Do analysts recommend EARN or GROW?

Ellington Credit presently has a consensus target price of $5.50, indicating a potential upside of 26.15%. Given Ellington Credit's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ellington Credit is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ellington Credit 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 U.S. Global Investors 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media favor EARN or GROW?

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 5 more articles in the media than Ellington Credit. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 1 mentions for Ellington Credit. Ellington Credit's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.84 indicating that Ellington Credit is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ellington Credit 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive U.S. Global Investors 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate SITC or GROW?

Site Centers presently has a consensus target price of $6.75, suggesting a potential upside of 134.38%. Given Site Centers' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Site Centers is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Site Centers 2 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 U.S. Global Investors 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media favor SITC or GROW?

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 5 more articles in the media than Site Centers. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 1 mentions for Site Centers. Site Centers' average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.84 indicating that Site Centers is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Site Centers 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive U.S. Global Investors 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer GROW or WHF?

WhiteHorse Finance has a consensus target price of $7.25, indicating a potential upside of 2.11%. Given WhiteHorse Finance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe WhiteHorse Finance is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score U.S. Global Investors 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 WhiteHorse Finance 2 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Do analysts recommend GROW or ELME?

Elme Communities has a consensus price target of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 965.09%. Given Elme Communities' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Elme Communities is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score U.S. Global Investors 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Elme Communities 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.75

Does the media prefer GROW or ELME?

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 5 more articles in the media than Elme Communities. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 1 mentions for Elme Communities. Elme Communities' average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.84 indicating that Elme Communities is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment U.S. Global Investors 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Elme Communities 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Do analysts rate HCMA or GROW?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score HCM Acquisition 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 U.S. Global Investors 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, HCMA or GROW?

HCM Acquisition has higher earnings, but lower revenue than U.S. Global Investors. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio HCM Acquisition N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A U.S. Global Investors $10.25M 3.61 -$330K $0.26 11.46

U.S. Global Investors (GROW) Competitors

$2.98 -0.29 (-8.87%)

As of 09/4/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

GROW vs. EARN, SITC, WHF, ELME, and HCMA

Should you buy U.S. Global Investors stock or one of its competitors? U.S. Global Investors's main competitors and comparable companies include Ellington Credit (EARN), Site Centers (SITC), WhiteHorse Finance (WHF), Elme Communities (ELME), and HCM Acquisition (HCMA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Ellington Credit?

Ellington Credit (NYSE:EARN) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 5 more articles in the media than Ellington Credit. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 1 mentions for Ellington Credit. Ellington Credit's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.84 indicating that Ellington Credit is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ellington Credit	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
U.S. Global Investors	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ellington Credit pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 22.0%. U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Ellington Credit pays out -98.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. U.S. Global Investors pays out 34.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ellington Credit is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

U.S. Global Investors has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ellington Credit. Ellington Credit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than U.S. Global Investors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ellington Credit	$51.80M	3.21	-$38.85M	-$0.98	N/A
U.S. Global Investors	$10.25M	3.61	-$330K	$0.26	11.46

Ellington Credit has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Ellington Credit presently has a consensus target price of $5.50, indicating a potential upside of 26.15%. Given Ellington Credit's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ellington Credit is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ellington Credit	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
U.S. Global Investors	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 29.81% compared to Ellington Credit's net margin of -70.52%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.68% beat Ellington Credit's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ellington Credit	-70.52%	N/A	N/A
U.S. Global Investors	29.81%	6.68%	6.28%

20.4% of Ellington Credit shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Ellington Credit shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Ellington Credit on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Site Centers?

Site Centers (NYSE:SITC) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Site Centers presently has a consensus target price of $6.75, suggesting a potential upside of 134.38%. Given Site Centers' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Site Centers is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Site Centers	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
U.S. Global Investors	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Site Centers has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Site Centers has a net margin of 219.18% compared to U.S. Global Investors' net margin of 29.81%. Site Centers' return on equity of 40.56% beat U.S. Global Investors' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Site Centers	219.18%	40.56%	27.81%
U.S. Global Investors	29.81%	6.68%	6.28%

88.7% of Site Centers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Site Centers shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 5 more articles in the media than Site Centers. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 1 mentions for Site Centers. Site Centers' average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.84 indicating that Site Centers is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Site Centers	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
U.S. Global Investors	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Site Centers has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. Global Investors. Site Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than U.S. Global Investors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Site Centers	$113.49M	1.33	$177.86M	$2.41	1.20
U.S. Global Investors	$10.25M	3.61	-$330K	$0.26	11.46

Summary

Site Centers beats U.S. Global Investors on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to WhiteHorse Finance?

U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) and WhiteHorse Finance (NASDAQ:WHF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 29.81% compared to WhiteHorse Finance's net margin of 26.88%. WhiteHorse Finance's return on equity of 8.94% beat U.S. Global Investors' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
U.S. Global Investors	29.81%	6.68%	6.28%
WhiteHorse Finance	26.88%	8.94%	3.75%

WhiteHorse Finance has a consensus target price of $7.25, indicating a potential upside of 2.11%. Given WhiteHorse Finance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe WhiteHorse Finance is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
U.S. Global Investors	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
WhiteHorse Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 6 more articles in the media than WhiteHorse Finance. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 0 mentions for WhiteHorse Finance. U.S. Global Investors' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat WhiteHorse Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that U.S. Global Investors is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
U.S. Global Investors	Positive
WhiteHorse Finance	Neutral

U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. WhiteHorse Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.1%. U.S. Global Investors pays out 34.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WhiteHorse Finance pays out 126.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. WhiteHorse Finance has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. WhiteHorse Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WhiteHorse Finance has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.2% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

WhiteHorse Finance has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. Global Investors. WhiteHorse Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than U.S. Global Investors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
U.S. Global Investors	$10.25M	3.61	-$330K	$0.26	11.46
WhiteHorse Finance	$72.67M	2.10	$14.34M	$0.79	8.99

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats WhiteHorse Finance on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Elme Communities?

U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) and Elme Communities (NYSE:ELME) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

Elme Communities has a consensus price target of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 965.09%. Given Elme Communities' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Elme Communities is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
U.S. Global Investors	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Elme Communities	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75

U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Elme Communities pays an annual dividend of $0.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. U.S. Global Investors pays out 34.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Elme Communities pays out -11.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Elme Communities is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

U.S. Global Investors has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Elme Communities. Elme Communities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than U.S. Global Investors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
U.S. Global Investors	$10.25M	3.61	-$330K	$0.26	11.46
Elme Communities	$206.36M	0.73	-$154.16M	-$1.52	N/A

U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Elme Communities has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 29.81% compared to Elme Communities' net margin of -74.71%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.68% beat Elme Communities' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
U.S. Global Investors	29.81%	6.68%	6.28%
Elme Communities	-74.71%	-20.43%	-8.29%

23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.9% of Elme Communities shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Elme Communities shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 5 more articles in the media than Elme Communities. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 1 mentions for Elme Communities. Elme Communities' average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.84 indicating that Elme Communities is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
U.S. Global Investors	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Elme Communities	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Elme Communities on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to HCM Acquisition?

HCM Acquisition (NASDAQ:HCMA) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and risk.

HCM Acquisition has higher earnings, but lower revenue than U.S. Global Investors.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HCM Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
U.S. Global Investors	$10.25M	3.61	-$330K	$0.26	11.46

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 29.81% compared to HCM Acquisition's net margin of 0.00%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.68% beat HCM Acquisition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HCM Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A
U.S. Global Investors	29.81%	6.68%	6.28%

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 6 more articles in the media than HCM Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 0 mentions for HCM Acquisition. U.S. Global Investors' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat HCM Acquisition's score of 0.00 indicating that U.S. Global Investors is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
HCM Acquisition	Neutral
U.S. Global Investors	Positive

HCM Acquisition has a beta of -0.27, meaning that its stock price is 127% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

11.8% of HCM Acquisition shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 71.2% of HCM Acquisition shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HCM Acquisition	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
U.S. Global Investors	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats HCM Acquisition on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get U.S. Global Investors News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GROW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GROW vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	U.S. Global Investors	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$36.96M	$5.72B	$14.30B	$12.91B
Dividend Yield	3.02%	7.39%	5.88%	9.14%
P/E Ratio	11.92	31.67	26.19	25.45
Price / Sales	3.61	1,294.66	528.79	106.58
Price / Cash	N/A	48.14	39.96	52.44
Price / Book	0.86	1.98	2.13	6.17
Net Income	-$330K	$419.47M	$1.32B	$350.08M
7 Day Performance	-10.51%	7.28%	3.84%	-0.14%
1 Month Performance	-3.87%	0.60%	1.69%	0.94%
1 Year Performance	23.14%	5.65%	11.19%	14.02%

U.S. Global Investors Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GROW U.S. Global Investors	3.1217 of 5 stars	$2.98 -8.9%	N/A	+23.1%	$36.96M	$10.25M	11.92	20	News Coverage Earnings Report Short Interest Decrease Gap Up High Trading Volume
EARN Ellington Credit	3.4741 of 5 stars	$4.33 -1.0%	$5.50 +27.2%	-22.9%	$162.53M	$51.80M	N/A	170	Positive News
SITC Site Centers	2.9383 of 5 stars	$2.98 +0.8%	$6.75 +126.9%	-69.2%	$156.10M	$113.49M	1.23	270	News Coverage
WHF WhiteHorse Finance	2.8247 of 5 stars	$7.03 -0.6%	$7.25 +3.2%	-18.9%	$150.96M	$72.67M	8.90	N/A
ELME Elme Communities	2.6361 of 5 stars	$1.69 +0.3%	$18.00 +968.2%	-90.2%	$149.73M	$206.36M	N/A	100	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:GROW) was last updated on 9/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

U.S. Global Investors (GROW) Competitors

GROW vs. EARN, SITC, WHF, ELME, and HCMA

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Ellington Credit?

Summary

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Site Centers?

Summary

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to WhiteHorse Finance?

Summary

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Elme Communities?

Summary

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to HCM Acquisition?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GROW vs. The Competition

U.S. Global Investors Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

U.S. Global Investors (GROW) Competitors

GROW vs. EARN, SITC, WHF, ELME, and HCMA

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Ellington Credit?

Does the media favor EARN or GROW?

Is EARN or GROW a better dividend stock?

Which has better earnings & valuation, EARN or GROW?

Which has more risk and volatility, EARN or GROW?

Do analysts recommend EARN or GROW?

Is EARN or GROW more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in EARN or GROW?

Summary

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Site Centers?

Do analysts rate SITC or GROW?

Which has more risk and volatility, SITC or GROW?

Is SITC or GROW more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of SITC or GROW?

Does the media favor SITC or GROW?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, SITC or GROW?

Summary

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to WhiteHorse Finance?

Is GROW or WHF more profitable?

Do analysts prefer GROW or WHF?

Does the media prefer GROW or WHF?

Is GROW or WHF a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, GROW or WHF?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of GROW or WHF?

Which has better earnings & valuation, GROW or WHF?

Summary

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Elme Communities?

Do analysts recommend GROW or ELME?

Is GROW or ELME a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, GROW or ELME?

Which has more volatility & risk, GROW or ELME?

Is GROW or ELME more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of GROW or ELME?

Does the media prefer GROW or ELME?

Summary

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to HCM Acquisition?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, HCMA or GROW?

Is HCMA or GROW more profitable?

Does the media refer more to HCMA or GROW?

Which has more volatility & risk, HCMA or GROW?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in HCMA or GROW?

Do analysts rate HCMA or GROW?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GROW vs. The Competition

U.S. Global Investors Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools