Does the media refer more to ACGL or EG?

In the previous week, Everest Group had 21 more articles in the media than Arch Capital Group. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Everest Group and 8 mentions for Arch Capital Group. Everest Group's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Arch Capital Group's score of 0.68 indicating that Everest Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Arch Capital Group 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Everest Group 15 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CINF or EG?

In the previous week, Everest Group had 15 more articles in the media than Cincinnati Financial. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Everest Group and 14 mentions for Cincinnati Financial. Cincinnati Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Everest Group's score of 1.20 indicating that Cincinnati Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cincinnati Financial 10 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Everest Group 15 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to EG or AXS?

In the previous week, Everest Group had 25 more articles in the media than Axis Capital. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Everest Group and 4 mentions for Axis Capital. Everest Group's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Axis Capital's score of 0.79 indicating that Everest Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Everest Group 15 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Axis Capital 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CB or EG?

Chubb has higher revenue and earnings than Everest Group. Everest Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chubb, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Chubb $59.40B 2.22 $10.31B $28.27 12.07 Everest Group $17.50B 0.81 $1.59B $47.29 7.83

Is CB or EG more profitable?

Chubb has a net margin of 18.10% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 11.41%. Chubb's return on equity of 14.47% beat Everest Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Chubb 18.10% 14.47% 4.19% Everest Group 11.41% 13.63% 3.37%

Does the media refer more to CB or EG?

In the previous week, Chubb had 39 more articles in the media than Everest Group. MarketBeat recorded 68 mentions for Chubb and 29 mentions for Everest Group. Chubb's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Everest Group's score of 1.20 indicating that Chubb is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Chubb 64 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Everest Group 15 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer EG or CNA?

Everest Group presently has a consensus price target of $395.27, suggesting a potential upside of 6.78%. Given Everest Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Everest Group is more favorable than CNA Financial. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Everest Group 0 Sell rating(s) 12 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25 CNA Financial 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media refer more to EG or CNA?

In the previous week, Everest Group had 10 more articles in the media than CNA Financial. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Everest Group and 19 mentions for CNA Financial. Everest Group's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat CNA Financial's score of 0.69 indicating that Everest Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Everest Group 15 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive CNA Financial 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Everest Group (EG) Competitors

$370.18 +1.82 (+0.49%)

As of 08/21/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Compare

EG vs. ACGL, CINF, AXS, CB, and CNA

Should you buy Everest Group stock or one of its competitors? Everest Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Arch Capital Group (ACGL), Cincinnati Financial (CINF), Axis Capital (AXS), Chubb (CB), and CNA Financial (CNA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "insurance" industry.

How does Everest Group compare to Arch Capital Group?

Arch Capital Group (NASDAQ:ACGL) and Everest Group (NYSE:EG) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Arch Capital Group has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 11.41%. Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 17.06% beat Everest Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Arch Capital Group	24.40%	17.06%	4.87%
Everest Group	11.41%	13.63%	3.37%

Arch Capital Group currently has a consensus price target of $111.11, suggesting a potential upside of 11.79%. Everest Group has a consensus price target of $395.27, suggesting a potential upside of 6.78%. Given Arch Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Arch Capital Group is more favorable than Everest Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Arch Capital Group	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Everest Group	0 Sell rating(s)	12 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

In the previous week, Everest Group had 21 more articles in the media than Arch Capital Group. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Everest Group and 8 mentions for Arch Capital Group. Everest Group's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Arch Capital Group's score of 0.68 indicating that Everest Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Arch Capital Group	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Everest Group	15 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Arch Capital Group has higher revenue and earnings than Everest Group. Arch Capital Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everest Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Arch Capital Group	$19.93B	1.70	$4.40B	$12.79	7.77
Everest Group	$17.50B	0.81	$1.59B	$47.29	7.83

89.1% of Arch Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Everest Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Arch Capital Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Everest Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.31, indicating that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Everest Group has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Arch Capital Group beats Everest Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Everest Group compare to Cincinnati Financial?

Cincinnati Financial (NASDAQ:CINF) and Everest Group (NYSE:EG) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Cincinnati Financial has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Everest Group. Everest Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cincinnati Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cincinnati Financial	$12.63B	2.04	$2.39B	$21.20	7.94
Everest Group	$17.50B	0.81	$1.59B	$47.29	7.83

In the previous week, Everest Group had 15 more articles in the media than Cincinnati Financial. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Everest Group and 14 mentions for Cincinnati Financial. Cincinnati Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Everest Group's score of 1.20 indicating that Cincinnati Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cincinnati Financial	10 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Everest Group	15 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cincinnati Financial currently has a consensus price target of $195.40, suggesting a potential upside of 16.11%. Everest Group has a consensus price target of $395.27, suggesting a potential upside of 6.78%. Given Cincinnati Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Cincinnati Financial is more favorable than Everest Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cincinnati Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Everest Group	0 Sell rating(s)	12 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Everest Group has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 23.84% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 11.41%. Everest Group's return on equity of 13.63% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cincinnati Financial	23.84%	9.63%	3.70%
Everest Group	11.41%	13.63%	3.37%

65.2% of Cincinnati Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Everest Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Cincinnati Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Everest Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cincinnati Financial pays an annual dividend of $3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Everest Group pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Cincinnati Financial pays out 17.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Everest Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cincinnati Financial has raised its dividend for 65 consecutive years and Everest Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Cincinnati Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Cincinnati Financial beats Everest Group on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Everest Group compare to Axis Capital?

Everest Group (NYSE:EG) and Axis Capital (NYSE:AXS) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

Everest Group has higher revenue and earnings than Axis Capital. Axis Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everest Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Everest Group	$17.50B	0.81	$1.59B	$47.29	7.83
Axis Capital	$6.56B	1.10	$1.01B	$14.08	7.00

In the previous week, Everest Group had 25 more articles in the media than Axis Capital. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Everest Group and 4 mentions for Axis Capital. Everest Group's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Axis Capital's score of 0.79 indicating that Everest Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Everest Group	15 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Axis Capital	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

92.6% of Everest Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of Axis Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Everest Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Axis Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Axis Capital has a net margin of 16.23% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 11.41%. Axis Capital's return on equity of 17.00% beat Everest Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Everest Group	11.41%	13.63%	3.37%
Axis Capital	16.23%	17.00%	2.82%

Everest Group currently has a consensus target price of $395.27, suggesting a potential upside of 6.78%. Axis Capital has a consensus target price of $120.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.20%. Given Axis Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Axis Capital is more favorable than Everest Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Everest Group	0 Sell rating(s)	12 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Axis Capital	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.58

Everest Group pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Axis Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Everest Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Axis Capital pays out 12.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Everest Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Everest Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Axis Capital has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Everest Group beats Axis Capital on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Everest Group compare to Chubb?

Chubb (NYSE:CB) and Everest Group (NYSE:EG) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

83.8% of Chubb shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Everest Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Chubb shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Everest Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chubb pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Everest Group pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Chubb pays out 14.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Everest Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chubb has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years and Everest Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Chubb had 39 more articles in the media than Everest Group. MarketBeat recorded 68 mentions for Chubb and 29 mentions for Everest Group. Chubb's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Everest Group's score of 1.20 indicating that Chubb is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Chubb	64 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Everest Group	15 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Chubb currently has a consensus target price of $361.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.82%. Everest Group has a consensus target price of $395.27, indicating a potential upside of 6.78%. Given Everest Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Everest Group is more favorable than Chubb.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chubb	1 Sell rating(s)	12 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.45
Everest Group	0 Sell rating(s)	12 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Chubb has higher revenue and earnings than Everest Group. Everest Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chubb, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chubb	$59.40B	2.22	$10.31B	$28.27	12.07
Everest Group	$17.50B	0.81	$1.59B	$47.29	7.83

Chubb has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Everest Group has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Chubb has a net margin of 18.10% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 11.41%. Chubb's return on equity of 14.47% beat Everest Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chubb	18.10%	14.47%	4.19%
Everest Group	11.41%	13.63%	3.37%

Summary

Chubb beats Everest Group on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Everest Group compare to CNA Financial?

Everest Group (NYSE:EG) and CNA Financial (NYSE:CNA) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Everest Group has higher revenue and earnings than CNA Financial. Everest Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNA Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Everest Group	$17.50B	0.81	$1.59B	$47.29	7.83
CNA Financial	$14.99B	0.89	$1.28B	$4.55	10.79

In the previous week, Everest Group had 10 more articles in the media than CNA Financial. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Everest Group and 19 mentions for CNA Financial. Everest Group's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat CNA Financial's score of 0.69 indicating that Everest Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Everest Group	15 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
CNA Financial	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Everest Group pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. CNA Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Everest Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 42.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Everest Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CNA Financial has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years. CNA Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CNA Financial has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Everest Group presently has a consensus price target of $395.27, suggesting a potential upside of 6.78%. Given Everest Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Everest Group is more favorable than CNA Financial.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Everest Group	0 Sell rating(s)	12 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
CNA Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

92.6% of Everest Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.5% of CNA Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Everest Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of CNA Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Everest Group has a net margin of 11.41% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 8.16%. Everest Group's return on equity of 13.63% beat CNA Financial's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Everest Group	11.41%	13.63%	3.37%
CNA Financial	8.16%	11.34%	1.84%

Summary

Everest Group beats CNA Financial on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Everest Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

EG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Everest Group	Insurance Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$14.19B	$19.29B	$13.63B	$24.31B
Dividend Yield	2.16%	3.30%	5.89%	3.70%
P/E Ratio	7.83	15.79	29.61	30.31
Price / Sales	0.81	30.80	521.62	20.99
Price / Cash	9.09	12.56	38.19	32.49
Price / Book	0.92	2.07	2.18	6.77
Net Income	$1.59B	$1.80B	$1.31B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.07%	-0.59%	-0.30%	-0.65%
1 Month Performance	-1.48%	3.47%	2.37%	3.38%
1 Year Performance	7.73%	8.97%	9.68%	14.90%

Everest Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
EG Everest Group	4.7488 of 5 stars	$370.18 +0.5%	$395.27 +6.8%	+7.7%	$14.19B	$17.50B	7.83	3,064	Trending News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
ACGL Arch Capital Group	3.8976 of 5 stars	$97.81 -0.9%	$111.11 +13.6%	+6.4%	$33.68B	$19.93B	7.65	8,000	Insider Trade
CINF Cincinnati Financial	4.7197 of 5 stars	$171.06 -1.2%	$195.40 +14.2%	+8.3%	$26.58B	$12.63B	8.07	5,705	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Downgrade
AXS Axis Capital	4.5429 of 5 stars	$99.88 -1.3%	$120.50 +20.6%	-0.6%	$7.38B	$6.56B	7.09	1,966	Analyst Downgrade
CB Chubb	4.2674 of 5 stars	$341.24 -0.7%	$360.09 +5.5%	+23.0%	$132.58B	$59.40B	12.07	45,000	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:EG) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Everest Group (EG) Competitors

EG vs. ACGL, CINF, AXS, CB, and CNA

How does Everest Group compare to Arch Capital Group?

Summary

How does Everest Group compare to Cincinnati Financial?

Summary

How does Everest Group compare to Axis Capital?

Summary

How does Everest Group compare to Chubb?

Summary

How does Everest Group compare to CNA Financial?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

EG vs. The Competition

Everest Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Everest Group (EG) Competitors

EG vs. ACGL, CINF, AXS, CB, and CNA

How does Everest Group compare to Arch Capital Group?

Is ACGL or EG more profitable?

Do analysts recommend ACGL or EG?

Does the media refer more to ACGL or EG?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ACGL or EG?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in ACGL or EG?

Which has more risk and volatility, ACGL or EG?

Summary

How does Everest Group compare to Cincinnati Financial?

Which has better earnings & valuation, CINF or EG?

Does the media refer more to CINF or EG?

Do analysts rate CINF or EG?

Which has more risk and volatility, CINF or EG?

Is CINF or EG more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CINF or EG?

Is CINF or EG a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Everest Group compare to Axis Capital?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, EG or AXS?

Does the media refer more to EG or AXS?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in EG or AXS?

Is EG or AXS more profitable?

Do analysts prefer EG or AXS?

Is EG or AXS a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, EG or AXS?

Summary

How does Everest Group compare to Chubb?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CB or EG?

Is CB or EG a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to CB or EG?

Do analysts recommend CB or EG?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CB or EG?

Which has more volatility and risk, CB or EG?

Is CB or EG more profitable?

Summary

How does Everest Group compare to CNA Financial?

Which has better valuation & earnings, EG or CNA?

Does the media refer more to EG or CNA?

Is EG or CNA a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, EG or CNA?

Do analysts prefer EG or CNA?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in EG or CNA?

Is EG or CNA more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

EG vs. The Competition

Everest Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools