Ladder Capital Competitors

Ladder Capital (NYSE:LADR) and Douglas Emmett (NYSE:DEI) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

46.9% of Ladder Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.7% of Douglas Emmett shares are held by institutional investors. 12.0% of Ladder Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of Douglas Emmett shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ladder Capital and Douglas Emmett's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Douglas Emmett has higher revenue and earnings than Ladder Capital. Ladder Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Douglas Emmett, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Ladder Capital and Douglas Emmett's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Ladder Capital has a beta of 2.33, indicating that its stock price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Douglas Emmett has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Ladder Capital and Douglas Emmett, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Ladder Capital presently has a consensus target price of $10.8333, indicating a potential downside of 6.93%. Douglas Emmett has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 2.26%. Given Douglas Emmett's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Douglas Emmett is more favorable than Ladder Capital.

Dividends

Ladder Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Douglas Emmett pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Ladder Capital pays out 55.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Douglas Emmett pays out 53.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ladder Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Douglas Emmett has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Douglas Emmett beats Ladder Capital on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

STAG Industrial (NYSE:STAG) and Ladder Capital (NYSE:LADR) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Dividends

STAG Industrial pays an annual dividend of $1.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Ladder Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. STAG Industrial pays out 78.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ladder Capital pays out 55.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. STAG Industrial has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Ladder Capital has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Ladder Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares STAG Industrial and Ladder Capital's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Ladder Capital has higher revenue and earnings than STAG Industrial. Ladder Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than STAG Industrial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.1% of STAG Industrial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.9% of Ladder Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of STAG Industrial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ladder Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares STAG Industrial and Ladder Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for STAG Industrial and Ladder Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

STAG Industrial presently has a consensus target price of $33.75, suggesting a potential downside of 4.23%. Ladder Capital has a consensus target price of $10.8333, suggesting a potential downside of 6.93%. Given STAG Industrial's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe STAG Industrial is more favorable than Ladder Capital.

Risk & Volatility

STAG Industrial has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ladder Capital has a beta of 2.33, suggesting that its stock price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Ladder Capital beats STAG Industrial on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Howard Hughes (NYSE:HHC) and Ladder Capital (NYSE:LADR) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

The Howard Hughes has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ladder Capital has a beta of 2.33, suggesting that its share price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for The Howard Hughes and Ladder Capital, as provided by MarketBeat.

The Howard Hughes presently has a consensus price target of $115.6667, indicating a potential upside of 15.68%. Ladder Capital has a consensus price target of $10.8333, indicating a potential downside of 6.93%. Given The Howard Hughes' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe The Howard Hughes is more favorable than Ladder Capital.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares The Howard Hughes and Ladder Capital's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Ladder Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than The Howard Hughes. Ladder Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Howard Hughes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares The Howard Hughes and Ladder Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.9% of The Howard Hughes shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.9% of Ladder Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.7% of The Howard Hughes shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ladder Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ladder Capital beats The Howard Hughes on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cousins Properties (NYSE:CUZ) and Ladder Capital (NYSE:LADR) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Dividends

Cousins Properties pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Ladder Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Cousins Properties pays out 42.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ladder Capital pays out 55.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cousins Properties has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Ladder Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Cousins Properties and Ladder Capital's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Cousins Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Ladder Capital. Ladder Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cousins Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Cousins Properties and Ladder Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

96.5% of Cousins Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.9% of Ladder Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Cousins Properties shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ladder Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Cousins Properties has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ladder Capital has a beta of 2.33, indicating that its share price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Cousins Properties and Ladder Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Cousins Properties presently has a consensus price target of $35.6667, indicating a potential upside of 0.92%. Ladder Capital has a consensus price target of $10.8333, indicating a potential downside of 6.93%. Given Cousins Properties' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Cousins Properties is more favorable than Ladder Capital.

Summary

Cousins Properties beats Ladder Capital on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

MGM Growth Properties (NYSE:MGP) and Ladder Capital (NYSE:LADR) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

MGM Growth Properties has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ladder Capital has a beta of 2.33, indicating that its stock price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares MGM Growth Properties and Ladder Capital's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Ladder Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MGM Growth Properties. Ladder Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MGM Growth Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

MGM Growth Properties pays an annual dividend of $1.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Ladder Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. MGM Growth Properties pays out 85.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ladder Capital pays out 55.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MGM Growth Properties has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Ladder Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Ladder Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares MGM Growth Properties and Ladder Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

83.2% of MGM Growth Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.9% of Ladder Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of MGM Growth Properties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ladder Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for MGM Growth Properties and Ladder Capital, as provided by MarketBeat.

MGM Growth Properties presently has a consensus target price of $34.0625, suggesting a potential downside of 2.20%. Ladder Capital has a consensus target price of $10.8333, suggesting a potential downside of 6.93%. Given MGM Growth Properties' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe MGM Growth Properties is more favorable than Ladder Capital.

Summary

Ladder Capital beats MGM Growth Properties on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

CoreSite Realty (NYSE:COR) and Ladder Capital (NYSE:LADR) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

95.2% of CoreSite Realty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.9% of Ladder Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of CoreSite Realty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ladder Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CoreSite Realty and Ladder Capital's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Ladder Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CoreSite Realty. Ladder Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CoreSite Realty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

CoreSite Realty has a beta of 0.23, indicating that its share price is 77% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ladder Capital has a beta of 2.33, indicating that its share price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for CoreSite Realty and Ladder Capital, as provided by MarketBeat.

CoreSite Realty presently has a consensus target price of $130.4444, suggesting a potential upside of 7.04%. Ladder Capital has a consensus target price of $10.8333, suggesting a potential downside of 6.93%. Given CoreSite Realty's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe CoreSite Realty is more favorable than Ladder Capital.

Dividends

CoreSite Realty pays an annual dividend of $4.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Ladder Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. CoreSite Realty pays out 96.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ladder Capital pays out 55.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CoreSite Realty has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Ladder Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Ladder Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares CoreSite Realty and Ladder Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

CoreSite Realty beats Ladder Capital on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.