East Resources Acquisition (ERES) Competitors

$9.25 -0.41 (-4.24%)
As of 06/18/2026

ERES vs. PHCF, VRTS, PAX, CCAP, and BOC

Should you buy East Resources Acquisition stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares East Resources Acquisition with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with East Resources Acquisition include Puhui Wealth Investment Management (PHCF), Virtus Investment Partners (VRTS), Patria Investments (PAX), Crescent Capital BDC (CCAP), and Boston Omaha (BOC). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does East Resources Acquisition compare to Puhui Wealth Investment Management?

Puhui Wealth Investment Management (NASDAQ:PHCF) and East Resources Acquisition (NASDAQ:ERES) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Puhui Wealth Investment Management's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled East Resources Acquisition'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Puhui Wealth Investment Management Neutral
East Resources Acquisition Neutral

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Puhui Wealth Investment ManagementN/A N/A N/A
East Resources Acquisition N/A N/A -7.08%

Puhui Wealth Investment Management has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, East Resources Acquisition has a beta of -0.02, meaning that its share price is 102% less volatile than the broader market.

0.6% of Puhui Wealth Investment Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.5% of East Resources Acquisition shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.2% of Puhui Wealth Investment Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 47.0% of East Resources Acquisition shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

East Resources Acquisition has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Puhui Wealth Investment Management.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Puhui Wealth Investment Management$2.44M0.00-$4.74MN/AN/A
East Resources AcquisitionN/AN/A-$640KN/AN/A

Summary

Puhui Wealth Investment Management beats East Resources Acquisition on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does East Resources Acquisition compare to Virtus Investment Partners?

East Resources Acquisition (NASDAQ:ERES) and Virtus Investment Partners (NASDAQ:VRTS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

East Resources Acquisition has a beta of -0.02, meaning that its share price is 102% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Virtus Investment Partners has higher revenue and earnings than East Resources Acquisition.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
East Resources AcquisitionN/AN/A-$640KN/AN/A
Virtus Investment Partners$829.12M1.15$121.75M$16.998.37

Virtus Investment Partners has a consensus price target of $134.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.39%. Given Virtus Investment Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Virtus Investment Partners is more favorable than East Resources Acquisition.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
East Resources Acquisition
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Virtus Investment Partners
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

In the previous week, East Resources Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Virtus Investment Partners'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
East Resources Acquisition Neutral
Virtus Investment Partners Neutral

18.5% of East Resources Acquisition shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.5% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.0% of East Resources Acquisition shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.4% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Virtus Investment Partners has a net margin of 13.42% compared to East Resources Acquisition's net margin of 0.00%. Virtus Investment Partners' return on equity of 21.56% beat East Resources Acquisition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
East Resources AcquisitionN/A N/A -7.08%
Virtus Investment Partners 13.42%21.56%5.27%

Summary

Virtus Investment Partners beats East Resources Acquisition on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does East Resources Acquisition compare to Patria Investments?

Patria Investments (NYSE:PAX) and East Resources Acquisition (NASDAQ:ERES) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Patria Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled East Resources Acquisition'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Patria Investments Neutral
East Resources Acquisition Neutral

Patria Investments has a net margin of 19.91% compared to East Resources Acquisition's net margin of 0.00%. Patria Investments' return on equity of 38.68% beat East Resources Acquisition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Patria Investments19.91% 38.68% 15.84%
East Resources Acquisition N/A N/A -7.08%

Patria Investments has higher revenue and earnings than East Resources Acquisition.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Patria Investments$381.73M1.98$73.40M$0.4525.27
East Resources AcquisitionN/AN/A-$640KN/AN/A

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, East Resources Acquisition has a beta of -0.02, suggesting that its stock price is 102% less volatile than the broader market.

Patria Investments currently has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 49.52%. Given Patria Investments' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Patria Investments is more favorable than East Resources Acquisition.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Patria Investments
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
East Resources Acquisition
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

96.3% of Patria Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.5% of East Resources Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. 58.1% of Patria Investments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 47.0% of East Resources Acquisition shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Patria Investments beats East Resources Acquisition on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does East Resources Acquisition compare to Crescent Capital BDC?

East Resources Acquisition (NASDAQ:ERES) and Crescent Capital BDC (NASDAQ:CCAP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Crescent Capital BDC had 4 more articles in the media than East Resources Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Crescent Capital BDC and 0 mentions for East Resources Acquisition. Crescent Capital BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.03 beat East Resources Acquisition's score of 0.00 indicating that Crescent Capital BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
East Resources Acquisition Neutral
Crescent Capital BDC Neutral

Crescent Capital BDC has a net margin of 9.26% compared to East Resources Acquisition's net margin of 0.00%. Crescent Capital BDC's return on equity of 9.34% beat East Resources Acquisition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
East Resources AcquisitionN/A N/A -7.08%
Crescent Capital BDC 9.26%9.34%4.04%

East Resources Acquisition has a beta of -0.02, indicating that its stock price is 102% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Capital BDC has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Crescent Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than East Resources Acquisition.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
East Resources AcquisitionN/AN/A-$640KN/AN/A
Crescent Capital BDC$26.38M15.62$34.51M$0.4127.27

18.5% of East Resources Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.5% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 47.0% of East Resources Acquisition shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Crescent Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $13.90, suggesting a potential upside of 24.33%. Given Crescent Capital BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Capital BDC is more favorable than East Resources Acquisition.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
East Resources Acquisition
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Crescent Capital BDC
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

Summary

Crescent Capital BDC beats East Resources Acquisition on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does East Resources Acquisition compare to Boston Omaha?

East Resources Acquisition (NASDAQ:ERES) and Boston Omaha (NYSE:BOC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, East Resources Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Boston Omaha'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
East Resources Acquisition Neutral
Boston Omaha Neutral

East Resources Acquisition has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Boston Omaha's net margin of -12.10%. East Resources Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat Boston Omaha's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
East Resources AcquisitionN/A N/A -7.08%
Boston Omaha -12.10%-2.57%-1.94%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
East Resources Acquisition
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Boston Omaha
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

East Resources Acquisition has a beta of -0.02, suggesting that its stock price is 102% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Boston Omaha has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

18.5% of East Resources Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.4% of Boston Omaha shares are held by institutional investors. 47.0% of East Resources Acquisition shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of Boston Omaha shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

East Resources Acquisition has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Boston Omaha.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
East Resources AcquisitionN/AN/A-$640KN/AN/A
Boston Omaha$114.38M3.50-$12.43M-$0.44N/A

Summary

Boston Omaha beats East Resources Acquisition on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get East Resources Acquisition News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ERES and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ERES and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ERES vs. The Competition

MetricEast Resources AcquisitionInvestment advice IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$106.20M$941.44M$13.91B$12.60B
Dividend YieldN/A252.57%5.75%5.74%
P/E RatioN/A6.2320.2124.44
Price / SalesN/A1.95139.7191.64
Price / CashN/A5.0519.5755.09
Price / Book-4.341.362.256.58
Net Income-$640K$112.38M$1.14B$337.17M
7 Day Performance-3.55%-1.82%-0.42%0.83%
1 Month Performance4.64%2.56%1.14%3.27%
1 Year Performance62.85%6.55%22.75%36.05%

East Resources Acquisition Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ERES
East Resources Acquisition
N/A$9.25
-4.2%
N/A+62.9%$106.20MN/AN/A6
PHCF
Puhui Wealth Investment Management
N/AN/AN/AN/A$3.69M$2.44MN/A40
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners
2.1118 of 5 stars
$142.57
+1.2%
$134.50
-5.7%
-18.0%$952.62M$829.12M8.44770
PAX
Patria Investments
4.3853 of 5 stars
$11.50
+2.5%
$17.00
+47.8%
-18.8%$765.01M$381.73M23.00390
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC
4.81 of 5 stars
$11.19
-1.1%
$14.30
+27.8%
-22.6%$416.73M$167.29M27.29N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:ERES) was last updated on 6/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners