Texas Pacific Land (TPL) Competitors

Texas Pacific Land has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Texas Pacific Land presently has a consensus price target of $639.00, indicating a potential upside of 73.27%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $31.71, indicating a potential upside of 14.35%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.32% compared to Magnolia Oil & Gas' net margin of 28.77%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.76% beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity.

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Texas Pacific Land pays out 30.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Texas Pacific Land has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Texas Pacific Land and Texas Pacific Land both had 10 articles in the media. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.40 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the media.

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.9% of EOG Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of EOG Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Texas Pacific Land presently has a consensus price target of $639.00, suggesting a potential upside of 73.27%. EOG Resources has a consensus price target of $157.07, suggesting a potential upside of 6.66%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than EOG Resources.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EOG Resources has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, EOG Resources had 8 more articles in the media than Texas Pacific Land. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for EOG Resources and 10 mentions for Texas Pacific Land. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat EOG Resources' score of 1.08 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. EOG Resources pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Texas Pacific Land pays out 30.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Texas Pacific Land has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and EOG Resources has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. EOG Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

EOG Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Texas Pacific Land. EOG Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.32% compared to EOG Resources' net margin of 25.44%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.76% beat EOG Resources' return on equity.

Texas Pacific Land presently has a consensus price target of $639.00, indicating a potential upside of 73.27%. Occidental Petroleum has a consensus price target of $64.96, indicating a potential upside of 5.71%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Occidental Petroleum.

In the previous week, Occidental Petroleum had 10 more articles in the media than Texas Pacific Land. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Occidental Petroleum and 10 mentions for Texas Pacific Land. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Occidental Petroleum's score of 0.78 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Occidental Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Texas Pacific Land pays out 30.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Texas Pacific Land has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Occidental Petroleum has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Occidental Petroleum is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Occidental Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Occidental Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Occidental Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Texas Pacific Land. Occidental Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 0.16, meaning that its share price is 84% less volatile than the broader market.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.32% compared to Occidental Petroleum's net margin of 28.36%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.76% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 12 more articles in the media than Texas Pacific Land. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 10 mentions for Texas Pacific Land. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 1.12 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Texas Pacific Land. Diamondback Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.32% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 8.58%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.76% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Texas Pacific Land currently has a consensus price target of $639.00, suggesting a potential upside of 73.27%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $224.05, suggesting a potential upside of 9.31%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Texas Pacific Land pays out 30.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Texas Pacific Land has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Diamondback Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.