Does the media refer more to GOOD or LAND?

In the previous week, Gladstone Commercial and Gladstone Commercial both had 1 articles in the media. Gladstone Land's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Gladstone Commercial's score of 0.00 indicating that Gladstone Land is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gladstone Commercial 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Gladstone Land 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Do analysts recommend FPI or LAND?

Gladstone Land has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.61%. Given Gladstone Land's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gladstone Land is more favorable than Farmland Partners. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Farmland Partners 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Gladstone Land 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Does the media refer more to FPI or LAND?

In the previous week, Farmland Partners had 2 more articles in the media than Gladstone Land. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Farmland Partners and 1 mentions for Gladstone Land. Farmland Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Gladstone Land's score of 1.54 indicating that Farmland Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Farmland Partners 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Gladstone Land 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Does the media refer more to UMH or LAND?

In the previous week, UMH Properties had 6 more articles in the media than Gladstone Land. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for UMH Properties and 1 mentions for Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat UMH Properties' score of 0.90 indicating that Gladstone Land is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment UMH Properties 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Gladstone Land 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, SAFE or LAND?

Safehold has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safehold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Safehold $385.55M 2.82 $114.47M $1.62 9.48 Gladstone Land $88.34M 4.22 $13.53M -$0.55 N/A

Does the media prefer SAFE or LAND?

In the previous week, Safehold had 6 more articles in the media than Gladstone Land. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Safehold and 1 mentions for Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Safehold's score of 0.58 indicating that Gladstone Land is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Safehold 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Gladstone Land 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Does the media favor LAND or BEEP?

In the previous week, Mobile Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Gladstone Land. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Mobile Infrastructure and 1 mentions for Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Mobile Infrastructure's score of 0.33 indicating that Gladstone Land is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gladstone Land 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Mobile Infrastructure 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Gladstone Land (LAND) Competitors

$8.65 -0.04 (-0.46%)

As of 08/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

LAND vs. GOOD, FPI, UMH, SAFE, and BEEP

Should you buy Gladstone Land stock or one of its competitors? Gladstone Land's main competitors and comparable companies include Gladstone Commercial (GOOD), Farmland Partners (FPI), UMH Properties (UMH), Safehold (SAFE), and Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "real estate" sector.

How does Gladstone Land compare to Gladstone Commercial?

Gladstone Commercial (NASDAQ:GOOD) and Gladstone Land (NASDAQ:LAND) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Gladstone Commercial has a net margin of 14.55% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of -7.31%. Gladstone Commercial's return on equity of 14.61% beat Gladstone Land's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gladstone Commercial	14.55%	14.61%	1.99%
Gladstone Land	-7.31%	-0.96%	-0.53%

Gladstone Commercial currently has a consensus price target of $12.83, indicating a potential downside of 0.59%. Gladstone Land has a consensus price target of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.61%. Given Gladstone Land's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gladstone Land is more favorable than Gladstone Commercial.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gladstone Commercial	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Gladstone Land	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

In the previous week, Gladstone Commercial and Gladstone Commercial both had 1 articles in the media. Gladstone Land's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Gladstone Commercial's score of 0.00 indicating that Gladstone Land is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gladstone Commercial	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Gladstone Land	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

45.5% of Gladstone Commercial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Gladstone Commercial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gladstone Commercial has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Gladstone Commercial pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Gladstone Land pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Gladstone Commercial pays out 461.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Land pays out -101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gladstone Land has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Gladstone Commercial has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gladstone Commercial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Commercial	$161.34M	3.87	$19.29M	$0.26	49.65
Gladstone Land	$88.34M	4.22	$13.53M	-$0.55	N/A

Summary

Gladstone Land beats Gladstone Commercial on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gladstone Land compare to Farmland Partners?

Farmland Partners (NYSE:FPI) and Gladstone Land (NASDAQ:LAND) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Farmland Partners has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Farmland Partners had 2 more articles in the media than Gladstone Land. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Farmland Partners and 1 mentions for Gladstone Land. Farmland Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Gladstone Land's score of 1.54 indicating that Farmland Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Farmland Partners	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Gladstone Land	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

58.0% of Farmland Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.9% of Farmland Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Farmland Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Gladstone Land pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Farmland Partners pays out 70.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gladstone Land pays out -101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gladstone Land has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gladstone Land is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Gladstone Land has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.61%. Given Gladstone Land's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gladstone Land is more favorable than Farmland Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Farmland Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Gladstone Land	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Farmland Partners has a net margin of 49.85% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of -7.31%. Farmland Partners' return on equity of 5.54% beat Gladstone Land's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Farmland Partners	49.85%	5.54%	3.58%
Gladstone Land	-7.31%	-0.96%	-0.53%

Farmland Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Farmland Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Farmland Partners	$52.18M	8.50	$31.55M	$0.51	19.94
Gladstone Land	$88.34M	4.22	$13.53M	-$0.55	N/A

Summary

Farmland Partners beats Gladstone Land on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gladstone Land compare to UMH Properties?

UMH Properties (NYSE:UMH) and Gladstone Land (NASDAQ:LAND) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

UMH Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UMH Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
UMH Properties	$261.75M	5.39	$26.50M	$0.12	137.58
Gladstone Land	$88.34M	4.22	$13.53M	-$0.55	N/A

UMH Properties has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

UMH Properties has a net margin of 11.55% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of -7.31%. UMH Properties' return on equity of 5.40% beat Gladstone Land's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
UMH Properties	11.55%	5.40%	1.86%
Gladstone Land	-7.31%	-0.96%	-0.53%

UMH Properties pays an annual dividend of $0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Gladstone Land pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. UMH Properties pays out 750.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Land pays out -101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UMH Properties has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Gladstone Land has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gladstone Land is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

75.4% of UMH Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.3% of UMH Properties shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, UMH Properties had 6 more articles in the media than Gladstone Land. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for UMH Properties and 1 mentions for Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat UMH Properties' score of 0.90 indicating that Gladstone Land is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
UMH Properties	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Gladstone Land	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

UMH Properties presently has a consensus price target of $17.25, suggesting a potential upside of 4.48%. Gladstone Land has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.61%. Given Gladstone Land's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gladstone Land is more favorable than UMH Properties.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
UMH Properties	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Gladstone Land	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Summary

UMH Properties beats Gladstone Land on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gladstone Land compare to Safehold?

Safehold (NYSE:SAFE) and Gladstone Land (NASDAQ:LAND) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, Safehold had 6 more articles in the media than Gladstone Land. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Safehold and 1 mentions for Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Safehold's score of 0.58 indicating that Gladstone Land is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Safehold	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Gladstone Land	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Safehold currently has a consensus price target of $17.17, suggesting a potential upside of 11.83%. Gladstone Land has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.61%. Given Gladstone Land's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gladstone Land is more favorable than Safehold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Safehold	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.10
Gladstone Land	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

70.4% of Safehold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Safehold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Safehold pays an annual dividend of $0.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Gladstone Land pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Safehold pays out 43.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gladstone Land pays out -101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Safehold has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Gladstone Land has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gladstone Land is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Safehold has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Safehold has a net margin of 27.70% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of -7.31%. Safehold's return on equity of 4.76% beat Gladstone Land's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Safehold	27.70%	4.76%	1.62%
Gladstone Land	-7.31%	-0.96%	-0.53%

Safehold has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safehold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Safehold	$385.55M	2.82	$114.47M	$1.62	9.48
Gladstone Land	$88.34M	4.22	$13.53M	-$0.55	N/A

Summary

Safehold beats Gladstone Land on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gladstone Land compare to Mobile Infrastructure?

Gladstone Land (NASDAQ:LAND) and Mobile Infrastructure (NASDAQ:BEEP) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.3% of Mobile Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 36.6% of Mobile Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gladstone Land has a net margin of -7.31% compared to Mobile Infrastructure's net margin of -67.22%. Gladstone Land's return on equity of -0.96% beat Mobile Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gladstone Land	-7.31%	-0.96%	-0.53%
Mobile Infrastructure	-67.22%	-11.25%	-4.69%

Gladstone Land has higher revenue and earnings than Mobile Infrastructure. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mobile Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Land	$88.34M	4.22	$13.53M	-$0.55	N/A
Mobile Infrastructure	$35.08M	3.21	-$21.44M	-$0.60	N/A

In the previous week, Mobile Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Gladstone Land. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Mobile Infrastructure and 1 mentions for Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Mobile Infrastructure's score of 0.33 indicating that Gladstone Land is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gladstone Land	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Mobile Infrastructure	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Gladstone Land presently has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.61%. Mobile Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $6.25, suggesting a potential upside of 128.94%. Given Mobile Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Mobile Infrastructure is more favorable than Gladstone Land.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gladstone Land	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Mobile Infrastructure	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mobile Infrastructure has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Gladstone Land beats Mobile Infrastructure on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gladstone Land News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAND and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LAND vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Gladstone Land	Specialized REITs Industry	Real Estate Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$373.13M	$19.13B	$5.69B	$12.83B
Dividend Yield	6.48%	5.07%	6.30%	10.78%
P/E Ratio	-15.73	28.55	28.94	24.21
Price / Sales	4.22	6.88	128.91	94.86
Price / Cash	5.32	79.70	34.34	36.90
Price / Book	0.48	3.28	1.91	6.42
Net Income	$13.53M	$557.35M	-$63.99M	$348.89M
7 Day Performance	4.09%	-0.76%	-0.45%	0.08%
1 Month Performance	0.93%	1.98%	-0.25%	3.88%
1 Year Performance	-5.36%	0.46%	11.29%	16.98%

Gladstone Land Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LAND Gladstone Land	1.9909 of 5 stars	$8.65 -0.5%	$10.00 +15.6%	-5.4%	$373.13M	$88.34M	N/A	70	Positive News Ex-Dividend
GOOD Gladstone Commercial	0.5758 of 5 stars	$12.77 -1.4%	$12.83 +0.5%	-3.1%	$626.88M	$161.34M	49.12	70	Ex-Dividend
FPI Farmland Partners	2.7225 of 5 stars	$9.75 -1.5%	N/A	-7.8%	$431.94M	$52.18M	19.12	30	Positive News
UMH UMH Properties	3.3302 of 5 stars	$15.68 -1.4%	$17.25 +10.0%	+3.1%	$1.35B	$261.75M	130.67	460
SAFE Safehold	3.8361 of 5 stars	$15.46 -5.1%	$18.71 +21.0%	-5.2%	$1.15B	$385.55M	9.54	120	News Coverage Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:LAND) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Gladstone Land (LAND) Competitors

LAND vs. GOOD, FPI, UMH, SAFE, and BEEP

How does Gladstone Land compare to Gladstone Commercial?

Summary

How does Gladstone Land compare to Farmland Partners?

Summary

How does Gladstone Land compare to UMH Properties?

Summary

How does Gladstone Land compare to Safehold?

Summary

How does Gladstone Land compare to Mobile Infrastructure?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LAND vs. The Competition

Gladstone Land Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Gladstone Land (LAND) Competitors

LAND vs. GOOD, FPI, UMH, SAFE, and BEEP

How does Gladstone Land compare to Gladstone Commercial?

Is GOOD or LAND more profitable?

Do analysts prefer GOOD or LAND?

Does the media refer more to GOOD or LAND?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in GOOD or LAND?

Which has more volatility & risk, GOOD or LAND?

Is GOOD or LAND a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GOOD or LAND?

Summary

How does Gladstone Land compare to Farmland Partners?

Which has more volatility and risk, FPI or LAND?

Does the media refer more to FPI or LAND?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of FPI or LAND?

Is FPI or LAND a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend FPI or LAND?

Is FPI or LAND more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, FPI or LAND?

Summary

How does Gladstone Land compare to UMH Properties?

Which has better earnings and valuation, UMH or LAND?

Which has more volatility & risk, UMH or LAND?

Is UMH or LAND more profitable?

Is UMH or LAND a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in UMH or LAND?

Does the media refer more to UMH or LAND?

Do analysts prefer UMH or LAND?

Summary

How does Gladstone Land compare to Safehold?

Does the media prefer SAFE or LAND?

Do analysts rate SAFE or LAND?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in SAFE or LAND?

Is SAFE or LAND a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, SAFE or LAND?

Is SAFE or LAND more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, SAFE or LAND?

Summary

How does Gladstone Land compare to Mobile Infrastructure?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in LAND or BEEP?

Is LAND or BEEP more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, LAND or BEEP?

Does the media favor LAND or BEEP?

Do analysts prefer LAND or BEEP?

Which has more volatility and risk, LAND or BEEP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LAND vs. The Competition

Gladstone Land Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools