Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) Competitors

Regency Centers has higher revenue and earnings than Kite Realty Group Trust. Kite Realty Group Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regency Centers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Regency Centers has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kite Realty Group Trust has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Regency Centers pays an annual dividend of $3.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Kite Realty Group Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Regency Centers pays out 102.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kite Realty Group Trust pays out 71.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Regency Centers has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Kite Realty Group Trust has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Kite Realty Group Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

96.1% of Regency Centers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Kite Realty Group Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Regency Centers shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Kite Realty Group Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Regency Centers had 8 more articles in the media than Kite Realty Group Trust. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Regency Centers and 3 mentions for Kite Realty Group Trust. Kite Realty Group Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Regency Centers' score of 1.57 indicating that Kite Realty Group Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Regency Centers presently has a consensus target price of $83.82, indicating a potential upside of 10.45%. Kite Realty Group Trust has a consensus target price of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.68%. Given Kite Realty Group Trust's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kite Realty Group Trust is more favorable than Regency Centers.

Kite Realty Group Trust has a net margin of 41.80% compared to Regency Centers' net margin of 34.38%. Kite Realty Group Trust's return on equity of 11.26% beat Regency Centers' return on equity.

Kite Realty Group Trust has a net margin of 41.80% compared to Acadia Realty Trust's net margin of 12.14%. Kite Realty Group Trust's return on equity of 11.26% beat Acadia Realty Trust's return on equity.

Kite Realty Group Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Acadia Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Kite Realty Group Trust pays out 71.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Acadia Realty Trust pays out 235.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kite Realty Group Trust has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Acadia Realty Trust has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Kite Realty Group Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Kite Realty Group Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Acadia Realty Trust. Kite Realty Group Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acadia Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

90.8% of Kite Realty Group Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.7% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Kite Realty Group Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Kite Realty Group Trust and Kite Realty Group Trust both had 3 articles in the media. Kite Realty Group Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Acadia Realty Trust's score of 1.61 indicating that Kite Realty Group Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Kite Realty Group Trust currently has a consensus price target of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.68%. Acadia Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $24.20, suggesting a potential upside of 19.86%. Given Acadia Realty Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Acadia Realty Trust is more favorable than Kite Realty Group Trust.

Kite Realty Group Trust has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acadia Realty Trust has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kite Realty Group Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Saul Centers. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Kite Realty Group Trust and 2 mentions for Saul Centers. Kite Realty Group Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Saul Centers' score of 1.60 indicating that Kite Realty Group Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Saul Centers has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kite Realty Group Trust has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Kite Realty Group Trust has a consensus target price of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.68%. Given Kite Realty Group Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kite Realty Group Trust is more favorable than Saul Centers.

Kite Realty Group Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Saul Centers. Kite Realty Group Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Saul Centers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Saul Centers pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Kite Realty Group Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Saul Centers pays out 243.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kite Realty Group Trust pays out 71.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kite Realty Group Trust has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

50.0% of Saul Centers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Kite Realty Group Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 51.0% of Saul Centers shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Kite Realty Group Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kite Realty Group Trust has a net margin of 41.80% compared to Saul Centers' net margin of 11.54%. Saul Centers' return on equity of 11.97% beat Kite Realty Group Trust's return on equity.

Kite Realty Group Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Brixmor Property Group pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Kite Realty Group Trust pays out 71.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brixmor Property Group pays out 87.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kite Realty Group Trust has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Brixmor Property Group has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Kite Realty Group Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Brixmor Property Group has higher revenue and earnings than Kite Realty Group Trust. Kite Realty Group Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brixmor Property Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

90.8% of Kite Realty Group Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Kite Realty Group Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kite Realty Group Trust has a net margin of 41.80% compared to Brixmor Property Group's net margin of 30.82%. Brixmor Property Group's return on equity of 14.38% beat Kite Realty Group Trust's return on equity.

In the previous week, Brixmor Property Group had 5 more articles in the media than Kite Realty Group Trust. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Brixmor Property Group and 3 mentions for Kite Realty Group Trust. Brixmor Property Group's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat Kite Realty Group Trust's score of 1.61 indicating that Brixmor Property Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Kite Realty Group Trust currently has a consensus target price of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.68%. Brixmor Property Group has a consensus target price of $34.33, indicating a potential upside of 16.90%. Given Brixmor Property Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Brixmor Property Group is more favorable than Kite Realty Group Trust.

Kite Realty Group Trust has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.