Does the media refer more to OPEN or LQDT?

In the previous week, Opendoor Technologies and Opendoor Technologies both had 6 articles in the media. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Opendoor Technologies' score of 0.66 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Opendoor Technologies 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Liquidity Services 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor LQDT or SPSC?

In the previous week, SPS Commerce had 10 more articles in the media than Liquidity Services. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for SPS Commerce and 6 mentions for Liquidity Services. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat SPS Commerce's score of 1.10 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Liquidity Services 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive SPS Commerce 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor LQDT or CMPR?

In the previous week, Cimpress had 10 more articles in the media than Liquidity Services. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Cimpress and 6 mentions for Liquidity Services. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Cimpress' score of 0.35 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Liquidity Services 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cimpress 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor LQDT or ZD?

In the previous week, Ziff Davis had 4 more articles in the media than Liquidity Services. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Ziff Davis and 6 mentions for Liquidity Services. Ziff Davis' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Liquidity Services' score of 1.16 indicating that Ziff Davis is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Liquidity Services 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ziff Davis 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, YELP or LQDT?

Yelp has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Yelp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Yelp $1.46B 0.99 $145.60M $2.19 12.03 Liquidity Services $479.92M 2.48 $28.09M $0.93 41.04

Is YELP or LQDT more profitable?

Yelp has a net margin of 9.47% compared to Liquidity Services' net margin of 6.30%. Yelp's return on equity of 20.19% beat Liquidity Services' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Yelp 9.47% 20.19% 14.45% Liquidity Services 6.30% 18.49% 10.35%

Does the media refer more to YELP or LQDT?

In the previous week, Yelp had 2 more articles in the media than Liquidity Services. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Yelp and 6 mentions for Liquidity Services. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Yelp's score of 0.53 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Yelp 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Liquidity Services 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Liquidity Services (LQDT) Competitors

$38.17 -0.28 (-0.73%)

Closing price 07/30/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$38.17 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 07/30/2026 07:34 PM Eastern

Compare

LQDT vs. OPEN, SPSC, CMPR, ZD, and YELP

Should you buy Liquidity Services stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Liquidity Services with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Liquidity Services include Opendoor Technologies (OPEN), SPS Commerce (SPSC), Cimpress (CMPR), Ziff Davis (ZD), and Yelp (YELP). These companies are all part of the "internet software & services" industry.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Opendoor Technologies?

Opendoor Technologies (NASDAQ:OPEN) and Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) are both internet software & services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Liquidity Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Opendoor Technologies. Opendoor Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Opendoor Technologies	$4.37B	0.84	-$1.30B	-$1.60	N/A
Liquidity Services	$479.92M	2.48	$28.09M	$0.93	41.04

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 6.30% compared to Opendoor Technologies' net margin of -35.25%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat Opendoor Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Opendoor Technologies	-35.25%	-52.46%	-17.22%
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%

In the previous week, Opendoor Technologies and Opendoor Technologies both had 6 articles in the media. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Opendoor Technologies' score of 0.66 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Opendoor Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Liquidity Services	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Opendoor Technologies has a beta of 3.56, meaning that its share price is 256% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Opendoor Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $4.51, indicating a potential upside of 18.06%. Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $44.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.27%. Given Opendoor Technologies' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Opendoor Technologies is more favorable than Liquidity Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Opendoor Technologies	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.71
Liquidity Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

62.4% of Opendoor Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Opendoor Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Liquidity Services beats Opendoor Technologies on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to SPS Commerce?

Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) and SPS Commerce (NASDAQ:SPSC) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

SPS Commerce has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. SPS Commerce is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Liquidity Services	$479.92M	2.48	$28.09M	$0.93	41.04
SPS Commerce	$751.51M	3.22	$93.34M	$2.40	27.43

71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.0% of SPS Commerce shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of SPS Commerce shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SPS Commerce has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, SPS Commerce had 10 more articles in the media than Liquidity Services. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for SPS Commerce and 6 mentions for Liquidity Services. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat SPS Commerce's score of 1.10 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Liquidity Services	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
SPS Commerce	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Liquidity Services currently has a consensus price target of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.27%. SPS Commerce has a consensus price target of $71.40, suggesting a potential upside of 8.46%. Given Liquidity Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Liquidity Services is more favorable than SPS Commerce.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Liquidity Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
SPS Commerce	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.18

SPS Commerce has a net margin of 11.92% compared to Liquidity Services' net margin of 6.30%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat SPS Commerce's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%
SPS Commerce	11.92%	12.43%	10.37%

Summary

SPS Commerce beats Liquidity Services on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Cimpress?

Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) and Cimpress (NASDAQ:CMPR) are both internet software & services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cimpress has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.6% of Cimpress shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.2% of Cimpress shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Liquidity Services currently has a consensus price target of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.27%. Cimpress has a consensus price target of $111.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.74%. Given Cimpress' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cimpress is more favorable than Liquidity Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Liquidity Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Cimpress	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Cimpress had 10 more articles in the media than Liquidity Services. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Cimpress and 6 mentions for Liquidity Services. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Cimpress' score of 0.35 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Liquidity Services	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cimpress	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 6.30% compared to Cimpress' net margin of 2.57%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat Cimpress' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%
Cimpress	2.57%	-18.24%	4.85%

Liquidity Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cimpress. Liquidity Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cimpress, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Liquidity Services	$479.92M	2.48	$28.09M	$0.93	41.04
Cimpress	$3.74B	0.61	$14.95M	$1.78	53.20

Summary

Cimpress beats Liquidity Services on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Ziff Davis?

Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) and Ziff Davis (NASDAQ:ZD) are both small-cap internet software & services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Ziff Davis had 4 more articles in the media than Liquidity Services. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Ziff Davis and 6 mentions for Liquidity Services. Ziff Davis' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Liquidity Services' score of 1.16 indicating that Ziff Davis is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Liquidity Services	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ziff Davis	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Liquidity Services has a net margin of 6.30% compared to Ziff Davis' net margin of 3.26%. Liquidity Services' return on equity of 18.49% beat Ziff Davis' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%
Ziff Davis	3.26%	12.17%	6.16%

71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Ziff Davis shares are held by institutional investors. 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Ziff Davis shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Liquidity Services currently has a consensus price target of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.27%. Ziff Davis has a consensus price target of $47.25, suggesting a potential downside of 10.19%. Given Liquidity Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Liquidity Services is more favorable than Ziff Davis.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Liquidity Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Ziff Davis	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.22

Ziff Davis has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Liquidity Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ziff Davis, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Liquidity Services	$479.92M	2.48	$28.09M	$0.93	41.04
Ziff Davis	$1.45B	1.34	$47.35M	$1.13	46.56

Summary

Ziff Davis beats Liquidity Services on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Liquidity Services compare to Yelp?

Yelp (NYSE:YELP) and Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) are both small-cap internet software & services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Yelp currently has a consensus target price of $27.88, suggesting a potential upside of 5.80%. Liquidity Services has a consensus target price of $44.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.27%. Given Liquidity Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Liquidity Services is more favorable than Yelp.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Yelp	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75
Liquidity Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Yelp has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Yelp had 2 more articles in the media than Liquidity Services. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Yelp and 6 mentions for Liquidity Services. Liquidity Services' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Yelp's score of 0.53 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Yelp	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Liquidity Services	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

90.1% of Yelp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.3% of Yelp shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.1% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Yelp has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Yelp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Yelp	$1.46B	0.99	$145.60M	$2.19	12.03
Liquidity Services	$479.92M	2.48	$28.09M	$0.93	41.04

Yelp has a net margin of 9.47% compared to Liquidity Services' net margin of 6.30%. Yelp's return on equity of 20.19% beat Liquidity Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Yelp	9.47%	20.19%	14.45%
Liquidity Services	6.30%	18.49%	10.35%

Summary

Yelp and Liquidity Services tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Liquidity Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LQDT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LQDT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Liquidity Services	Auction/Valuation Services Industry	Business Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$1.20B	$9.99B	$6.92B	$12.02B
Dividend Yield	N/A	N/A	2.98%	10.11%
P/E Ratio	41.04	19.94	27.71	23.57
Price / Sales	2.48	2.89	363.34	77.65
Price / Cash	23.15	13.61	22.62	58.30
Price / Book	5.86	4.49	5.38	5.85
Net Income	$28.09M	$629.32M	$206.89M	$336.53M
7 Day Performance	1.62%	3.12%	4.91%	0.35%
1 Month Performance	-2.43%	-3.45%	-2.70%	-4.99%
1 Year Performance	59.84%	18.54%	8.26%	17.95%

Liquidity Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LQDT Liquidity Services	2.9675 of 5 stars	$38.17 -0.7%	$44.00 +15.3%	+57.5%	$1.20B	$479.92M	41.04	740	News Coverage Positive News Upcoming Earnings Analyst Upgrade
OPEN Opendoor Technologies	3.1165 of 5 stars	$3.94 +2.3%	$4.51 +14.5%	+84.5%	$3.80B	$3.94B	N/A	1,042	Upcoming Earnings
SPSC SPS Commerce	3.1431 of 5 stars	$68.50 +4.3%	$75.82 +10.7%	-52.8%	$2.51B	$762.08M	28.54	2,948	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast Gap Down
CMPR Cimpress	2.5244 of 5 stars	$100.12 +0.7%	$111.50 +11.4%	+69.9%	$2.43B	$3.40B	56.25	15,500	Trending News Earnings Report Gap Down
ZD Ziff Davis	1.8397 of 5 stars	$52.93 +1.1%	$47.25 -10.7%	+69.2%	$1.95B	$1.45B	46.84	3,900	Positive News Upcoming Earnings

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:LQDT) was last updated on 7/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Liquidity Services (LQDT) Competitors

LQDT vs. OPEN, SPSC, CMPR, ZD, and YELP

How does Liquidity Services compare to Opendoor Technologies?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to SPS Commerce?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Cimpress?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Ziff Davis?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Yelp?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LQDT vs. The Competition

Liquidity Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Liquidity Services (LQDT) Competitors

LQDT vs. OPEN, SPSC, CMPR, ZD, and YELP

How does Liquidity Services compare to Opendoor Technologies?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, OPEN or LQDT?

Is OPEN or LQDT more profitable?

Does the media refer more to OPEN or LQDT?

Which has more volatility & risk, OPEN or LQDT?

Do analysts recommend OPEN or LQDT?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in OPEN or LQDT?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to SPS Commerce?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, LQDT or SPSC?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of LQDT or SPSC?

Which has more volatility and risk, LQDT or SPSC?

Does the media favor LQDT or SPSC?

Do analysts recommend LQDT or SPSC?

Is LQDT or SPSC more profitable?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Cimpress?

Which has more volatility and risk, LQDT or CMPR?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of LQDT or CMPR?

Do analysts recommend LQDT or CMPR?

Does the media favor LQDT or CMPR?

Is LQDT or CMPR more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, LQDT or CMPR?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Ziff Davis?

Does the media favor LQDT or ZD?

Is LQDT or ZD more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in LQDT or ZD?

Which has more risk & volatility, LQDT or ZD?

Do analysts rate LQDT or ZD?

Which has better earnings and valuation, LQDT or ZD?

Summary

How does Liquidity Services compare to Yelp?

Do analysts prefer YELP or LQDT?

Which has more risk & volatility, YELP or LQDT?

Does the media refer more to YELP or LQDT?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of YELP or LQDT?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, YELP or LQDT?

Is YELP or LQDT more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LQDT vs. The Competition

Liquidity Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools