Go Pro

Everest Group (EG) Competitors

Everest Group logo
$374.88 +0.73 (+0.19%)
Closing price 07/31/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$374.09 -0.79 (-0.21%)
As of 07/31/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

EG vs. ACGL, CINF, AXS, CB, and CNA

Should you buy Everest Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Everest Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Everest Group include Arch Capital Group (ACGL), Cincinnati Financial (CINF), Axis Capital (AXS), Chubb (CB), and CNA Financial (CNA). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does Everest Group compare to Arch Capital Group?

Arch Capital Group (NASDAQ:ACGL) and Everest Group (NYSE:EG) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, Everest Group had 6 more articles in the media than Arch Capital Group. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Everest Group and 24 mentions for Arch Capital Group. Everest Group's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Arch Capital Group's score of 1.05 indicating that Everest Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Arch Capital Group
14 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Everest Group
17 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

89.1% of Arch Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Everest Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Arch Capital Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Everest Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Arch Capital Group has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 11.41%. Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 17.06% beat Everest Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Arch Capital Group24.40% 17.06% 4.87%
Everest Group 11.41%13.63%3.37%

Arch Capital Group presently has a consensus price target of $110.39, indicating a potential upside of 9.81%. Everest Group has a consensus price target of $391.27, indicating a potential upside of 4.37%. Given Arch Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Arch Capital Group is more favorable than Everest Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Arch Capital Group
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Everest Group
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Arch Capital Group has higher revenue and earnings than Everest Group. Arch Capital Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everest Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Arch Capital Group$19.93B1.76$4.40B$12.797.86
Everest Group$17.50B0.85$1.59B$47.297.93

Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.31, suggesting that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Everest Group has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Arch Capital Group beats Everest Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Everest Group compare to Cincinnati Financial?

Cincinnati Financial (NASDAQ:CINF) and Everest Group (NYSE:EG) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Cincinnati Financial has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Everest Group. Everest Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cincinnati Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cincinnati Financial$12.63B2.16$2.39B$21.208.38
Everest Group$17.50B0.85$1.59B$47.297.93

In the previous week, Everest Group had 9 more articles in the media than Cincinnati Financial. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Everest Group and 21 mentions for Cincinnati Financial. Everest Group's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Cincinnati Financial's score of 0.36 indicating that Everest Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cincinnati Financial
7 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Everest Group
17 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

65.2% of Cincinnati Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Everest Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Cincinnati Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Everest Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cincinnati Financial pays an annual dividend of $3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Everest Group pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Cincinnati Financial pays out 17.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Everest Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cincinnati Financial has increased its dividend for 65 consecutive years and Everest Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Everest Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cincinnati Financial presently has a consensus target price of $197.60, indicating a potential upside of 11.21%. Everest Group has a consensus target price of $391.27, indicating a potential upside of 4.37%. Given Cincinnati Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Cincinnati Financial is more favorable than Everest Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cincinnati Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Everest Group
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Everest Group has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 23.84% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 11.41%. Everest Group's return on equity of 13.63% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cincinnati Financial23.84% 9.63% 3.70%
Everest Group 11.41%13.63%3.37%

Summary

Cincinnati Financial beats Everest Group on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Everest Group compare to Axis Capital?

Axis Capital (NYSE:AXS) and Everest Group (NYSE:EG) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Axis Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Everest Group pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Axis Capital pays out 12.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Everest Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Everest Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Everest Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Everest Group had 4 more articles in the media than Axis Capital. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Everest Group and 26 mentions for Axis Capital. Everest Group's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Axis Capital's score of 0.32 indicating that Everest Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Axis Capital
7 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Everest Group
17 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Axis Capital currently has a consensus target price of $122.42, indicating a potential upside of 15.95%. Everest Group has a consensus target price of $391.27, indicating a potential upside of 4.37%. Given Axis Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Axis Capital is more favorable than Everest Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Axis Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
Everest Group
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

93.4% of Axis Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Everest Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Axis Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Everest Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Everest Group has higher revenue and earnings than Axis Capital. Axis Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everest Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Axis Capital$6.56B1.17$1.01B$14.087.50
Everest Group$17.50B0.85$1.59B$47.297.93

Axis Capital has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Everest Group has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Axis Capital has a net margin of 16.23% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 11.41%. Axis Capital's return on equity of 17.00% beat Everest Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Axis Capital16.23% 17.00% 2.82%
Everest Group 11.41%13.63%3.37%

Summary

Axis Capital and Everest Group tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Everest Group compare to Chubb?

Chubb (NYSE:CB) and Everest Group (NYSE:EG) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Chubb had 4 more articles in the media than Everest Group. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Chubb and 30 mentions for Everest Group. Chubb's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Everest Group's score of 1.12 indicating that Chubb is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chubb
25 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Everest Group
17 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

83.8% of Chubb shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Everest Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Chubb shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Everest Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chubb has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Everest Group has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Chubb has higher revenue and earnings than Everest Group. Everest Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chubb, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chubb$59.40B2.28$10.31B$28.2712.42
Everest Group$17.50B0.85$1.59B$47.297.93

Chubb pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Everest Group pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Chubb pays out 14.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Everest Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chubb has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years and Everest Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Chubb presently has a consensus price target of $360.09, indicating a potential upside of 2.57%. Everest Group has a consensus price target of $391.27, indicating a potential upside of 4.37%. Given Everest Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Everest Group is more favorable than Chubb.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chubb
1 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45
Everest Group
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Chubb has a net margin of 18.10% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 11.41%. Chubb's return on equity of 14.47% beat Everest Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chubb18.10% 14.47% 4.19%
Everest Group 11.41%13.63%3.37%

Summary

Chubb beats Everest Group on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Everest Group compare to CNA Financial?

Everest Group (NYSE:EG) and CNA Financial (NYSE:CNA) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Everest Group presently has a consensus target price of $391.27, suggesting a potential upside of 4.37%. Given Everest Group's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Everest Group is more favorable than CNA Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Everest Group
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
CNA Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Everest Group pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. CNA Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Everest Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 43.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Everest Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CNA Financial has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years. CNA Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Everest Group has higher revenue and earnings than CNA Financial. Everest Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNA Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Everest Group$17.50B0.85$1.59B$47.297.93
CNA Financial$14.99B0.95$1.28B$4.4711.75

Everest Group has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CNA Financial has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Everest Group has a net margin of 11.41% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 8.08%. Everest Group's return on equity of 13.63% beat CNA Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Everest Group11.41% 13.63% 3.37%
CNA Financial 8.08%11.57%1.86%

In the previous week, Everest Group had 23 more articles in the media than CNA Financial. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Everest Group and 7 mentions for CNA Financial. Everest Group's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat CNA Financial's score of 0.73 indicating that Everest Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Everest Group
17 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CNA Financial
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

92.6% of Everest Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.5% of CNA Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Everest Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of CNA Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Everest Group beats CNA Financial on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Everest Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

EG vs. The Competition

MetricEverest GroupInsurance IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$14.83B$19.59B$13.65B$23.69B
Dividend Yield2.14%3.28%5.95%4.22%
P/E Ratio7.9315.5028.6630.98
Price / Sales0.8528.80468.0119.22
Price / Cash9.1912.4844.5018.73
Price / Book1.029.803.684.76
Net Income$1.59B$1.80B$1.31B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-3.79%-0.09%3.63%-0.34%
1 Month Performance0.90%0.44%0.07%-0.53%
1 Year Performance13.03%13.62%12.94%19.19%

Everest Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
EG
Everest Group
4.3325 of 5 stars
$374.88
+0.2%
$391.27
+4.4%
+13.0%$14.83B$17.50B7.933,064
ACGL
Arch Capital Group
3.3569 of 5 stars
$103.88
+0.5%
$109.82
+5.7%
+14.2%$36.11B$19.93B7.988,000
CINF
Cincinnati Financial
4.5798 of 5 stars
$184.23
+0.8%
$192.40
+4.4%
+21.5%$28.28B$12.63B10.535,705
AXS
Axis Capital
4.7556 of 5 stars
$117.20
+0.6%
$124.45
+6.2%
+13.3%$8.59B$6.56B8.731,966
CB
Chubb
4.4854 of 5 stars
$359.00
-0.2%
$360.09
+0.3%
+31.3%$139.53B$59.40B12.7045,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:EG) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners