Go Pro

Creative Medical Technology (CELZ) Competitors

Creative Medical Technology logo
$1.21 -0.10 (-7.63%)
Closing price 08/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.27 +0.06 (+5.29%)
As of 08/24/2026 07:21 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CELZ vs. SGMO, LTRN, BYSI, GNTA, and KYNB

Should you buy Creative Medical Technology stock or one of its competitors? Creative Medical Technology's main competitors and comparable companies include Sangamo Therapeutics (SGMO), Lantern Pharma (LTRN), BeyondSpring (BYSI), Genenta Science (GNTA), and Kyntra Bio (KYNB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "biotechnology" industry.

How does Creative Medical Technology compare to Sangamo Therapeutics?

Sangamo Therapeutics (NASDAQ:SGMO) and Creative Medical Technology (NASDAQ:CELZ) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Creative Medical Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sangamo Therapeutics. Creative Medical Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sangamo Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sangamo Therapeutics$39.55M0.78-$122.93M-$0.38N/A
Creative Medical Technology$10K797.39-$5.99M-$2.07N/A

56.9% of Sangamo Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Creative Medical Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Sangamo Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Creative Medical Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Creative Medical Technology has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sangamo Therapeutics' net margin of -310.81%. Creative Medical Technology's return on equity of -86.52% beat Sangamo Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sangamo Therapeutics-310.81% -2,662.06% -132.12%
Creative Medical Technology N/A -86.52%-81.96%

In the previous week, Creative Medical Technology had 3 more articles in the media than Sangamo Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Creative Medical Technology and 0 mentions for Sangamo Therapeutics. Creative Medical Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Sangamo Therapeutics' score of 0.00 indicating that Creative Medical Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sangamo Therapeutics Neutral
Creative Medical Technology Neutral

Sangamo Therapeutics has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Creative Medical Technology has a beta of 1.95, indicating that its stock price is 95% more volatile than the broader market.

Sangamo Therapeutics presently has a consensus price target of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7,332.43%. Given Sangamo Therapeutics' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Sangamo Therapeutics is more favorable than Creative Medical Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sangamo Therapeutics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Creative Medical Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Creative Medical Technology beats Sangamo Therapeutics on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Creative Medical Technology compare to Lantern Pharma?

Creative Medical Technology (NASDAQ:CELZ) and Lantern Pharma (NASDAQ:LTRN) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, Creative Medical Technology had 2 more articles in the media than Lantern Pharma. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Creative Medical Technology and 1 mentions for Lantern Pharma. Creative Medical Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Lantern Pharma's score of 0.00 indicating that Creative Medical Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Creative Medical Technology
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Lantern Pharma
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Creative Medical Technology has a beta of 1.95, indicating that its share price is 95% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lantern Pharma has a beta of 2.35, indicating that its share price is 135% more volatile than the broader market.

Creative Medical Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Lantern Pharma. Lantern Pharma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Creative Medical Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Creative Medical Technology$10K797.39-$5.99M-$2.07N/A
Lantern PharmaN/AN/A-$17.12M-$1.62N/A

Creative Medical Technology's return on equity of -86.52% beat Lantern Pharma's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Creative Medical TechnologyN/A -86.52% -81.96%
Lantern Pharma N/A -368.02%-148.62%

1.4% of Creative Medical Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.6% of Lantern Pharma shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Creative Medical Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.5% of Lantern Pharma shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Creative Medical Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Lantern Pharma
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Creative Medical Technology beats Lantern Pharma on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Creative Medical Technology compare to BeyondSpring?

BeyondSpring (NASDAQ:BYSI) and Creative Medical Technology (NASDAQ:CELZ) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

BeyondSpring has higher revenue and earnings than Creative Medical Technology. BeyondSpring is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Creative Medical Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BeyondSpring$1.75M16.66-$1.01M-$0.12N/A
Creative Medical Technology$10K797.39-$5.99M-$2.07N/A

In the previous week, Creative Medical Technology had 3 more articles in the media than BeyondSpring. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Creative Medical Technology and 0 mentions for BeyondSpring. Creative Medical Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat BeyondSpring's score of 0.00 indicating that Creative Medical Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BeyondSpring Neutral
Creative Medical Technology Neutral

BeyondSpring has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Creative Medical Technology has a beta of 1.95, indicating that its share price is 95% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BeyondSpring
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Creative Medical Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

40.3% of BeyondSpring shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Creative Medical Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 29.3% of BeyondSpring shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Creative Medical Technology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

BeyondSpring's return on equity of 0.00% beat Creative Medical Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BeyondSpringN/A N/A -28.88%
Creative Medical Technology N/A -86.52%-81.96%

Summary

BeyondSpring and Creative Medical Technology tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Creative Medical Technology compare to Genenta Science?

Genenta Science (NASDAQ:GNTA) and Creative Medical Technology (NASDAQ:CELZ) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

15.1% of Genenta Science shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Creative Medical Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 29.0% of Genenta Science shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Creative Medical Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Creative Medical Technology had 3 more articles in the media than Genenta Science. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Creative Medical Technology and 0 mentions for Genenta Science. Creative Medical Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Genenta Science's score of 0.00 indicating that Creative Medical Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Genenta Science Neutral
Creative Medical Technology Neutral

Creative Medical Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Genenta Science.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genenta ScienceN/AN/A-$7.39MN/AN/A
Creative Medical Technology$10K797.39-$5.99M-$2.07N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Genenta Science
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Creative Medical Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Genenta Science has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Creative Medical Technology has a beta of 1.95, suggesting that its stock price is 95% more volatile than the broader market.

Genenta Science's return on equity of 0.00% beat Creative Medical Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Genenta ScienceN/A N/A N/A
Creative Medical Technology N/A -86.52%-81.96%

Summary

Creative Medical Technology beats Genenta Science on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Creative Medical Technology compare to Kyntra Bio?

Kyntra Bio (NASDAQ:KYNB) and Creative Medical Technology (NASDAQ:CELZ) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Kyntra Bio has a net margin of 2,199.13% compared to Creative Medical Technology's net margin of 0.00%. Kyntra Bio's return on equity of 0.00% beat Creative Medical Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kyntra Bio2,199.13% N/A -47.27%
Creative Medical Technology N/A -86.52%-81.96%

In the previous week, Kyntra Bio had 3 more articles in the media than Creative Medical Technology. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Kyntra Bio and 3 mentions for Creative Medical Technology. Creative Medical Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Kyntra Bio's score of -0.70 indicating that Creative Medical Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kyntra Bio
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Creative Medical Technology
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Kyntra Bio has higher revenue and earnings than Creative Medical Technology. Creative Medical Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kyntra Bio, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kyntra Bio$6.44M5.02$183.45M$45.300.18
Creative Medical Technology$10K797.39-$5.99M-$2.07N/A

Kyntra Bio presently has a consensus price target of $32.50, suggesting a potential upside of 307.27%. Given Kyntra Bio's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Kyntra Bio is more favorable than Creative Medical Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kyntra Bio
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Creative Medical Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

72.7% of Kyntra Bio shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Creative Medical Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 4.2% of Kyntra Bio shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Creative Medical Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Kyntra Bio has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Creative Medical Technology has a beta of 1.95, indicating that its stock price is 95% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kyntra Bio beats Creative Medical Technology on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Creative Medical Technology News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CELZ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CELZ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CELZ vs. The Competition

MetricCreative Medical TechnologyBiotechnology IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$8.64M$4.01B$7.36B$12.81B
Dividend YieldN/A3.64%2.54%10.78%
P/E Ratio-0.5811.69270.5624.05
Price / Sales797.391,415.32639.68105.23
Price / CashN/A44.9429.0336.89
Price / Book0.5917.2611.186.40
Net Income-$5.99M-$22.72M$3.46B$347.95M
7 Day Performance12.04%2.51%1.73%1.49%
1 Month Performance49.38%9.80%7.33%5.15%
1 Year Performance-62.07%57.43%26.11%17.01%

Creative Medical Technology Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CELZ
Creative Medical Technology
1.757 of 5 stars
$1.21
-7.6%
N/A-62.1%$8.64M$10KN/A5
SGMO
Sangamo Therapeutics
1.0792 of 5 stars
$0.07
flat
$5.50
+7,332.4%
N/A$30.66M$39.55MN/A480
LTRN
Lantern Pharma
0.1619 of 5 stars
$2.36
-5.1%
N/A-53.2%$30.20MN/AN/A20
BYSI
BeyondSpring
0.0369 of 5 stars
$0.72
flat
N/A-59.7%$29.69M$1.75MN/A80
GNTA
Genenta Science
0.4493 of 5 stars
$1.25
+2.5%
N/A-67.2%$29.49MN/AN/A7

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CELZ) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners