Go Pro

Everest Group (EG) Competitors

Everest Group logo
$366.20 +2.54 (+0.70%)
Closing price 08/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$366.12 -0.08 (-0.02%)
As of 07:02 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

EG vs. ACGL, CINF, AXS, CB, and CNA

Should you buy Everest Group stock or one of its competitors? Everest Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Arch Capital Group (ACGL), Cincinnati Financial (CINF), Axis Capital (AXS), Chubb (CB), and CNA Financial (CNA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "insurance" industry.

How does Everest Group compare to Arch Capital Group?

Everest Group (NYSE:EG) and Arch Capital Group (NASDAQ:ACGL) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and risk.

Everest Group presently has a consensus price target of $393.93, suggesting a potential upside of 7.57%. Arch Capital Group has a consensus price target of $111.11, suggesting a potential upside of 13.34%. Given Arch Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Arch Capital Group is more favorable than Everest Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Everest Group
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Arch Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

In the previous week, Arch Capital Group had 15 more articles in the media than Everest Group. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Arch Capital Group and 9 mentions for Everest Group. Everest Group's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Arch Capital Group's score of 0.41 indicating that Everest Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Everest Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Arch Capital Group
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

92.6% of Everest Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Arch Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Everest Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Arch Capital Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Arch Capital Group has higher revenue and earnings than Everest Group. Arch Capital Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everest Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Everest Group$17.50B0.80$1.59B$47.297.74
Arch Capital Group$19.93B1.68$4.40B$12.797.66

Arch Capital Group has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 11.41%. Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 17.06% beat Everest Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Everest Group11.41% 13.63% 3.37%
Arch Capital Group 24.40%17.06%4.87%

Summary

Arch Capital Group beats Everest Group on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Everest Group compare to Cincinnati Financial?

Everest Group (NYSE:EG) and Cincinnati Financial (NASDAQ:CINF) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

92.6% of Everest Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.2% of Cincinnati Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Everest Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Cincinnati Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cincinnati Financial has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Everest Group. Everest Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cincinnati Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Everest Group$17.50B0.80$1.59B$47.297.74
Cincinnati Financial$12.63B2.10$2.39B$21.208.14

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 23.84% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 11.41%. Everest Group's return on equity of 13.63% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Everest Group11.41% 13.63% 3.37%
Cincinnati Financial 23.84%9.63%3.70%

Everest Group currently has a consensus price target of $393.93, suggesting a potential upside of 7.57%. Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $195.40, suggesting a potential upside of 13.16%. Given Cincinnati Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cincinnati Financial is more favorable than Everest Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Everest Group
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Cincinnati Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Everest Group pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Cincinnati Financial pays an annual dividend of $3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Everest Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 17.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Everest Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Cincinnati Financial has raised its dividend for 65 consecutive years. Everest Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Everest Group had 6 more articles in the media than Cincinnati Financial. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Everest Group and 3 mentions for Cincinnati Financial. Cincinnati Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Everest Group's score of 0.99 indicating that Cincinnati Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Everest Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cincinnati Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Cincinnati Financial beats Everest Group on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Everest Group compare to Axis Capital?

Everest Group (NYSE:EG) and Axis Capital (NYSE:AXS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk and valuation.

Everest Group pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Axis Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Everest Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Axis Capital pays out 12.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Everest Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Everest Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

92.6% of Everest Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of Axis Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Everest Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Axis Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Axis Capital has a net margin of 16.23% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 11.41%. Axis Capital's return on equity of 17.00% beat Everest Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Everest Group11.41% 13.63% 3.37%
Axis Capital 16.23%17.00%2.82%

Everest Group currently has a consensus target price of $393.93, indicating a potential upside of 7.57%. Axis Capital has a consensus target price of $120.50, indicating a potential upside of 20.42%. Given Axis Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Axis Capital is more favorable than Everest Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Everest Group
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Axis Capital
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Everest Group has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Axis Capital has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Everest Group has higher revenue and earnings than Axis Capital. Axis Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everest Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Everest Group$17.50B0.80$1.59B$47.297.74
Axis Capital$6.56B1.11$1.01B$14.087.11

In the previous week, Axis Capital had 16 more articles in the media than Everest Group. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Axis Capital and 9 mentions for Everest Group. Everest Group's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Axis Capital's score of -0.35 indicating that Everest Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Everest Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Axis Capital
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Axis Capital beats Everest Group on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Everest Group compare to Chubb?

Everest Group (NYSE:EG) and Chubb (NYSE:CB) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chubb has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

92.6% of Everest Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.8% of Chubb shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Everest Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Chubb shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chubb has a net margin of 18.10% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 11.41%. Chubb's return on equity of 14.47% beat Everest Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Everest Group11.41% 13.63% 3.37%
Chubb 18.10%14.47%4.19%

Everest Group pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Chubb pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Everest Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chubb pays out 14.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Everest Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Chubb has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years.

Everest Group currently has a consensus target price of $393.93, suggesting a potential upside of 7.57%. Chubb has a consensus target price of $360.09, suggesting a potential upside of 4.56%. Given Everest Group's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Everest Group is more favorable than Chubb.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Everest Group
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Chubb
1 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45

Chubb has higher revenue and earnings than Everest Group. Everest Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chubb, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Everest Group$17.50B0.80$1.59B$47.297.74
Chubb$62.29B2.13$10.31B$28.2712.18

In the previous week, Chubb had 5 more articles in the media than Everest Group. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Chubb and 9 mentions for Everest Group. Everest Group's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Chubb's score of 0.88 indicating that Everest Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Everest Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Chubb
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Chubb beats Everest Group on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Everest Group compare to CNA Financial?

CNA Financial (NYSE:CNA) and Everest Group (NYSE:EG) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Everest Group has a consensus target price of $393.93, indicating a potential upside of 7.57%. Given Everest Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Everest Group is more favorable than CNA Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CNA Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Everest Group
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

98.5% of CNA Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Everest Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of CNA Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Everest Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Everest Group has higher revenue and earnings than CNA Financial. Everest Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNA Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CNA Financial$14.99B0.92$1.28B$4.5511.24
Everest Group$17.50B0.80$1.59B$47.297.74

Everest Group has a net margin of 11.41% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 8.16%. Everest Group's return on equity of 13.63% beat CNA Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CNA Financial8.16% 11.34% 1.84%
Everest Group 11.41%13.63%3.37%

CNA Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Everest Group pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. CNA Financial pays out 42.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Everest Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CNA Financial has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Everest Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CNA Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Everest Group had 7 more articles in the media than CNA Financial. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Everest Group and 2 mentions for CNA Financial. Everest Group's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat CNA Financial's score of 0.92 indicating that Everest Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CNA Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Everest Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Everest Group has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Everest Group beats CNA Financial on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Everest Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

EG vs. The Competition

MetricEverest GroupInsurance IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$13.94B$19.35B$14.07B$24.29B
Dividend Yield2.20%3.31%5.88%3.69%
P/E Ratio7.7415.6229.5730.23
Price / Sales0.8030.88512.9220.60
Price / Cash8.9312.6239.9733.80
Price / Book0.919.783.706.69
Net Income$1.59B$1.80B$1.31B$1.06B
7 Day Performance-2.12%0.60%0.78%0.45%
1 Month Performance-1.59%2.76%1.83%3.07%
1 Year Performance8.70%11.30%12.22%18.36%

Everest Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
EG
Everest Group
4.81 of 5 stars
$366.21
+0.7%
$393.93
+7.6%
+8.8%$13.94B$17.50B7.743,064
ACGL
Arch Capital Group
3.9842 of 5 stars
$98.25
-0.2%
$110.96
+12.9%
+9.0%$33.60B$19.93B7.688,000
CINF
Cincinnati Financial
4.6141 of 5 stars
$173.86
-1.7%
$195.40
+12.4%
+12.1%$27.14B$12.63B8.205,705
AXS
Axis Capital
4.5082 of 5 stars
$101.60
-1.8%
$120.50
+18.6%
+1.9%$7.55B$6.56B7.221,966
CB
Chubb
4.0711 of 5 stars
$347.40
-0.8%
$360.09
+3.7%
+25.2%$135.15B$59.40B12.2945,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:EG) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners