Triple Flag Precious Metals (TFPM) Competitors

Triple Flag Precious Metals currently has a consensus price target of $38.67, suggesting a potential upside of 14.87%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus price target of $226.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.24%. Given Triple Flag Precious Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Triple Flag Precious Metals is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Triple Flag Precious Metals. Triple Flag Precious Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 33 more articles in the media than Triple Flag Precious Metals. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 6 mentions for Triple Flag Precious Metals. Triple Flag Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Agnico Eagle Mines' score of 1.17 indicating that Triple Flag Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Triple Flag Precious Metals has a net margin of 84.32% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines' net margin of 40.44%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 22.04% beat Triple Flag Precious Metals' return on equity.

Triple Flag Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Triple Flag Precious Metals pays out 11.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 15.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Triple Flag Precious Metals has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Triple Flag Precious Metals has a beta of -0.17, meaning that its stock price is 117% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

82.9% of Triple Flag Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Triple Flag Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Triple Flag Precious Metals pays out 11.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alamos Gold pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Triple Flag Precious Metals has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Triple Flag Precious Metals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Triple Flag Precious Metals has a beta of -0.17, meaning that its share price is 117% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Triple Flag Precious Metals currently has a consensus target price of $38.67, indicating a potential upside of 14.87%. Alamos Gold has a consensus target price of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 29.71%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Triple Flag Precious Metals.

82.9% of Triple Flag Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Triple Flag Precious Metals. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triple Flag Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Triple Flag Precious Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Triple Flag Precious Metals and 5 mentions for Alamos Gold. Triple Flag Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Alamos Gold's score of 1.26 indicating that Triple Flag Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Triple Flag Precious Metals has a net margin of 84.32% compared to Alamos Gold's net margin of 52.64%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 19.28% beat Triple Flag Precious Metals' return on equity.

Triple Flag Precious Metals has a net margin of 84.32% compared to Centerra Gold's net margin of 36.92%. Centerra Gold's return on equity of 15.35% beat Triple Flag Precious Metals' return on equity.

Triple Flag Precious Metals has a beta of -0.17, meaning that its stock price is 117% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Centerra Gold has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Triple Flag Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Centerra Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Triple Flag Precious Metals pays out 11.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Centerra Gold pays out 6.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Triple Flag Precious Metals has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Centerra Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Triple Flag Precious Metals currently has a consensus target price of $38.67, suggesting a potential upside of 14.87%. Centerra Gold has a consensus target price of $17.50, suggesting a potential downside of 23.55%. Given Triple Flag Precious Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Triple Flag Precious Metals is more favorable than Centerra Gold.

Centerra Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Triple Flag Precious Metals. Centerra Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triple Flag Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

82.9% of Triple Flag Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of Centerra Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Centerra Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Centerra Gold had 7 more articles in the media than Triple Flag Precious Metals. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Centerra Gold and 6 mentions for Triple Flag Precious Metals. Triple Flag Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Centerra Gold's score of 1.28 indicating that Triple Flag Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Triple Flag Precious Metals has a net margin of 84.32% compared to Franco-Nevada's net margin of 63.79%. Franco-Nevada's return on equity of 18.58% beat Triple Flag Precious Metals' return on equity.

Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.35, indicating that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Triple Flag Precious Metals has a beta of -0.17, indicating that its share price is 117% less volatile than the broader market.

77.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.9% of Triple Flag Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Franco-Nevada presently has a consensus target price of $273.40, indicating a potential upside of 3.94%. Triple Flag Precious Metals has a consensus target price of $38.67, indicating a potential upside of 14.87%. Given Triple Flag Precious Metals' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Triple Flag Precious Metals is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Franco-Nevada has higher revenue and earnings than Triple Flag Precious Metals. Triple Flag Precious Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Triple Flag Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Franco-Nevada pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Triple Flag Precious Metals pays out 11.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Franco-Nevada has increased its dividend for 18 consecutive years and Triple Flag Precious Metals has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Triple Flag Precious Metals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Franco-Nevada had 14 more articles in the media than Triple Flag Precious Metals. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Franco-Nevada and 6 mentions for Triple Flag Precious Metals. Triple Flag Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Franco-Nevada's score of 1.60 indicating that Triple Flag Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.