Regency Centers Competitors

Regency Centers (NASDAQ:REG) and Simon Property Group (NYSE:SPG) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.2% of Regency Centers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.2% of Simon Property Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Regency Centers shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.9% of Simon Property Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Regency Centers pays an annual dividend of $2.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Simon Property Group pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Regency Centers pays out 61.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Simon Property Group pays out 43.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regency Centers has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Simon Property Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Simon Property Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Regency Centers and Simon Property Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Simon Property Group has higher revenue and earnings than Regency Centers. Simon Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regency Centers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Regency Centers has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Simon Property Group has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its share price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Regency Centers and Simon Property Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Regency Centers and Simon Property Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Regency Centers presently has a consensus price target of $52.2273, suggesting a potential downside of 12.16%. Simon Property Group has a consensus price target of $102.75, suggesting a potential downside of 12.27%. Given Regency Centers' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Regency Centers is more favorable than Simon Property Group.

Summary

Simon Property Group beats Regency Centers on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Regency Centers (NASDAQ:REG) and Welltower (NYSE:WELL) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and profitability.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

89.2% of Regency Centers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.2% of Welltower shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Regency Centers shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Welltower shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Regency Centers pays an annual dividend of $2.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Welltower pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Regency Centers pays out 61.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Welltower pays out 58.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regency Centers has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Welltower has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Regency Centers and Welltower's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Welltower has higher revenue and earnings than Regency Centers. Regency Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Welltower, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Regency Centers has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Welltower has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Regency Centers and Welltower's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Regency Centers and Welltower, as reported by MarketBeat.

Regency Centers presently has a consensus price target of $52.2273, indicating a potential downside of 12.16%. Welltower has a consensus price target of $63.3750, indicating a potential downside of 16.27%. Given Regency Centers' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Regency Centers is more favorable than Welltower.

Summary

Welltower beats Regency Centers on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Regency Centers (NASDAQ:REG) and SBA Communications (NASDAQ:SBAC) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and profitability.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

89.2% of Regency Centers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of SBA Communications shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Regency Centers shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of SBA Communications shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Regency Centers pays an annual dividend of $2.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. SBA Communications pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Regency Centers pays out 61.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SBA Communications pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regency Centers has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and SBA Communications has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Regency Centers and SBA Communications' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Regency Centers has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SBA Communications. Regency Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SBA Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Regency Centers has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SBA Communications has a beta of 0.21, indicating that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Regency Centers and SBA Communications' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Regency Centers and SBA Communications, as reported by MarketBeat.

Regency Centers presently has a consensus price target of $52.2273, indicating a potential downside of 12.16%. SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $316.0833, indicating a potential upside of 9.63%. Given SBA Communications' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SBA Communications is more favorable than Regency Centers.

Summary

SBA Communications beats Regency Centers on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Regency Centers (NASDAQ:REG) and Weyerhaeuser (NYSE:WY) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and profitability.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

89.2% of Regency Centers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Weyerhaeuser shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Regency Centers shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Weyerhaeuser shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Regency Centers pays an annual dividend of $2.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Weyerhaeuser pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Regency Centers pays out 61.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Weyerhaeuser pays out 174.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Regency Centers has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Weyerhaeuser has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Regency Centers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Regency Centers and Weyerhaeuser's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Regency Centers has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Weyerhaeuser. Regency Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Weyerhaeuser, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Regency Centers has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Weyerhaeuser has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Regency Centers and Weyerhaeuser's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Regency Centers and Weyerhaeuser, as reported by MarketBeat.

Regency Centers presently has a consensus price target of $52.2273, indicating a potential downside of 12.16%. Weyerhaeuser has a consensus price target of $32.4286, indicating a potential downside of 17.53%. Given Regency Centers' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Regency Centers is more favorable than Weyerhaeuser.

Summary

Regency Centers beats Weyerhaeuser on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Regency Centers (NASDAQ:REG) and Equity Residential (NYSE:EQR) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and profitability.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

89.2% of Regency Centers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.6% of Equity Residential shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Regency Centers shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Equity Residential shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Regency Centers pays an annual dividend of $2.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Equity Residential pays an annual dividend of $2.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Regency Centers pays out 61.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Equity Residential pays out 69.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regency Centers has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Equity Residential has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Regency Centers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Regency Centers and Equity Residential's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Equity Residential has higher revenue and earnings than Regency Centers. Regency Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equity Residential, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Regency Centers has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Equity Residential has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Regency Centers and Equity Residential's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Regency Centers and Equity Residential, as reported by MarketBeat.

Regency Centers presently has a consensus price target of $52.2273, indicating a potential downside of 12.16%. Equity Residential has a consensus price target of $65.4375, indicating a potential downside of 9.89%. Given Equity Residential's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Equity Residential is more favorable than Regency Centers.

Summary

Equity Residential beats Regency Centers on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Regency Centers (NASDAQ:REG) and AvalonBay Communities (NYSE:AVB) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and profitability.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

89.2% of Regency Centers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.0% of AvalonBay Communities shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Regency Centers shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of AvalonBay Communities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Regency Centers and AvalonBay Communities' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Regency Centers pays an annual dividend of $2.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. AvalonBay Communities pays an annual dividend of $6.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Regency Centers pays out 61.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AvalonBay Communities pays out 68.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regency Centers has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and AvalonBay Communities has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Regency Centers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Regency Centers and AvalonBay Communities, as reported by MarketBeat.

Regency Centers presently has a consensus price target of $52.2273, indicating a potential downside of 12.16%. AvalonBay Communities has a consensus price target of $178.0667, indicating a potential downside of 6.19%. Given AvalonBay Communities' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe AvalonBay Communities is more favorable than Regency Centers.

Risk & Volatility

Regency Centers has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AvalonBay Communities has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Regency Centers and AvalonBay Communities' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

AvalonBay Communities has higher revenue and earnings than Regency Centers. Regency Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AvalonBay Communities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

AvalonBay Communities beats Regency Centers on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.