Does the media favor OPEN or LQDT?

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 8 more articles in the media than Opendoor Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Liquidity Services and 15 mentions for Opendoor Technologies. Opendoor Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.25 indicating that Opendoor Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Opendoor Technologies 3 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Liquidity Services 8 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to CMPR or LQDT?

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 13 more articles in the media than Cimpress. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Liquidity Services and 10 mentions for Cimpress. Cimpress' average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.25 indicating that Cimpress is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cimpress 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Liquidity Services 8 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor LQDT or SPSC?

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 20 more articles in the media than SPS Commerce. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Liquidity Services and 3 mentions for SPS Commerce. SPS Commerce's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.25 indicating that SPS Commerce is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Liquidity Services 8 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral SPS Commerce 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to ZD or LQDT?

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 18 more articles in the media than Ziff Davis. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Liquidity Services and 5 mentions for Ziff Davis. Ziff Davis' average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.25 indicating that Ziff Davis is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ziff Davis 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Liquidity Services 8 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings and valuation, YELP or LQDT?

Yelp has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Yelp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Yelp $1.46B 0.85 $145.60M $2.19 10.38 Liquidity Services $476.67M 2.37 $28.09M $0.93 38.94

Is YELP or LQDT more profitable?

Yelp has a net margin of 9.47% compared to Liquidity Services' net margin of 6.30%. Yelp's return on equity of 20.19% beat Liquidity Services' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Yelp 9.47% 20.19% 14.45% Liquidity Services 6.30% 18.49% 10.35%

Does the media prefer YELP or LQDT?

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 10 more articles in the media than Yelp. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Liquidity Services and 13 mentions for Yelp. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Yelp's score of 0.20 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Yelp 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Liquidity Services 8 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Liquidity Services (LQDT) Competitors

$36.21 -0.12 (-0.33%)

Closing price 05/29/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$36.20 -0.01 (-0.03%)

As of 05/29/2026 05:40 PM Eastern

Compare

LQDT vs. OPEN, CMPR, SPSC, ZD, and YELP

Should you buy Liquidity Services stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Liquidity Services with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Liquidity Services include Opendoor Technologies (OPEN), Cimpress (CMPR), SPS Commerce (SPSC), Ziff Davis (ZD), and Yelp (YELP). These companies are all part of the "internet software & services" industry.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Opendoor Technologies?

Opendoor Technologies (NASDAQ:OPEN) and Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) are both internet software & services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

62.4% of Opendoor Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Opendoor Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 8 more articles in the media than Opendoor Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Liquidity Services and 15 mentions for Opendoor Technologies. Opendoor Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.25 indicating that Opendoor Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Opendoor Technologies	3 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Liquidity Services	8 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 6.30% compared to Opendoor Technologies' net margin of -35.25%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat Opendoor Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Opendoor Technologies	-35.25%	-52.46%	-17.22%
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%

Liquidity Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Opendoor Technologies. Opendoor Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Opendoor Technologies	$4.37B	1.11	-$1.30B	-$1.60	N/A
Liquidity Services	$476.67M	2.37	$28.09M	$0.93	38.94

Opendoor Technologies has a beta of 3.55, indicating that its stock price is 255% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Opendoor Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $4.38, suggesting a potential downside of 13.10%. Liquidity Services has a consensus target price of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.51%. Given Liquidity Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Liquidity Services is more favorable than Opendoor Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Opendoor Technologies	4 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.63
Liquidity Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Summary

Liquidity Services beats Opendoor Technologies on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Cimpress?

Cimpress (NASDAQ:CMPR) and Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) are both internet software & services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

Cimpress currently has a consensus price target of $111.50, suggesting a potential upside of 13.13%. Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.51%. Given Liquidity Services' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Liquidity Services is more favorable than Cimpress.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cimpress	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Liquidity Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Cimpress has a beta of 1.8, meaning that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 13 more articles in the media than Cimpress. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Liquidity Services and 10 mentions for Cimpress. Cimpress' average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.25 indicating that Cimpress is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cimpress	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Liquidity Services	8 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 6.30% compared to Cimpress' net margin of 1.24%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat Cimpress' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cimpress	1.24%	-8.25%	2.25%
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%

77.6% of Cimpress shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Cimpress shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Liquidity Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cimpress. Liquidity Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cimpress, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cimpress	$3.40B	0.70	$14.95M	$1.78	55.37
Liquidity Services	$476.67M	2.37	$28.09M	$0.93	38.94

Summary

Cimpress and Liquidity Services tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to SPS Commerce?

Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) and SPS Commerce (NASDAQ:SPSC) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

SPS Commerce has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. SPS Commerce is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Liquidity Services	$476.67M	2.37	$28.09M	$0.93	38.94
SPS Commerce	$751.51M	2.77	$93.34M	$2.40	23.65

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 20 more articles in the media than SPS Commerce. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Liquidity Services and 3 mentions for SPS Commerce. SPS Commerce's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.25 indicating that SPS Commerce is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Liquidity Services	8 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
SPS Commerce	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

SPS Commerce has a net margin of 11.92% compared to Liquidity Services' net margin of 6.30%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat SPS Commerce's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%
SPS Commerce	11.92%	12.43%	10.37%

71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.0% of SPS Commerce shares are held by institutional investors. 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of SPS Commerce shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SPS Commerce has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Liquidity Services currently has a consensus target price of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.51%. SPS Commerce has a consensus target price of $76.45, suggesting a potential upside of 34.72%. Given SPS Commerce's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SPS Commerce is more favorable than Liquidity Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Liquidity Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
SPS Commerce	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27

Summary

SPS Commerce beats Liquidity Services on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Ziff Davis?

Ziff Davis (NASDAQ:ZD) and Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) are both small-cap internet software & services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 18 more articles in the media than Ziff Davis. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Liquidity Services and 5 mentions for Ziff Davis. Ziff Davis' average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.25 indicating that Ziff Davis is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ziff Davis	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Liquidity Services	8 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

99.8% of Ziff Davis shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Ziff Davis shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ziff Davis has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Liquidity Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ziff Davis, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ziff Davis	$1.45B	1.14	$47.35M	$1.13	39.88
Liquidity Services	$476.67M	2.37	$28.09M	$0.93	38.94

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 6.30% compared to Ziff Davis' net margin of 3.26%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat Ziff Davis' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ziff Davis	3.26%	12.17%	6.16%
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%

Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Ziff Davis presently has a consensus target price of $47.25, indicating a potential upside of 4.84%. Liquidity Services has a consensus target price of $44.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.51%. Given Liquidity Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Liquidity Services is more favorable than Ziff Davis.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ziff Davis	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11
Liquidity Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Summary

Ziff Davis and Liquidity Services tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Yelp?

Yelp (NYSE:YELP) and Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) are both small-cap internet software & services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Yelp has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Yelp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Yelp	$1.46B	0.85	$145.60M	$2.19	10.38
Liquidity Services	$476.67M	2.37	$28.09M	$0.93	38.94

90.1% of Yelp shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. 8.3% of Yelp shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Yelp has a net margin of 9.47% compared to Liquidity Services' net margin of 6.30%. Yelp's return on equity of 20.19% beat Liquidity Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Yelp	9.47%	20.19%	14.45%
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%

Yelp currently has a consensus price target of $27.88, indicating a potential upside of 22.61%. Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $44.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.51%. Given Yelp's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Yelp is more favorable than Liquidity Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Yelp	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75
Liquidity Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Yelp has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 10 more articles in the media than Yelp. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Liquidity Services and 13 mentions for Yelp. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Yelp's score of 0.20 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Yelp	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Liquidity Services	8 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Yelp beats Liquidity Services on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Liquidity Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LQDT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LQDT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Liquidity Services	Auction/Valuation Services Industry	Business Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$1.13B	$11.01B	$6.70B	$12.56B
Dividend Yield	N/A	N/A	3.01%	5.31%
P/E Ratio	38.94	19.95	28.68	26.27
Price / Sales	2.37	3.17	429.40	142.41
Price / Cash	21.80	13.63	23.79	56.84
Price / Book	5.56	3.74	7.02	7.30
Net Income	$28.09M	$629.32M	$205.41M	$337.27M
7 Day Performance	5.17%	-3.50%	3.72%	3.58%
1 Month Performance	1.57%	3.05%	3.61%	5.71%
1 Year Performance	54.61%	73.27%	41.75%	39.70%

Liquidity Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LQDT Liquidity Services	3.9756 of 5 stars	$36.21 -0.3%	$44.00 +21.5%	+54.6%	$1.13B	$476.67M	38.94	740	Trending News Insider Trade
OPEN Opendoor Technologies	1.5352 of 5 stars	$4.31 +0.6%	$4.38 +1.7%	+679.9%	$4.15B	$3.94B	N/A	1,042	Options Volume
CMPR Cimpress	2.6305 of 5 stars	$99.52 -3.3%	$111.50 +12.0%	+122.2%	$2.41B	$3.66B	55.91	15,500	Insider Trade Analyst Revision Gap Down
SPSC SPS Commerce	3.76 of 5 stars	$52.48 -1.1%	$76.45 +45.7%	-59.6%	$1.93B	$762.08M	21.87	2,948
ZD Ziff Davis	2.8232 of 5 stars	$41.91 +1.8%	$47.25 +12.7%	+39.5%	$1.54B	$1.45B	37.09	3,900	News Coverage Insider Trade Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:LQDT) was last updated on 5/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Liquidity Services (LQDT) Competitors

LQDT vs. OPEN, CMPR, SPSC, ZD, and YELP

How does Liquidity Services compare to Opendoor Technologies?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Cimpress?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to SPS Commerce?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Ziff Davis?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Yelp?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LQDT vs. The Competition

Liquidity Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Liquidity Services (LQDT) Competitors

LQDT vs. OPEN, CMPR, SPSC, ZD, and YELP

How does Liquidity Services compare to Opendoor Technologies?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of OPEN or LQDT?

Does the media favor OPEN or LQDT?

Is OPEN or LQDT more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, OPEN or LQDT?

Which has more risk & volatility, OPEN or LQDT?

Do analysts recommend OPEN or LQDT?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Cimpress?

Do analysts prefer CMPR or LQDT?

Which has more risk and volatility, CMPR or LQDT?

Does the media refer more to CMPR or LQDT?

Is CMPR or LQDT more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CMPR or LQDT?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CMPR or LQDT?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to SPS Commerce?

Which has better earnings and valuation, LQDT or SPSC?

Does the media favor LQDT or SPSC?

Is LQDT or SPSC more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of LQDT or SPSC?

Which has more volatility and risk, LQDT or SPSC?

Do analysts prefer LQDT or SPSC?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Ziff Davis?

Does the media refer more to ZD or LQDT?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in ZD or LQDT?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ZD or LQDT?

Is ZD or LQDT more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, ZD or LQDT?

Do analysts rate ZD or LQDT?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Yelp?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, YELP or LQDT?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in YELP or LQDT?

Is YELP or LQDT more profitable?

Do analysts prefer YELP or LQDT?

Which has more volatility and risk, YELP or LQDT?

Does the media prefer YELP or LQDT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LQDT vs. The Competition

Liquidity Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools