Texas Pacific Land (TPL) Competitors

Texas Pacific Land currently has a consensus target price of $639.00, indicating a potential upside of 61.45%. Viper Energy has a consensus target price of $57.86, indicating a potential upside of 23.13%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Viper Energy.

Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Viper Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Texas Pacific Land pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Viper Energy pays out -475.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Texas Pacific Land has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Viper Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Texas Pacific Land has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Viper Energy. Viper Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Viper Energy has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.03% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of -2.77%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.52% beat Viper Energy's return on equity.

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.7% of Viper Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Viper Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Viper Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Texas Pacific Land. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Viper Energy and 6 mentions for Texas Pacific Land. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Viper Energy's score of 0.95 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.03% compared to Magnolia Oil & Gas' net margin of 24.40%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.52% beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity.

In the previous week, Texas Pacific Land had 3 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Texas Pacific Land and 3 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.84 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Texas Pacific Land has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Texas Pacific Land presently has a consensus target price of $639.00, suggesting a potential upside of 61.45%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus target price of $31.42, suggesting a potential upside of 11.41%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Texas Pacific Land pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Texas Pacific Land has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.03% compared to Matador Resources' net margin of 14.41%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.52% beat Matador Resources' return on equity.

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Texas Pacific Land pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Texas Pacific Land has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Matador Resources currently has a consensus price target of $65.08, indicating a potential upside of 14.67%. Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of $639.00, indicating a potential upside of 61.45%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Matador Resources.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Texas Pacific Land. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 15 more articles in the media than Texas Pacific Land. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Matador Resources and 6 mentions for Texas Pacific Land. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.86 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Texas Pacific Land presently has a consensus price target of $639.00, indicating a potential upside of 61.45%. Northern Oil and Gas has a consensus price target of $33.00, indicating a potential upside of 48.11%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Northern Oil and Gas.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Northern Oil and Gas has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Texas Pacific Land and Texas Pacific Land both had 6 articles in the media. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Northern Oil and Gas' score of 0.50 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Texas Pacific Land has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Northern Oil and Gas. Northern Oil and Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.03% compared to Northern Oil and Gas' net margin of -33.17%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.52% beat Northern Oil and Gas' return on equity.

Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Northern Oil and Gas pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.1%. Texas Pacific Land pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Northern Oil and Gas pays out -28.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Texas Pacific Land has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Northern Oil and Gas has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Northern Oil and Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.