Gladstone Land (LAND) Competitors

In the previous week, Gladstone Land had 7 more articles in the media than Farmland Partners. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Gladstone Land and 1 mentions for Farmland Partners. Gladstone Land's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Farmland Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Gladstone Land is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

58.0% of Farmland Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are held by institutional investors. 7.9% of Farmland Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Farmland Partners has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Farmland Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Gladstone Land pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Farmland Partners pays out 70.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gladstone Land pays out -91.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gladstone Land has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gladstone Land is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Gladstone Land has a consensus price target of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.95%. Given Gladstone Land's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gladstone Land is more favorable than Farmland Partners.

Farmland Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Farmland Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Farmland Partners has a net margin of 49.85% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of -6.68%. Farmland Partners' return on equity of 5.54% beat Gladstone Land's return on equity.

Gladstone Land pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Stag Industrial pays an annual dividend of $1.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Gladstone Land pays out -91.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Stag Industrial pays out 119.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Land has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Stag Industrial has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Gladstone Land is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gladstone Land currently has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.95%. Stag Industrial has a consensus target price of $50.50, suggesting a potential upside of 36.67%. Given Stag Industrial's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Stag Industrial is more favorable than Gladstone Land.

Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Stag Industrial has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Stag Industrial has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stag Industrial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Stag Industrial has a net margin of 28.04% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of -6.68%. Stag Industrial's return on equity of 6.79% beat Gladstone Land's return on equity.

In the previous week, Gladstone Land had 1 more articles in the media than Stag Industrial. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Gladstone Land and 7 mentions for Stag Industrial. Stag Industrial's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Gladstone Land's score of 0.40 indicating that Stag Industrial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Stag Industrial shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Stag Industrial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Safehold presently has a consensus target price of $17.17, indicating a potential upside of 11.62%. Gladstone Land has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.95%. Given Gladstone Land's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gladstone Land is more favorable than Safehold.

Safehold has a beta of 1.75, suggesting that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

70.4% of Safehold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Safehold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Safehold pays an annual dividend of $0.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Gladstone Land pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Safehold pays out 43.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gladstone Land pays out -91.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Safehold has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Gladstone Land has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gladstone Land is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Safehold has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safehold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Safehold has a net margin of 27.70% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of -6.68%. Safehold's return on equity of 4.76% beat Gladstone Land's return on equity.

In the previous week, Gladstone Land had 5 more articles in the media than Safehold. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Gladstone Land and 3 mentions for Safehold. Safehold's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Gladstone Land's score of 0.40 indicating that Safehold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mobile Infrastructure has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Gladstone Land has higher revenue and earnings than Mobile Infrastructure. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mobile Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Mobile Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Gladstone Land. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Mobile Infrastructure and 8 mentions for Gladstone Land. Mobile Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Gladstone Land's score of 0.40 indicating that Mobile Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Gladstone Land has a net margin of -6.68% compared to Mobile Infrastructure's net margin of -70.76%. Gladstone Land's return on equity of -0.87% beat Mobile Infrastructure's return on equity.

53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.3% of Mobile Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.6% of Mobile Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gladstone Land currently has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.95%. Mobile Infrastructure has a consensus target price of $6.25, suggesting a potential upside of 131.48%. Given Mobile Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Mobile Infrastructure is more favorable than Gladstone Land.