Free Trial

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) Competitors

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. logo
$37.57 +0.18 (+0.48%)
Closing price 10/9/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$37.58 +0.01 (+0.01%)
As of 10/9/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PECO vs. REG, AKR, BFS, BRX, and FRT

Should you buy Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. stock or one of its competitors? Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s main competitors and comparable companies include Regency Centers (REG), Acadia Realty Trust (AKR), Saul Centers (BFS), Brixmor Property Group (BRX), and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "retail reits" industry.

How does Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. compare to Regency Centers?

Regency Centers (NASDAQ:REG) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (NASDAQ:PECO) are both real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk, media sentiment and earnings.

Regency Centers pays an annual dividend of $3.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Regency Centers pays out 102.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Regency Centers has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Regency Centers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Regency Centers had 4 more articles in the media than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Regency Centers and 2 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Regency Centers' score of 0.41 indicating that Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Regency Centers
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

96.1% of Regency Centers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Regency Centers shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Regency Centers currently has a consensus price target of $83.21, suggesting a potential upside of 15.49%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a consensus price target of $43.30, suggesting a potential upside of 15.25%. Given Regency Centers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Regency Centers is more favorable than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Regency Centers
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Regency Centers has a net margin of 34.38% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s net margin of 19.14%. Regency Centers' return on equity of 8.04% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Regency Centers34.38% 8.04% 4.26%
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. 19.14%5.52%2.69%

Regency Centers has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Regency Centers has higher revenue and earnings than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Regency Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Regency Centers$1.55B8.49$527.46M$2.9524.42
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.$726.59M6.65$111.30M$1.1532.67

Summary

Regency Centers beats Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. on 17 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. compare to Acadia Realty Trust?

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (NASDAQ:PECO) and Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE:AKR) are both mid-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. currently has a consensus target price of $43.30, indicating a potential upside of 15.25%. Acadia Realty Trust has a consensus target price of $23.80, indicating a potential upside of 30.54%. Given Acadia Realty Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Acadia Realty Trust is more favorable than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Acadia Realty Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has higher revenue and earnings than Acadia Realty Trust. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acadia Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.$726.59M6.65$111.30M$1.1532.67
Acadia Realty Trust$410.76M6.10$16.90M$0.3453.62

In the previous week, Acadia Realty Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Acadia Realty Trust and 2 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Acadia Realty Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s score of 0.94 indicating that Acadia Realty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Acadia Realty Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.7% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acadia Realty Trust has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a net margin of 19.14% compared to Acadia Realty Trust's net margin of 12.14%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.52% beat Acadia Realty Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.19.14% 5.52% 2.69%
Acadia Realty Trust 12.14%1.85%1.04%

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Acadia Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Acadia Realty Trust pays out 235.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Acadia Realty Trust has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Acadia Realty Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Acadia Realty Trust beats Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. compare to Saul Centers?

Saul Centers (NYSE:BFS) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (NASDAQ:PECO) are both real estate companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

50.0% of Saul Centers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. 51.0% of Saul Centers shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Saul Centers has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. had 1 more articles in the media than Saul Centers. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and 1 mentions for Saul Centers. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Saul Centers' score of 0.71 indicating that Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Saul Centers
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a consensus price target of $43.30, indicating a potential upside of 15.25%. Given Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is more favorable than Saul Centers.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Saul Centers
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a net margin of 19.14% compared to Saul Centers' net margin of 11.54%. Saul Centers' return on equity of 11.97% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Saul Centers11.54% 11.97% 1.61%
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. 19.14%5.52%2.69%

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has higher revenue and earnings than Saul Centers. Saul Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Saul Centers$289.84M2.56$37.51M$0.9730.96
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.$726.59M6.65$111.30M$1.1532.67

Saul Centers pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Saul Centers pays out 243.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. beats Saul Centers on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. compare to Brixmor Property Group?

Brixmor Property Group (NYSE:BRX) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (NASDAQ:PECO) are both mid-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Brixmor Property Group has higher revenue and earnings than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Brixmor Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brixmor Property Group$1.37B6.10$386.23M$1.4019.49
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.$726.59M6.65$111.30M$1.1532.67

Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Brixmor Property Group presently has a consensus target price of $33.82, indicating a potential upside of 23.96%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a consensus target price of $43.30, indicating a potential upside of 15.25%. Given Brixmor Property Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Brixmor Property Group is more favorable than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brixmor Property Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

In the previous week, Brixmor Property Group had 4 more articles in the media than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Brixmor Property Group and 2 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Brixmor Property Group's score of 0.21 indicating that Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brixmor Property Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Brixmor Property Group pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Brixmor Property Group pays out 87.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brixmor Property Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Brixmor Property Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Brixmor Property Group has a net margin of 30.82% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s net margin of 19.14%. Brixmor Property Group's return on equity of 14.38% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brixmor Property Group30.82% 14.38% 4.77%
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. 19.14%5.52%2.69%

Summary

Brixmor Property Group beats Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. compare to Federal Realty Investment Trust?

Federal Realty Investment Trust (NYSE:FRT) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (NASDAQ:PECO) are both mid-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Federal Realty Investment Trust currently has a consensus price target of $126.19, suggesting a potential upside of 18.76%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a consensus price target of $43.30, suggesting a potential upside of 15.25%. Given Federal Realty Investment Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Federal Realty Investment Trust is more favorable than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Federal Realty Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

In the previous week, Federal Realty Investment Trust and Federal Realty Investment Trust both had 2 articles in the media. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's score of 0.85 indicating that Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Federal Realty Investment Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Federal Realty Investment Trust$1.28B7.18$411.08M$4.9521.47
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.$726.59M6.65$111.30M$1.1532.67

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 32.67% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s net margin of 19.14%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 13.65% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Federal Realty Investment Trust32.67% 13.65% 4.83%
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. 19.14%5.52%2.69%

Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 93.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Federal Realty Investment Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Federal Realty Investment Trust beats Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. on 16 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PECO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PECO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PECO vs. The Competition

MetricPhillips Edison & Company, Inc.Retail REITs IndustryReal Estate SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$4.84B$6.90B$5.17B$13.30B
Dividend Yield3.67%5.45%6.71%22.58%
P/E Ratio32.6726.5827.3026.14
Price / Sales6.6591.52119.2387.88
Price / Cash12.5656.4934.0553.71
Price / Book1.832.311.746.33
Net Income$111.30M$272.91M-$73.94M$382.15M
7 Day Performance-0.50%-1.80%-0.52%-1.40%
1 Month Performance-2.19%-4.17%-3.86%-3.35%
1 Year Performance12.99%8.33%-5.78%1.49%

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
3.7613 of 5 stars
$37.57
+0.5%
$43.30
+15.3%
+13.0%$4.84B$726.59M32.67320
REG
Regency Centers
4.0026 of 5 stars
$71.51
-0.1%
$83.63
+16.9%
+2.4%$13.09B$1.55B24.24507
AKR
Acadia Realty Trust
3.5383 of 5 stars
$18.59
-0.2%
$23.80
+28.1%
-3.9%$2.55B$410.76M54.66138
BFS
Saul Centers
1.9739 of 5 stars
$29.81
-1.2%
N/A-0.7%$736.78M$289.84M30.7398
BRX
Brixmor Property Group
4.4009 of 5 stars
$27.34
-0.2%
$34.18
+25.0%
+2.8%$8.39B$1.37B19.53464

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PECO) was last updated on 10/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners