Do analysts rate FTEK or OMSE?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Fuel Tech 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 OMS Energy Technologies 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, FTEK or OMSE?

OMS Energy Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Fuel Tech. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Fuel Tech $26.38M 1.67 -$2.32M -$0.09 N/A OMS Energy Technologies $155.91M 1.15 $32.21M N/A N/A

Does the media prefer FTEK or OMSE?

In the previous week, Fuel Tech had 1 more articles in the media than OMS Energy Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Fuel Tech and 1 mentions for OMS Energy Technologies. OMS Energy Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Fuel Tech's score of 1.01 indicating that OMS Energy Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fuel Tech 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive OMS Energy Technologies 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Do analysts rate FTEK or TAYD?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Fuel Tech 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Taylor Devices 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Is FTEK or TAYD more profitable?

Taylor Devices has a net margin of 21.52% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of -11.15%. Taylor Devices' return on equity of 15.77% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Fuel Tech -11.15% -7.34% -6.30% Taylor Devices 21.52% 15.77% 14.31%

Does the media prefer FTEK or TAYD?

In the previous week, Taylor Devices had 1 more articles in the media than Fuel Tech. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Taylor Devices and 2 mentions for Fuel Tech. Fuel Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Taylor Devices' score of 1.01 indicating that Fuel Tech is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fuel Tech 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Taylor Devices 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate FTEK or CHRN?

ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 72.76%. Given ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock is more favorable than Fuel Tech. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Fuel Tech 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Does the media prefer FTEK or CHRN?

In the previous week, ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock had 1 more articles in the media than Fuel Tech. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock and 2 mentions for Fuel Tech. Fuel Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock's score of 0.85 indicating that Fuel Tech is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fuel Tech 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate FTEK or TRT?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Fuel Tech 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Trio-Tech International 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media favor FTEK or TRT?

In the previous week, Fuel Tech had 1 more articles in the media than Trio-Tech International. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Fuel Tech and 1 mentions for Trio-Tech International. Trio-Tech International's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Fuel Tech's score of 1.01 indicating that Trio-Tech International is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fuel Tech 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Trio-Tech International 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer FTEK or SOTK?

Sono-Tek has a consensus target price of $8.50, indicating a potential upside of 64.41%. Given Sono-Tek's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sono-Tek is more favorable than Fuel Tech. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Fuel Tech 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Sono-Tek 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Is FTEK or SOTK more profitable?

Sono-Tek has a net margin of 9.62% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of -11.15%. Sono-Tek's return on equity of 10.55% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Fuel Tech -11.15% -7.34% -6.30% Sono-Tek 9.62% 10.55% 8.30%

Does the media prefer FTEK or SOTK?

In the previous week, Sono-Tek had 3 more articles in the media than Fuel Tech. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Sono-Tek and 2 mentions for Fuel Tech. Fuel Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Sono-Tek's score of 0.56 indicating that Fuel Tech is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fuel Tech 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Sono-Tek 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Fuel Tech (FTEK) Competitors

$1.41 -0.03 (-2.08%)

Closing price 07/31/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$1.43 +0.02 (+1.21%)

As of 07/31/2026 07:56 PM Eastern

Compare

FTEK vs. OMSE, TAYD, CHRN, TRT, and SOTK

Should you buy Fuel Tech stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fuel Tech with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fuel Tech include OMS Energy Technologies (OMSE), Taylor Devices (TAYD), ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock (CHRN), Trio-Tech International (TRT), and Sono-Tek (SOTK).

How does Fuel Tech compare to OMS Energy Technologies?

Fuel Tech (NASDAQ:FTEK) and OMS Energy Technologies (NASDAQ:OMSE) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

OMS Energy Technologies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of -11.15%. OMS Energy Technologies' return on equity of 0.00% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fuel Tech	-11.15%	-7.34%	-6.30%
OMS Energy Technologies	N/A	N/A	N/A

OMS Energy Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Fuel Tech.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fuel Tech	$26.38M	1.67	-$2.32M	-$0.09	N/A
OMS Energy Technologies	$155.91M	1.15	$32.21M	N/A	N/A

20.9% of Fuel Tech shares are held by institutional investors. 9.8% of Fuel Tech shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fuel Tech	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
OMS Energy Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Fuel Tech had 1 more articles in the media than OMS Energy Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Fuel Tech and 1 mentions for OMS Energy Technologies. OMS Energy Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Fuel Tech's score of 1.01 indicating that OMS Energy Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fuel Tech	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
OMS Energy Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Fuel Tech has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OMS Energy Technologies has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fuel Tech and OMS Energy Technologies tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fuel Tech compare to Taylor Devices?

Fuel Tech (NASDAQ:FTEK) and Taylor Devices (NASDAQ:TAYD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Taylor Devices had 1 more articles in the media than Fuel Tech. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Taylor Devices and 2 mentions for Fuel Tech. Fuel Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Taylor Devices' score of 1.01 indicating that Fuel Tech is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fuel Tech	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Taylor Devices	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Taylor Devices has higher revenue and earnings than Fuel Tech. Fuel Tech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Taylor Devices, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fuel Tech	$26.38M	1.67	-$2.32M	-$0.09	N/A
Taylor Devices	$46.29M	3.57	$9.41M	$3.30	15.55

Fuel Tech has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Taylor Devices has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

20.9% of Fuel Tech shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.6% of Taylor Devices shares are held by institutional investors. 9.8% of Fuel Tech shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.9% of Taylor Devices shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Taylor Devices has a net margin of 21.52% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of -11.15%. Taylor Devices' return on equity of 15.77% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fuel Tech	-11.15%	-7.34%	-6.30%
Taylor Devices	21.52%	15.77%	14.31%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fuel Tech	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Taylor Devices	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Taylor Devices beats Fuel Tech on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fuel Tech compare to ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock?

Fuel Tech (NASDAQ:FTEK) and ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock (NASDAQ:CHRN) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

20.9% of Fuel Tech shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock shares are held by institutional investors. 9.8% of Fuel Tech shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of -11.15% compared to ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock's net margin of -135.66%. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -7.34% beat ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fuel Tech	-11.15%	-7.34%	-6.30%
ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock	-135.66%	-197.81%	-74.17%

Fuel Tech has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock had 1 more articles in the media than Fuel Tech. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock and 2 mentions for Fuel Tech. Fuel Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock's score of 0.85 indicating that Fuel Tech is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fuel Tech	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Fuel Tech has higher revenue and earnings than ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock. Fuel Tech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fuel Tech	$26.38M	1.67	-$2.32M	-$0.09	N/A
ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock	$12.80M	6.13	-$11.69M	-$5.38	N/A

ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 72.76%. Given ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock is more favorable than Fuel Tech.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fuel Tech	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Summary

Fuel Tech beats ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fuel Tech compare to Trio-Tech International?

Fuel Tech (NASDAQ:FTEK) and Trio-Tech International (NYSE:TRT) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

20.9% of Fuel Tech shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.0% of Trio-Tech International shares are held by institutional investors. 9.8% of Fuel Tech shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 39.5% of Trio-Tech International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Trio-Tech International has higher revenue and earnings than Fuel Tech. Fuel Tech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trio-Tech International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fuel Tech	$26.38M	1.67	-$2.32M	-$0.09	N/A
Trio-Tech International	$58.35M	1.73	$1.05M	$0.04	249.50

Fuel Tech has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trio-Tech International has a beta of 1.92, indicating that its share price is 92% more volatile than the broader market.

Trio-Tech International has a net margin of 1.51% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of -11.15%. Trio-Tech International's return on equity of 1.84% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fuel Tech	-11.15%	-7.34%	-6.30%
Trio-Tech International	1.51%	1.84%	1.40%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fuel Tech	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Trio-Tech International	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Fuel Tech had 1 more articles in the media than Trio-Tech International. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Fuel Tech and 1 mentions for Trio-Tech International. Trio-Tech International's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Fuel Tech's score of 1.01 indicating that Trio-Tech International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fuel Tech	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Trio-Tech International	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Trio-Tech International beats Fuel Tech on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fuel Tech compare to Sono-Tek?

Fuel Tech (NASDAQ:FTEK) and Sono-Tek (NASDAQ:SOTK) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk and valuation.

Sono-Tek has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fuel Tech. Fuel Tech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sono-Tek, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fuel Tech	$26.38M	1.67	-$2.32M	-$0.09	N/A
Sono-Tek	$21.44M	3.79	$1.81M	$0.13	39.77

In the previous week, Sono-Tek had 3 more articles in the media than Fuel Tech. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Sono-Tek and 2 mentions for Fuel Tech. Fuel Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Sono-Tek's score of 0.56 indicating that Fuel Tech is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fuel Tech	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Sono-Tek	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

20.9% of Fuel Tech shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.9% of Sono-Tek shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.8% of Fuel Tech shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Sono-Tek shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sono-Tek has a net margin of 9.62% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of -11.15%. Sono-Tek's return on equity of 10.55% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fuel Tech	-11.15%	-7.34%	-6.30%
Sono-Tek	9.62%	10.55%	8.30%

Sono-Tek has a consensus target price of $8.50, indicating a potential upside of 64.41%. Given Sono-Tek's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sono-Tek is more favorable than Fuel Tech.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fuel Tech	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Sono-Tek	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Fuel Tech has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its share price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Sono-Tek beats Fuel Tech on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fuel Tech News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FTEK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FTEK vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Fuel Tech	Commercial Services & Supplies Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$44.88M	$4.34B	$10.61B	$12.30B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.10%	120.65%	9.45%
P/E Ratio	-15.66	32.79	27.56	24.66
Price / Sales	1.67	1,033.94	951.03	110.52
Price / Cash	N/A	22.51	24.14	59.62
Price / Book	1.10	4.17	4.47	5.90
Net Income	-$2.32M	$145.93M	$610.22M	$336.31M
7 Day Performance	-8.74%	0.60%	0.25%	0.09%
1 Month Performance	-32.21%	-0.32%	-2.63%	-5.67%
1 Year Performance	-45.14%	10.17%	12.04%	18.79%

Fuel Tech Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FTEK Fuel Tech	1.5281 of 5 stars	$1.41 -2.1%	N/A	-46.8%	$44.88M	$26.38M	N/A	70	Positive News Upcoming Earnings Short Interest Decrease
OMSE OMS Energy Technologies	1.2303 of 5 stars	$4.20 -2.6%	N/A	-41.5%	$182.96M	$155.91M	N/A	632	News Coverage Short Interest Decrease
TAYD Taylor Devices	1.7852 of 5 stars	$56.44 +3.0%	N/A	+13.8%	$176.47M	$46.29M	17.10	120	Positive News
CHRN ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock	0.3675 of 5 stars	$25.38 -12.1%	$6.00 -76.4%	+533.0%	$102.95M	$12.80M	N/A	60	Gap Up
TRT Trio-Tech International	N/A	$10.37 +9.2%	N/A	+266.9%	$96.07M	$58.35M	74.07	740	Positive News Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FTEK) was last updated on 8/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Fuel Tech (FTEK) Competitors

FTEK vs. OMSE, TAYD, CHRN, TRT, and SOTK

How does Fuel Tech compare to OMS Energy Technologies?

Summary

How does Fuel Tech compare to Taylor Devices?

Summary

How does Fuel Tech compare to ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock?

Summary

How does Fuel Tech compare to Trio-Tech International?

Summary

How does Fuel Tech compare to Sono-Tek?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FTEK vs. The Competition

Fuel Tech Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Fuel Tech (FTEK) Competitors

FTEK vs. OMSE, TAYD, CHRN, TRT, and SOTK

How does Fuel Tech compare to OMS Energy Technologies?

Is FTEK or OMSE more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, FTEK or OMSE?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of FTEK or OMSE?

Do analysts rate FTEK or OMSE?

Does the media prefer FTEK or OMSE?

Which has more volatility & risk, FTEK or OMSE?

Summary

How does Fuel Tech compare to Taylor Devices?

Does the media prefer FTEK or TAYD?

Which has better earnings & valuation, FTEK or TAYD?

Which has more risk and volatility, FTEK or TAYD?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of FTEK or TAYD?

Is FTEK or TAYD more profitable?

Do analysts rate FTEK or TAYD?

Summary

How does Fuel Tech compare to ChronoScale Corporation Common Stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of FTEK or CHRN?

Is FTEK or CHRN more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, FTEK or CHRN?

Does the media prefer FTEK or CHRN?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, FTEK or CHRN?

Do analysts rate FTEK or CHRN?

Summary

How does Fuel Tech compare to Trio-Tech International?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of FTEK or TRT?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, FTEK or TRT?

Which has more volatility & risk, FTEK or TRT?

Is FTEK or TRT more profitable?

Do analysts rate FTEK or TRT?

Does the media favor FTEK or TRT?

Summary

How does Fuel Tech compare to Sono-Tek?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, FTEK or SOTK?

Does the media prefer FTEK or SOTK?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in FTEK or SOTK?

Is FTEK or SOTK more profitable?

Do analysts prefer FTEK or SOTK?

Which has more volatility & risk, FTEK or SOTK?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FTEK vs. The Competition

Fuel Tech Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools