NASDAQ:GCMG

GCM Grosvenor Competitors

$12.19
-0.06 (-0.49 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 10:47 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$12.06
Now: $12.19
$12.36
50-Day Range
$11.90
MA: $12.60
$13.18
52-Week Range
$9.00
Now: $12.19
$15.36
Volume2,340 shs
Average Volume418,585 shs
Market Capitalization$2.27 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield1.98%
Beta0.01

Competitors

GCM Grosvenor (NASDAQ:GCMG) Vs. AMG, JHG, EVR, HLNE, LAZ, and HLI

Should you be buying GCMG stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "investment advice" are considered alternatives and competitors to GCM Grosvenor, including Affiliated Managers Group (AMG), Janus Henderson Group (JHG), Evercore (EVR), Hamilton Lane (HLNE), Lazard (LAZ), and Houlihan Lokey (HLI).

Affiliated Managers Group (NYSE:AMG) and GCM Grosvenor (NASDAQ:GCMG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Affiliated Managers Group and GCM Grosvenor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Affiliated Managers Group5.37%19.15%8.64%
GCM GrosvenorN/A4.98%0.09%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Affiliated Managers Group and GCM Grosvenor's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Affiliated Managers Group$2.24 billion3.00$15.70 million$14.2211.10
GCM GrosvenorN/AN/A$4.28 millionN/AN/A

Affiliated Managers Group has higher revenue and earnings than GCM Grosvenor.

Risk and Volatility

Affiliated Managers Group has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.01, suggesting that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Affiliated Managers Group and GCM Grosvenor, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Affiliated Managers Group12202.20
GCM Grosvenor10102.00

Affiliated Managers Group presently has a consensus target price of $133.60, suggesting a potential downside of 15.34%. GCM Grosvenor has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.12%. Given GCM Grosvenor's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GCM Grosvenor is more favorable than Affiliated Managers Group.

Dividends

Affiliated Managers Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. GCM Grosvenor pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Affiliated Managers Group pays out 0.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

98.8% of Affiliated Managers Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.3% of GCM Grosvenor shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Affiliated Managers Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of GCM Grosvenor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Affiliated Managers Group beats GCM Grosvenor on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

GCM Grosvenor (NASDAQ:GCMG) and Janus Henderson Group (NYSE:JHG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares GCM Grosvenor and Janus Henderson Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GCM GrosvenorN/AN/A$4.28 millionN/AN/A
Janus Henderson Group$2.19 billion2.62$427.60 million$2.4713.48

Janus Henderson Group has higher revenue and earnings than GCM Grosvenor.

Dividends

GCM Grosvenor pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Janus Henderson Group pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Janus Henderson Group pays out 58.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Janus Henderson Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Janus Henderson Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for GCM Grosvenor and Janus Henderson Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
GCM Grosvenor10102.00
Janus Henderson Group26101.89

GCM Grosvenor currently has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.12%. Janus Henderson Group has a consensus target price of $25.1286, suggesting a potential downside of 24.52%. Given GCM Grosvenor's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe GCM Grosvenor is more favorable than Janus Henderson Group.

Volatility & Risk

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.01, suggesting that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Janus Henderson Group has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

53.3% of GCM Grosvenor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.2% of Janus Henderson Group shares are held by institutional investors. 21.7% of GCM Grosvenor shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Janus Henderson Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares GCM Grosvenor and Janus Henderson Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
GCM GrosvenorN/A4.98%0.09%
Janus Henderson Group3.71%10.41%6.93%

Summary

Janus Henderson Group beats GCM Grosvenor on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Evercore (NYSE:EVR) and GCM Grosvenor (NASDAQ:GCMG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Evercore and GCM Grosvenor, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Evercore01713.00
GCM Grosvenor10102.00

Evercore currently has a consensus price target of $138.7778, indicating a potential upside of 3.38%. GCM Grosvenor has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.12%. Given GCM Grosvenor's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe GCM Grosvenor is more favorable than Evercore.

Profitability

This table compares Evercore and GCM Grosvenor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Evercore11.80%27.11%12.25%
GCM GrosvenorN/A4.98%0.09%

Dividends

Evercore pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. GCM Grosvenor pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Evercore pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Evercore has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Volatility & Risk

Evercore has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its share price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.01, meaning that its share price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

88.8% of Evercore shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.3% of GCM Grosvenor shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.8% of Evercore shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of GCM Grosvenor shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Evercore and GCM Grosvenor's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Evercore$2.01 billion2.81$297.44 million$7.7017.43
GCM GrosvenorN/AN/A$4.28 millionN/AN/A

Evercore has higher revenue and earnings than GCM Grosvenor.

Summary

Evercore beats GCM Grosvenor on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

GCM Grosvenor (NASDAQ:GCMG) and Hamilton Lane (NASDAQ:HLNE) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Volatility and Risk

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.01, indicating that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hamilton Lane has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for GCM Grosvenor and Hamilton Lane, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
GCM Grosvenor10102.00
Hamilton Lane03202.40

GCM Grosvenor presently has a consensus target price of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.12%. Hamilton Lane has a consensus target price of $87.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.38%. Given GCM Grosvenor's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe GCM Grosvenor is more favorable than Hamilton Lane.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares GCM Grosvenor and Hamilton Lane's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GCM GrosvenorN/AN/A$4.28 millionN/AN/A
Hamilton Lane$274.05 million17.80$60.83 million$2.0146.01

Hamilton Lane has higher revenue and earnings than GCM Grosvenor.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

53.3% of GCM Grosvenor shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.9% of Hamilton Lane shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.7% of GCM Grosvenor shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 34.6% of Hamilton Lane shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

GCM Grosvenor pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Hamilton Lane pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Hamilton Lane pays out 62.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hamilton Lane has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares GCM Grosvenor and Hamilton Lane's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
GCM GrosvenorN/A4.98%0.09%
Hamilton Lane19.78%44.51%20.35%

Summary

Hamilton Lane beats GCM Grosvenor on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lazard (NYSE:LAZ) and GCM Grosvenor (NASDAQ:GCMG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Dividends

Lazard pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. GCM Grosvenor pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Lazard pays out 57.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lazard has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Lazard is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Lazard and GCM Grosvenor's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lazard$2.67 billion1.79$286.50 million$3.2813.87
GCM GrosvenorN/AN/A$4.28 millionN/AN/A

Lazard has higher revenue and earnings than GCM Grosvenor.

Risk & Volatility

Lazard has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.01, meaning that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Lazard and GCM Grosvenor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Lazard11.62%47.79%6.01%
GCM GrosvenorN/A4.98%0.09%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

74.5% of Lazard shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.3% of GCM Grosvenor shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Lazard shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of GCM Grosvenor shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Lazard and GCM Grosvenor, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Lazard14402.33
GCM Grosvenor10102.00

Lazard currently has a consensus price target of $42.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 6.23%. GCM Grosvenor has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.12%. Given GCM Grosvenor's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe GCM Grosvenor is more favorable than Lazard.

Summary

Lazard beats GCM Grosvenor on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

GCM Grosvenor (NASDAQ:GCMG) and Houlihan Lokey (NYSE:HLI) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares GCM Grosvenor and Houlihan Lokey's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
GCM GrosvenorN/A4.98%0.09%
Houlihan Lokey18.06%19.18%12.48%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

53.3% of GCM Grosvenor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.5% of Houlihan Lokey shares are held by institutional investors. 21.7% of GCM Grosvenor shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.0% of Houlihan Lokey shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares GCM Grosvenor and Houlihan Lokey's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GCM GrosvenorN/AN/A$4.28 millionN/AN/A
Houlihan Lokey$1.16 billion3.93$183.79 million$3.2020.67

Houlihan Lokey has higher revenue and earnings than GCM Grosvenor.

Volatility and Risk

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.01, meaning that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Houlihan Lokey has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

GCM Grosvenor pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Houlihan Lokey pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Houlihan Lokey pays out 41.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Houlihan Lokey has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Houlihan Lokey is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for GCM Grosvenor and Houlihan Lokey, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
GCM Grosvenor10102.00
Houlihan Lokey24001.67

GCM Grosvenor presently has a consensus target price of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.12%. Houlihan Lokey has a consensus target price of $66.00, indicating a potential downside of 0.23%. Given GCM Grosvenor's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe GCM Grosvenor is more favorable than Houlihan Lokey.

Summary

Houlihan Lokey beats GCM Grosvenor on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


GCM Grosvenor Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Affiliated Managers Group logo
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group
2.3$157.81+0.7%$6.73 billion$2.24 billion68.32Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Janus Henderson Group logo
JHG
Janus Henderson Group
1.9$33.29+2.7%$5.74 billion$2.19 billion75.66Analyst Revision
Evercore logo
EVR
Evercore
2.4$134.24+1.1%$5.64 billion$2.01 billion24.06Analyst Report
Hamilton Lane logo
HLNE
Hamilton Lane
1.5$92.48+0.5%$4.88 billion$274.05 million47.92Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Lazard logo
LAZ
Lazard
2.4$45.50+0.2%$4.78 billion$2.67 billion17.84Analyst Upgrade
Houlihan Lokey logo
HLI
Houlihan Lokey
2.1$66.15+0.1%$4.56 billion$1.16 billion21.76
AllianceBernstein logo
AB
AllianceBernstein
2.0$39.88+1.2%$3.92 billion$3.52 billion14.45Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Artisan Partners Asset Management logo
APAM
Artisan Partners Asset Management
2.2$56.66+4.8%$3.89 billion$799 million19.27Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Moelis & Company logo
MC
Moelis & Company
1.7$52.14+1.6%$3.34 billion$746.53 million41.38Analyst Report
Cohen & Steers logo
CNS
Cohen & Steers
2.1$67.61+0.9%$3.26 billion$410.83 million27.94Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Focus Financial Partners logo
FOCS
Focus Financial Partners
1.8$44.02+0.8%$3.16 billion$1.22 billion183.42Analyst Revision
StepStone Group logo
STEP
StepStone Group
1.1$33.14+5.0%$3.14 billionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Federated Hermes logo
FHI
Federated Hermes
1.5$31.71+1.5%$3.14 billion$1.33 billion10.26Analyst Revision
Noah logo
NOAH
Noah
1.9$41.13+1.0%$2.52 billion$253.09 million19.04
Virtus Investment Partners logo
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners
1.7$256.64+0.6%$1.97 billion$563.25 million38.71Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
BrightSphere Investment Group logo
BSIG
BrightSphere Investment Group
2.0$23.84+1.7%$1.89 billion$819.50 million12.82Analyst Upgrade
Victory Capital logo
VCTR
Victory Capital
1.6$27.58+0.7%$1.87 billion$612.37 million10.41Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
PJT Partners logo
PJT
PJT Partners
2.1$68.64+0.6%$1.64 billion$717.64 million19.67Analyst Report
AssetMark Financial logo
AMK
AssetMark Financial
1.4$22.32+0.4%$1.62 billion$417.94 million-1,115.44Analyst Report
Sculptor Capital Management logo
SCU
Sculptor Capital Management
1.3$21.90+2.8%$1.24 billion$597.35 million-11.00
Pzena Investment Management logo
PZN
Pzena Investment Management
0.9$10.96+3.0%$780.02 million$150.75 million52.19Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Diamond Hill Investment Group logo
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
1.4$164.75+2.3%$520.61 million$136.62 million14.26News Coverage
Barings BDC logo
BBDC
Barings BDC
2.2$10.32+0.8%$494.97 million$75.65 million-258.00Unusual Options Activity
Fidus Investment logo
FDUS
Fidus Investment
1.6$16.63+0.0%$406.39 million$77.11 million18.48
Value Line logo
VALU
Value Line
1.1$30.11+1.4%$288.27 million$40.30 million16.19Decrease in Short Interest
Saratoga Investment logo
SAR
Saratoga Investment
1.6$24.60+0.2%$274.78 million$58.45 million8.51Increase in Short Interest
PUYI
Puyi
0.5$4.20+4.8%$253.32 million$18.33 million0.00Increase in Short Interest
Monroe Capital logo
MRCC
Monroe Capital
1.1$10.78+2.5%$229.66 million$68.19 million-53.90Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Silvercrest Asset Management Group logo
SAMG
Silvercrest Asset Management Group
2.1$15.34+2.4%$221.36 million$102.15 million13.70Analyst Revision
News Coverage
WHG
Westwood Holdings Group
1.1$16.51+3.8%$139.20 million$84.08 million71.79
Manning & Napier logo
MN
Manning & Napier
0.5$7.81+6.1%$133.87 million$136 million43.39High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
StoneCastle Financial logo
BANX
StoneCastle Financial
1.5$19.77+0.1%$129.73 million$16.35 million63.78
U.S. Global Investors logo
GROW
U.S. Global Investors
0.4$8.53+11.7%$128.51 million$4.48 million0.00High Trading Volume
Gap Down
Great Elm Capital logo
GECC
Great Elm Capital
1.7$3.31+0.3%$77.81 million$27.04 million-1.36Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
HNNA
Hennessy Advisors
1.4$9.10+0.8%$66.98 million$33.39 million8.58Gap Down
PHCF
Puhui Wealth Investment Management
0.4$4.30+7.9%$49.48 million$2.18 million0.00Increase in Short Interest
Medley Management logo
MDLY
Medley Management
0.5$8.11+2.2%$5.43 million$48.84 million-1.02High Trading Volume
This page was last updated on 4/16/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.