Free Trial

Liquidity Services (LQDT) Competitors

Liquidity Services logo
$34.33 -1.86 (-5.14%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$34.39 +0.06 (+0.17%)
As of 04:20 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

LQDT vs. SPSC, CMPR, ZD, YELP, and QNST

Should you be buying Liquidity Services stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Liquidity Services include SPS Commerce (SPSC), Cimpress (CMPR), Ziff Davis (ZD), Yelp (YELP), and QuinStreet (QNST). These companies are all part of the "internet software & services" industry.

How does Liquidity Services compare to SPS Commerce?

Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) and SPS Commerce (NASDAQ:SPSC) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 4 more articles in the media than SPS Commerce. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Liquidity Services and 10 mentions for SPS Commerce. SPS Commerce's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.60 indicating that SPS Commerce is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Liquidity Services
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
SPS Commerce
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

SPS Commerce has a net margin of 11.92% compared to Liquidity Services' net margin of 6.30%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat SPS Commerce's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Liquidity Services6.30% 18.49% 10.35%
SPS Commerce 11.92%12.43%10.37%

SPS Commerce has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. SPS Commerce is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Liquidity Services$476.67M2.25$28.09M$0.9336.91
SPS Commerce$751.51M2.58$93.34M$2.4021.99

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SPS Commerce has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Liquidity Services presently has a consensus price target of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.17%. SPS Commerce has a consensus price target of $76.45, suggesting a potential upside of 44.86%. Given SPS Commerce's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SPS Commerce is more favorable than Liquidity Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Liquidity Services
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
SPS Commerce
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.27

71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.0% of SPS Commerce shares are held by institutional investors. 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of SPS Commerce shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

SPS Commerce beats Liquidity Services on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Cimpress?

Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) and Cimpress (NASDAQ:CMPR) are both internet software & services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and media sentiment.

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 6.30% compared to Cimpress' net margin of 1.24%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat Cimpress' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Liquidity Services6.30% 18.49% 10.35%
Cimpress 1.24%-8.25%2.25%

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its share price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cimpress has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its share price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Liquidity Services presently has a consensus price target of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.17%. Cimpress has a consensus price target of $111.50, suggesting a potential upside of 26.06%. Given Liquidity Services' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Liquidity Services is more favorable than Cimpress.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Liquidity Services
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Cimpress
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Liquidity Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cimpress. Liquidity Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cimpress, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Liquidity Services$476.67M2.25$28.09M$0.9336.91
Cimpress$3.40B0.63$14.95M$1.7849.69

71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.6% of Cimpress shares are held by institutional investors. 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.2% of Cimpress shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 1 more articles in the media than Cimpress. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Liquidity Services and 13 mentions for Cimpress. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Cimpress' score of 0.17 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Liquidity Services
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cimpress
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Liquidity Services beats Cimpress on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Ziff Davis?

Ziff Davis (NASDAQ:ZD) and Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) are both small-cap internet software & services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Ziff Davis has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Liquidity Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ziff Davis, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ziff Davis$1.45B1.09$47.35M$1.1337.08
Liquidity Services$476.67M2.25$28.09M$0.9336.91

In the previous week, Ziff Davis had 3 more articles in the media than Liquidity Services. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Ziff Davis and 14 mentions for Liquidity Services. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Ziff Davis' score of 0.41 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ziff Davis
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Liquidity Services
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 6.30% compared to Ziff Davis' net margin of 3.26%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat Ziff Davis' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ziff Davis3.26% 12.17% 6.16%
Liquidity Services 6.30%18.49%10.35%

99.8% of Ziff Davis shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Ziff Davis shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Ziff Davis currently has a consensus price target of $45.38, suggesting a potential upside of 8.29%. Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.17%. Given Liquidity Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Liquidity Services is more favorable than Ziff Davis.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ziff Davis
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
Liquidity Services
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Ziff Davis and Liquidity Services tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Yelp?

Yelp (NYSE:YELP) and Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) are both small-cap internet software & services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Yelp has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Yelp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yelp$1.46B1.03$145.60M$2.1911.57
Liquidity Services$476.67M2.25$28.09M$0.9336.91

In the previous week, Yelp had 6 more articles in the media than Liquidity Services. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Yelp and 14 mentions for Liquidity Services. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Yelp's score of 0.55 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Yelp
5 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Liquidity Services
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Yelp has a net margin of 9.47% compared to Liquidity Services' net margin of 6.30%. Yelp's return on equity of 20.19% beat Liquidity Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Yelp9.47% 20.19% 14.45%
Liquidity Services 6.30%18.49%10.35%

90.1% of Yelp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.3% of Yelp shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Yelp has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Yelp currently has a consensus price target of $28.38, suggesting a potential upside of 11.98%. Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.17%. Given Liquidity Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Liquidity Services is more favorable than Yelp.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Yelp
4 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.63
Liquidity Services
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Yelp beats Liquidity Services on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to QuinStreet?

Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) and QuinStreet (NASDAQ:QNST) are both small-cap internet software & services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, QuinStreet had 4 more articles in the media than Liquidity Services. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for QuinStreet and 14 mentions for Liquidity Services. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat QuinStreet's score of 0.40 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Liquidity Services
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
QuinStreet
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Liquidity Services presently has a consensus price target of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.17%. QuinStreet has a consensus price target of $20.50, suggesting a potential upside of 61.04%. Given QuinStreet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe QuinStreet is more favorable than Liquidity Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Liquidity Services
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
QuinStreet
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 6.30% compared to QuinStreet's net margin of 5.53%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat QuinStreet's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Liquidity Services6.30% 18.49% 10.35%
QuinStreet 5.53%9.97%5.28%

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, QuinStreet has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Liquidity Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than QuinStreet. QuinStreet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Liquidity Services$476.67M2.25$28.09M$0.9336.91
QuinStreet$1.18B0.61$4.71M$1.1411.17

71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of QuinStreet shares are held by institutional investors. 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.0% of QuinStreet shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Liquidity Services beats QuinStreet on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Liquidity Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LQDT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LQDT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LQDT vs. The Competition

MetricLiquidity ServicesAuction/Valuation Services IndustryBusiness SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.07B$11.15B$6.42B$12.27B
Dividend YieldN/AN/A3.07%5.22%
P/E Ratio36.9119.4231.4725.70
Price / Sales2.253.16442.4664.14
Price / Cash21.7913.7922.6136.27
Price / Book5.274.396.166.74
Net Income$28.09M$629.32M$200.03M$333.09M
7 Day PerformanceN/AN/AN/A0.52%
1 Month Performance5.86%10.86%5.76%8.97%
1 Year Performance34.57%62.77%44.20%42.42%

Liquidity Services Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LQDT
Liquidity Services
4.4385 of 5 stars
$34.33
-5.1%
$44.00
+28.2%
+41.9%$1.07B$476.67M36.91740
SPSC
SPS Commerce
4.2143 of 5 stars
$55.81
+1.7%
$84.91
+52.1%
-60.8%$2.06B$751.51M22.772,948
CMPR
Cimpress
2.8701 of 5 stars
$82.13
-1.1%
$97.50
+18.7%
+109.9%$2.00B$3.56B91.7315,500
ZD
Ziff Davis
2.8747 of 5 stars
$47.54
-1.4%
$41.13
-13.5%
+32.7%$1.80B$1.45B43.173,900
YELP
Yelp
3.7102 of 5 stars
$27.67
-5.0%
$28.50
+3.0%
-30.3%$1.65B$1.46B12.315,168

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:LQDT) was last updated on 5/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners