Texas Pacific Land (TPL) Competitors

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.03% compared to Magnolia Oil & Gas' net margin of 24.40%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.52% beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Magnolia Oil & Gas presently has a consensus price target of $31.08, indicating a potential upside of 16.27%. Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of $639.00, indicating a potential upside of 56.08%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Texas Pacific Land has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Texas Pacific Land pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Texas Pacific Land has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas and Magnolia Oil & Gas both had 9 articles in the media. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.77 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Texas Pacific Land. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 7 more articles in the media than Texas Pacific Land. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Matador Resources and 9 mentions for Texas Pacific Land. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Matador Resources' score of -0.30 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Texas Pacific Land pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Texas Pacific Land has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.03% compared to Matador Resources' net margin of 14.41%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.52% beat Matador Resources' return on equity.

Texas Pacific Land presently has a consensus price target of $639.00, indicating a potential upside of 56.08%. Matador Resources has a consensus price target of $64.38, indicating a potential upside of 21.17%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Matador Resources.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.03% compared to Northern Oil and Gas' net margin of -33.17%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.52% beat Northern Oil and Gas' return on equity.

Texas Pacific Land presently has a consensus target price of $639.00, suggesting a potential upside of 56.08%. Northern Oil and Gas has a consensus target price of $31.88, suggesting a potential upside of 56.54%. Given Northern Oil and Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Northern Oil and Gas is more favorable than Texas Pacific Land.

Texas Pacific Land has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Northern Oil and Gas. Northern Oil and Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Northern Oil and Gas pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.8%. Texas Pacific Land pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Northern Oil and Gas pays out -28.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Texas Pacific Land has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Northern Oil and Gas has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Northern Oil and Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Northern Oil and Gas has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Northern Oil and Gas had 14 more articles in the media than Texas Pacific Land. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Northern Oil and Gas and 9 mentions for Texas Pacific Land. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Northern Oil and Gas' score of 0.03 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ovintiv has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Texas Pacific Land had 4 more articles in the media than Ovintiv. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Texas Pacific Land and 5 mentions for Ovintiv. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Ovintiv's score of 0.86 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ovintiv presently has a consensus target price of $64.16, indicating a potential upside of 13.63%. Texas Pacific Land has a consensus target price of $639.00, indicating a potential upside of 56.08%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Ovintiv.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.03% compared to Ovintiv's net margin of 8.51%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.52% beat Ovintiv's return on equity.

Ovintiv has higher revenue and earnings than Texas Pacific Land. Ovintiv is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

83.8% of Ovintiv shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Ovintiv shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ovintiv pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Ovintiv pays out 38.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Texas Pacific Land pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ovintiv has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Texas Pacific Land has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Ovintiv is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.