GCM Grosvenor Competitors

Affiliated Managers Group (NYSE:AMG) and GCM Grosvenor (NASDAQ:GCMG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Affiliated Managers Group and GCM Grosvenor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Affiliated Managers Group and GCM Grosvenor's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Affiliated Managers Group has higher revenue and earnings than GCM Grosvenor.

Risk and Volatility

Affiliated Managers Group has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.01, suggesting that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Affiliated Managers Group and GCM Grosvenor, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Affiliated Managers Group presently has a consensus target price of $133.60, suggesting a potential downside of 15.34%. GCM Grosvenor has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.12%. Given GCM Grosvenor's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GCM Grosvenor is more favorable than Affiliated Managers Group.

Dividends

Affiliated Managers Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. GCM Grosvenor pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Affiliated Managers Group pays out 0.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

98.8% of Affiliated Managers Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.3% of GCM Grosvenor shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Affiliated Managers Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of GCM Grosvenor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Affiliated Managers Group beats GCM Grosvenor on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

GCM Grosvenor (NASDAQ:GCMG) and Janus Henderson Group (NYSE:JHG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares GCM Grosvenor and Janus Henderson Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Janus Henderson Group has higher revenue and earnings than GCM Grosvenor.

Dividends

GCM Grosvenor pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Janus Henderson Group pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Janus Henderson Group pays out 58.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Janus Henderson Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Janus Henderson Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for GCM Grosvenor and Janus Henderson Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

GCM Grosvenor currently has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.12%. Janus Henderson Group has a consensus target price of $25.1286, suggesting a potential downside of 24.52%. Given GCM Grosvenor's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe GCM Grosvenor is more favorable than Janus Henderson Group.

Volatility & Risk

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.01, suggesting that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Janus Henderson Group has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

53.3% of GCM Grosvenor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.2% of Janus Henderson Group shares are held by institutional investors. 21.7% of GCM Grosvenor shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Janus Henderson Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares GCM Grosvenor and Janus Henderson Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Janus Henderson Group beats GCM Grosvenor on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Evercore (NYSE:EVR) and GCM Grosvenor (NASDAQ:GCMG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Evercore and GCM Grosvenor, as provided by MarketBeat.

Evercore currently has a consensus price target of $138.7778, indicating a potential upside of 3.38%. GCM Grosvenor has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.12%. Given GCM Grosvenor's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe GCM Grosvenor is more favorable than Evercore.

Profitability

This table compares Evercore and GCM Grosvenor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Evercore pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. GCM Grosvenor pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Evercore pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Evercore has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Volatility & Risk

Evercore has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its share price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.01, meaning that its share price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

88.8% of Evercore shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.3% of GCM Grosvenor shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.8% of Evercore shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of GCM Grosvenor shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Evercore and GCM Grosvenor's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Evercore has higher revenue and earnings than GCM Grosvenor.

Summary

Evercore beats GCM Grosvenor on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

GCM Grosvenor (NASDAQ:GCMG) and Hamilton Lane (NASDAQ:HLNE) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Volatility and Risk

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.01, indicating that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hamilton Lane has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for GCM Grosvenor and Hamilton Lane, as provided by MarketBeat.

GCM Grosvenor presently has a consensus target price of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.12%. Hamilton Lane has a consensus target price of $87.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.38%. Given GCM Grosvenor's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe GCM Grosvenor is more favorable than Hamilton Lane.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares GCM Grosvenor and Hamilton Lane's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Hamilton Lane has higher revenue and earnings than GCM Grosvenor.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

53.3% of GCM Grosvenor shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.9% of Hamilton Lane shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.7% of GCM Grosvenor shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 34.6% of Hamilton Lane shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

GCM Grosvenor pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Hamilton Lane pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Hamilton Lane pays out 62.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hamilton Lane has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares GCM Grosvenor and Hamilton Lane's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Hamilton Lane beats GCM Grosvenor on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lazard (NYSE:LAZ) and GCM Grosvenor (NASDAQ:GCMG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Dividends

Lazard pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. GCM Grosvenor pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Lazard pays out 57.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lazard has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Lazard is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Lazard and GCM Grosvenor's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Lazard has higher revenue and earnings than GCM Grosvenor.

Risk & Volatility

Lazard has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.01, meaning that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Lazard and GCM Grosvenor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

74.5% of Lazard shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.3% of GCM Grosvenor shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Lazard shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of GCM Grosvenor shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Lazard and GCM Grosvenor, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Lazard currently has a consensus price target of $42.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 6.23%. GCM Grosvenor has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.12%. Given GCM Grosvenor's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe GCM Grosvenor is more favorable than Lazard.

Summary

Lazard beats GCM Grosvenor on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

GCM Grosvenor (NASDAQ:GCMG) and Houlihan Lokey (NYSE:HLI) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares GCM Grosvenor and Houlihan Lokey's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

53.3% of GCM Grosvenor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.5% of Houlihan Lokey shares are held by institutional investors. 21.7% of GCM Grosvenor shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.0% of Houlihan Lokey shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares GCM Grosvenor and Houlihan Lokey's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Houlihan Lokey has higher revenue and earnings than GCM Grosvenor.

Volatility and Risk

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.01, meaning that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Houlihan Lokey has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

GCM Grosvenor pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Houlihan Lokey pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Houlihan Lokey pays out 41.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Houlihan Lokey has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Houlihan Lokey is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for GCM Grosvenor and Houlihan Lokey, as provided by MarketBeat.

GCM Grosvenor presently has a consensus target price of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.12%. Houlihan Lokey has a consensus target price of $66.00, indicating a potential downside of 0.23%. Given GCM Grosvenor's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe GCM Grosvenor is more favorable than Houlihan Lokey.

Summary

Houlihan Lokey beats GCM Grosvenor on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.