Futu Competitors

Interactive Brokers Group (NASDAQ:IBKR) and Futu (NASDAQ:FUTU) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

16.1% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Futu shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Interactive Brokers Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Interactive Brokers Group and Futu's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Interactive Brokers Group and Futu's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Interactive Brokers Group has higher revenue and earnings than Futu.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Interactive Brokers Group and Futu, as reported by MarketBeat.

Interactive Brokers Group currently has a consensus target price of $80.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.87%. Futu has a consensus target price of $219.16, indicating a potential upside of 84.34%. Given Futu's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Futu is more favorable than Interactive Brokers Group.

Volatility & Risk

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Futu has a beta of 1.76, suggesting that its share price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Credit Suisse Group (NYSE:CS) and Futu (NASDAQ:FUTU) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

2.1% of Credit Suisse Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Futu shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Credit Suisse Group and Futu's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Credit Suisse Group and Futu's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Credit Suisse Group has higher revenue and earnings than Futu.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Credit Suisse Group and Futu, as reported by MarketBeat.

Futu has a consensus price target of $219.16, indicating a potential upside of 84.34%. Given Futu's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Futu is more favorable than Credit Suisse Group.

Volatility & Risk

Credit Suisse Group has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Futu has a beta of 1.76, suggesting that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Futu beats Credit Suisse Group on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Raymond James (NYSE:RJF) and Futu (NASDAQ:FUTU) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

75.1% of Raymond James shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Futu shares are held by institutional investors. 10.8% of Raymond James shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Raymond James and Futu's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Raymond James and Futu's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Raymond James has higher revenue and earnings than Futu.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Raymond James and Futu, as reported by MarketBeat.

Raymond James currently has a consensus price target of $121.70, indicating a potential downside of 9.29%. Futu has a consensus price target of $219.16, indicating a potential upside of 84.34%. Given Futu's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Futu is more favorable than Raymond James.

Volatility & Risk

Raymond James has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Futu has a beta of 1.76, suggesting that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Raymond James beats Futu on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

MarketAxess (NASDAQ:MKTX) and Futu (NASDAQ:FUTU) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares MarketAxess and Futu's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

MarketAxess has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Futu has a beta of 1.76, suggesting that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares MarketAxess and Futu's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

MarketAxess has higher revenue and earnings than Futu.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

90.8% of MarketAxess shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Futu shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of MarketAxess shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for MarketAxess and Futu, as reported by MarketBeat.

MarketAxess currently has a consensus price target of $568.25, indicating a potential upside of 24.53%. Futu has a consensus price target of $219.16, indicating a potential upside of 84.34%. Given Futu's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Futu is more favorable than MarketAxess.

Nomura (NYSE:NMR) and Futu (NASDAQ:FUTU) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Nomura and Futu's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Nomura has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Futu has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nomura and Futu's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Nomura has higher revenue and earnings than Futu.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.9% of Nomura shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Futu shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Nomura and Futu, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Futu has a consensus price target of $219.16, indicating a potential upside of 84.34%. Given Futu's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Futu is more favorable than Nomura.

Summary

Futu beats Nomura on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

SEI Investments (NASDAQ:SEIC) and Futu (NASDAQ:FUTU) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares SEI Investments and Futu's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

SEI Investments has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Futu has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares SEI Investments and Futu's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SEI Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Futu.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

73.7% of SEI Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Futu shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.9% of SEI Investments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for SEI Investments and Futu, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

SEI Investments presently has a consensus price target of $71.8333, indicating a potential upside of 13.41%. Futu has a consensus price target of $219.16, indicating a potential upside of 84.34%. Given Futu's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Futu is more favorable than SEI Investments.