Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) Competitors

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has higher revenue and earnings than Acadia Realty Trust. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acadia Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acadia Realty Trust has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.7% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. presently has a consensus price target of $41.43, indicating a potential downside of 1.31%. Acadia Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 6.61%. Given Acadia Realty Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Acadia Realty Trust is more favorable than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc..

In the previous week, Acadia Realty Trust had 6 more articles in the media than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Acadia Realty Trust and 1 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Acadia Realty Trust's score of 1.13 indicating that Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Acadia Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 141.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Acadia Realty Trust pays out 266.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Acadia Realty Trust has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Acadia Realty Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a net margin of 15.61% compared to Acadia Realty Trust's net margin of 9.77%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.46% beat Acadia Realty Trust's return on equity.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Saul Centers has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a net margin of 15.61% compared to Saul Centers' net margin of 12.43%. Saul Centers' return on equity of 12.44% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. presently has a consensus price target of $41.43, indicating a potential downside of 1.31%. Given Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is more favorable than Saul Centers.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has higher revenue and earnings than Saul Centers. Saul Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.0% of Saul Centers shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 51.0% of Saul Centers shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. both had 1 articles in the media. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Saul Centers' score of 0.00 indicating that Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Saul Centers pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 141.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Saul Centers pays out 222.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Brixmor Property Group had 5 more articles in the media than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Brixmor Property Group and 1 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Brixmor Property Group's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s score of 1.20 indicating that Brixmor Property Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Brixmor Property Group has higher revenue and earnings than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Brixmor Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. currently has a consensus target price of $41.43, suggesting a potential downside of 1.31%. Brixmor Property Group has a consensus target price of $32.64, suggesting a potential upside of 0.26%. Given Brixmor Property Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brixmor Property Group is more favorable than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc..

Brixmor Property Group has a net margin of 31.99% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s net margin of 15.61%. Brixmor Property Group's return on equity of 14.85% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Brixmor Property Group pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 141.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brixmor Property Group pays out 85.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Brixmor Property Group has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Brixmor Property Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 38.63% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s net margin of 15.61%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 15.99% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Federal Realty Investment Trust had 3 more articles in the media than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust and 1 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's score of 0.65 indicating that Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Federal Realty Investment Trust currently has a consensus price target of $123.21, suggesting a potential downside of 2.00%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.43, suggesting a potential downside of 1.31%. Given Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is more favorable than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 141.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Federal Realty Investment Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.