Gladstone Land (LAND) Competitors

Farmland Partners has a net margin of 49.85% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of -7.31%. Farmland Partners' return on equity of 5.54% beat Gladstone Land's return on equity.

In the previous week, Gladstone Land had 1 more articles in the media than Farmland Partners. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gladstone Land and 3 mentions for Farmland Partners. Gladstone Land's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Farmland Partners' score of 0.83 indicating that Gladstone Land is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Farmland Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Farmland Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.0% of Farmland Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.9% of Farmland Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gladstone Land currently has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.71%. Given Gladstone Land's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gladstone Land is more favorable than Farmland Partners.

Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Farmland Partners has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Gladstone Land pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Farmland Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Gladstone Land pays out -101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Farmland Partners pays out 70.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gladstone Land has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gladstone Land is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Gladstone Land had 1 more articles in the media than UMH Properties. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gladstone Land and 3 mentions for UMH Properties. Gladstone Land's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat UMH Properties' score of 1.43 indicating that Gladstone Land is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

UMH Properties has a net margin of 11.55% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of -7.31%. UMH Properties' return on equity of 5.40% beat Gladstone Land's return on equity.

UMH Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UMH Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

UMH Properties presently has a consensus target price of $17.25, indicating a potential upside of 11.07%. Gladstone Land has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.71%. Given UMH Properties' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe UMH Properties is more favorable than Gladstone Land.

75.4% of UMH Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are held by institutional investors. 8.3% of UMH Properties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

UMH Properties has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

UMH Properties pays an annual dividend of $0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Gladstone Land pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. UMH Properties pays out 750.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Land pays out -101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UMH Properties has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Gladstone Land has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gladstone Land is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Safehold has a net margin of 27.70% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of -7.31%. Safehold's return on equity of 4.76% beat Gladstone Land's return on equity.

Safehold has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safehold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safehold has a beta of 1.73, meaning that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the broader market.

Gladstone Land presently has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.71%. Safehold has a consensus price target of $17.17, suggesting a potential upside of 22.56%. Given Safehold's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Safehold is more favorable than Gladstone Land.

In the previous week, Safehold had 1 more articles in the media than Gladstone Land. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Safehold and 4 mentions for Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Safehold's score of 0.62 indicating that Gladstone Land is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Gladstone Land pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Safehold pays an annual dividend of $0.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Gladstone Land pays out -101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Safehold pays out 43.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gladstone Land has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Safehold has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Gladstone Land is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.4% of Safehold shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Safehold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mobile Infrastructure has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Gladstone Land has a net margin of -7.31% compared to Mobile Infrastructure's net margin of -67.22%. Gladstone Land's return on equity of -0.96% beat Mobile Infrastructure's return on equity.

53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.3% of Mobile Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.6% of Mobile Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gladstone Land has higher revenue and earnings than Mobile Infrastructure. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mobile Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gladstone Land currently has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.71%. Mobile Infrastructure has a consensus target price of $6.25, indicating a potential upside of 123.21%. Given Mobile Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Mobile Infrastructure is more favorable than Gladstone Land.

In the previous week, Gladstone Land had 3 more articles in the media than Mobile Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gladstone Land and 1 mentions for Mobile Infrastructure. Mobile Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Gladstone Land's score of 1.61 indicating that Mobile Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.