Free Trial

Flux Power (FLUX) Competitors

Flux Power logo
$0.88 +0.03 (+4.07%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$0.89 +0.01 (+1.14%)
As of 04:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FLUX vs. STEM, CBAT, ELBM, XCH, and ZEO

Should you buy Flux Power stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Flux Power with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Flux Power include Stem (STEM), China BAK Battery (CBAT), Electra Battery Materials (ELBM), XCHG (XCH), and Zeo Energy (ZEO). These companies are all part of the "electrical equipment" industry.

How does Flux Power compare to Stem?

Flux Power (NASDAQ:FLUX) and Stem (NYSE:STEM) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

Stem has higher revenue and earnings than Flux Power. Flux Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stem, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flux Power$66.43M0.28-$6.67M-$0.34N/A
Stem$156.27M0.44$137.76M-$8.70N/A

Flux Power has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Stem has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Stem had 8 more articles in the media than Flux Power. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Stem and 1 mentions for Flux Power. Flux Power's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Stem's score of 0.50 indicating that Flux Power is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Flux Power Positive
Stem Positive

Stem has a net margin of 94.16% compared to Flux Power's net margin of -12.48%. Stem's return on equity of 0.00% beat Flux Power's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flux Power-12.48% -502.31% -14.32%
Stem 94.16%N/A -21.16%

Stem has a consensus price target of $12.38, indicating a potential upside of 59.55%. Given Stem's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Stem is more favorable than Flux Power.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flux Power
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Stem
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.60

38.0% of Flux Power shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.6% of Stem shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Flux Power shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Stem shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Stem beats Flux Power on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Flux Power compare to China BAK Battery?

China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) and Flux Power (NASDAQ:FLUX) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Flux Power has lower revenue, but higher earnings than China BAK Battery. China BAK Battery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flux Power, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China BAK Battery$195.19M0.31-$9.38M-$0.18N/A
Flux Power$66.43M0.28-$6.67M-$0.34N/A

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 1 more articles in the media than Flux Power. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for China BAK Battery and 1 mentions for Flux Power. Flux Power's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat China BAK Battery's score of 0.94 indicating that Flux Power is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China BAK Battery Positive
Flux Power Positive

China BAK Battery has a net margin of -7.43% compared to Flux Power's net margin of -12.48%. China BAK Battery's return on equity of -15.32% beat Flux Power's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China BAK Battery-7.43% -15.32% -4.23%
Flux Power -12.48%-502.31%-14.32%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China BAK Battery
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Flux Power
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.0% of Flux Power shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Flux Power shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flux Power has a beta of 1.66, suggesting that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Flux Power beats China BAK Battery on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Flux Power compare to Electra Battery Materials?

Flux Power (NASDAQ:FLUX) and Electra Battery Materials (NASDAQ:ELBM) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Electra Battery Materials has a consensus price target of $2.00, indicating a potential upside of 224.73%. Given Electra Battery Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Electra Battery Materials is more favorable than Flux Power.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flux Power
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Electra Battery Materials
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

In the previous week, Flux Power and Flux Power both had 1 articles in the media. Electra Battery Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Flux Power's score of 0.99 indicating that Electra Battery Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Flux Power Positive
Electra Battery Materials Positive

Flux Power has higher revenue and earnings than Electra Battery Materials. Flux Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Electra Battery Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flux Power$66.43M0.28-$6.67M-$0.34N/A
Electra Battery MaterialsN/AN/A-$95.52M-$1.16N/A

Electra Battery Materials has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Flux Power's net margin of -12.48%. Electra Battery Materials' return on equity of 4.90% beat Flux Power's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flux Power-12.48% -502.31% -14.32%
Electra Battery Materials N/A 4.90%1.67%

Flux Power has a beta of 1.66, suggesting that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Electra Battery Materials has a beta of 2.52, suggesting that its share price is 152% more volatile than the broader market.

38.0% of Flux Power shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.9% of Electra Battery Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.0% of Flux Power shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of Electra Battery Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Electra Battery Materials beats Flux Power on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Flux Power compare to XCHG?

XCHG (NASDAQ:XCH) and Flux Power (NASDAQ:FLUX) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Flux Power has higher revenue and earnings than XCHG. XCHG is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flux Power, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
XCHG$25.10M1.81-$32.50M-$0.08N/A
Flux Power$66.43M0.28-$6.67M-$0.34N/A

XCHG has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Flux Power's net margin of -12.48%. XCHG's return on equity of 0.00% beat Flux Power's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
XCHGN/A N/A N/A
Flux Power -12.48%-502.31%-14.32%

38.0% of Flux Power shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Flux Power shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
XCHG
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Flux Power
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

XCHG has a beta of -1.04, meaning that its share price is 204% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flux Power has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, XCHG had 1 more articles in the media than Flux Power. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for XCHG and 1 mentions for Flux Power. Flux Power's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat XCHG's score of 0.94 indicating that Flux Power is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
XCHG Positive
Flux Power Positive

Summary

Flux Power beats XCHG on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Flux Power compare to Zeo Energy?

Zeo Energy (NASDAQ:ZEO) and Flux Power (NASDAQ:FLUX) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and earnings.

In the previous week, Zeo Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Flux Power. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Zeo Energy and 1 mentions for Flux Power. Zeo Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Flux Power's score of 0.99 indicating that Zeo Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zeo Energy Positive
Flux Power Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Zeo Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Flux Power
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Flux Power has a net margin of -12.48% compared to Zeo Energy's net margin of -15.13%. Zeo Energy's return on equity of 0.00% beat Flux Power's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zeo Energy-15.13% N/A -20.46%
Flux Power -12.48%-502.31%-14.32%

38.0% of Flux Power shares are held by institutional investors. 56.2% of Zeo Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Flux Power shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Flux Power has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Zeo Energy. Flux Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zeo Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zeo Energy$69.35M0.62-$14.01M-$0.37N/A
Flux Power$66.43M0.28-$6.67M-$0.34N/A

Zeo Energy has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flux Power has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Flux Power beats Zeo Energy on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Flux Power News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FLUX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FLUX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FLUX vs. The Competition

MetricFlux PowerELEC PRODS IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$18.80M$20.15B$39.90B$12.34B
Dividend YieldN/A1.04%3.16%5.67%
P/E Ratio-2.5938.7181.4524.58
Price / Sales0.28300.66634.09168.09
Price / CashN/A68.6049.0237.92
Price / Book-2.758.489.936.78
Net Income-$6.67M$401.97M$1.07B$337.32M
7 Day Performance-12.00%5.40%1.07%2.01%
1 Month Performance-10.21%12.32%6.79%3.88%
1 Year Performance-43.59%70.56%163.34%32.23%

Flux Power Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FLUX
Flux Power
1.8171 of 5 stars
$0.88
+4.1%
N/A-45.8%$18.80M$66.43MN/A120
STEM
Stem
3.1267 of 5 stars
$7.67
-1.4%
$12.38
+61.3%
-18.8%$68.76M$156.27MN/A660
CBAT
China BAK Battery
1.3565 of 5 stars
$0.73
-0.8%
N/A-42.3%$64.45M$195.19MN/A1,739
ELBM
Electra Battery Materials
3.3398 of 5 stars
$0.61
-1.9%
$2.00
+227.9%
-45.3%$64.24MN/AN/A37
XCH
XCHG
1.5194 of 5 stars
$0.64
-7.5%
N/A-54.9%$46.43M$25.10MN/A165

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FLUX) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners