Free Trial

U.S. Global Investors (GROW) Competitors

U.S. Global Investors logo
$2.57 +0.05 (+1.98%)
As of 12:28 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GROW vs. ALF, SAMG, SPMC, EARN, and TPZ

Should you buy U.S. Global Investors stock or one of its competitors? U.S. Global Investors's main competitors and comparable companies include Centurion Acquisition (ALF), Silvercrest Asset Management Group (SAMG), Sound Point Meridian Capital (SPMC), Ellington Credit (EARN), and Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund (TPZ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Centurion Acquisition?

Centurion Acquisition (NASDAQ:ALF) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 29.81% compared to Centurion Acquisition's net margin of 0.00%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.70% beat Centurion Acquisition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Centurion AcquisitionN/A N/A N/A
U.S. Global Investors 29.81%6.70%6.30%

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 4 more articles in the media than Centurion Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 1 mentions for Centurion Acquisition. Centurion Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 1.47 indicating that Centurion Acquisition is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Centurion Acquisition Very Positive
U.S. Global Investors Positive

Centurion Acquisition has a beta of 0.02, indicating that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

U.S. Global Investors has higher revenue and earnings than Centurion Acquisition.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centurion AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
U.S. Global Investors$10.25M3.08$3.06M$0.2510.28

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Centurion Acquisition
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.0% of Centurion Acquisition shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Centurion Acquisition on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Silvercrest Asset Management Group?

Silvercrest Asset Management Group (NASDAQ:SAMG) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 2 more articles in the media than Silvercrest Asset Management Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 3 mentions for Silvercrest Asset Management Group. U.S. Global Investors' average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Silvercrest Asset Management Group's score of 1.02 indicating that U.S. Global Investors is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Silvercrest Asset Management Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
U.S. Global Investors
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Silvercrest Asset Management Group has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Silvercrest Asset Management Group pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Silvercrest Asset Management Group pays out 700.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. U.S. Global Investors pays out 36.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Silvercrest Asset Management Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Silvercrest Asset Management Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Silvercrest Asset Management Group has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. Global Investors. U.S. Global Investors is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Silvercrest Asset Management Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Silvercrest Asset Management Group$125.32M1.06$4.89M$0.1293.04
U.S. Global Investors$10.25M3.08$3.06M$0.2510.28

47.6% of Silvercrest Asset Management Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.7% of Silvercrest Asset Management Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Silvercrest Asset Management Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 29.81% compared to Silvercrest Asset Management Group's net margin of 0.74%. Silvercrest Asset Management Group's return on equity of 8.55% beat U.S. Global Investors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Silvercrest Asset Management Group0.74% 8.55% 4.67%
U.S. Global Investors 29.81%6.70%6.30%

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Silvercrest Asset Management Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Sound Point Meridian Capital?

U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) and Sound Point Meridian Capital (NYSE:SPMC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Sound Point Meridian Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 25.8%. U.S. Global Investors pays out 36.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sound Point Meridian Capital pays out -27.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sound Point Meridian Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Sound Point Meridian Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sound Point Meridian Capital has a consensus target price of $12.83, indicating a potential upside of 112.12%. Given Sound Point Meridian Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sound Point Meridian Capital is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Sound Point Meridian Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

U.S. Global Investors has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sound Point Meridian Capital. Sound Point Meridian Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than U.S. Global Investors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
U.S. Global Investors$10.25M3.08$3.06M$0.2510.28
Sound Point Meridian Capital$72.51M1.71-$118.49M-$5.78N/A

U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sound Point Meridian Capital has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 29.81% compared to Sound Point Meridian Capital's net margin of 0.00%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.70% beat Sound Point Meridian Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
U.S. Global Investors29.81% 6.70% 6.30%
Sound Point Meridian Capital N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Sound Point Meridian Capital had 10 more articles in the media than U.S. Global Investors. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Sound Point Meridian Capital and 5 mentions for U.S. Global Investors. U.S. Global Investors' average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Sound Point Meridian Capital's score of 0.07 indicating that U.S. Global Investors is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
U.S. Global Investors
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Sound Point Meridian Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Sound Point Meridian Capital on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Ellington Credit?

Ellington Credit (NYSE:EARN) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Ellington Credit has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Ellington Credit presently has a consensus target price of $5.25, indicating a potential upside of 68.00%. Given Ellington Credit's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Ellington Credit is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ellington Credit
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

U.S. Global Investors has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ellington Credit. Ellington Credit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than U.S. Global Investors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ellington Credit$51.80M2.30-$38.85M-$0.98N/A
U.S. Global Investors$10.25M3.08$3.06M$0.2510.28

20.4% of Ellington Credit shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Ellington Credit shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ellington Credit pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 30.7%. U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Ellington Credit pays out -98.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. U.S. Global Investors pays out 36.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ellington Credit is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 3 more articles in the media than Ellington Credit. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 2 mentions for Ellington Credit. U.S. Global Investors' average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Ellington Credit's score of 0.28 indicating that U.S. Global Investors is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ellington Credit
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
U.S. Global Investors
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 29.81% compared to Ellington Credit's net margin of -70.52%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.70% beat Ellington Credit's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ellington Credit-70.52% N/A N/A
U.S. Global Investors 29.81%6.70%6.30%

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Ellington Credit on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund?

U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) and Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund (NYSE:TPZ) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and dividends.

U.S. Global Investors has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
U.S. Global Investors$10.25M3.08$3.06M$0.2510.28
Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund$24.21M4.66N/AN/AN/A

U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. U.S. Global Investors pays out 36.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 5 more articles in the media than Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 0 mentions for Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund. U.S. Global Investors' average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that U.S. Global Investors is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
U.S. Global Investors Positive
Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund Neutral

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 29.81% compared to Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund's net margin of 0.00%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.70% beat Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
U.S. Global Investors29.81% 6.70% 6.30%
Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund N/A N/A N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by institutional investors. 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get U.S. Global Investors News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GROW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GROW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GROW vs. The Competition

MetricU.S. Global InvestorsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$31.61M$5.35B$14.14B$12.01B
Dividend Yield3.50%5.52%4.88%4.50%
P/E Ratio10.2824.7120.4830.36
Price / Sales3.087.664.845.82
Price / Cash10.3529.7220.3222.80
Price / Book0.701.801.813.77
Net Income$3.06M$419.50M$1.33B$390.55M
7 Day Performance2.80%0.09%0.03%-0.58%
1 Month Performance-10.14%-1.95%-0.68%-6.84%
1 Year Performance7.98%-1.94%4.71%-6.12%

U.S. Global Investors Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GROW
U.S. Global Investors
4.0275 of 5 stars
$2.57
+2.0%
N/A+6.8%$31.61M$10.25M10.2821
ALF
Centurion Acquisition
1.0241 of 5 stars
$10.87
+0.4%
N/AN/A$131.91MN/AN/A21
SAMG
Silvercrest Asset Management Group
2.4069 of 5 stars
$10.81
-0.4%
N/A-21.0%$128.28M$125.32M90.22171
SPMC
Sound Point Meridian Capital
4.5611 of 5 stars
$6.20
+0.7%
$15.13
+144.1%
-62.5%$126.98M-$121.96MN/AN/A
EARN
Ellington Credit
2.799 of 5 stars
$3.30
-1.1%
$5.25
+59.3%
-39.4%$126.16M$15.88MN/A160

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GROW) was last updated on 11/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners