Nomura (NMR) Competitors

Nomura has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Raymond James Financial has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Nomura pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Raymond James Financial pays an annual dividend of $2.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Nomura pays out 27.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Raymond James Financial pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Raymond James Financial has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

15.1% of Nomura shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.8% of Raymond James Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Nomura shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Raymond James Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Raymond James Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Nomura. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Raymond James Financial and 3 mentions for Nomura. Raymond James Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Nomura's score of 0.88 indicating that Raymond James Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Raymond James Financial has a net margin of 13.57% compared to Nomura's net margin of 8.09%. Raymond James Financial's return on equity of 19.07% beat Nomura's return on equity.

Nomura presently has a consensus price target of $10.20, indicating a potential downside of 6.12%. Raymond James Financial has a consensus price target of $181.46, indicating a potential upside of 4.56%. Given Raymond James Financial's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Raymond James Financial is more favorable than Nomura.

Nomura has higher revenue and earnings than Raymond James Financial. Nomura is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Raymond James Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

LPL Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Nomura pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. LPL Financial pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nomura pays out 27.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, LPL Financial had 9 more articles in the media than Nomura. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for LPL Financial and 3 mentions for Nomura. LPL Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Nomura's score of 0.88 indicating that LPL Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Nomura has a net margin of 8.09% compared to LPL Financial's net margin of 5.13%. LPL Financial's return on equity of 32.20% beat Nomura's return on equity.

95.7% of LPL Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.1% of Nomura shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of LPL Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Nomura shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nomura has higher revenue and earnings than LPL Financial. Nomura is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LPL Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

LPL Financial has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nomura has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

LPL Financial presently has a consensus price target of $405.79, suggesting a potential upside of 14.70%. Nomura has a consensus price target of $10.20, suggesting a potential downside of 6.12%. Given LPL Financial's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe LPL Financial is more favorable than Nomura.

15.1% of Nomura shares are held by institutional investors. 35.2% of Futu shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Nomura shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Futu had 1 more articles in the media than Nomura. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Futu and 3 mentions for Nomura. Futu's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Nomura's score of 0.88 indicating that Futu is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Nomura has higher revenue and earnings than Futu. Futu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomura, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Futu has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nomura has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Futu pays an annual dividend of $2.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Nomura pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Futu pays out 25.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nomura pays out 27.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Futu is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Futu has a net margin of 42.95% compared to Nomura's net margin of 8.09%. Futu's return on equity of 28.20% beat Nomura's return on equity.

Futu presently has a consensus target price of $139.91, indicating a potential upside of 24.11%. Nomura has a consensus target price of $10.20, indicating a potential downside of 6.12%. Given Futu's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Futu is more favorable than Nomura.

Stifel Financial has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nomura has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Stifel Financial currently has a consensus price target of $91.90, suggesting a potential upside of 15.16%. Nomura has a consensus price target of $10.20, suggesting a potential downside of 6.12%. Given Stifel Financial's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Stifel Financial is more favorable than Nomura.

In the previous week, Stifel Financial had 9 more articles in the media than Nomura. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Stifel Financial and 3 mentions for Nomura. Stifel Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Nomura's score of 0.88 indicating that Stifel Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Nomura has higher revenue and earnings than Stifel Financial. Nomura is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stifel Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Stifel Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Nomura pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Stifel Financial pays out 24.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nomura pays out 27.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Stifel Financial has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

82.0% of Stifel Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.1% of Nomura shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of Stifel Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Nomura shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Stifel Financial has a net margin of 16.11% compared to Nomura's net margin of 8.09%. Stifel Financial's return on equity of 19.22% beat Nomura's return on equity.