Goosehead Insurance (GSHD) Competitors

Goosehead Insurance pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.8%. Enact pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Goosehead Insurance pays out 403.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enact pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enact has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Goosehead Insurance currently has a consensus price target of $67.73, suggesting a potential upside of 59.51%. Given Goosehead Insurance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Goosehead Insurance is more favorable than Enact.

Enact has a net margin of 54.56% compared to Goosehead Insurance's net margin of 7.94%. Enact's return on equity of 13.09% beat Goosehead Insurance's return on equity.

In the previous week, Goosehead Insurance had 5 more articles in the media than Enact. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Goosehead Insurance and 5 mentions for Enact. Goosehead Insurance's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Enact's score of 0.50 indicating that Goosehead Insurance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.62, indicating that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Enact has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Enact has higher revenue and earnings than Goosehead Insurance. Enact is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goosehead Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

18.0% of Enact shares are held by institutional investors. 38.1% of Goosehead Insurance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Enact shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Essent Group pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Goosehead Insurance pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.8%. Essent Group pays out 20.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Goosehead Insurance pays out 403.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Essent Group has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Essent Group presently has a consensus price target of $67.86, suggesting a potential upside of 12.74%. Goosehead Insurance has a consensus price target of $67.73, suggesting a potential upside of 59.51%. Given Goosehead Insurance's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Goosehead Insurance is more favorable than Essent Group.

Essent Group has a net margin of 54.72% compared to Goosehead Insurance's net margin of 7.94%. Essent Group's return on equity of 12.09% beat Goosehead Insurance's return on equity.

In the previous week, Essent Group had 2 more articles in the media than Goosehead Insurance. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Essent Group and 10 mentions for Goosehead Insurance. Essent Group's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Goosehead Insurance's score of 0.55 indicating that Essent Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Essent Group has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.62, suggesting that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Essent Group has higher revenue and earnings than Goosehead Insurance. Essent Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goosehead Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.0% of Essent Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of Essent Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.1% of Goosehead Insurance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Goosehead Insurance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lemonade. Lemonade is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goosehead Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

80.3% of Lemonade shares are held by institutional investors. 12.5% of Lemonade shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.1% of Goosehead Insurance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lemonade has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its share price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Lemonade had 19 more articles in the media than Goosehead Insurance. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Lemonade and 10 mentions for Goosehead Insurance. Goosehead Insurance's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Lemonade's score of 0.32 indicating that Goosehead Insurance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Goosehead Insurance has a net margin of 7.94% compared to Lemonade's net margin of -16.44%. Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of -20.96% beat Lemonade's return on equity.

Lemonade presently has a consensus price target of $64.88, suggesting a potential upside of 13.46%. Goosehead Insurance has a consensus price target of $67.73, suggesting a potential upside of 59.51%. Given Goosehead Insurance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Goosehead Insurance is more favorable than Lemonade.

Goosehead Insurance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Oscar Health. Oscar Health is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goosehead Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

75.7% of Oscar Health shares are held by institutional investors. 25.1% of Oscar Health shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.1% of Goosehead Insurance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Oscar Health has a beta of 2.34, meaning that its stock price is 134% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Goosehead Insurance had 2 more articles in the media than Oscar Health. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Goosehead Insurance and 8 mentions for Oscar Health. Goosehead Insurance's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Oscar Health's score of 0.53 indicating that Goosehead Insurance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Goosehead Insurance has a net margin of 7.94% compared to Oscar Health's net margin of -3.79%. Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of -20.96% beat Oscar Health's return on equity.

Oscar Health presently has a consensus target price of $16.78, suggesting a potential downside of 6.46%. Goosehead Insurance has a consensus target price of $67.73, suggesting a potential upside of 59.51%. Given Goosehead Insurance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Goosehead Insurance is more favorable than Oscar Health.