Go Pro

U.S. Global Investors (GROW) Competitors

U.S. Global Investors logo
$2.98 +0.05 (+1.71%)
Closing price 09/25/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.91 -0.07 (-2.21%)
As of 09/25/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GROW vs. LAFA, INAC, ALF, TPZ, and SAMG

Should you buy U.S. Global Investors stock or one of its competitors? U.S. Global Investors's main competitors and comparable companies include Lafayette Acquisition (LAFA), Indigo Acquisition (INAC), Centurion Acquisition (ALF), Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund (TPZ), and Silvercrest Asset Management Group (SAMG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Lafayette Acquisition?

Lafayette Acquisition (NASDAQ:LAFA) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

U.S. Global Investors has higher revenue and earnings than Lafayette Acquisition.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lafayette AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
U.S. Global Investors$10.25M3.58$3.06M$0.2511.92

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 29.81% compared to Lafayette Acquisition's net margin of 0.00%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.70% beat Lafayette Acquisition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lafayette AcquisitionN/A N/A N/A
U.S. Global Investors 29.81%6.70%6.30%

23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by institutional investors. 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lafayette Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Lafayette Acquisition and Lafayette Acquisition both had 2 articles in the media. Lafayette Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.89 indicating that Lafayette Acquisition is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lafayette Acquisition Positive
U.S. Global Investors Positive

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Lafayette Acquisition on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Indigo Acquisition?

U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) and Indigo Acquisition (NASDAQ:INAC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 29.81% compared to Indigo Acquisition's net margin of 0.00%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.70% beat Indigo Acquisition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
U.S. Global Investors29.81% 6.70% 6.30%
Indigo Acquisition N/A N/A N/A

U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Indigo Acquisition has a beta of -0.02, indicating that its share price is 102% less volatile than the broader market.

23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors and U.S. Global Investors both had 2 articles in the media. Indigo Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.89 indicating that Indigo Acquisition is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
U.S. Global Investors Positive
Indigo Acquisition Positive

U.S. Global Investors has higher revenue and earnings than Indigo Acquisition.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
U.S. Global Investors$10.25M3.58$3.06M$0.2511.92
Indigo AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Indigo Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Indigo Acquisition on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Centurion Acquisition?

Centurion Acquisition (NASDAQ:ALF) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.0% of Centurion Acquisition shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 1 more articles in the media than Centurion Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 1 mentions for Centurion Acquisition. Centurion Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 1.82 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.89 indicating that Centurion Acquisition is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Centurion Acquisition Very Positive
U.S. Global Investors Positive

Centurion Acquisition has a beta of 0.02, meaning that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

U.S. Global Investors has higher revenue and earnings than Centurion Acquisition.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centurion AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
U.S. Global Investors$10.25M3.58$3.06M$0.2511.92

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Centurion Acquisition
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 29.81% compared to Centurion Acquisition's net margin of 0.00%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.70% beat Centurion Acquisition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Centurion AcquisitionN/A N/A N/A
U.S. Global Investors 29.81%6.70%6.30%

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Centurion Acquisition on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund?

Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund (NYSE:TPZ) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and media sentiment.

Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 29.81% compared to Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund's net margin of 0.00%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.70% beat Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure FundN/A N/A N/A
U.S. Global Investors 29.81%6.70%6.30%

U.S. Global Investors has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund$24.21M4.68N/AN/AN/A
U.S. Global Investors$10.25M3.58$3.06M$0.2511.92

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 2 more articles in the media than Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 0 mentions for Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund. U.S. Global Investors' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that U.S. Global Investors is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund Neutral
U.S. Global Investors Positive

Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. U.S. Global Investors pays out 36.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Silvercrest Asset Management Group?

Silvercrest Asset Management Group (NASDAQ:SAMG) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Silvercrest Asset Management Group has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 29.81% compared to Silvercrest Asset Management Group's net margin of 0.72%. Silvercrest Asset Management Group's return on equity of 8.71% beat U.S. Global Investors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Silvercrest Asset Management Group0.72% 8.71% 4.91%
U.S. Global Investors 29.81%6.70%6.30%

Silvercrest Asset Management Group has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. Global Investors. U.S. Global Investors is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Silvercrest Asset Management Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Silvercrest Asset Management Group$125.44M0.97$4.89M$0.1193.64
U.S. Global Investors$10.25M3.58$3.06M$0.2511.92

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Silvercrest Asset Management Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

47.6% of Silvercrest Asset Management Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by institutional investors. 21.7% of Silvercrest Asset Management Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Silvercrest Asset Management Group pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.2%. U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Silvercrest Asset Management Group pays out 763.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. U.S. Global Investors pays out 36.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Silvercrest Asset Management Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Silvercrest Asset Management Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Silvercrest Asset Management Group had 1 more articles in the media than U.S. Global Investors. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Silvercrest Asset Management Group and 2 mentions for U.S. Global Investors. Silvercrest Asset Management Group's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.89 indicating that Silvercrest Asset Management Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Silvercrest Asset Management Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
U.S. Global Investors
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Silvercrest Asset Management Group beats U.S. Global Investors on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get U.S. Global Investors News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GROW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GROW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GROW vs. The Competition

MetricU.S. Global InvestorsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$36.03M$5.25B$13.60B$13.12B
Dividend Yield3.07%7.53%5.99%13.50%
P/E Ratio11.9229.3524.5725.78
Price / Sales3.581,218.14505.7584.19
Price / Cash11.8147.8850.3252.93
Price / Book0.813.502.716.30
Net Income$3.06M$417.50M$1.32B$360.35M
7 Day Performance-2.61%-0.14%-0.52%-0.23%
1 Month Performance-10.78%-2.32%-1.84%-3.87%
1 Year Performance10.78%4.52%8.98%5.38%

U.S. Global Investors Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GROW
U.S. Global Investors
2.0164 of 5 stars
$2.98
+1.7%
N/A+12.5%$36.03M$10.25M11.9221
LAFA
Lafayette Acquisition
N/A$10.17
+0.1%
N/AN/A$139.13MN/AN/A2
INAC
Indigo Acquisition
N/A$10.41
+0.6%
N/AN/A$133.76MN/AN/A2
ALF
Centurion Acquisition
1.055 of 5 stars
$10.82
-0.6%
N/AN/A$131.30MN/AN/A21
TPZ
Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund
N/A$20.92
-0.5%
N/A-3.8%$125.50M$24.21MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GROW) was last updated on 9/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners