Go Pro

Flora Growth (FLGC) Competitors

Flora Growth logo
$4.86 +0.02 (+0.41%)
As of 10/2/2026

FLGC vs. LFWD, FEMY, ICU, MODD, and CUPR

Should you buy Flora Growth stock or one of its competitors? Flora Growth's main competitors and comparable companies include Lifeward (LFWD), Femasys (FEMY), SeaStar Medical (ICU), Modular Medical (MODD), and Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) (CUPR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "healthcare equipment & supplies" industry.

How does Flora Growth compare to Lifeward?

Flora Growth (NASDAQ:FLGC) and Lifeward (NASDAQ:LFWD) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Lifeward had 2 more articles in the media than Flora Growth. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Lifeward and 0 mentions for Flora Growth. Flora Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lifeward'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Flora Growth Neutral
Lifeward Neutral

Flora Growth has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lifeward has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

36.0% of Flora Growth shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.8% of Lifeward shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Flora Growth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Lifeward shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lifeward has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 70.94%. Given Lifeward's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lifeward is more favorable than Flora Growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flora Growth
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Lifeward
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Flora Growth has higher revenue and earnings than Lifeward. Lifeward is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flora Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flora Growth$57.61M0.09-$15.91M-$32.49N/A
Lifeward$21.82M0.76-$19.91M-$16.82N/A

Flora Growth has a net margin of -32.03% compared to Lifeward's net margin of -141.28%. Flora Growth's return on equity of -64.02% beat Lifeward's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flora Growth-32.03% -64.02% -34.46%
Lifeward -141.28%-235.86%-81.72%

Summary

Flora Growth beats Lifeward on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Flora Growth compare to Femasys?

Flora Growth (NASDAQ:FLGC) and Femasys (NASDAQ:FEMY) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Femasys has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 2,339.02%. Given Femasys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Femasys is more favorable than Flora Growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flora Growth
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Femasys
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Flora Growth has a net margin of -32.03% compared to Femasys' net margin of -534.36%. Flora Growth's return on equity of -64.02% beat Femasys' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flora Growth-32.03% -64.02% -34.46%
Femasys -534.36%-225.97%-74.68%

In the previous week, Femasys had 1 more articles in the media than Flora Growth. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Femasys and 0 mentions for Flora Growth. Femasys' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Flora Growth's score of 0.00 indicating that Femasys is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Flora Growth Neutral
Femasys Positive

Flora Growth has higher revenue and earnings than Femasys. Femasys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flora Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flora Growth$57.61M0.09-$15.91M-$32.49N/A
Femasys$2.29M7.50-$18.63M-$3.53N/A

Flora Growth has a beta of 1.9, meaning that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Femasys has a beta of -2.16, meaning that its stock price is 316% less volatile than the broader market.

36.0% of Flora Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Femasys shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Flora Growth shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.8% of Femasys shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Femasys beats Flora Growth on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Flora Growth compare to SeaStar Medical?

Flora Growth (NASDAQ:FLGC) and SeaStar Medical (NASDAQ:ICU) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Flora Growth has a net margin of -32.03% compared to SeaStar Medical's net margin of -795.51%. Flora Growth's return on equity of -64.02% beat SeaStar Medical's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flora Growth-32.03% -64.02% -34.46%
SeaStar Medical -795.51%-162.75%-109.89%

SeaStar Medical has a consensus price target of $8.00, indicating a potential upside of 70.58%. Given SeaStar Medical's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SeaStar Medical is more favorable than Flora Growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flora Growth
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
SeaStar Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Flora Growth has a beta of 1.9, suggesting that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SeaStar Medical has a beta of -1.09, suggesting that its share price is 209% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, SeaStar Medical had 5 more articles in the media than Flora Growth. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for SeaStar Medical and 0 mentions for Flora Growth. SeaStar Medical's average media sentiment score of 0.28 beat Flora Growth's score of 0.00 indicating that SeaStar Medical is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Flora Growth Neutral
SeaStar Medical Neutral

36.0% of Flora Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.7% of SeaStar Medical shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Flora Growth shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of SeaStar Medical shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

SeaStar Medical has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Flora Growth. SeaStar Medical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flora Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flora Growth$57.61M0.09-$15.91M-$32.49N/A
SeaStar Medical$1.23M16.82-$12.15M-$3.91N/A

Summary

Flora Growth and SeaStar Medical tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Flora Growth compare to Modular Medical?

Flora Growth (NASDAQ:FLGC) and Modular Medical (NASDAQ:MODD) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

36.0% of Flora Growth shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.5% of Modular Medical shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Flora Growth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Modular Medical shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Modular Medical has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Flora Growth's net margin of -32.03%. Flora Growth's return on equity of -64.02% beat Modular Medical's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flora Growth-32.03% -64.02% -34.46%
Modular Medical N/A -292.14%-222.79%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flora Growth
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Modular Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Flora Growth has higher revenue and earnings than Modular Medical. Modular Medical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flora Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flora Growth$57.61M0.09-$15.91M-$32.49N/A
Modular MedicalN/AN/A-$28.24M-$8.69N/A

Flora Growth has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Modular Medical has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Flora Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Modular Medical'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Flora Growth Neutral
Modular Medical Neutral

Summary

Flora Growth beats Modular Medical on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Flora Growth compare to Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)?

Flora Growth (NASDAQ:FLGC) and Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) (NASDAQ:CUPR) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) had 4 more articles in the media than Flora Growth. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) and 0 mentions for Flora Growth. Flora Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)'s score of -0.15 indicating that Flora Growth is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Flora Growth Neutral
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) Neutral

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Flora Growth.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flora Growth$57.61M0.09-$15.91M-$32.49N/A
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)$49.89K339.71-$3.63MN/AN/A

36.0% of Flora Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Flora Growth shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Flora Growth has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) has a beta of -0.08, indicating that its stock price is 108% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flora Growth
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Flora Growth's net margin of -32.03%. Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat Flora Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flora Growth-32.03% -64.02% -34.46%
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) beats Flora Growth on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Flora Growth News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FLGC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FLGC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FLGC vs. The Competition

MetricFlora GrowthHealthcare Equipment & Supplies IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$5.08M$5.45B$7.14B$13.18B
Dividend YieldN/A1.80%2.53%16.78%
P/E Ratio-0.1524.90275.9726.04
Price / Sales0.0984.87669.23109.59
Price / CashN/A32.4377.6051.75
Price / Book0.405.7310.936.31
Net Income-$15.91M$152.68M$3.51B$362.16M
7 Day Performance19.41%-1.71%-2.00%-1.66%
1 Month Performance-4.33%-4.81%-6.15%-4.50%
1 Year Performance-74.38%1.08%7.44%2.06%

Flora Growth Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FLGC
Flora Growth
0.0836 of 5 stars
$4.86
+0.4%
N/A-73.2%$5.08M$57.61MN/A280
LFWD
Lifeward
1.9392 of 5 stars
$6.85
-0.9%
$10.00
+46.0%
-37.2%$19.39M$22.03MN/A81
FEMY
Femasys
3.1189 of 5 stars
$2.17
+3.6%
$50.00
+2,209.5%
-75.3%$18.14M$2.29MN/A54
ICU
SeaStar Medical
2.8245 of 5 stars
$4.05
+13.8%
$8.00
+97.5%
-31.5%$17.55M$1.23MN/A2
MODD
Modular Medical
0.2126 of 5 stars
$1.94
-0.6%
N/A-90.2%$15.81MN/AN/A51

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FLGC) was last updated on 10/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners