NASDAQ:LQDT

Liquidity Services Competitors

$18.87
+0.19 (+1.02 %)
(As of 04/9/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$18.57
Now: $18.87
$19.12
50-Day Range
$15.61
MA: $18.16
$20.33
52-Week Range
$4.51
Now: $18.87
$22.13
Volume176,615 shs
Average Volume378,902 shs
Market Capitalization$659.00 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.2

Competitors

Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) Vs. FB, SE, EQIX, TWTR, EBAY, and CSGP

Should you be buying LQDT stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "internet software & services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Liquidity Services, including Facebook (FB), SEA (SE), Equinix (EQIX), Twitter (TWTR), eBay (EBAY), and CoStar Group (CSGP).

Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) and Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

Facebook has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

65.0% of Facebook shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.4% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. 14.1% of Facebook shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.8% of Liquidity Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Facebook and Liquidity Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Facebook32.00%23.27%18.12%
Liquidity Services-1.83%2.17%1.27%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Facebook and Liquidity Services' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Facebook$70.70 billion12.59$18.49 billion$6.4348.59
Liquidity Services$205.94 million3.20$-3,770,000.00$0.12157.25

Facebook has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Facebook is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Facebook and Liquidity Services, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Facebook143712.88
Liquidity Services00103.00

Facebook currently has a consensus price target of $327.6410, indicating a potential upside of 4.86%. Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $16.50, indicating a potential downside of 12.56%. Given Facebook's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Facebook is more favorable than Liquidity Services.

Summary

Facebook beats Liquidity Services on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

SEA (NYSE:SE) and Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for SEA and Liquidity Services, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SEA02802.80
Liquidity Services00103.00

SEA currently has a consensus price target of $204.9167, suggesting a potential downside of 18.34%. Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential downside of 12.56%. Given Liquidity Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Liquidity Services is more favorable than SEA.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares SEA and Liquidity Services' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SEA$2.18 billion37.72$-1,462,800,000.00($2.27)-110.54
Liquidity Services$205.94 million3.20$-3,770,000.00$0.12157.25

Liquidity Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SEA. SEA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares SEA and Liquidity Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SEA-38.59%-144.79%-22.93%
Liquidity Services-1.83%2.17%1.27%

Volatility & Risk

SEA has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

74.4% of SEA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.4% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of SEA shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.8% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Liquidity Services beats SEA on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) and Equinix (NASDAQ:EQIX) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Liquidity Services and Equinix's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Liquidity Services$205.94 million3.20$-3,770,000.00$0.12157.25
Equinix$5.56 billion11.04$507.45 million$22.8130.14

Equinix has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Equinix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

61.4% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of Equinix shares are held by institutional investors. 21.8% of Liquidity Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Equinix shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Liquidity Services and Equinix, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Liquidity Services00103.00
Equinix021912.95

Liquidity Services currently has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential downside of 12.56%. Equinix has a consensus price target of $819.30, suggesting a potential upside of 19.18%. Given Equinix's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Equinix is more favorable than Liquidity Services.

Volatility and Risk

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Equinix has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Liquidity Services and Equinix's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Liquidity Services-1.83%2.17%1.27%
Equinix7.58%4.62%1.74%

Summary

Equinix beats Liquidity Services on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) and Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Volatility and Risk

Twitter has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

73.2% of Twitter shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.4% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Twitter shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.8% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Twitter and Liquidity Services, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Twitter1211602.39
Liquidity Services00103.00

Twitter currently has a consensus price target of $66.0385, indicating a potential downside of 7.24%. Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $16.50, indicating a potential downside of 12.56%. Given Twitter's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Twitter is more favorable than Liquidity Services.

Profitability

This table compares Twitter and Liquidity Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Twitter-31.70%-12.42%-7.89%
Liquidity Services-1.83%2.17%1.27%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Twitter and Liquidity Services' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Twitter$3.46 billion16.43$1.47 billion$1.9935.77
Liquidity Services$205.94 million3.20$-3,770,000.00$0.12157.25

Twitter has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. Twitter is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Twitter beats Liquidity Services on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY) and Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares eBay and Liquidity Services' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
eBay$10.80 billion3.94$1.79 billion$2.3226.93
Liquidity Services$205.94 million3.20$-3,770,000.00$0.12157.25

eBay has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. eBay is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

eBay has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

90.1% of eBay shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.4% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of eBay shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.8% of Liquidity Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares eBay and Liquidity Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
eBay50.42%82.73%11.84%
Liquidity Services-1.83%2.17%1.27%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for eBay and Liquidity Services, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
eBay0141302.48
Liquidity Services00103.00

eBay currently has a consensus price target of $67.4815, indicating a potential upside of 8.02%. Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $16.50, indicating a potential downside of 12.56%. Given eBay's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe eBay is more favorable than Liquidity Services.

Summary

eBay beats Liquidity Services on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

CoStar Group (NASDAQ:CSGP) and Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CoStar Group and Liquidity Services' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CoStar Group$1.40 billion24.99$314.96 million$9.1297.31
Liquidity Services$205.94 million3.20$-3,770,000.00$0.12157.25

CoStar Group has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidity Services. CoStar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares CoStar Group and Liquidity Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CoStar Group17.57%7.58%6.05%
Liquidity Services-1.83%2.17%1.27%

Risk and Volatility

CoStar Group has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

95.1% of CoStar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.4% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of CoStar Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.8% of Liquidity Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for CoStar Group and Liquidity Services, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CoStar Group001003.00
Liquidity Services00103.00

CoStar Group currently has a consensus price target of $925.3636, suggesting a potential upside of 4.27%. Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential downside of 12.56%. Given CoStar Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe CoStar Group is more favorable than Liquidity Services.

Summary

CoStar Group beats Liquidity Services on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Liquidity Services Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Facebook logo
FB
Facebook
1.8$312.46+0.2%$889.78 billion$70.70 billion35.59Analyst Report
Insider Selling
SEA logo
SE
SEA
1.2$250.93+0.9%$82.06 billion$2.18 billion-85.35
Equinix logo
EQIX
Equinix
2.4$687.46+0.0%$61.38 billion$5.56 billion134.80
Twitter logo
TWTR
Twitter
1.3$71.19+0.0%$56.82 billion$3.46 billion-51.59Analyst Report
Insider Selling
eBay logo
EBAY
eBay
2.0$62.47+0.4%$42.51 billion$10.80 billion8.69Analyst Report
CoStar Group logo
CSGP
CoStar Group
1.6$887.49+1.5%$34.98 billion$1.40 billion119.13
VeriSign logo
VRSN
VeriSign
1.6$205.30+0.3%$23.22 billion$1.23 billion30.46
Akamai Technologies logo
AKAM
Akamai Technologies
1.6$103.87+0.5%$16.95 billion$2.89 billion30.46
Opendoor Technologies logo
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies
1.6$20.51+1.5%$11.84 billionN/A0.00
Angi logo
ANGI
Angi
0.8$14.88+1.9%$7.44 billion$1.33 billion1,489.49Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
J2 Global logo
JCOM
J2 Global
1.4$123.22+0.2%$5.56 billion$1.37 billion27.81Unusual Options Activity
Envestnet logo
ENV
Envestnet
1.2$74.70+0.5%$4.04 billion$900.13 million-574.62Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
LivePerson logo
LPSN
LivePerson
1.8$56.83+0.1%$3.85 billion$291.61 million-30.55Unusual Options Activity
Stamps.com logo
STMP
Stamps.com
1.7$205.64+0.5%$3.78 billion$571.85 million25.48
SPS Commerce logo
SPSC
SPS Commerce
1.5$101.27+0.4%$3.60 billion$279.12 million89.62
Yelp logo
YELP
Yelp
1.4$40.55+1.3%$3.04 billion$1.01 billion-238.52
Cornerstone OnDemand logo
CSOD
Cornerstone OnDemand
1.9$44.97+0.6%$2.93 billion$576.52 million-88.18News Coverage
Cimpress logo
CMPR
Cimpress
1.6$106.27+0.1%$2.76 billion$2.48 billion69.91Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
NIC logo
EGOV
NIC
1.6$33.98+0.1%$2.28 billion$354.20 million37.76
Perficient logo
PRFT
Perficient
1.5$62.83+2.6%$2.08 billion$565.53 million61.60News Coverage
Gap Up
TechTarget logo
TTGT
TechTarget
1.5$72.58+2.2%$2.04 billion$133.96 million115.21Analyst Report
Gap Up
QuinStreet logo
QNST
QuinStreet
2.0$20.16+0.7%$1.07 billion$490.34 million34.17
Brightcove logo
BCOV
Brightcove
1.6$21.60+2.8%$869.36 million$184.46 million-58.38Gap Down
Blucora logo
BCOR
Blucora
1.9$16.80+0.8%$810.42 million$717.95 million-2.92News Coverage
Limelight Networks logo
LLNW
Limelight Networks
1.8$3.58+0.8%$444.40 million$200.63 million-59.67
ZIX logo
ZIXI
ZIX
1.9$7.57+1.2%$432.17 million$173.43 million-24.42
Travelzoo logo
TZOO
Travelzoo
1.2$16.98+1.3%$195.25 million$111.41 million-13.06
RealNetworks logo
RNWK
RealNetworks
0.8$4.90+4.9%$189.15 million$172.11 million-9.80Unusual Options Activity
Gap Down
DHI Group logo
DHX
DHI Group
2.1$2.95+5.8%$154.39 million$149.37 million-5.00Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Gap Down
Marchex logo
MCHX
Marchex
1.5$2.89+1.0%$114.36 million$106.13 million-4.07Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Support.com logo
SPRT
Support.com
0.4$5.04+2.0%$99.07 million$63.33 million168.06
Synacor logo
SYNC
Synacor
0.7$2.19+0.0%$86.82 million$121.85 million-7.30
This page was last updated on 4/10/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.