Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) Competitors

Acadia Realty Trust presently has a consensus target price of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.59%. Federal Realty Investment Trust has a consensus target price of $113.13, suggesting a potential downside of 1.87%. Given Acadia Realty Trust's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Acadia Realty Trust is more favorable than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

97.7% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Acadia Realty Trust has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Acadia Realty Trust. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acadia Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Federal Realty Investment Trust had 8 more articles in the media than Acadia Realty Trust. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust and 12 mentions for Acadia Realty Trust. Acadia Realty Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's score of 1.14 indicating that Acadia Realty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Acadia Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Acadia Realty Trust pays out 266.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Acadia Realty Trust has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Federal Realty Investment Trust has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years. Federal Realty Investment Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 38.63% compared to Acadia Realty Trust's net margin of 9.77%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 15.99% beat Acadia Realty Trust's return on equity.

Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Brixmor Property Group pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brixmor Property Group pays out 85.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust has raised its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Brixmor Property Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Federal Realty Investment Trust had 5 more articles in the media than Brixmor Property Group. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust and 15 mentions for Brixmor Property Group. Federal Realty Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Brixmor Property Group's score of 1.01 indicating that Federal Realty Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 38.63% compared to Brixmor Property Group's net margin of 31.99%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 15.99% beat Brixmor Property Group's return on equity.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brixmor Property Group. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brixmor Property Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Federal Realty Investment Trust presently has a consensus price target of $113.13, suggesting a potential downside of 1.87%. Brixmor Property Group has a consensus price target of $32.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.28%. Given Brixmor Property Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brixmor Property Group is more favorable than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Federal Realty Investment Trust presently has a consensus price target of $113.13, suggesting a potential downside of 1.87%. CBRE Group has a consensus price target of $180.29, suggesting a potential upside of 26.47%. Given CBRE Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CBRE Group is more favorable than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its share price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CBRE Group has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Federal Realty Investment Trust had 4 more articles in the media than CBRE Group. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust and 16 mentions for CBRE Group. Federal Realty Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat CBRE Group's score of 1.12 indicating that Federal Realty Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 38.63% compared to CBRE Group's net margin of 3.11%. CBRE Group's return on equity of 24.08% beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity.

93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of CBRE Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of CBRE Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CBRE Group has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Realty Investment Trust. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CBRE Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Kimco Realty pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kimco Realty pays out 120.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust has raised its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Kimco Realty has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Kimco Realty has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Realty Investment Trust. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimco Realty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kimco Realty has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Federal Realty Investment Trust presently has a consensus price target of $113.13, suggesting a potential downside of 1.87%. Kimco Realty has a consensus price target of $24.71, suggesting a potential upside of 4.97%. Given Kimco Realty's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kimco Realty is more favorable than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

In the previous week, Kimco Realty had 1 more articles in the media than Federal Realty Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Kimco Realty and 20 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust. Federal Realty Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Kimco Realty's score of 0.68 indicating that Federal Realty Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 38.63% compared to Kimco Realty's net margin of 28.54%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 15.99% beat Kimco Realty's return on equity.

93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.3% of Kimco Realty shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Kimco Realty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.