Gladstone Land (LAND) Competitors

Farmland Partners has a net margin of 49.85% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of -6.68%. Farmland Partners' return on equity of 5.54% beat Gladstone Land's return on equity.

58.0% of Farmland Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.9% of Farmland Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Farmland Partners had 10 more articles in the media than Gladstone Land. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Farmland Partners and 1 mentions for Gladstone Land. Farmland Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Gladstone Land's score of 0.21 indicating that Farmland Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Farmland Partners has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Farmland Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Gladstone Land pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Farmland Partners pays out 70.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gladstone Land pays out -91.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gladstone Land has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gladstone Land is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Farmland Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Farmland Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gladstone Land has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.07%. Given Gladstone Land's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gladstone Land is more favorable than Farmland Partners.

Gladstone Land presently has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.07%. Given Gladstone Land's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gladstone Land is more favorable than Permian Basin Royalty Trust.

Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.9% of Permian Basin Royalty Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gladstone Land pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Permian Basin Royalty Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Gladstone Land pays out -91.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Permian Basin Royalty Trust pays out 162.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Land has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gladstone Land is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a net margin of 88.99% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of -6.68%. Permian Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 9,061.81% beat Gladstone Land's return on equity.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Permian Basin Royalty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Permian Basin Royalty Trust had 6 more articles in the media than Gladstone Land. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Permian Basin Royalty Trust and 1 mentions for Gladstone Land. Permian Basin Royalty Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Gladstone Land's score of 0.21 indicating that Permian Basin Royalty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Orchid Island Capital presently has a consensus price target of $7.50, suggesting a potential upside of 16.01%. Gladstone Land has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.07%. Given Gladstone Land's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gladstone Land is more favorable than Orchid Island Capital.

Orchid Island Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.6%. Gladstone Land pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Orchid Island Capital pays out 81.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Land pays out -91.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Orchid Island Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Gladstone Land has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Orchid Island Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Orchid Island Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Orchid Island Capital has a beta of 1.55, indicating that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Orchid Island Capital has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of -6.68%. Orchid Island Capital's return on equity of 11.87% beat Gladstone Land's return on equity.

In the previous week, Orchid Island Capital had 2 more articles in the media than Gladstone Land. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Orchid Island Capital and 1 mentions for Gladstone Land. Orchid Island Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Gladstone Land's score of 0.21 indicating that Orchid Island Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

32.7% of Orchid Island Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Orchid Island Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Ladder Capital had 3 more articles in the media than Gladstone Land. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Ladder Capital and 1 mentions for Gladstone Land. Ladder Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat Gladstone Land's score of 0.21 indicating that Ladder Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ladder Capital currently has a consensus price target of $12.36, indicating a potential upside of 27.72%. Gladstone Land has a consensus price target of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.07%. Given Ladder Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ladder Capital is more favorable than Gladstone Land.

62.3% of Ladder Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.6% of Ladder Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Gladstone Land shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ladder Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.5%. Gladstone Land pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Ladder Capital pays out 219.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Land pays out -91.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gladstone Land has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Ladder Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Land. Gladstone Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ladder Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ladder Capital has a net margin of 12.62% compared to Gladstone Land's net margin of -6.68%. Ladder Capital's return on equity of 5.92% beat Gladstone Land's return on equity.

Ladder Capital has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.