S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
Log in
NYSE:NMR

Nomura Competitors

$6.05
+0.04 (+0.67 %)
(As of 03/5/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$5.94
Now: $6.05
$6.05
50-Day Range
$5.30
MA: $5.80
$6.25
52-Week Range
$3.55
Now: $6.05
$6.31
Volume204,200 shs
Average Volume346,198 shs
Market Capitalization$18.50 billion
P/E Ratio8.64
Dividend Yield5.29%
Beta0.97

Competitors

Nomura (NYSE:NMR) Vs. CS, IBKR, MKTX, FUTU, RJF, and SEIC

Should you be buying NMR stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "security brokers & dealers" are considered alternatives and competitors to Nomura, including Credit Suisse Group (CS), Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR), MarketAxess (MKTX), Futu (FUTU), Raymond James (RJF), and SEI Investments (SEIC).

Nomura (NYSE:NMR) and Credit Suisse Group (NYSE:CS) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Dividends

Nomura pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Credit Suisse Group pays an annual dividend of $0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Nomura pays out 51.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Credit Suisse Group pays out 3.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Credit Suisse Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.9% of Nomura shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Credit Suisse Group shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nomura and Credit Suisse Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomura$17.93 billion1.03$2.00 billion$0.629.76
Credit Suisse Group$36.02 billion0.94$3.44 billion$1.3310.44

Credit Suisse Group has higher revenue and earnings than Nomura. Nomura is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Credit Suisse Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Nomura and Credit Suisse Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nomura01302.75
Credit Suisse Group05902.64

Credit Suisse Group has a consensus target price of $8.50, suggesting a potential downside of 38.80%. Given Credit Suisse Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Credit Suisse Group is more favorable than Nomura.

Volatility and Risk

Nomura has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Credit Suisse Group has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Nomura and Credit Suisse Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nomura13.00%8.41%0.54%
Credit Suisse Group11.83%8.32%0.47%

Summary

Credit Suisse Group beats Nomura on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nomura (NYSE:NMR) and Interactive Brokers Group (NASDAQ:IBKR) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Nomura pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Interactive Brokers Group pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Nomura pays out 51.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Profitability

This table compares Nomura and Interactive Brokers Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nomura13.00%8.41%0.54%
Interactive Brokers Group6.90%2.24%0.23%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Nomura and Interactive Brokers Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nomura01302.75
Interactive Brokers Group10402.60

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $70.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.91%. Given Interactive Brokers Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Interactive Brokers Group is more favorable than Nomura.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nomura and Interactive Brokers Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomura$17.93 billion1.03$2.00 billion$0.629.76
Interactive Brokers Group$2.58 billion12.15$161 million$2.2733.13

Nomura has higher revenue and earnings than Interactive Brokers Group. Nomura is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interactive Brokers Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.9% of Nomura shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.1% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Nomura has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500.

MarketAxess (NASDAQ:MKTX) and Nomura (NYSE:NMR) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

MarketAxess has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nomura has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

MarketAxess pays an annual dividend of $2.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Nomura pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. MarketAxess pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nomura pays out 51.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MarketAxess has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares MarketAxess and Nomura's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MarketAxess$511.35 million37.48$204.90 million$5.4093.40
Nomura$17.93 billion1.03$2.00 billion$0.629.76

Nomura has higher revenue and earnings than MarketAxess. Nomura is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MarketAxess, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for MarketAxess and Nomura, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
MarketAxess07402.36
Nomura01302.75

MarketAxess presently has a consensus price target of $504.20, suggesting a potential downside of 0.03%. Given MarketAxess' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe MarketAxess is more favorable than Nomura.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

90.8% of MarketAxess shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Nomura shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of MarketAxess shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares MarketAxess and Nomura's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
MarketAxess42.73%33.35%26.26%
Nomura13.00%8.41%0.54%

Summary

MarketAxess beats Nomura on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nomura (NYSE:NMR) and Futu (NASDAQ:FUTU) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk and valuation.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Nomura and Futu's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomura$17.93 billion1.03$2.00 billion$0.629.76
Futu$136.28 million139.43N/AN/AN/A

Nomura has higher revenue and earnings than Futu.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.9% of Nomura shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Futu shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Nomura and Futu, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nomura01302.75
Futu01302.75

Futu has a consensus target price of $223.50, indicating a potential upside of 59.18%. Given Futu's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Futu is more favorable than Nomura.

Volatility & Risk

Nomura has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Futu has a beta of 1.76, suggesting that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Nomura and Futu's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nomura13.00%8.41%0.54%
FutuN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Futu beats Nomura on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Raymond James (NYSE:RJF) and Nomura (NYSE:NMR) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

75.1% of Raymond James shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Nomura shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.8% of Raymond James shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Raymond James has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nomura has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Raymond James and Nomura, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Raymond James02902.82
Nomura01302.75

Raymond James presently has a consensus target price of $116.50, indicating a potential downside of 0.91%. Given Raymond James' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Raymond James is more favorable than Nomura.

Profitability

This table compares Raymond James and Nomura's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Raymond James10.02%12.29%1.88%
Nomura13.00%8.41%0.54%

Dividends

Raymond James pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Nomura pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Raymond James pays out 25.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nomura pays out 51.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Raymond James has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Raymond James and Nomura's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Raymond James$8.17 billion1.98$818 million$6.1119.24
Nomura$17.93 billion1.03$2.00 billion$0.629.76

Nomura has higher revenue and earnings than Raymond James. Nomura is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Raymond James, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Raymond James beats Nomura on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

SEI Investments (NASDAQ:SEIC) and Nomura (NYSE:NMR) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Dividends

SEI Investments pays an annual dividend of $0.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Nomura pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. SEI Investments pays out 22.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nomura pays out 51.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. SEI Investments has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for SEI Investments and Nomura, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SEI Investments03202.40
Nomura01302.75

SEI Investments presently has a consensus target price of $64.1250, indicating a potential upside of 9.34%. Given SEI Investments' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe SEI Investments is more favorable than Nomura.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

73.7% of SEI Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Nomura shares are held by institutional investors. 23.9% of SEI Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SEI Investments and Nomura's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SEI Investments$1.65 billion5.10$501.43 million$3.2418.10
Nomura$17.93 billion1.03$2.00 billion$0.629.76

Nomura has higher revenue and earnings than SEI Investments. Nomura is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SEI Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

SEI Investments has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nomura has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares SEI Investments and Nomura's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SEI Investments27.06%26.05%21.57%
Nomura13.00%8.41%0.54%

Summary

SEI Investments beats Nomura on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


Nomura Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Credit Suisse Group logo
CS
Credit Suisse Group
1.6$13.89+0.2%$34.00 billion$36.02 billion8.74High Trading Volume
Interactive Brokers Group logo
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group
1.0$75.20+0.5%$31.34 billion$2.58 billion34.98Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
MarketAxess logo
MKTX
MarketAxess
1.5$504.37+3.9%$19.16 billion$511.35 million69.47High Trading Volume
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Up
FUTU
Futu
1.5$140.41+6.4%$19.00 billion$136.28 million167.16Analyst Report
Gap Up
Raymond James logo
RJF
Raymond James
2.1$117.57+0.7%$16.19 billion$8.17 billion20.20Insider Selling
News Coverage
SEI Investments logo
SEIC
SEI Investments
2.0$58.65+4.0%$8.42 billion$1.65 billion19.62Gap Up
Jefferies Financial Group logo
JEF
Jefferies Financial Group
2.5$30.53+2.6%$7.63 billion$6.01 billion11.27Unusual Options Activity
Stifel Financial logo
SF
Stifel Financial
1.0$63.04+1.3%$7.04 billion$3.34 billion17.07
Virtu Financial logo
VIRT
Virtu Financial
1.7$26.98+0.8%$5.22 billion$1.53 billion6.50
Freedom logo
FRHC
Freedom
1.1$49.01+2.1%$2.86 billion$121.90 million53.86Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
TIGR
UP Fintech
1.2$19.30+5.3%$2.72 billion$58.66 million321.72Analyst Report
Gap Down
Navient logo
NAVI
Navient
2.0$12.88+2.0%$2.37 billion$5.53 billion6.57
Piper Sandler Companies logo
PIPR
Piper Sandler Companies
1.3$109.95+2.0%$2.01 billion$846.30 million43.80Ex-Dividend
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Waddell & Reed Financial logo
WDR
Waddell & Reed Financial
1.3$25.18+0.7%$1.57 billion$1.07 billion18.12
Piper Jaffray Companies logo
PJC
Piper Jaffray Companies
1.7$79.62+1.3%$1.16 billion$800.99 million12.99News Coverage
Gap Down
Cowen logo
COWN
Cowen
1.7$34.02+0.7%$903.88 million$1.05 billion8.20Gap Down
WisdomTree Investments logo
WETF
WisdomTree Investments
1.7$6.00+1.3%$898.90 million$268.40 million-54.54Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
AC
Associated Capital Group
1.2$34.29+0.6%$764.84 million$31.26 million-36.09High Trading Volume
News Coverage
GAMCO Investors logo
GBL
GAMCO Investors
1.0$19.32+1.2%$530.45 million$312.37 million8.15
OPY
Oppenheimer
1.0$39.55+1.8%$494.10 million$1.03 billion7.99
Greenhill & Co., Inc. logo
GHL
Greenhill & Co., Inc.
1.4$15.75+2.2%$307.31 million$301.01 million-25.00Ex-Dividend
SIEB
Siebert Financial
0.9$4.14+1.0%$126.91 million$28.59 million46.00News Coverage
JMP Group logo
JMP
JMP Group
2.1$5.26+1.5%$103.44 million$100.08 million-5.11Decrease in Short Interest
China Finance Online logo
JRJC
China Finance Online
0.5$10.33+3.1%$25.23 million$35.52 million-4.51Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 3/8/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.