Does the media refer more to LQDT or OPEN?

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 1 more articles in the media than Opendoor Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Liquidity Services and 9 mentions for Opendoor Technologies. Opendoor Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.69 indicating that Opendoor Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Liquidity Services 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Opendoor Technologies 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CMPR or LQDT?

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 6 more articles in the media than Cimpress. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Liquidity Services and 4 mentions for Cimpress. Cimpress' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.69 indicating that Cimpress is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cimpress 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Liquidity Services 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor LQDT or SPSC?

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 7 more articles in the media than SPS Commerce. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Liquidity Services and 3 mentions for SPS Commerce. SPS Commerce's average media sentiment score of 1.74 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.69 indicating that SPS Commerce is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Liquidity Services 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive SPS Commerce 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Does the media favor LQDT or ZD?

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 6 more articles in the media than Ziff Davis. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Liquidity Services and 4 mentions for Ziff Davis. Ziff Davis' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.69 indicating that Ziff Davis is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Liquidity Services 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ziff Davis 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation & earnings, LQDT or YELP?

Yelp has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Yelp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Liquidity Services $476.67M 2.55 $28.09M $0.93 41.94 Yelp $1.46B 0.97 $145.60M $2.19 11.80

Is LQDT or YELP more profitable?

Yelp has a net margin of 9.47% compared to Liquidity Services' net margin of 6.30%. Yelp's return on equity of 20.19% beat Liquidity Services' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Liquidity Services 6.30% 18.49% 10.35% Yelp 9.47% 20.19% 14.45%

Liquidity Services (LQDT) Competitors

$39.00 +0.42 (+1.09%)

Closing price 07/10/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$40.52 +1.52 (+3.91%)

As of 07/10/2026 07:03 PM Eastern

Compare

LQDT vs. OPEN, CMPR, SPSC, ZD, and YELP

Should you buy Liquidity Services stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Liquidity Services with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Liquidity Services include Opendoor Technologies (OPEN), Cimpress (CMPR), SPS Commerce (SPSC), Ziff Davis (ZD), and Yelp (YELP). These companies are all part of the "internet software & services" industry.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Opendoor Technologies?

Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) and Opendoor Technologies (NASDAQ:OPEN) are both internet software & services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 1 more articles in the media than Opendoor Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Liquidity Services and 9 mentions for Opendoor Technologies. Opendoor Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.69 indicating that Opendoor Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Liquidity Services	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Opendoor Technologies	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.4% of Opendoor Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Opendoor Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Liquidity Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Opendoor Technologies. Opendoor Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Liquidity Services	$476.67M	2.55	$28.09M	$0.93	41.94
Opendoor Technologies	$4.37B	1.05	-$1.30B	-$1.60	N/A

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 6.30% compared to Opendoor Technologies' net margin of -35.25%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat Opendoor Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%
Opendoor Technologies	-35.25%	-52.46%	-17.22%

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Opendoor Technologies has a beta of 3.56, indicating that its share price is 256% more volatile than the broader market.

Liquidity Services presently has a consensus target price of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 12.82%. Opendoor Technologies has a consensus target price of $4.38, suggesting a potential downside of 7.98%. Given Liquidity Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Liquidity Services is more favorable than Opendoor Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Liquidity Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Opendoor Technologies	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.71

Summary

Liquidity Services beats Opendoor Technologies on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Cimpress?

Cimpress (NASDAQ:CMPR) and Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) are both internet software & services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Cimpress has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Cimpress currently has a consensus price target of $111.50, suggesting a potential upside of 11.80%. Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 12.82%. Given Liquidity Services' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Liquidity Services is more favorable than Cimpress.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cimpress	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Liquidity Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 6.30% compared to Cimpress' net margin of 1.24%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat Cimpress' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cimpress	1.24%	-8.25%	2.25%
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%

77.6% of Cimpress shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Cimpress shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Liquidity Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cimpress. Liquidity Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cimpress, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cimpress	$3.40B	0.71	$14.95M	$1.78	56.03
Liquidity Services	$476.67M	2.55	$28.09M	$0.93	41.94

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 6 more articles in the media than Cimpress. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Liquidity Services and 4 mentions for Cimpress. Cimpress' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.69 indicating that Cimpress is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cimpress	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Liquidity Services	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Cimpress beats Liquidity Services on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to SPS Commerce?

Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) and SPS Commerce (NASDAQ:SPSC) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings and profitability.

SPS Commerce has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. SPS Commerce is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Liquidity Services	$476.67M	2.55	$28.09M	$0.93	41.94
SPS Commerce	$751.51M	2.97	$93.34M	$2.40	25.35

71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.0% of SPS Commerce shares are held by institutional investors. 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of SPS Commerce shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

SPS Commerce has a net margin of 11.92% compared to Liquidity Services' net margin of 6.30%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat SPS Commerce's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%
SPS Commerce	11.92%	12.43%	10.37%

Liquidity Services presently has a consensus price target of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 12.82%. SPS Commerce has a consensus price target of $76.45, suggesting a potential upside of 25.64%. Given SPS Commerce's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SPS Commerce is more favorable than Liquidity Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Liquidity Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
SPS Commerce	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SPS Commerce has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 7 more articles in the media than SPS Commerce. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Liquidity Services and 3 mentions for SPS Commerce. SPS Commerce's average media sentiment score of 1.74 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.69 indicating that SPS Commerce is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Liquidity Services	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
SPS Commerce	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Summary

SPS Commerce beats Liquidity Services on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Ziff Davis?

Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) and Ziff Davis (NASDAQ:ZD) are both small-cap internet software & services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk and profitability.

71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Ziff Davis shares are held by institutional investors. 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Ziff Davis shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Liquidity Services currently has a consensus target price of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 12.82%. Ziff Davis has a consensus target price of $47.25, suggesting a potential downside of 9.45%. Given Liquidity Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Liquidity Services is more favorable than Ziff Davis.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Liquidity Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Ziff Davis	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.22

Ziff Davis has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Liquidity Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ziff Davis, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Liquidity Services	$476.67M	2.55	$28.09M	$0.93	41.94
Ziff Davis	$1.45B	1.32	$47.35M	$1.13	46.18

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 6.30% compared to Ziff Davis' net margin of 3.26%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat Ziff Davis' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%
Ziff Davis	3.26%	12.17%	6.16%

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 6 more articles in the media than Ziff Davis. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Liquidity Services and 4 mentions for Ziff Davis. Ziff Davis' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.69 indicating that Ziff Davis is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Liquidity Services	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ziff Davis	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Liquidity Services and Ziff Davis tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Yelp?

Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) and Yelp (NYSE:YELP) are both small-cap internet software & services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yelp has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Yelp has a net margin of 9.47% compared to Liquidity Services' net margin of 6.30%. Yelp's return on equity of 20.19% beat Liquidity Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%
Yelp	9.47%	20.19%	14.45%

Liquidity Services presently has a consensus price target of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 12.82%. Yelp has a consensus price target of $27.88, suggesting a potential upside of 7.88%. Given Liquidity Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Liquidity Services is more favorable than Yelp.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Liquidity Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Yelp	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75

Yelp has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Yelp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Liquidity Services	$476.67M	2.55	$28.09M	$0.93	41.94
Yelp	$1.46B	0.97	$145.60M	$2.19	11.80

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 10 more articles in the media than Yelp. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Liquidity Services and 0 mentions for Yelp. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Yelp's score of 0.00 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Liquidity Services	Positive
Yelp	Neutral

71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.1% of Yelp shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Yelp shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Liquidity Services beats Yelp on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Liquidity Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LQDT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LQDT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Liquidity Services	Auction/Valuation Services Industry	Business Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$1.20B	$9.23B	$6.89B	$12.61B
Dividend Yield	N/A	N/A	3.14%	7.83%
P/E Ratio	41.94	19.82	29.06	24.56
Price / Sales	2.55	2.77	341.11	121.71
Price / Cash	23.23	13.21	23.30	60.04
Price / Book	5.99	4.44	5.76	6.39
Net Income	$28.09M	$629.32M	$204.30M	$331.44M
7 Day Performance	1.67%	-5.56%	-1.30%	0.37%
1 Month Performance	2.79%	-7.62%	2.60%	2.17%
1 Year Performance	62.98%	26.17%	15.53%	20.90%

Liquidity Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LQDT Liquidity Services	3.4238 of 5 stars	$39.00 +1.1%	$44.00 +12.8%	+59.8%	$1.20B	$476.67M	41.94	740
OPEN Opendoor Technologies	1.6129 of 5 stars	$4.79 -5.9%	$4.38 -8.6%	+439.2%	$4.62B	$4.37B	N/A	1,042	Trending News Analyst Upgrade Options Volume
CMPR Cimpress	2.9923 of 5 stars	$96.24 +2.2%	$111.50 +15.9%	+102.5%	$2.33B	$3.40B	54.07	15,500	News Coverage
SPSC SPS Commerce	4.8006 of 5 stars	$60.93 +1.5%	$76.45 +25.5%	-55.3%	$2.24B	$751.51M	25.39	2,948	Positive News Analyst Upgrade
ZD Ziff Davis	1.8861 of 5 stars	$53.26 -1.0%	$47.25 -11.3%	+54.7%	$1.96B	$1.45B	47.13	3,900

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:LQDT) was last updated on 7/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Liquidity Services (LQDT) Competitors

LQDT vs. OPEN, CMPR, SPSC, ZD, and YELP

How does Liquidity Services compare to Opendoor Technologies?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Cimpress?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to SPS Commerce?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Ziff Davis?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Yelp?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LQDT vs. The Competition

Liquidity Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Liquidity Services (LQDT) Competitors

LQDT vs. OPEN, CMPR, SPSC, ZD, and YELP

How does Liquidity Services compare to Opendoor Technologies?

Does the media refer more to LQDT or OPEN?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of LQDT or OPEN?

Which has better earnings & valuation, LQDT or OPEN?

Is LQDT or OPEN more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, LQDT or OPEN?

Do analysts rate LQDT or OPEN?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Cimpress?

Which has more volatility & risk, CMPR or LQDT?

Do analysts rate CMPR or LQDT?

Is CMPR or LQDT more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CMPR or LQDT?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CMPR or LQDT?

Does the media refer more to CMPR or LQDT?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to SPS Commerce?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, LQDT or SPSC?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in LQDT or SPSC?

Is LQDT or SPSC more profitable?

Do analysts recommend LQDT or SPSC?

Which has more risk & volatility, LQDT or SPSC?

Does the media favor LQDT or SPSC?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Ziff Davis?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in LQDT or ZD?

Do analysts recommend LQDT or ZD?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, LQDT or ZD?

Is LQDT or ZD more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, LQDT or ZD?

Does the media favor LQDT or ZD?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Yelp?

Which has more volatility & risk, LQDT or YELP?

Is LQDT or YELP more profitable?

Do analysts recommend LQDT or YELP?

Which has better valuation & earnings, LQDT or YELP?

Does the media prefer LQDT or YELP?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in LQDT or YELP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LQDT vs. The Competition

Liquidity Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools