Log in

NASDAQ:GSHDGoosehead Insurance Competitors & Alternatives

$105.67
-0.78 (-0.73 %)
(As of 08/7/2020 04:00 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$104.60
Now: $105.67
$107.00
50-Day Range
$71.96
MA: $82.43
$109.16
52-Week Range
$37.26
Now: $105.67
$110.88
Volume123,259 shs
Average Volume170,582 shs
Market Capitalization$3.86 billion
P/E Ratio301.92
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.95

Competitors

Goosehead Insurance (NASDAQ:GSHD) Vs. BRO, ERIE, EQH, EHTH, CRVL, and FANH

Should you be buying GSHD stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "insurance agents, brokers, & service" are considered alternatives and competitors to Goosehead Insurance, including Brown & Brown (BRO), Erie Indemnity (ERIE), Equitable (EQH), eHealth (EHTH), CorVel (CRVL), and Fanhua (FANH).

Goosehead Insurance (NASDAQ:GSHD) and Brown & Brown (NYSE:BRO) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

42.1% of Goosehead Insurance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Brown & Brown shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.4% of Goosehead Insurance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.1% of Brown & Brown shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Goosehead Insurance and Brown & Brown's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Goosehead Insurance6.39%-22.88%7.41%
Brown & Brown17.69%12.54%5.54%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Goosehead Insurance and Brown & Brown, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Goosehead Insurance01202.67
Brown & Brown15202.13

Goosehead Insurance currently has a consensus target price of $73.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 30.60%. Brown & Brown has a consensus target price of $41.7143, suggesting a potential downside of 9.43%. Given Brown & Brown's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brown & Brown is more favorable than Goosehead Insurance.

Risk & Volatility

Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Goosehead Insurance and Brown & Brown's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goosehead Insurance$77.49 million49.83$3.57 million$0.22480.32
Brown & Brown$2.39 billion5.45$398.51 million$1.4032.90

Brown & Brown has higher revenue and earnings than Goosehead Insurance. Brown & Brown is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goosehead Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Brown & Brown beats Goosehead Insurance on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Erie Indemnity (NASDAQ:ERIE) and Goosehead Insurance (NASDAQ:GSHD) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Erie Indemnity and Goosehead Insurance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Erie Indemnity11.76%25.86%14.70%
Goosehead Insurance6.39%-22.88%7.41%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Erie Indemnity and Goosehead Insurance's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Erie Indemnity$2.48 billion4.05$316.82 million$6.0635.84
Goosehead Insurance$77.49 million49.83$3.57 million$0.22480.32

Erie Indemnity has higher revenue and earnings than Goosehead Insurance. Erie Indemnity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goosehead Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

35.0% of Erie Indemnity shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.1% of Goosehead Insurance shares are owned by institutional investors. 45.8% of Erie Indemnity shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 63.4% of Goosehead Insurance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Erie Indemnity and Goosehead Insurance, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Erie Indemnity00103.00
Goosehead Insurance01202.67

Goosehead Insurance has a consensus price target of $73.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 30.60%. Given Goosehead Insurance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Goosehead Insurance is more favorable than Erie Indemnity.

Goosehead Insurance (NASDAQ:GSHD) and Equitable (NYSE:EQH) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Equitable has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its share price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Goosehead Insurance and Equitable's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Goosehead Insurance6.39%-22.88%7.41%
EquitableN/AN/AN/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Goosehead Insurance and Equitable's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goosehead Insurance$77.49 million49.83$3.57 million$0.22480.32
Equitable$9.59 billion1.01$2.18 billion$4.854.42

Equitable has higher revenue and earnings than Goosehead Insurance. Equitable is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goosehead Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

42.1% of Goosehead Insurance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.1% of Equitable shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.4% of Goosehead Insurance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Equitable shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Goosehead Insurance and Equitable, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Goosehead Insurance01202.67
Equitable01602.86

Goosehead Insurance currently has a consensus target price of $73.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 30.60%. Equitable has a consensus target price of $22.5714, suggesting a potential upside of 5.23%. Given Equitable's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Equitable is more favorable than Goosehead Insurance.

Summary

Equitable beats Goosehead Insurance on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH) and Goosehead Insurance (NASDAQ:GSHD) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for eHealth and Goosehead Insurance, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
eHealth011002.91
Goosehead Insurance01202.67

eHealth currently has a consensus target price of $149.1818, suggesting a potential upside of 87.74%. Goosehead Insurance has a consensus target price of $73.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 30.60%. Given eHealth's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe eHealth is more favorable than Goosehead Insurance.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

42.1% of Goosehead Insurance shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of eHealth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 63.4% of Goosehead Insurance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares eHealth and Goosehead Insurance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
eHealth13.74%12.68%10.05%
Goosehead Insurance6.39%-22.88%7.41%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares eHealth and Goosehead Insurance's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
eHealth$506.20 million4.02$66.89 million$3.5022.70
Goosehead Insurance$77.49 million49.83$3.57 million$0.22480.32

eHealth has higher revenue and earnings than Goosehead Insurance. eHealth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goosehead Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

eHealth has a beta of -0.14, indicating that its share price is 114% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

eHealth beats Goosehead Insurance on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

CorVel (NASDAQ:CRVL) and Goosehead Insurance (NASDAQ:GSHD) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Risk & Volatility

CorVel has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for CorVel and Goosehead Insurance, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CorVel0000N/A
Goosehead Insurance01202.67

Goosehead Insurance has a consensus target price of $73.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 30.60%. Given Goosehead Insurance's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Goosehead Insurance is more favorable than CorVel.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CorVel and Goosehead Insurance's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CorVel$592.22 million2.44$47.38 millionN/AN/A
Goosehead Insurance$77.49 million49.83$3.57 million$0.22480.32

CorVel has higher revenue and earnings than Goosehead Insurance.

Profitability

This table compares CorVel and Goosehead Insurance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CorVel7.39%21.62%10.01%
Goosehead Insurance6.39%-22.88%7.41%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

45.5% of CorVel shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.1% of Goosehead Insurance shares are held by institutional investors. 50.4% of CorVel shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 63.4% of Goosehead Insurance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Goosehead Insurance (NASDAQ:GSHD) and Fanhua (NASDAQ:FANH) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fanhua has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

42.1% of Goosehead Insurance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.5% of Fanhua shares are held by institutional investors. 63.4% of Goosehead Insurance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Goosehead Insurance and Fanhua's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goosehead Insurance$77.49 million49.83$3.57 million$0.22480.32
Fanhua$532.33 million2.56$27.14 million$1.3515.56

Fanhua has higher revenue and earnings than Goosehead Insurance. Fanhua is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goosehead Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Goosehead Insurance and Fanhua, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Goosehead Insurance01202.67
Fanhua02002.00

Goosehead Insurance presently has a consensus price target of $73.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 30.60%. Fanhua has a consensus price target of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.52%. Given Fanhua's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fanhua is more favorable than Goosehead Insurance.

Profitability

This table compares Goosehead Insurance and Fanhua's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Goosehead Insurance6.39%-22.88%7.41%
Fanhua2.44%18.63%11.32%

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Brown & Brown logo
BRO
Brown & Brown
1.6$46.06-1.0%$13.03 billion$2.39 billion29.53Ex-Dividend
Erie Indemnity logo
ERIE
Erie Indemnity
1.3$217.20-0.1%$10.03 billion$2.48 billion38.51Dividend Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Equitable logo
EQH
Equitable
1.6$21.45-3.9%$9.64 billion$9.59 billion-357.44Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Increase in Short Interest
Heavy News Reporting
eHealth logo
EHTH
eHealth
1.6$79.46-3.8%$2.04 billion$506.20 million25.55Analyst Report
Insider Buying
CorVel logo
CRVL
CorVel
0.9$80.38-2.9%$1.45 billion$592.22 million35.10Analyst Downgrade
Fanhua logo
FANH
Fanhua
1.4$21.00-2.4%$1.37 billion$532.33 million95.46
HUIZ
Phoenix Tree
0.5$9.17-3.9%$476.09 million$142.68 million0.00Lockup Expiration
BFYT
Benefytt Technologies
1.0$31.01-0.4%$441.71 million$381.81 million-23.67Upcoming Earnings
Health Insurance Innovations logo
HIIQ
Health Insurance Innovations
2.0$31.01-0.4%$440.65 million$381.81 million12.50Heavy News Reporting
CRD.A
Crawford & Company
0.6$7.91-5.4%$420.44 million$1.05 billion-395.50Dividend Increase
Decrease in Short Interest
Heavy News Reporting
Crawford & Company logo
CRD.B
Crawford & Company
1.2$7.40-3.9%$393.33 million$1.05 billion-92.49Dividend Increase
Analyst Upgrade
High Trading Volume
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
This page was last updated on 8/9/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.