Go Pro
→ Ray Dalio: Buy Gold. Get Paid. (From Investors Alley) (Ad)tc pixel Free GROW Stock Alerts

U.S. Global Investors (GROW) Competitors

U.S. Global Investors logo
$3.18 +0.05 (+1.60%)
Closing price 08/14/2026 03:56 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$3.16 -0.02 (-0.47%)
As of 08/14/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

GROW vs. WHF, RANG, HCMA, ELME, and STEX

Should you buy U.S. Global Investors stock or one of its competitors? U.S. Global Investors's main competitors and comparable companies include WhiteHorse Finance (WHF), Range Capital Acquisition (RANG), HCM Acquisition (HCMA), Elme Communities (ELME), and Biosig Technologies (STEX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to WhiteHorse Finance?

WhiteHorse Finance (NASDAQ:WHF) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

WhiteHorse Finance presently has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.99%. Given WhiteHorse Finance's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe WhiteHorse Finance is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WhiteHorse Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, WhiteHorse Finance had 9 more articles in the media than U.S. Global Investors. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for WhiteHorse Finance and 3 mentions for U.S. Global Investors. U.S. Global Investors' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat WhiteHorse Finance's score of 0.24 indicating that U.S. Global Investors is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
WhiteHorse Finance
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
U.S. Global Investors
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

13.2% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

WhiteHorse Finance has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. Global Investors. WhiteHorse Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than U.S. Global Investors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WhiteHorse Finance$23.04M6.59$14.34M$0.798.95
U.S. Global Investors$9.48M4.16-$330K$0.2612.23

WhiteHorse Finance has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

WhiteHorse Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.1%. U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. WhiteHorse Finance pays out 126.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. U.S. Global Investors pays out 34.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WhiteHorse Finance has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. WhiteHorse Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 33.29% compared to WhiteHorse Finance's net margin of 26.88%. WhiteHorse Finance's return on equity of 8.94% beat U.S. Global Investors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WhiteHorse Finance26.88% 8.94% 3.75%
U.S. Global Investors 33.29%6.92%6.51%

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats WhiteHorse Finance on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Range Capital Acquisition?

Range Capital Acquisition (NASDAQ:RANG) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.6% of Range Capital Acquisition shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Range Capital Acquisition has higher earnings, but lower revenue than U.S. Global Investors.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Range Capital AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
U.S. Global Investors$9.48M4.16-$330K$0.2612.23

Range Capital Acquisition has a beta of 0.08, indicating that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 33.29% compared to Range Capital Acquisition's net margin of 0.00%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.92% beat Range Capital Acquisition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Range Capital AcquisitionN/A N/A N/A
U.S. Global Investors 33.29%6.92%6.51%

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 1 more articles in the media than Range Capital Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 2 mentions for Range Capital Acquisition. Range Capital Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 1.48 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.99 indicating that Range Capital Acquisition is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Range Capital Acquisition Positive
U.S. Global Investors Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Range Capital Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Range Capital Acquisition on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to HCM Acquisition?

HCM Acquisition (NASDAQ:HCMA) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 1 more articles in the media than HCM Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 2 mentions for HCM Acquisition. HCM Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.99 indicating that HCM Acquisition is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
HCM Acquisition Very Positive
U.S. Global Investors Positive

11.8% of HCM Acquisition shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 71.2% of HCM Acquisition shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 33.29% compared to HCM Acquisition's net margin of 0.00%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.92% beat HCM Acquisition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HCM AcquisitionN/A N/A N/A
U.S. Global Investors 33.29%6.92%6.51%

HCM Acquisition has higher earnings, but lower revenue than U.S. Global Investors.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HCM AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
U.S. Global Investors$9.48M4.16-$330K$0.2612.23

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HCM Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

HCM Acquisition has a beta of -0.27, suggesting that its stock price is 127% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats HCM Acquisition on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Elme Communities?

U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) and Elme Communities (NYSE:ELME) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 1 more articles in the media than Elme Communities. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 2 mentions for Elme Communities. Elme Communities' average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.99 indicating that Elme Communities is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
U.S. Global Investors
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Elme Communities
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

U.S. Global Investors has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Elme Communities. Elme Communities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than U.S. Global Investors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
U.S. Global Investors$9.48M4.16-$330K$0.2612.23
Elme Communities$206.36M0.70-$154.16M-$1.52N/A

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 33.29% compared to Elme Communities' net margin of -74.71%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.92% beat Elme Communities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
U.S. Global Investors33.29% 6.92% 6.51%
Elme Communities -74.71%-20.43%-8.29%

23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.9% of Elme Communities shares are held by institutional investors. 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Elme Communities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Elme Communities pays an annual dividend of $0.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.1%. U.S. Global Investors pays out 34.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Elme Communities pays out -11.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Elme Communities is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Elme Communities has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Elme Communities has a consensus target price of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1,007.69%. Given Elme Communities' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Elme Communities is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Elme Communities
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Elme Communities on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Biosig Technologies?

Biosig Technologies (NASDAQ:STEX) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, Biosig Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than U.S. Global Investors. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Biosig Technologies and 3 mentions for U.S. Global Investors. U.S. Global Investors' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Biosig Technologies' score of 0.99 indicating that U.S. Global Investors is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Biosig Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
U.S. Global Investors
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

7.2% of Biosig Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.7% of Biosig Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 33.29% compared to Biosig Technologies' net margin of 0.00%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.92% beat Biosig Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Biosig TechnologiesN/A -717.92% -336.75%
U.S. Global Investors 33.29%6.92%6.51%

U.S. Global Investors has higher revenue and earnings than Biosig Technologies. Biosig Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than U.S. Global Investors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Biosig TechnologiesN/AN/A-$462.77M-$9.05N/A
U.S. Global Investors$9.48M4.16-$330K$0.2612.23

Biosig Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $8.00, suggesting a potential upside of 669.23%. Given Biosig Technologies' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Biosig Technologies is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Biosig Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Biosig Technologies has a beta of 1.98, suggesting that its share price is 98% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Biosig Technologies on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get U.S. Global Investors News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GROW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GROW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GROW vs. The Competition

Export
MetricU.S. Global InvestorsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$39.45M$5.73B$13.87B$13.07B
Dividend Yield2.88%7.38%5.87%10.64%
P/E Ratio12.2338.2529.4025.40
Price / Sales4.161,208.86507.22125.76
Price / CashN/A48.2837.2653.27
Price / Book0.923.692.816.21
Net Income-$330K$417.15M$1.31B$347.71M
7 Day Performance2.58%0.60%0.77%1.08%
1 Month Performance8.53%1.18%1.43%1.87%
1 Year Performance29.27%6.64%12.06%20.79%

U.S. Global Investors Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GROW
U.S. Global Investors
3.5275 of 5 stars		$3.18
+1.6%		N/A+29.3%$39.45M$9.48M12.2320
WHF
WhiteHorse Finance
2.7432 of 5 stars		$7.17
+6.8%		$7.50
+4.7%		-16.6%$153.93M$72.67M17.48N/A
RANG
Range Capital Acquisition
0.7411 of 5 stars		$10.74
+0.0%		N/A+4.9%$150.29MN/AN/AN/A
HCMA
HCM Acquisition
1.0705 of 5 stars		$10.30
+0.2%		N/A+74.3%$145.66MN/AN/AN/A
ELME
Elme Communities
3.5653 of 5 stars		$1.62
-0.3%		$18.00
+1,014.6%		-90.3%$143.51M$206.36MN/A100

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:GROW) was last updated on 8/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ray Dalio: Buy Gold. Get Paid.
Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, is urging investors to hold 15% of their portfolio in gold and c...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
A Dark Day Is Coming to America
Keith Kaplan, CEO of TradeSmith, has spent more than $17 million studying AI since 2022. He says a major shift...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why I'm sending this one to my own family
Behind the Markets editor Kelly Maguire says she has never sent an email quite like this one. A sealed congres...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Man who Predicted Trump 2016 Win: “Prepare for Mid-Term Meltdown”
In 2016, major election models gave Hillary Clinton a 99% chance of winning - but former CIA and Pentagon advi...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
The dollar reset no one told you about
Porter Stansberry says a dollar reset is underway - one that has happened only once before in America's 250-ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
The chart Wall Street hopes you never see
The Buffett Indicator, which measures total stock market value against GDP, just hit 229.9 percent, higher tha...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel