Texas Pacific Land (TPL) Competitors

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.32% compared to Magnolia Oil & Gas' net margin of 28.77%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.76% beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity.

Texas Pacific Land presently has a consensus price target of $639.00, indicating a potential upside of 88.87%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $31.88, indicating a potential upside of 31.46%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 7 more articles in the media than Texas Pacific Land. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 4 mentions for Texas Pacific Land. Magnolia Oil & Gas' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Texas Pacific Land's score of 0.03 indicating that Magnolia Oil & Gas is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Texas Pacific Land pays out 30.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Texas Pacific Land has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Texas Pacific Land has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

EOG Resources currently has a consensus price target of $158.37, indicating a potential upside of 12.06%. Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of $639.00, indicating a potential upside of 88.87%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than EOG Resources.

EOG Resources has a beta of 0.36, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.32% compared to EOG Resources' net margin of 25.44%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.76% beat EOG Resources' return on equity.

In the previous week, EOG Resources had 9 more articles in the media than Texas Pacific Land. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for EOG Resources and 4 mentions for Texas Pacific Land. EOG Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Texas Pacific Land's score of 0.03 indicating that EOG Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

EOG Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Texas Pacific Land. EOG Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

89.9% of EOG Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of EOG Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

EOG Resources pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. EOG Resources pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Texas Pacific Land pays out 30.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. EOG Resources has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Texas Pacific Land has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. EOG Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Texas Pacific Land currently has a consensus price target of $639.00, suggesting a potential upside of 88.87%. Occidental Petroleum has a consensus price target of $65.54, suggesting a potential upside of 14.02%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Occidental Petroleum.

Occidental Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Texas Pacific Land. Occidental Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 0.24, indicating that its stock price is 76% less volatile than the broader market.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.32% compared to Occidental Petroleum's net margin of 28.36%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.76% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity.

In the previous week, Occidental Petroleum had 15 more articles in the media than Texas Pacific Land. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Occidental Petroleum and 4 mentions for Texas Pacific Land. Occidental Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Texas Pacific Land's score of 0.03 indicating that Occidental Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Occidental Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Occidental Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Occidental Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Texas Pacific Land pays out 30.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Texas Pacific Land has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Occidental Petroleum has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Occidental Petroleum is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Texas Pacific Land pays out 30.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Texas Pacific Land has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Diamondback Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Diamondback Energy currently has a consensus price target of $226.33, suggesting a potential upside of 22.44%. Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of $639.00, suggesting a potential upside of 88.87%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 8 more articles in the media than Texas Pacific Land. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 4 mentions for Texas Pacific Land. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Texas Pacific Land's score of 0.03 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.32% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 8.58%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.76% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Texas Pacific Land. Diamondback Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.