Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) Competitors

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. presently has a consensus price target of $43.30, suggesting a potential upside of 14.82%. Acadia Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $23.80, suggesting a potential upside of 30.30%. Given Acadia Realty Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Acadia Realty Trust is more favorable than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc..

In the previous week, Acadia Realty Trust had 3 more articles in the media than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Acadia Realty Trust and 2 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Acadia Realty Trust's score of 0.90 indicating that Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Acadia Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Acadia Realty Trust pays out 235.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Acadia Realty Trust has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Acadia Realty Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acadia Realty Trust has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.7% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has higher revenue and earnings than Acadia Realty Trust. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acadia Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a net margin of 19.14% compared to Acadia Realty Trust's net margin of 12.14%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.52% beat Acadia Realty Trust's return on equity.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a consensus target price of $43.30, indicating a potential upside of 14.82%. Given Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is more favorable than Saul Centers.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a net margin of 19.14% compared to Saul Centers' net margin of 11.54%. Saul Centers' return on equity of 11.97% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

50.0% of Saul Centers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. 51.0% of Saul Centers shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Saul Centers and Saul Centers both had 2 articles in the media. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Saul Centers' score of 0.71 indicating that Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Saul Centers pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Saul Centers pays out 243.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Saul Centers has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has higher revenue and earnings than Saul Centers. Saul Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Brixmor Property Group pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brixmor Property Group pays out 87.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Brixmor Property Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Brixmor Property Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. currently has a consensus price target of $43.30, indicating a potential upside of 14.82%. Brixmor Property Group has a consensus price target of $33.45, indicating a potential upside of 22.57%. Given Brixmor Property Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brixmor Property Group is more favorable than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc..

80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Brixmor Property Group has a net margin of 30.82% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s net margin of 19.14%. Brixmor Property Group's return on equity of 14.38% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

In the previous week, Brixmor Property Group had 5 more articles in the media than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Brixmor Property Group and 2 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Brixmor Property Group's score of -0.08 indicating that Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Brixmor Property Group has higher revenue and earnings than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Brixmor Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 93.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Federal Realty Investment Trust has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years. Federal Realty Investment Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. currently has a consensus price target of $43.30, suggesting a potential upside of 14.82%. Federal Realty Investment Trust has a consensus price target of $125.06, suggesting a potential upside of 18.31%. Given Federal Realty Investment Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Federal Realty Investment Trust is more favorable than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc..

In the previous week, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. had 2 more articles in the media than Federal Realty Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and 0 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 32.67% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s net margin of 19.14%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 13.65% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.