Free Trial

U.S. Global Investors (GROW) Competitors

U.S. Global Investors logo
$2.99 +0.03 (+1.01%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.99 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06:02 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GROW vs. INAC, ACR, SAMG, WTF, and AFJK

Should you buy U.S. Global Investors stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares U.S. Global Investors with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with U.S. Global Investors include Indigo Acquisition (INAC), ACRES Commercial Realty (ACR), Silvercrest Asset Management Group (SAMG), Waton Financial (WTF), and Aimei Health Technology (AFJK). These companies are all part of the "trading" industry.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Indigo Acquisition?

Indigo Acquisition (NASDAQ:INAC) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by institutional investors. 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Indigo Acquisition has higher earnings, but lower revenue than U.S. Global Investors.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Indigo AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
U.S. Global Investors$9.48M3.91-$330K$0.2611.50

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 33.29% compared to Indigo Acquisition's net margin of 0.00%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.92% beat Indigo Acquisition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Indigo AcquisitionN/A N/A N/A
U.S. Global Investors 33.29%6.92%6.51%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Indigo Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 3 more articles in the media than Indigo Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 1 mentions for Indigo Acquisition. Indigo Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.30 indicating that Indigo Acquisition is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Indigo Acquisition Very Positive
U.S. Global Investors Neutral

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Indigo Acquisition on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to ACRES Commercial Realty?

U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) and ACRES Commercial Realty (NYSE:ACR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.0% of ACRES Commercial Realty shares are held by institutional investors. 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of ACRES Commercial Realty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

ACRES Commercial Realty has a consensus price target of $24.50, indicating a potential upside of 50.04%. Given ACRES Commercial Realty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ACRES Commercial Realty is more favorable than U.S. Global Investors.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
ACRES Commercial Realty
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

ACRES Commercial Realty has a net margin of 37.20% compared to U.S. Global Investors' net margin of 33.29%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.92% beat ACRES Commercial Realty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
U.S. Global Investors33.29% 6.92% 6.51%
ACRES Commercial Realty 37.20%5.61%1.36%

U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ACRES Commercial Realty has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ACRES Commercial Realty had 2 more articles in the media than U.S. Global Investors. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ACRES Commercial Realty and 4 mentions for U.S. Global Investors. ACRES Commercial Realty's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.30 indicating that ACRES Commercial Realty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
U.S. Global Investors
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ACRES Commercial Realty
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

ACRES Commercial Realty has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. Global Investors. U.S. Global Investors is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ACRES Commercial Realty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
U.S. Global Investors$9.48M3.91-$330K$0.2611.50
ACRES Commercial Realty$79.95M1.46$21.32M$0.6525.12

Summary

ACRES Commercial Realty beats U.S. Global Investors on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Silvercrest Asset Management Group?

U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) and Silvercrest Asset Management Group (NASDAQ:SAMG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 3 more articles in the media than Silvercrest Asset Management Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 1 mentions for Silvercrest Asset Management Group. Silvercrest Asset Management Group's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.30 indicating that Silvercrest Asset Management Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
U.S. Global Investors Neutral
Silvercrest Asset Management Group Positive

23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.6% of Silvercrest Asset Management Group shares are held by institutional investors. 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of Silvercrest Asset Management Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Silvercrest Asset Management Group has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. Global Investors. U.S. Global Investors is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Silvercrest Asset Management Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
U.S. Global Investors$9.48M3.91-$330K$0.2611.50
Silvercrest Asset Management Group$125.32M1.03$4.89M$0.3036.33

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Silvercrest Asset Management Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Silvercrest Asset Management Group has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 33.29% compared to Silvercrest Asset Management Group's net margin of 2.12%. Silvercrest Asset Management Group's return on equity of 10.51% beat U.S. Global Investors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
U.S. Global Investors33.29% 6.92% 6.51%
Silvercrest Asset Management Group 2.12%10.51%6.18%

U.S. Global Investors pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Silvercrest Asset Management Group pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. U.S. Global Investors pays out 34.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Silvercrest Asset Management Group pays out 280.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Silvercrest Asset Management Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Silvercrest Asset Management Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Silvercrest Asset Management Group beats U.S. Global Investors on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Waton Financial?

Waton Financial (NASDAQ:WTF) and U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 3 more articles in the media than Waton Financial. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 1 mentions for Waton Financial. Waton Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.30 indicating that Waton Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Waton Financial Very Positive
U.S. Global Investors Neutral

23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by institutional investors. 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

U.S. Global Investors has higher revenue and earnings than Waton Financial.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Waton Financial$7.45M16.29-$11.97MN/AN/A
U.S. Global Investors$9.48M3.91-$330K$0.2611.50

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Waton Financial
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Waton Financial has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 33.29% compared to Waton Financial's net margin of 0.00%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.92% beat Waton Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Waton FinancialN/A N/A N/A
U.S. Global Investors 33.29%6.92%6.51%

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Waton Financial on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does U.S. Global Investors compare to Aimei Health Technology?

U.S. Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) and Aimei Health Technology (NASDAQ:AFJK) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and dividends.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
U.S. Global Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Aimei Health Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

U.S. Global Investors has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aimei Health Technology has a beta of 0.22, suggesting that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

Aimei Health Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than U.S. Global Investors. U.S. Global Investors is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aimei Health Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
U.S. Global Investors$9.48M3.91-$330K$0.2611.50
Aimei Health TechnologyN/AN/A$1.06M$0.18183.63

U.S. Global Investors has a net margin of 33.29% compared to Aimei Health Technology's net margin of 0.00%. U.S. Global Investors' return on equity of 6.92% beat Aimei Health Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
U.S. Global Investors33.29% 6.92% 6.51%
Aimei Health Technology N/A -33.32%2.91%

In the previous week, U.S. Global Investors had 3 more articles in the media than Aimei Health Technology. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for U.S. Global Investors and 1 mentions for Aimei Health Technology. Aimei Health Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat U.S. Global Investors' score of 0.30 indicating that Aimei Health Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
U.S. Global Investors Neutral
Aimei Health Technology Very Positive

23.6% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.6% of Aimei Health Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 19.2% of U.S. Global Investors shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Aimei Health Technology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

U.S. Global Investors beats Aimei Health Technology on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get U.S. Global Investors News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GROW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GROW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GROW vs. The Competition

MetricU.S. Global InvestorsFIN IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$37.09M$12.59B$13.91B$12.35B
Dividend Yield3.09%7.26%5.75%5.66%
P/E Ratio11.5021.9420.1224.58
Price / Sales3.914.50146.73167.29
Price / CashN/A12.9719.5037.92
Price / Book0.863.292.256.78
Net Income-$330K$553.89M$1.14B$337.32M
7 Day Performance9.12%1.97%1.15%1.96%
1 Month Performance14.12%3.19%2.00%3.81%
1 Year Performance26.69%9.12%12.45%32.18%

U.S. Global Investors Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GROW
U.S. Global Investors
3.2617 of 5 stars
$2.99
+1.0%
N/A+25.4%$37.09M$9.48M11.5020
INAC
Indigo Acquisition
N/A$10.20
-0.1%
N/AN/A$131.07MN/AN/A2
ACR
ACRES Commercial Realty
4.2789 of 5 stars
$18.36
-0.5%
$24.50
+33.4%
+0.4%$130.90M$79.95M28.252,018
SAMG
Silvercrest Asset Management Group
2.3391 of 5 stars
$10.85
-0.7%
N/A-26.1%$130.11M$125.32M36.60150
WTF
Waton Financial
0.5098 of 5 stars
$2.71
-8.0%
N/A-53.0%$129.42M$7.45MN/A31

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GROW) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners