Go Pro

CalciMedica (CALC) Competitors

CalciMedica logo
$0.80 +0.04 (+5.75%)
As of 02:07 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CALC vs. TCRT, MGX, MCRB, INMB, and BHST

Should you buy CalciMedica stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CalciMedica with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CalciMedica include Alaunos Therapeutics (TCRT), Metagenomi (MGX), Seres Therapeutics (MCRB), INmune Bio (INMB), and BioHarvest Sciences (BHST).

How does CalciMedica compare to Alaunos Therapeutics?

Alaunos Therapeutics (NASDAQ:TCRT) and CalciMedica (NASDAQ:CALC) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Alaunos Therapeutics has a beta of -1, suggesting that its stock price is 200% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CalciMedica has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Alaunos Therapeutics' return on equity of -165.94% beat CalciMedica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alaunos TherapeuticsN/A -165.94% -123.50%
CalciMedica N/A -863.40%-144.33%

27.7% of Alaunos Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.1% of Alaunos Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.3% of CalciMedica shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Alaunos Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CalciMedica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alaunos TherapeuticsN/AN/A-$4.18M-$2.13N/A
CalciMedicaN/AN/A-$29.56M-$1.31N/A

CalciMedica has a consensus price target of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 1,156.28%. Given CalciMedica's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CalciMedica is more favorable than Alaunos Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alaunos Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
CalciMedica
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, CalciMedica had 2 more articles in the media than Alaunos Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CalciMedica and 0 mentions for Alaunos Therapeutics. Alaunos Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CalciMedica'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alaunos Therapeutics Neutral
CalciMedica Neutral

Summary

CalciMedica beats Alaunos Therapeutics on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CalciMedica compare to Metagenomi?

Metagenomi (NASDAQ:MGX) and CalciMedica (NASDAQ:CALC) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

CalciMedica has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Metagenomi's net margin of -384.61%. Metagenomi's return on equity of -51.23% beat CalciMedica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Metagenomi-384.61% -51.23% -36.62%
CalciMedica N/A -863.40%-144.33%

CalciMedica has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Metagenomi. CalciMedica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metagenomi, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Metagenomi$25.21M1.82-$87.87M-$2.30N/A
CalciMedicaN/AN/A-$29.56M-$1.31N/A

Metagenomi has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CalciMedica has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Metagenomi currently has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 475.66%. CalciMedica has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1,156.28%. Given CalciMedica's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CalciMedica is more favorable than Metagenomi.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Metagenomi
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
CalciMedica
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, CalciMedica had 2 more articles in the media than Metagenomi. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CalciMedica and 0 mentions for Metagenomi. Metagenomi's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CalciMedica'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Metagenomi Neutral
CalciMedica Neutral

Summary

Metagenomi beats CalciMedica on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CalciMedica compare to Seres Therapeutics?

Seres Therapeutics (NASDAQ:MCRB) and CalciMedica (NASDAQ:CALC) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Seres Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than CalciMedica. Seres Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CalciMedica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seres Therapeutics$790K64.51$5.70M-$5.17N/A
CalciMedicaN/AN/A-$29.56M-$1.31N/A

In the previous week, CalciMedica had 2 more articles in the media than Seres Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CalciMedica and 0 mentions for Seres Therapeutics. Seres Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CalciMedica'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seres Therapeutics Neutral
CalciMedica Neutral

Seres Therapeutics has a beta of 0.2, meaning that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CalciMedica has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Seres Therapeutics' return on equity of -130.29% beat CalciMedica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seres TherapeuticsN/A -130.29% -35.35%
CalciMedica N/A -863.40%-144.33%

59.3% of Seres Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 5.2% of Seres Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 28.3% of CalciMedica shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Seres Therapeutics currently has a consensus target price of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 222.89%. CalciMedica has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 1,156.28%. Given CalciMedica's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CalciMedica is more favorable than Seres Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seres Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
CalciMedica
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Seres Therapeutics beats CalciMedica on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CalciMedica compare to INmune Bio?

INmune Bio (NASDAQ:INMB) and CalciMedica (NASDAQ:CALC) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

INmune Bio's return on equity of -103.03% beat CalciMedica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
INmune BioN/A -103.03% -77.66%
CalciMedica N/A -863.40%-144.33%

12.7% of INmune Bio shares are held by institutional investors. 21.4% of INmune Bio shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.3% of CalciMedica shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

INmune Bio has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CalciMedica has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

CalciMedica has lower revenue, but higher earnings than INmune Bio. INmune Bio is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CalciMedica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
INmune Bio$50K1,012.70-$45.93M-$1.67N/A
CalciMedicaN/AN/A-$29.56M-$1.31N/A

In the previous week, INmune Bio had 2 more articles in the media than CalciMedica. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for INmune Bio and 2 mentions for CalciMedica. INmune Bio's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat CalciMedica's score of 0.00 indicating that INmune Bio is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
INmune Bio
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CalciMedica
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CalciMedica has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1,156.28%. Given CalciMedica's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CalciMedica is more favorable than INmune Bio.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
INmune Bio
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
CalciMedica
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

INmune Bio beats CalciMedica on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CalciMedica compare to BioHarvest Sciences?

CalciMedica (NASDAQ:CALC) and BioHarvest Sciences (NASDAQ:BHST) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

CalciMedica has a net margin of 0.00% compared to BioHarvest Sciences' net margin of -32.54%. BioHarvest Sciences' return on equity of -76.03% beat CalciMedica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CalciMedicaN/A -863.40% -144.33%
BioHarvest Sciences -32.54%-76.03%-25.30%

BioHarvest Sciences has higher revenue and earnings than CalciMedica. BioHarvest Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CalciMedica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CalciMedicaN/AN/A-$29.56M-$1.31N/A
BioHarvest Sciences$34.51M1.26-$11.14M-$0.59N/A

In the previous week, CalciMedica had 1 more articles in the media than BioHarvest Sciences. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CalciMedica and 1 mentions for BioHarvest Sciences. CalciMedica's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BioHarvest Sciences'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CalciMedica
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
BioHarvest Sciences
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CalciMedica has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

CalciMedica currently has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1,156.28%. BioHarvest Sciences has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 351.26%. Given CalciMedica's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe CalciMedica is more favorable than BioHarvest Sciences.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CalciMedica
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
BioHarvest Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

BioHarvest Sciences beats CalciMedica on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CalciMedica News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CALC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CALC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CALC vs. The Competition

MetricCalciMedicaPharmaceuticals IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$12.55M$11.44B$6.80B$13.01B
Dividend YieldN/A2.74%2.60%10.03%
P/E Ratio-0.61791.58279.9825.51
Price / SalesN/A947.06649.35116.02
Price / CashN/A14.8228.6434.82
Price / Book-1.7310.4411.156.35
Net Income-$29.56M$2.80B$3.48B$347.60M
7 Day Performance10.89%1.86%2.51%3.14%
1 Month Performance-17.55%-2.90%-2.78%-2.08%
1 Year Performance-73.90%155.40%64.32%21.27%

CalciMedica Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CALC
CalciMedica
2.8855 of 5 stars
$0.80
+5.8%
$10.00
+1,156.3%
-74.4%$12.55MN/AN/A30
TCRT
Alaunos Therapeutics
0.5703 of 5 stars
$1.90
flat
N/A-30.5%$46.40MN/AN/A40
MGX
Metagenomi
3.0988 of 5 stars
$1.21
flat
$7.00
+478.5%
-46.2%$45.56M$25.21MN/A236
MCRB
Seres Therapeutics
2.2587 of 5 stars
$4.65
-3.1%
$17.00
+265.6%
-64.0%$45.01M$790KN/A330
INMB
INmune Bio
1.0414 of 5 stars
$1.69
-1.2%
N/A-27.7%$44.92M$50KN/A10

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CALC) was last updated on 8/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners