Free Trial

Texas Pacific Land (TPL) Competitors

Texas Pacific Land logo
$387.08 -14.31 (-3.56%)
Closing price 05/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$380.50 -6.58 (-1.70%)
As of 04:00 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

TPL vs. FANG, VNOM, MGY, MTDR, and NOG

Should you buy Texas Pacific Land stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Texas Pacific Land with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Texas Pacific Land include Diamondback Energy (FANG), Viper Energy (VNOM), Magnolia Oil & Gas (MGY), Matador Resources (MTDR), and Northern Oil and Gas (NOG). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Texas Pacific Land compare to Diamondback Energy?

Texas Pacific Land (NYSE:TPL) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Texas Pacific Land. Texas Pacific Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Texas Pacific Land$798.19M33.45$481.38M$7.3053.03
Diamondback Energy$15.03B3.76$1.66B$0.86233.84

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 8 more articles in the media than Texas Pacific Land. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 22 mentions for Texas Pacific Land. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Texas Pacific Land's score of 1.07 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Texas Pacific Land
13 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Diamondback Energy
16 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.03% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.52% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Texas Pacific Land60.03% 35.52% 31.95%
Diamondback Energy 1.87%7.76%4.67%

Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Texas Pacific Land pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 488.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Texas Pacific Land has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Diamondback Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Texas Pacific Land presently has a consensus target price of $639.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.08%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $218.25, suggesting a potential upside of 8.53%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Texas Pacific Land
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
5 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.04

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Texas Pacific Land on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Texas Pacific Land compare to Viper Energy?

Texas Pacific Land (NYSE:TPL) and Viper Energy (NASDAQ:VNOM) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.7% of Viper Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Viper Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Viper Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Texas Pacific Land pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Viper Energy pays out -475.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Texas Pacific Land has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Viper Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Texas Pacific Land had 14 more articles in the media than Viper Energy. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Texas Pacific Land and 8 mentions for Viper Energy. Viper Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Texas Pacific Land's score of 1.07 indicating that Viper Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Texas Pacific Land
13 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Viper Energy
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Texas Pacific Land currently has a consensus price target of $639.00, indicating a potential upside of 65.08%. Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $56.43, indicating a potential upside of 16.68%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Viper Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Texas Pacific Land
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Viper Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Viper Energy has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Texas Pacific Land has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Viper Energy. Viper Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Texas Pacific Land$798.19M33.45$481.38M$7.3053.03
Viper Energy$1.40B12.40-$68M-$0.32N/A

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.03% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of -2.77%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.52% beat Viper Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Texas Pacific Land60.03% 35.52% 31.95%
Viper Energy -2.77%2.64%2.21%

Summary

Texas Pacific Land beats Viper Energy on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Texas Pacific Land compare to Magnolia Oil & Gas?

Magnolia Oil & Gas (NYSE:MGY) and Texas Pacific Land (NYSE:TPL) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Texas Pacific Land had 15 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Texas Pacific Land and 7 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.90 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Magnolia Oil & Gas
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Texas Pacific Land
13 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Magnolia Oil & Gas currently has a consensus price target of $31.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.38%. Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of $639.00, indicating a potential upside of 65.08%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Magnolia Oil & Gas
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53
Texas Pacific Land
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Texas Pacific Land pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Texas Pacific Land has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.03% compared to Magnolia Oil & Gas' net margin of 24.40%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.52% beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Magnolia Oil & Gas24.40% 16.28% 11.26%
Texas Pacific Land 60.03%35.52%31.95%

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Texas Pacific Land has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Magnolia Oil & Gas$1.31B4.06$325.25M$1.7216.63
Texas Pacific Land$798.19M33.45$481.38M$7.3053.03

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Texas Pacific Land beats Magnolia Oil & Gas on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Texas Pacific Land compare to Matador Resources?

Texas Pacific Land (NYSE:TPL) and Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Texas Pacific Land pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Texas Pacific Land has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.03% compared to Matador Resources' net margin of 14.41%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.52% beat Matador Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Texas Pacific Land60.03% 35.52% 31.95%
Matador Resources 14.41%11.20%5.62%

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Texas Pacific Land. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Texas Pacific Land$798.19M33.45$481.38M$7.3053.03
Matador Resources$3.70B1.93$759.22M$3.8914.75

Texas Pacific Land currently has a consensus price target of $639.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.08%. Matador Resources has a consensus price target of $63.46, suggesting a potential upside of 10.62%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Matador Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Texas Pacific Land
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Matador Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

In the previous week, Texas Pacific Land had 6 more articles in the media than Matador Resources. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Texas Pacific Land and 16 mentions for Matador Resources. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.69 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Texas Pacific Land
13 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Matador Resources
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Texas Pacific Land beats Matador Resources on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Texas Pacific Land compare to Northern Oil and Gas?

Northern Oil and Gas (NYSE:NOG) and Texas Pacific Land (NYSE:TPL) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.03% compared to Northern Oil and Gas' net margin of -33.17%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.52% beat Northern Oil and Gas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Northern Oil and Gas-33.17% 18.43% 7.14%
Texas Pacific Land 60.03%35.52%31.95%

Northern Oil and Gas pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Northern Oil and Gas pays out -28.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Texas Pacific Land pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Northern Oil and Gas has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Texas Pacific Land has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Northern Oil and Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Texas Pacific Land had 15 more articles in the media than Northern Oil and Gas. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Texas Pacific Land and 7 mentions for Northern Oil and Gas. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Northern Oil and Gas' score of 0.77 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Northern Oil and Gas
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Texas Pacific Land
13 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

98.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Northern Oil and Gas currently has a consensus price target of $31.33, suggesting a potential upside of 34.22%. Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of $639.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.08%. Given Texas Pacific Land's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Northern Oil and Gas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Northern Oil and Gas
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13
Texas Pacific Land
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Northern Oil and Gas has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Texas Pacific Land has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Northern Oil and Gas. Northern Oil and Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Northern Oil and Gas$2.48B1.00$38.76M-$6.37N/A
Texas Pacific Land$798.19M33.45$481.38M$7.3053.03

Summary

Texas Pacific Land beats Northern Oil and Gas on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Texas Pacific Land News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TPL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TPL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TPL vs. The Competition

MetricTexas Pacific LandOther Alt Energy IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$27.69B$14.92B$10.53B$22.96B
Dividend Yield0.60%3.57%10.21%4.07%
P/E Ratio53.0355.5020.2628.29
Price / Sales33.4572.581,026.7424.51
Price / Cash50.8534.2737.9325.11
Price / Book17.1612.514.364.73
Net Income$481.38M$276.65M$4.24B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-3.28%1.31%1.06%-1.11%
1 Month Performance-6.03%10.65%4.17%1.36%
1 Year Performance-16.97%64.07%51.46%24.41%

Texas Pacific Land Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TPL
Texas Pacific Land
3.7685 of 5 stars
$387.09
-3.6%
$639.00
+65.1%
-16.0%$27.69B$798.19M53.03100
FANG
Diamondback Energy
3.2579 of 5 stars
$213.69
+2.9%
$208.05
-2.6%
+37.6%$58.41B$15.03B38.091,762
VNOM
Viper Energy
3.7484 of 5 stars
$50.95
+2.1%
$55.00
+7.9%
+12.0%$17.84B$1.40BN/A711
MGY
Magnolia Oil & Gas
3.4455 of 5 stars
$31.14
+3.5%
$31.08
-0.2%
+22.7%$5.61B$1.31B18.10210
MTDR
Matador Resources
4.3119 of 5 stars
$63.86
+2.4%
$62.62
-1.9%
+23.6%$7.75B$3.70B10.47290

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:TPL) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners