Go Pro

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) Competitors

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. logo
$39.28 +0.07 (+0.18%)
As of 03:39 PM Eastern

PECO vs. REG, AKR, BFS, BRX, and FRT

Should you buy Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. stock or one of its competitors? Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s main competitors and comparable companies include Regency Centers (REG), Acadia Realty Trust (AKR), Saul Centers (BFS), Brixmor Property Group (BRX), and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "retail reits" industry.

How does Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. compare to Regency Centers?

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (NASDAQ:PECO) and Regency Centers (NASDAQ:REG) are both real estate companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Regency Centers shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Regency Centers shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. had 2 more articles in the media than Regency Centers. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and 11 mentions for Regency Centers. Regency Centers' average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s score of 0.99 indicating that Regency Centers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
5 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Regency Centers
11 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. presently has a consensus price target of $44.33, indicating a potential upside of 12.55%. Regency Centers has a consensus price target of $83.82, indicating a potential upside of 10.50%. Given Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is more favorable than Regency Centers.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Regency Centers
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Regency Centers pays an annual dividend of $3.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 113.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Regency Centers pays out 102.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Regency Centers has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Regency Centers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Regency Centers has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Regency Centers has higher revenue and earnings than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Regency Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.$726.59M6.98$111.30M$1.1534.25
Regency Centers$1.55B8.94$527.46M$2.9525.72

Regency Centers has a net margin of 34.38% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s net margin of 19.14%. Regency Centers' return on equity of 8.04% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.19.14% 5.52% 2.69%
Regency Centers 34.38%8.04%4.26%

Summary

Regency Centers beats Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. compare to Acadia Realty Trust?

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (NASDAQ:PECO) and Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE:AKR) are both mid-cap real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. had 10 more articles in the media than Acadia Realty Trust. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and 3 mentions for Acadia Realty Trust. Acadia Realty Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s score of 0.99 indicating that Acadia Realty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
5 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Acadia Realty Trust
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.7% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has higher revenue and earnings than Acadia Realty Trust. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acadia Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.$726.59M6.98$111.30M$1.1534.25
Acadia Realty Trust$410.76M6.75$16.90M$0.3459.41

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a net margin of 19.14% compared to Acadia Realty Trust's net margin of 12.14%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.52% beat Acadia Realty Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.19.14% 5.52% 2.69%
Acadia Realty Trust 12.14%1.85%1.04%

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Acadia Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 113.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Acadia Realty Trust pays out 235.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Acadia Realty Trust has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Acadia Realty Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acadia Realty Trust has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. currently has a consensus target price of $44.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.55%. Acadia Realty Trust has a consensus target price of $24.20, suggesting a potential upside of 19.80%. Given Acadia Realty Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Acadia Realty Trust is more favorable than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Acadia Realty Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88

Summary

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and Acadia Realty Trust tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. compare to Saul Centers?

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (NASDAQ:PECO) and Saul Centers (NYSE:BFS) are both real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. currently has a consensus target price of $44.33, indicating a potential upside of 12.55%. Given Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is more favorable than Saul Centers.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Saul Centers
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Saul Centers has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a net margin of 19.14% compared to Saul Centers' net margin of 11.54%. Saul Centers' return on equity of 11.97% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.19.14% 5.52% 2.69%
Saul Centers 11.54%11.97%1.61%

80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.0% of Saul Centers shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 51.0% of Saul Centers shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. had 11 more articles in the media than Saul Centers. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and 2 mentions for Saul Centers. Saul Centers' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s score of 0.99 indicating that Saul Centers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
5 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Saul Centers
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Saul Centers pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 113.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Saul Centers pays out 243.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has higher revenue and earnings than Saul Centers. Saul Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.$726.59M6.98$111.30M$1.1534.25
Saul Centers$289.84M2.78$37.51M$0.9733.63

Summary

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. beats Saul Centers on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. compare to Brixmor Property Group?

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (NASDAQ:PECO) and Brixmor Property Group (NYSE:BRX) are both mid-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Brixmor Property Group has higher revenue and earnings than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Brixmor Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.$726.59M6.98$111.30M$1.1534.25
Brixmor Property Group$1.37B6.58$386.23M$1.4021.00

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Brixmor Property Group pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 113.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brixmor Property Group pays out 87.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Brixmor Property Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Brixmor Property Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. had 5 more articles in the media than Brixmor Property Group. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and 8 mentions for Brixmor Property Group. Brixmor Property Group's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s score of 0.99 indicating that Brixmor Property Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
5 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Brixmor Property Group
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Brixmor Property Group has a net margin of 30.82% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s net margin of 19.14%. Brixmor Property Group's return on equity of 14.38% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.19.14% 5.52% 2.69%
Brixmor Property Group 30.82%14.38%4.77%

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. currently has a consensus price target of $44.33, indicating a potential upside of 12.55%. Brixmor Property Group has a consensus price target of $34.33, indicating a potential upside of 16.78%. Given Brixmor Property Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Brixmor Property Group is more favorable than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Brixmor Property Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93

Summary

Brixmor Property Group beats Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. compare to Federal Realty Investment Trust?

Federal Realty Investment Trust (NYSE:FRT) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (NASDAQ:PECO) are both real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. had 11 more articles in the media than Federal Realty Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and 2 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's score of 0.69 indicating that Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Federal Realty Investment Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
5 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 32.67% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s net margin of 19.14%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 13.65% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Federal Realty Investment Trust32.67% 13.65% 4.83%
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. 19.14%5.52%2.69%

Federal Realty Investment Trust currently has a consensus target price of $128.44, suggesting a potential upside of 9.56%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a consensus target price of $44.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.55%. Given Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is more favorable than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Federal Realty Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.72
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Federal Realty Investment Trust$1.34B7.59$411.08M$4.9523.68
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.$726.59M6.98$111.30M$1.1534.25

93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 93.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 113.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Federal Realty Investment Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Federal Realty Investment Trust beats Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PECO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PECO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PECO vs. The Competition

MetricPhillips Edison & Company, Inc.Retail REITs IndustryReal Estate SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$5.07B$7.40B$5.55B$12.92B
Dividend Yield3.34%5.18%6.36%8.56%
P/E Ratio34.2529.5628.4025.43
Price / Sales6.9896.33126.40123.68
Price / Cash13.0157.2934.5652.08
Price / Book1.902.511.866.17
Net Income$111.30M$272.91M-$64.37M$349.24M
7 Day Performance0.43%-1.82%-1.22%-1.46%
1 Month Performance-6.66%-4.81%-1.88%2.47%
1 Year Performance11.08%11.84%12.45%15.80%

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
2.8844 of 5 stars
$39.28
+0.2%
$44.33
+12.9%
+11.6%$5.06B$726.59M34.16290
REG
Regency Centers
4.2722 of 5 stars
$74.94
-0.8%
$83.82
+11.9%
+4.8%$13.72B$1.55B25.40440
AKR
Acadia Realty Trust
3.4001 of 5 stars
$20.51
-1.0%
$24.20
+18.0%
+2.8%$2.82B$410.76M60.32120
BFS
Saul Centers
1.5885 of 5 stars
$32.78
-1.5%
N/A-2.2%$810.32M$289.84M33.79110
BRX
Brixmor Property Group
4.4754 of 5 stars
$28.86
-1.1%
$34.33
+19.0%
+6.1%$8.86B$1.37B20.61500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PECO) was last updated on 9/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners