Does the media refer more to LQDT or OPEN?

In the previous week, Opendoor Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Liquidity Services. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Opendoor Technologies and 7 mentions for Liquidity Services. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Opendoor Technologies' score of 0.07 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Liquidity Services 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Opendoor Technologies 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor CMPR or LQDT?

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 3 more articles in the media than Cimpress. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Liquidity Services and 4 mentions for Cimpress. Cimpress' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.36 indicating that Cimpress is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cimpress 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Liquidity Services 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor SPSC or LQDT?

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 2 more articles in the media than SPS Commerce. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Liquidity Services and 5 mentions for SPS Commerce. SPS Commerce's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.36 indicating that SPS Commerce is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SPS Commerce 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Liquidity Services 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to LQDT or ZD?

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 4 more articles in the media than Ziff Davis. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Liquidity Services and 3 mentions for Ziff Davis. Ziff Davis' average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.36 indicating that Ziff Davis is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Liquidity Services 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Ziff Davis 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, LQDT or YELP?

Yelp has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Yelp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Liquidity Services $476.67M 2.48 $28.09M $0.93 40.74 Yelp $1.46B 0.86 $145.60M $2.19 10.44

Is LQDT or YELP more profitable?

Yelp has a net margin of 9.47% compared to Liquidity Services' net margin of 6.30%. Yelp's return on equity of 20.19% beat Liquidity Services' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Liquidity Services 6.30% 18.49% 10.35% Yelp 9.47% 20.19% 14.45%

Does the media refer more to LQDT or YELP?

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 4 more articles in the media than Yelp. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Liquidity Services and 3 mentions for Yelp. Yelp's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.36 indicating that Yelp is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Liquidity Services 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Yelp 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Liquidity Services (LQDT) Competitors

$37.89 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 06/18/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$37.92 +0.03 (+0.08%)

As of 06/18/2026 05:02 PM Eastern

Compare

LQDT vs. OPEN, CMPR, SPSC, ZD, and YELP

Should you buy Liquidity Services stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Liquidity Services with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Liquidity Services include Opendoor Technologies (OPEN), Cimpress (CMPR), SPS Commerce (SPSC), Ziff Davis (ZD), and Yelp (YELP). These companies are all part of the "internet software & services" industry.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Opendoor Technologies?

Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) and Opendoor Technologies (NASDAQ:OPEN) are both internet software & services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Opendoor Technologies has a beta of 3.55, indicating that its share price is 255% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Opendoor Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Liquidity Services. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Opendoor Technologies and 7 mentions for Liquidity Services. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Opendoor Technologies' score of 0.07 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Liquidity Services	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Opendoor Technologies	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Liquidity Services currently has a consensus price target of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.13%. Opendoor Technologies has a consensus price target of $4.38, suggesting a potential downside of 2.01%. Given Liquidity Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Liquidity Services is more favorable than Opendoor Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Liquidity Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Opendoor Technologies	4 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.63

71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.4% of Opendoor Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Opendoor Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 6.30% compared to Opendoor Technologies' net margin of -35.25%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat Opendoor Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%
Opendoor Technologies	-35.25%	-52.46%	-17.22%

Liquidity Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Opendoor Technologies. Opendoor Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Liquidity Services	$476.67M	2.48	$28.09M	$0.93	40.74
Opendoor Technologies	$4.37B	0.99	-$1.30B	-$1.60	N/A

Summary

Liquidity Services beats Opendoor Technologies on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Cimpress?

Cimpress (NASDAQ:CMPR) and Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) are both internet software & services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Liquidity Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cimpress. Liquidity Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cimpress, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cimpress	$3.40B	0.60	$14.95M	$1.78	47.67
Liquidity Services	$476.67M	2.48	$28.09M	$0.93	40.74

77.6% of Cimpress shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.2% of Cimpress shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 6.30% compared to Cimpress' net margin of 1.24%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat Cimpress' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cimpress	1.24%	-8.25%	2.25%
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 3 more articles in the media than Cimpress. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Liquidity Services and 4 mentions for Cimpress. Cimpress' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.36 indicating that Cimpress is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cimpress	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Liquidity Services	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Cimpress has a beta of 1.8, meaning that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Cimpress currently has a consensus target price of $111.50, suggesting a potential upside of 31.41%. Liquidity Services has a consensus target price of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.13%. Given Cimpress' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cimpress is more favorable than Liquidity Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cimpress	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Liquidity Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Summary

Cimpress beats Liquidity Services on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to SPS Commerce?

SPS Commerce (NASDAQ:SPSC) and Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

SPS Commerce currently has a consensus price target of $76.45, suggesting a potential upside of 43.90%. Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.13%. Given SPS Commerce's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SPS Commerce is more favorable than Liquidity Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SPS Commerce	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27
Liquidity Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

SPS Commerce has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

SPS Commerce has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. SPS Commerce is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SPS Commerce	$751.51M	2.60	$93.34M	$2.40	22.14
Liquidity Services	$476.67M	2.48	$28.09M	$0.93	40.74

SPS Commerce has a net margin of 11.92% compared to Liquidity Services' net margin of 6.30%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat SPS Commerce's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SPS Commerce	11.92%	12.43%	10.37%
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%

99.0% of SPS Commerce shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of SPS Commerce shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 2 more articles in the media than SPS Commerce. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Liquidity Services and 5 mentions for SPS Commerce. SPS Commerce's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.36 indicating that SPS Commerce is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SPS Commerce	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Liquidity Services	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

SPS Commerce beats Liquidity Services on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Ziff Davis?

Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) and Ziff Davis (NASDAQ:ZD) are both small-cap internet software & services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 6.30% compared to Ziff Davis' net margin of 3.26%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat Ziff Davis' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%
Ziff Davis	3.26%	12.17%	6.16%

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 4 more articles in the media than Ziff Davis. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Liquidity Services and 3 mentions for Ziff Davis. Ziff Davis' average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.36 indicating that Ziff Davis is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Liquidity Services	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Ziff Davis	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Ziff Davis shares are held by institutional investors. 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Ziff Davis shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ziff Davis has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Ziff Davis is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Liquidity Services	$476.67M	2.48	$28.09M	$0.93	40.74
Ziff Davis	$1.45B	1.17	$47.35M	$1.13	40.73

Liquidity Services currently has a consensus target price of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.13%. Ziff Davis has a consensus target price of $47.25, suggesting a potential upside of 2.65%. Given Liquidity Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Liquidity Services is more favorable than Ziff Davis.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Liquidity Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Ziff Davis	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.22

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Liquidity Services beats Ziff Davis on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Yelp?

Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) and Yelp (NYSE:YELP) are both small-cap internet software & services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.1% of Yelp shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Yelp shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yelp has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Yelp has a net margin of 9.47% compared to Liquidity Services' net margin of 6.30%. Yelp's return on equity of 20.19% beat Liquidity Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%
Yelp	9.47%	20.19%	14.45%

In the previous week, Liquidity Services had 4 more articles in the media than Yelp. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Liquidity Services and 3 mentions for Yelp. Yelp's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Liquidity Services' score of 0.36 indicating that Yelp is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Liquidity Services	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Yelp	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Yelp has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Yelp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Liquidity Services	$476.67M	2.48	$28.09M	$0.93	40.74
Yelp	$1.46B	0.86	$145.60M	$2.19	10.44

Liquidity Services presently has a consensus price target of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.13%. Yelp has a consensus price target of $27.88, suggesting a potential upside of 21.87%. Given Yelp's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Yelp is more favorable than Liquidity Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Liquidity Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Yelp	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75

Summary

Yelp beats Liquidity Services on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Liquidity Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LQDT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LQDT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Liquidity Services	Auction/Valuation Services Industry	Business Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$1.18B	$9.83B	$6.75B	$12.60B
Dividend Yield	N/A	N/A	3.19%	5.81%
P/E Ratio	40.74	20.02	28.87	24.42
Price / Sales	2.48	2.95	377.85	109.07
Price / Cash	22.82	13.49	23.58	55.09
Price / Book	5.82	4.50	5.79	6.58
Net Income	$28.09M	$629.32M	$205.49M	$337.17M
7 Day Performance	-0.13%	0.46%	6.14%	0.83%
1 Month Performance	9.99%	-1.13%	8.79%	3.27%
1 Year Performance	62.55%	77.58%	35.43%	36.05%

Liquidity Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LQDT Liquidity Services	3.0845 of 5 stars	$37.89 flat	$44.00 +16.1%	+62.5%	$1.18B	$476.67M	40.74	740	Insider Trade Gap Down
OPEN Opendoor Technologies	1.2846 of 5 stars	$4.74 +2.8%	$4.38 -7.6%	+671.4%	$4.57B	$4.37B	N/A	1,042	Insider Trade
CMPR Cimpress	3.7033 of 5 stars	$83.89 +0.7%	$111.50 +32.9%	+99.1%	$2.03B	$3.40B	47.13	15,500	Positive News Analyst Revision High Trading Volume
SPSC SPS Commerce	4.3868 of 5 stars	$54.98 -0.4%	$76.45 +39.1%	-60.4%	$2.02B	$751.51M	22.91	2,948	News Coverage Positive News
ZD Ziff Davis	2.3547 of 5 stars	$45.92 +0.2%	$47.25 +2.9%	+45.1%	$1.69B	$1.45B	40.64	3,900	News Coverage Positive News Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:LQDT) was last updated on 6/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Liquidity Services (LQDT) Competitors

LQDT vs. OPEN, CMPR, SPSC, ZD, and YELP

How does Liquidity Services compare to Opendoor Technologies?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Cimpress?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to SPS Commerce?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Ziff Davis?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Yelp?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LQDT vs. The Competition

Liquidity Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Liquidity Services (LQDT) Competitors

LQDT vs. OPEN, CMPR, SPSC, ZD, and YELP

How does Liquidity Services compare to Opendoor Technologies?

Which has more volatility and risk, LQDT or OPEN?

Does the media refer more to LQDT or OPEN?

Do analysts prefer LQDT or OPEN?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of LQDT or OPEN?

Is LQDT or OPEN more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, LQDT or OPEN?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Cimpress?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CMPR or LQDT?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CMPR or LQDT?

Is CMPR or LQDT more profitable?

Does the media favor CMPR or LQDT?

Which has more volatility & risk, CMPR or LQDT?

Do analysts rate CMPR or LQDT?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to SPS Commerce?

Do analysts recommend SPSC or LQDT?

Which has more volatility & risk, SPSC or LQDT?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, SPSC or LQDT?

Is SPSC or LQDT more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in SPSC or LQDT?

Does the media favor SPSC or LQDT?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Ziff Davis?

Is LQDT or ZD more profitable?

Does the media refer more to LQDT or ZD?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of LQDT or ZD?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, LQDT or ZD?

Do analysts recommend LQDT or ZD?

Which has more risk and volatility, LQDT or ZD?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Yelp?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of LQDT or YELP?

Which has more volatility & risk, LQDT or YELP?

Is LQDT or YELP more profitable?

Does the media refer more to LQDT or YELP?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, LQDT or YELP?

Do analysts rate LQDT or YELP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LQDT vs. The Competition

Liquidity Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools