Fusemachines (FUSE) Competitors

Fusemachines has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Domo has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fusemachines and Fusemachines both had 1 articles in the media. Fusemachines' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Domo's score of 0.10 indicating that Fusemachines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Domo has a consensus price target of $6.92, indicating a potential upside of 91.86%. Given Domo's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Domo is more favorable than Fusemachines.

Fusemachines has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Domo. Fusemachines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Domo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Fusemachines has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Domo's net margin of -18.61%.

46.8% of Fusemachines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.6% of Domo shares are held by institutional investors. 83.0% of Fusemachines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Domo shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Fusemachines had 1 more articles in the media than Arbe Robotics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fusemachines and 0 mentions for Arbe Robotics. Fusemachines' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Arbe Robotics' score of 0.00 indicating that Fusemachines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Arbe Robotics has a consensus price target of $2.25, suggesting a potential upside of 101.79%. Given Arbe Robotics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Arbe Robotics is more favorable than Fusemachines.

Fusemachines has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Arbe Robotics has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

46.8% of Fusemachines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.4% of Arbe Robotics shares are held by institutional investors. 83.0% of Fusemachines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 53.5% of Arbe Robotics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fusemachines has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Arbe Robotics' net margin of -4,402.73%. Fusemachines' return on equity of 0.00% beat Arbe Robotics' return on equity.

Fusemachines has higher revenue and earnings than Arbe Robotics. Fusemachines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arbe Robotics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Fusemachines has higher revenue and earnings than Brand Engagement Network. Fusemachines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brand Engagement Network, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Brand Engagement Network had 4 more articles in the media than Fusemachines. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Brand Engagement Network and 1 mentions for Fusemachines. Brand Engagement Network's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Fusemachines' score of 1.08 indicating that Brand Engagement Network is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Fusemachines has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brand Engagement Network has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

46.8% of Fusemachines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.8% of Brand Engagement Network shares are owned by institutional investors. 83.0% of Fusemachines shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.6% of Brand Engagement Network shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fusemachines has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Brand Engagement Network's net margin of -2,189.33%. Fusemachines' return on equity of 0.00% beat Brand Engagement Network's return on equity.

Fusemachines has higher revenue and earnings than MMTec.

Fusemachines has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MMTec has a beta of -0.2, suggesting that its share price is 120% less volatile than the broader market.

46.8% of Fusemachines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of MMTec shares are owned by institutional investors. 83.0% of Fusemachines shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.8% of MMTec shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Fusemachines and Fusemachines both had 1 articles in the media. Fusemachines' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat MMTec's score of 0.67 indicating that Fusemachines is being referred to more favorably in the media.