Blue Owl Capital (OWL) Competitors

Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hamilton Lane has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Hamilton Lane has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Blue Owl Capital. Hamilton Lane is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Owl Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

35.9% of Blue Owl Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.4% of Hamilton Lane shares are held by institutional investors. 25.7% of Blue Owl Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 24.0% of Hamilton Lane shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Blue Owl Capital presently has a consensus target price of $13.77, indicating a potential upside of 48.63%. Hamilton Lane has a consensus target price of $131.57, indicating a potential upside of 53.22%. Given Hamilton Lane's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hamilton Lane is more favorable than Blue Owl Capital.

Blue Owl Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. Hamilton Lane pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Blue Owl Capital pays out 766.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hamilton Lane pays out 36.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Blue Owl Capital has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Hamilton Lane has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Hamilton Lane has a net margin of 32.14% compared to Blue Owl Capital's net margin of 2.71%. Hamilton Lane's return on equity of 25.10% beat Blue Owl Capital's return on equity.

In the previous week, Blue Owl Capital had 8 more articles in the media than Hamilton Lane. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Blue Owl Capital and 7 mentions for Hamilton Lane. Hamilton Lane's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Blue Owl Capital's score of 0.31 indicating that Hamilton Lane is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Blue Owl Capital presently has a consensus target price of $13.77, suggesting a potential upside of 48.63%. StepStone Group has a consensus target price of $69.00, suggesting a potential upside of 59.91%. Given StepStone Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe StepStone Group is more favorable than Blue Owl Capital.

35.9% of Blue Owl Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.5% of StepStone Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.7% of Blue Owl Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of StepStone Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Blue Owl Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. StepStone Group pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Blue Owl Capital pays out 766.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. StepStone Group pays out -17.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Blue Owl Capital has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and StepStone Group has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Blue Owl Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Blue Owl Capital had 11 more articles in the media than StepStone Group. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Blue Owl Capital and 4 mentions for StepStone Group. StepStone Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Blue Owl Capital's score of 0.31 indicating that StepStone Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Blue Owl Capital has a net margin of 2.71% compared to StepStone Group's net margin of -30.53%. StepStone Group's return on equity of 43.38% beat Blue Owl Capital's return on equity.

Blue Owl Capital has higher revenue and earnings than StepStone Group. StepStone Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Owl Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, StepStone Group has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Blue Owl Capital currently has a consensus target price of $13.77, indicating a potential upside of 48.63%. TPG has a consensus target price of $63.33, indicating a potential upside of 45.59%. Given Blue Owl Capital's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Blue Owl Capital is more favorable than TPG.

Blue Owl Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. TPG pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Blue Owl Capital pays out 766.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TPG pays out 357.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blue Owl Capital has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Blue Owl Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TPG has a beta of 1.47, meaning that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Blue Owl Capital had 10 more articles in the media than TPG. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Blue Owl Capital and 5 mentions for TPG. TPG's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Blue Owl Capital's score of 0.31 indicating that TPG is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

TPG has higher revenue and earnings than Blue Owl Capital. TPG is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Owl Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

TPG has a net margin of 4.67% compared to Blue Owl Capital's net margin of 2.71%. TPG's return on equity of 28.10% beat Blue Owl Capital's return on equity.

35.9% of Blue Owl Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of TPG shares are held by institutional investors. 25.7% of Blue Owl Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 61.4% of TPG shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Apollo Global Management has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the broader market.

Blue Owl Capital currently has a consensus target price of $13.77, indicating a potential upside of 48.63%. Apollo Global Management has a consensus target price of $152.15, indicating a potential upside of 27.49%. Given Blue Owl Capital's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Blue Owl Capital is more favorable than Apollo Global Management.

In the previous week, Apollo Global Management had 3 more articles in the media than Blue Owl Capital. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Apollo Global Management and 15 mentions for Blue Owl Capital. Apollo Global Management's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Blue Owl Capital's score of 0.31 indicating that Apollo Global Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Apollo Global Management has higher revenue and earnings than Blue Owl Capital. Apollo Global Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Owl Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Blue Owl Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. Apollo Global Management pays an annual dividend of $2.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Blue Owl Capital pays out 766.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Apollo Global Management pays out 82.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blue Owl Capital has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Apollo Global Management has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Blue Owl Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

35.9% of Blue Owl Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of Apollo Global Management shares are held by institutional investors. 25.7% of Blue Owl Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Apollo Global Management shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Apollo Global Management has a net margin of 5.22% compared to Blue Owl Capital's net margin of 2.71%. Blue Owl Capital's return on equity of 23.14% beat Apollo Global Management's return on equity.