver Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than LM Funding America. Carver Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LM Funding America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LM Funding America$8.85M0.42-$26.92M-$2.19N/A
Carver Bancorp$22.74M0.38-$13.74M-$1.72N/A

Summary

LM Funding America beats Carver Bancorp on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LM Funding America compare to Sentage?

Sentage (NASDAQ:SNTG) and LM Funding America (NASDAQ:LMFA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Sentage has a net margin of 0.00% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of -368.68%. Sentage's return on equity of 0.00% beat LM Funding America's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SentageN/A N/A N/A
LM Funding America -368.68%-102.63%-67.53%

Sentage has higher earnings, but lower revenue than LM Funding America.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sentage$70K84.90-$2.28MN/AN/A
LM Funding America$8.85M0.42-$26.92M-$2.19N/A

In the previous week, LM Funding America had 1 more articles in the media than Sentage. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for LM Funding America and 2 mentions for Sentage. Sentage's average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat LM Funding America's score of 1.21 indicating that Sentage is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sentage Positive
LM Funding America Positive

LM Funding America has a consensus target price of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 2,214.81%. Given LM Funding America's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe LM Funding America is more favorable than Sentage.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sentage
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
LM Funding America
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

0.1% of Sentage shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.7% of LM Funding America shares are held by institutional investors. 62.4% of Sentage shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of LM Funding America shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sentage has a beta of 2.39, indicating that its share price is 139% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LM Funding America has a beta of 2.34, indicating that its share price is 134% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Sentage beats LM Funding America on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get LM Funding America News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LMFA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LMFA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LMFA vs. The Competition

MetricLM Funding AmericaFIN IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$3.75M$7.23B$14.03B$12.29B
Dividend YieldN/A5.88%5.75%5.66%
P/E Ratio-0.1017.4820.1624.47
Price / Sales0.4211.27148.50137.30
Price / CashN/A54.8519.5037.92
Price / Book0.093.542.276.71
Net Income-$26.92M$300.94M$1.14B$337.21M
7 Day Performance-0.74%2.56%2.10%1.92%
1 Month Performance-6.33%-1.02%3.58%3.80%
1 Year Performance-87.73%12.03%13.15%28.85%

LM Funding America Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LMFA
LM Funding America
4.1847 of 5 stars
$0.22
+4.6%
$5.00
+2,214.8%
-87.4%$3.75M$8.85MN/A8
GLBZ
Glen Burnie Bancorp
0.0348 of 5 stars
$4.64
-0.3%
N/A-3.4%$13.62M$11.83M464.4680
ANY
Sphere 3D
1.1832 of 5 stars
$2.87
-7.9%
N/A-53.5%$12.30M$11.18MN/A20
BTCT
BTC Digital
0.9955 of 5 stars
$1.27
-5.2%
N/A-54.2%$12.09M$14.04MN/A16
CARV
Carver Bancorp
0.0447 of 5 stars
$1.44
+6.7%
N/A-14.7%$8.96M$22.74MN/A110

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:LMFA) was last updated on 6/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners