DZS (DZSI) Competitors

Actelis Networks has a consensus price target of $3.00, indicating a potential upside of 3,129.28%. Given Actelis Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Actelis Networks is more favorable than DZS.

DZS has a net margin of -45.63% compared to Actelis Networks' net margin of -225.03%. DZS's return on equity of -179.34% beat Actelis Networks' return on equity.

40.8% of DZS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.4% of Actelis Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of DZS shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Actelis Networks shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Actelis Networks has lower revenue, but higher earnings than DZS. Actelis Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DZS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Actelis Networks had 9 more articles in the media than DZS. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Actelis Networks and 0 mentions for DZS. DZS's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Actelis Networks' score of -0.33 indicating that DZS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

DZS has a beta of 2, indicating that its share price is 100% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Actelis Networks has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pineapple Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled DZS'saverage media sentiment score.

Pineapple Energy has a beta of 2.81, meaning that its stock price is 181% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DZS has a beta of 2, meaning that its stock price is 100% more volatile than the broader market.

4.2% of Pineapple Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.8% of DZS shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Pineapple Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of DZS shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pineapple Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DZS. Pineapple Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DZS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Pineapple Energy has a net margin of -17.55% compared to DZS's net margin of -45.63%. DZS's return on equity of -179.34% beat Pineapple Energy's return on equity.

Given DZS's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe DZS is more favorable than Minim.

DZS has a net margin of -45.63% compared to Minim's net margin of -105.18%. DZS's return on equity of -179.34% beat Minim's return on equity.

In the previous week, Minim's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled DZS'saverage media sentiment score.

Minim has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DZS. Minim is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DZS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

56.6% of Minim shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.8% of DZS shares are held by institutional investors. 51.9% of Minim shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of DZS shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Minim has a beta of 1.81, suggesting that its share price is 81% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DZS has a beta of 2, suggesting that its share price is 100% more volatile than the broader market.

DZS has a net margin of -45.63% compared to Crown ElectroKinetics' net margin of -184.32%. DZS's return on equity of -179.34% beat Crown ElectroKinetics' return on equity.

In the previous week, Crown ElectroKinetics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled DZS'saverage media sentiment score.

5.3% of Crown ElectroKinetics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.8% of DZS shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Crown ElectroKinetics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of DZS shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Crown ElectroKinetics has a beta of 15.53, indicating that its share price is 1,453% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DZS has a beta of 2, indicating that its share price is 100% more volatile than the broader market.

Crown ElectroKinetics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DZS. Crown ElectroKinetics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DZS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.