Flux Power Competitors

CAE (NYSE:CAE) and Flux Power (NASDAQ:FLUX) are both aerospace companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

CAE has a beta of 1.73, meaning that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Flux Power has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for CAE and Flux Power, as reported by MarketBeat.

CAE currently has a consensus target price of $39.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 34.83%. Flux Power has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.05%. Given CAE's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe CAE is more favorable than Flux Power.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

52.3% of CAE shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.4% of Flux Power shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.3% of CAE shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 71.2% of Flux Power shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares CAE and Flux Power's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

CAE has higher revenue and earnings than Flux Power. Flux Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CAE, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares CAE and Flux Power's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

CAE beats Flux Power on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Novanta (NASDAQ:NOVT) and Flux Power (NASDAQ:FLUX) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

Novanta has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Flux Power has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Novanta and Flux Power, as reported by MarketBeat.

Novanta currently has a consensus target price of $99.50, suggesting a potential downside of 26.95%. Flux Power has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.05%. Given Flux Power's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Flux Power is more favorable than Novanta.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

90.2% of Novanta shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.4% of Flux Power shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Novanta shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 71.2% of Flux Power shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Novanta and Flux Power's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Novanta has higher revenue and earnings than Flux Power. Flux Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Novanta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Novanta and Flux Power's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Novanta beats Flux Power on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Spectrum Brands (NYSE:SPB) and Flux Power (NASDAQ:FLUX) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

Spectrum Brands has a beta of 1.94, meaning that its stock price is 94% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Flux Power has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Spectrum Brands and Flux Power, as reported by MarketBeat.

Spectrum Brands currently has a consensus target price of $82.50, suggesting a potential downside of 5.69%. Flux Power has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.05%. Given Flux Power's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Flux Power is more favorable than Spectrum Brands.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

92.6% of Spectrum Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.4% of Flux Power shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Spectrum Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 71.2% of Flux Power shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Spectrum Brands and Flux Power's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Spectrum Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Flux Power. Flux Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Spectrum Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Spectrum Brands and Flux Power's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Spectrum Brands beats Flux Power on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Energizer (NYSE:ENR) and Flux Power (NASDAQ:FLUX) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

Energizer has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Flux Power has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Energizer and Flux Power, as reported by MarketBeat.

Energizer currently has a consensus target price of $50.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 0.37%. Flux Power has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.05%. Given Flux Power's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Flux Power is more favorable than Energizer.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

86.4% of Energizer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.4% of Flux Power shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Energizer shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 71.2% of Flux Power shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Energizer and Flux Power's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Flux Power has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energizer. Flux Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energizer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Energizer and Flux Power's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Energizer beats Flux Power on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Atkore (NYSE:ATKR) and Flux Power (NASDAQ:FLUX) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

97.4% of Atkore shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.4% of Flux Power shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Atkore shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 71.2% of Flux Power shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Atkore and Flux Power's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Atkore has higher revenue and earnings than Flux Power.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Atkore and Flux Power, as reported by MarketBeat.

Atkore currently has a consensus target price of $61.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.49%. Flux Power has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.05%. Given Flux Power's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Flux Power is more favorable than Atkore.

Profitability

This table compares Atkore and Flux Power's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Atkore has a beta of 2.47, meaning that its stock price is 147% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Flux Power has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Atkore beats Flux Power on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Flux Power (NASDAQ:FLUX) and Integer (NYSE:ITGR) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

3.4% of Flux Power shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.5% of Integer shares are owned by institutional investors. 71.2% of Flux Power shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Integer shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Flux Power and Integer's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Integer has higher revenue and earnings than Flux Power. Flux Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Integer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Flux Power and Integer, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Flux Power presently has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.05%. Integer has a consensus price target of $99.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 6.63%. Given Flux Power's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Flux Power is more favorable than Integer.

Profitability

This table compares Flux Power and Integer's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Flux Power has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Integer has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Integer beats Flux Power on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.