Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) Competitors

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a net margin of 19.14% compared to Acadia Realty Trust's net margin of 12.14%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.52% beat Acadia Realty Trust's return on equity.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acadia Realty Trust has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.7% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Acadia Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Acadia Realty Trust pays out 235.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Acadia Realty Trust has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Acadia Realty Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. presently has a consensus price target of $44.22, suggesting a potential upside of 20.43%. Acadia Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $24.20, suggesting a potential upside of 26.60%. Given Acadia Realty Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Acadia Realty Trust is more favorable than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc..

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has higher revenue and earnings than Acadia Realty Trust. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acadia Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Acadia Realty Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Acadia Realty Trust and 0 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Acadia Realty Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s score of -0.50 indicating that Acadia Realty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

50.0% of Saul Centers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. 51.0% of Saul Centers shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a consensus price target of $44.22, indicating a potential upside of 20.43%. Given Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is more favorable than Saul Centers.

Saul Centers pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Saul Centers pays out 243.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Saul Centers has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has higher revenue and earnings than Saul Centers. Saul Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Saul Centers had 7 more articles in the media than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Saul Centers and 0 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Saul Centers' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s score of -0.50 indicating that Saul Centers is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a net margin of 19.14% compared to Saul Centers' net margin of 11.54%. Saul Centers' return on equity of 11.97% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. currently has a consensus price target of $44.22, indicating a potential upside of 20.43%. Brixmor Property Group has a consensus price target of $34.80, indicating a potential upside of 25.82%. Given Brixmor Property Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brixmor Property Group is more favorable than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc..

Brixmor Property Group has higher revenue and earnings than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Brixmor Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Brixmor Property Group had 3 more articles in the media than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Brixmor Property Group and 0 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Brixmor Property Group's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s score of -0.50 indicating that Brixmor Property Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Brixmor Property Group pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brixmor Property Group pays out 87.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Brixmor Property Group has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Brixmor Property Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Brixmor Property Group has a net margin of 30.82% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s net margin of 19.14%. Brixmor Property Group's return on equity of 14.38% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Federal Realty Investment Trust had 8 more articles in the media than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Federal Realty Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s score of -0.50 indicating that Federal Realty Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Federal Realty Investment Trust currently has a consensus price target of $128.69, indicating a potential upside of 17.62%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a consensus price target of $44.22, indicating a potential upside of 20.43%. Given Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is more favorable than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 32.67% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s net margin of 19.14%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 13.65% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 91.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Federal Realty Investment Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.