Cimpress Competitors

Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) and Cimpress (NASDAQ:CMPR) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

Facebook has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cimpress has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its share price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Facebook and Cimpress' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Facebook has higher revenue and earnings than Cimpress. Cimpress is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facebook, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Facebook and Cimpress, as reported by MarketBeat.

Facebook currently has a consensus price target of $327.6410, indicating a potential upside of 4.86%. Cimpress has a consensus price target of $121.6667, indicating a potential upside of 14.49%. Given Cimpress' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cimpress is more favorable than Facebook.

Profitability

This table compares Facebook and Cimpress' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

65.0% of Facebook shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.0% of Cimpress shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.1% of Facebook shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.5% of Cimpress shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Facebook beats Cimpress on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

SEA (NYSE:SE) and Cimpress (NASDAQ:CMPR) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares SEA and Cimpress' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Cimpress has higher revenue and earnings than SEA. SEA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cimpress, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares SEA and Cimpress' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for SEA and Cimpress, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

SEA currently has a consensus price target of $204.9167, suggesting a potential downside of 18.34%. Cimpress has a consensus price target of $121.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 14.49%. Given Cimpress' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cimpress is more favorable than SEA.

Volatility and Risk

SEA has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cimpress has a beta of 1.56, suggesting that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

74.4% of SEA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.0% of Cimpress shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of SEA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.5% of Cimpress shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cimpress beats SEA on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Equinix (NASDAQ:EQIX) and Cimpress (NASDAQ:CMPR) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

Equinix has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cimpress has a beta of 1.56, meaning that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Equinix and Cimpress' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Equinix and Cimpress, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Equinix currently has a consensus target price of $819.30, suggesting a potential upside of 19.18%. Cimpress has a consensus target price of $121.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 14.49%. Given Equinix's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Equinix is more favorable than Cimpress.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

93.4% of Equinix shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.0% of Cimpress shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Equinix shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.5% of Cimpress shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Equinix and Cimpress' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Equinix has higher revenue and earnings than Cimpress. Equinix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cimpress, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Equinix beats Cimpress on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) and Cimpress (NASDAQ:CMPR) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

Twitter has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cimpress has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its share price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

73.2% of Twitter shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.0% of Cimpress shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Twitter shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.5% of Cimpress shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Twitter and Cimpress, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Twitter currently has a consensus target price of $66.0385, indicating a potential downside of 7.24%. Cimpress has a consensus target price of $121.6667, indicating a potential upside of 14.49%. Given Cimpress' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cimpress is more favorable than Twitter.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Twitter and Cimpress' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Twitter has higher revenue and earnings than Cimpress. Twitter is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cimpress, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Twitter and Cimpress' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Cimpress beats Twitter on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY) and Cimpress (NASDAQ:CMPR) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for eBay and Cimpress, as reported by MarketBeat.

eBay currently has a consensus price target of $67.4815, indicating a potential upside of 8.02%. Cimpress has a consensus price target of $121.6667, indicating a potential upside of 14.49%. Given Cimpress' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cimpress is more favorable than eBay.

Volatility and Risk

eBay has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cimpress has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares eBay and Cimpress' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

90.1% of eBay shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.0% of Cimpress shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.0% of eBay shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.5% of Cimpress shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares eBay and Cimpress' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

eBay has higher revenue and earnings than Cimpress. eBay is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cimpress, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

eBay beats Cimpress on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cimpress (NASDAQ:CMPR) and CoStar Group (NASDAQ:CSGP) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Cimpress and CoStar Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Cimpress and CoStar Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

CoStar Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cimpress. Cimpress is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CoStar Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Cimpress and CoStar Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Cimpress currently has a consensus price target of $121.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 14.49%. CoStar Group has a consensus price target of $925.3636, suggesting a potential upside of 4.27%. Given Cimpress' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Cimpress is more favorable than CoStar Group.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

80.0% of Cimpress shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.1% of CoStar Group shares are held by institutional investors. 18.5% of Cimpress shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of CoStar Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Cimpress has a beta of 1.56, meaning that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CoStar Group has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

CoStar Group beats Cimpress on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.