Futu (FUTU) Competitors

VICI Properties has a net margin of 76.83% compared to Futu's net margin of 41.87%. Futu's return on equity of 26.48% beat VICI Properties' return on equity.

In the previous week, Futu had 1 more articles in the media than VICI Properties. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Futu and 15 mentions for VICI Properties. VICI Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Futu's score of 0.17 indicating that VICI Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

VICI Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Futu. VICI Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Futu, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

97.7% of VICI Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of VICI Properties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.2% of Futu shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

VICI Properties has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Futu has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

VICI Properties presently has a consensus price target of $33.38, indicating a potential upside of 21.77%. Futu has a consensus price target of $162.80, indicating a potential upside of 78.75%. Given Futu's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Futu is more favorable than VICI Properties.

VICI Properties pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Futu pays an annual dividend of $2.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. VICI Properties pays out 61.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Futu pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. VICI Properties has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. VICI Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Futu has higher revenue and earnings than Texas Pacific Land. Futu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by institutional investors. 35.2% of Futu shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Futu has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Texas Pacific Land had 1 more articles in the media than Futu. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Texas Pacific Land and 16 mentions for Futu. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Futu's score of 0.17 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.03% compared to Futu's net margin of 41.87%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.52% beat Futu's return on equity.

Futu currently has a consensus price target of $162.80, suggesting a potential upside of 78.75%. Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of $639.00, suggesting a potential upside of 60.84%. Given Futu's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Futu is more favorable than Texas Pacific Land.

Futu pays an annual dividend of $2.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Futu pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Texas Pacific Land pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Texas Pacific Land has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Futu is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Futu currently has a consensus target price of $162.80, indicating a potential upside of 78.75%. Given Futu's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Futu is more favorable than Nomura.

In the previous week, Futu had 15 more articles in the media than Nomura. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Futu and 1 mentions for Nomura. Nomura's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Futu's score of 0.17 indicating that Nomura is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Nomura has higher revenue and earnings than Futu. Futu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomura, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Futu has a net margin of 41.87% compared to Nomura's net margin of 7.64%. Futu's return on equity of 26.48% beat Nomura's return on equity.

Futu pays an annual dividend of $2.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Nomura pays an annual dividend of $0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Futu pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nomura pays out 17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

15.1% of Nomura shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.2% of Futu shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Nomura shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Futu has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nomura has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Futu has higher revenue and earnings than W.P. Carey. Futu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than W.P. Carey, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Futu had 4 more articles in the media than W.P. Carey. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Futu and 12 mentions for W.P. Carey. W.P. Carey's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Futu's score of 0.17 indicating that W.P. Carey is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Futu has a net margin of 41.87% compared to W.P. Carey's net margin of 29.35%. Futu's return on equity of 26.48% beat W.P. Carey's return on equity.

Futu has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, W.P. Carey has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Futu pays an annual dividend of $2.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. W.P. Carey pays an annual dividend of $3.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Futu pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. W.P. Carey pays out 159.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. W.P. Carey has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. W.P. Carey is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Futu currently has a consensus price target of $162.80, suggesting a potential upside of 78.75%. W.P. Carey has a consensus price target of $76.90, suggesting a potential upside of 3.95%. Given Futu's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Futu is more favorable than W.P. Carey.

73.7% of W.P. Carey shares are held by institutional investors. 35.2% of Futu shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of W.P. Carey shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.