Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) Competitors

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a net margin of 15.61% compared to Acadia Realty Trust's net margin of 9.77%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.46% beat Acadia Realty Trust's return on equity.

97.7% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has higher revenue and earnings than Acadia Realty Trust. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acadia Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Acadia Realty Trust has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Acadia Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Acadia Realty Trust pays out 266.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 141.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Acadia Realty Trust has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Acadia Realty Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Acadia Realty Trust had 6 more articles in the media than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Acadia Realty Trust and 2 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Acadia Realty Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s score of 1.46 indicating that Acadia Realty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Acadia Realty Trust currently has a consensus price target of $23.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.59%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.13%. Given Acadia Realty Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Acadia Realty Trust is more favorable than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc..

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a net margin of 15.61% compared to Saul Centers' net margin of 12.94%. Saul Centers' return on equity of 12.48% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.13%. Given Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is more favorable than Saul Centers.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has higher revenue and earnings than Saul Centers. Saul Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Saul Centers pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Saul Centers pays out 216.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 141.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

50.0% of Saul Centers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. 51.0% of Saul Centers shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Saul Centers has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Saul Centers and Saul Centers both had 2 articles in the media. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Saul Centers' score of 0.89 indicating that Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Brixmor Property Group has a net margin of 31.99% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s net margin of 15.61%. Brixmor Property Group's return on equity of 14.85% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. currently has a consensus price target of $40.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.13%. Brixmor Property Group has a consensus price target of $32.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.28%. Given Brixmor Property Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brixmor Property Group is more favorable than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc..

In the previous week, Brixmor Property Group had 12 more articles in the media than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Brixmor Property Group and 2 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Brixmor Property Group's score of 1.01 indicating that Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Brixmor Property Group pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 141.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brixmor Property Group pays out 85.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Brixmor Property Group has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Brixmor Property Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Brixmor Property Group has higher revenue and earnings than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Brixmor Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 38.63% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s net margin of 15.61%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 15.99% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Federal Realty Investment Trust presently has a consensus price target of $113.13, indicating a potential downside of 1.87%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.13%. Given Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is more favorable than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

In the previous week, Federal Realty Investment Trust had 18 more articles in the media than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust and 2 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's score of 1.14 indicating that Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its share price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 141.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Federal Realty Investment Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.