Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) Competitors

93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Regency Centers shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Regency Centers shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Regency Centers has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Regency Centers had 2 more articles in the media than Federal Realty Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Regency Centers and 4 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust. Regency Centers' average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's score of 0.65 indicating that Regency Centers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Federal Realty Investment Trust currently has a consensus price target of $123.21, indicating a potential downside of 2.00%. Regency Centers has a consensus price target of $82.27, indicating a potential upside of 2.47%. Given Regency Centers' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Regency Centers is more favorable than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 38.63% compared to Regency Centers' net margin of 34.47%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 15.99% beat Regency Centers' return on equity.

Regency Centers has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Realty Investment Trust. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regency Centers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Regency Centers pays an annual dividend of $3.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Regency Centers pays out 104.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Regency Centers has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acadia Realty Trust has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 38.63% compared to Acadia Realty Trust's net margin of 9.77%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 15.99% beat Acadia Realty Trust's return on equity.

Federal Realty Investment Trust presently has a consensus price target of $123.21, indicating a potential downside of 2.00%. Acadia Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 6.61%. Given Acadia Realty Trust's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Acadia Realty Trust is more favorable than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Acadia Realty Trust. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acadia Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.7% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Acadia Realty Trust had 3 more articles in the media than Federal Realty Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Acadia Realty Trust and 4 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust. Acadia Realty Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's score of 0.65 indicating that Acadia Realty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Acadia Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Acadia Realty Trust pays out 266.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Acadia Realty Trust has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 38.63% compared to Brixmor Property Group's net margin of 31.99%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 15.99% beat Brixmor Property Group's return on equity.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brixmor Property Group. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brixmor Property Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Brixmor Property Group had 2 more articles in the media than Federal Realty Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Brixmor Property Group and 4 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust. Brixmor Property Group's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's score of 0.65 indicating that Brixmor Property Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Brixmor Property Group pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brixmor Property Group pays out 85.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Brixmor Property Group has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Federal Realty Investment Trust currently has a consensus price target of $123.21, indicating a potential downside of 2.00%. Brixmor Property Group has a consensus price target of $32.64, indicating a potential upside of 0.26%. Given Brixmor Property Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Brixmor Property Group is more favorable than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CBRE Group had 6 more articles in the media than Federal Realty Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for CBRE Group and 4 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust. CBRE Group's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's score of 0.65 indicating that CBRE Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

CBRE Group presently has a consensus target price of $180.29, suggesting a potential upside of 35.39%. Federal Realty Investment Trust has a consensus target price of $123.21, suggesting a potential downside of 2.00%. Given CBRE Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe CBRE Group is more favorable than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

CBRE Group has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Realty Investment Trust. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CBRE Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 38.63% compared to CBRE Group's net margin of 3.11%. CBRE Group's return on equity of 24.08% beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity.

CBRE Group has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

98.4% of CBRE Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of CBRE Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.