NASDAQ:GROW

U.S. Global Investors Competitors

$8.12

-0.41 (-4.81 %)

(As of 04/16/2021 04:00 PM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$8.10

Now: $8.12▼

$8.90

50-Day Range

$6.36

MA: $7.80▼

$11.84

52-Week Range

$1.20

Now: $8.12▼

$12.89

Volume441,437 shs

Average Volume468,236 shs

Market Capitalization$122.34 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend Yield0.63%

Beta2.9

U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) Vs. FDUS, VALU, SAR, PUYI, MRCC, and SAMG

Should you be buying GROW stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "investment advice" are considered alternatives and competitors to U.S. Global Investors, including Fidus Investment (FDUS), Value Line (VALU), Saratoga Investment (SAR), Puyi (PUYI), Monroe Capital (MRCC), and Silvercrest Asset Management Group (SAMG).

U.S. Global Investors vs. Fidus Investment Stock

Fidus Investment (NASDAQ:FDUS) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

Fidus Investment has a beta of 1.89, meaning that its share price is 89% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 2.9, meaning that its share price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Fidus Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Fidus Investment pays out 86.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fidus Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and U.S. Global Investors has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Fidus Investment and U.S. Global Investors' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fidus Investment	26.80%	9.15%	4.66%
U.S. Global Investors	11.96%	6.06%	5.48%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fidus Investment and U.S. Global Investors' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fidus Investment	$77.11 million	5.28	$48.47 million	$1.44	11.57
U.S. Global Investors	$4.48 million	27.31	$-4,680,000.00	N/A	N/A

Fidus Investment has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. Global Investors.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

22.9% of Fidus Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.3% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Fidus Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Fidus Investment and U.S. Global Investors, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fidus Investment	0	0	6	0	3.00
U.S. Global Investors	0	0	0	0	N/A

Fidus Investment presently has a consensus price target of $15.40, suggesting a potential downside of 7.56%. Given Fidus Investment's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fidus Investment is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors.

Summary

Fidus Investment beats U.S. Global Investors on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

U.S. Global Investors vs. Value Line Stock

U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) and Value Line (NASDAQ:VALU) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 2.9, indicating that its stock price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Value Line has a beta of -0.1, indicating that its stock price is 110% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Value Line pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. U.S. Global Investors has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Value Line has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Value Line is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares U.S. Global Investors and Value Line's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
U.S. Global Investors	11.96%	6.06%	5.48%
Value Line	43.60%	32.05%	16.41%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares U.S. Global Investors and Value Line's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
U.S. Global Investors	$4.48 million	27.31	$-4,680,000.00	N/A	N/A
Value Line	$40.30 million	7.26	$15.66 million	N/A	N/A

Value Line has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. Global Investors.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

34.3% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of Value Line shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Value Line shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for U.S. Global Investors and Value Line, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
U.S. Global Investors	0	0	0	0	N/A
Value Line	0	0	0	0	N/A

Summary

Value Line beats U.S. Global Investors on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

U.S. Global Investors vs. Saratoga Investment Stock

U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) and Saratoga Investment (NYSE:SAR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares U.S. Global Investors and Saratoga Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
U.S. Global Investors	11.96%	6.06%	5.48%
Saratoga Investment	54.72%	7.97%	4.27%

Risk and Volatility

U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 2.9, indicating that its stock price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Saratoga Investment has a beta of 1.68, indicating that its stock price is 68% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

34.3% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.6% of Saratoga Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.7% of Saratoga Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Saratoga Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. Saratoga Investment pays out 69.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. U.S. Global Investors has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for U.S. Global Investors and Saratoga Investment, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
U.S. Global Investors	0	0	0	0	N/A
Saratoga Investment	0	0	7	0	3.00

Saratoga Investment has a consensus target price of $23.75, suggesting a potential downside of 3.77%. Given Saratoga Investment's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Saratoga Investment is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares U.S. Global Investors and Saratoga Investment's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
U.S. Global Investors	$4.48 million	27.31	$-4,680,000.00	N/A	N/A
Saratoga Investment	$58.45 million	4.72	$55.74 million	$2.49	9.91

Saratoga Investment has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. Global Investors.

Summary

Saratoga Investment beats U.S. Global Investors on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

U.S. Global Investors vs. Puyi Stock

Puyi (NASDAQ:PUYI) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Puyi and U.S. Global Investors' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Puyi	N/A	N/A	N/A
U.S. Global Investors	11.96%	6.06%	5.48%

Volatility and Risk

Puyi has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 2.9, indicating that its stock price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

34.3% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Puyi and U.S. Global Investors, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Puyi	0	0	0	0	N/A
U.S. Global Investors	0	0	0	0	N/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Puyi and U.S. Global Investors' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Puyi	$18.33 million	13.98	$-4,660,000.00	N/A	N/A
U.S. Global Investors	$4.48 million	27.31	$-4,680,000.00	N/A	N/A

Puyi has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. Global Investors.

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Puyi on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

U.S. Global Investors vs. Monroe Capital Stock

U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) and Monroe Capital (NASDAQ:MRCC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Dividends

U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Monroe Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Monroe Capital pays out 70.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. U.S. Global Investors has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Monroe Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility and Risk

U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 2.9, suggesting that its stock price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Monroe Capital has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares U.S. Global Investors and Monroe Capital's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
U.S. Global Investors	$4.48 million	27.31	$-4,680,000.00	N/A	N/A
Monroe Capital	$68.19 million	3.37	$19.21 million	$1.42	7.59

Monroe Capital has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. Global Investors.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

34.3% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.6% of Monroe Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Monroe Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares U.S. Global Investors and Monroe Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
U.S. Global Investors	11.96%	6.06%	5.48%
Monroe Capital	-4.93%	14.44%	5.41%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for U.S. Global Investors and Monroe Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
U.S. Global Investors	0	0	0	0	N/A
Monroe Capital	0	1	0	0	2.00

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Monroe Capital on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

U.S. Global Investors vs. Silvercrest Asset Management Group Stock

U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) and Silvercrest Asset Management Group (NASDAQ:SAMG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Dividends

U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Silvercrest Asset Management Group pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Silvercrest Asset Management Group pays out 54.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. U.S. Global Investors has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Silvercrest Asset Management Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Risk & Volatility

U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 2.9, indicating that its share price is 190% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Silvercrest Asset Management Group has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares U.S. Global Investors and Silvercrest Asset Management Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
U.S. Global Investors	$4.48 million	27.31	$-4,680,000.00	N/A	N/A
Silvercrest Asset Management Group	$102.15 million	2.15	$8.65 million	$1.17	12.99

Silvercrest Asset Management Group has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. Global Investors.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

34.3% of U.S. Global Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.2% of Silvercrest Asset Management Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.1% of Silvercrest Asset Management Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares U.S. Global Investors and Silvercrest Asset Management Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
U.S. Global Investors	11.96%	6.06%	5.48%
Silvercrest Asset Management Group	9.78%	18.47%	9.33%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for U.S. Global Investors and Silvercrest Asset Management Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
U.S. Global Investors	0	0	0	0	N/A
Silvercrest Asset Management Group	0	0	2	0	3.00

Silvercrest Asset Management Group has a consensus target price of $16.75, indicating a potential upside of 10.20%. Given Silvercrest Asset Management Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Silvercrest Asset Management Group is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors.

Summary

Silvercrest Asset Management Group beats U.S. Global Investors on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.